Jan 22, 2020, 9:50 PM You now, I follow the religion of my ancestors (Excellence, heroism, sovereignty, and debts that are ‘true’) and the philosophy of Jesus (purchase of cooperation through exhaustion of love, forgiveness, charity), and the philosophy of my civilization (falsification by realism, naturalism, materialism, operationalism, empiricism, sovereignty-volition, reciprocity, and testimonial truth). I use the philosophy of Jesus, Aristotle, and our ancestors long lost to history (European Aryanism). I understand that those that lack agency need christianity in exclusivity (monopoly) even if the rest of us use different archetypes for different purposes given that we have more agency (markets). So it depends upon the portfolio of control you have over your life. Modern life would suggest that the monopoly of the abrahamic deceits is harmful. And that we can see jesus as a philosopher of the personal and social if not the material, economic, political, military, and strategic. This is why I will always and everywhere recommend Markets (our group strategy) and criticize christianity (monpoly), as harmful. We need many saints, demigods, or gods (role models), but each of us may or must, choose the hierarchy of those gods that we will spend most of our time imitating. I know who I use: Aristotle, Alexander, Caesar, Arthur, Jefferson and Hayek. And when
Theme: Cooperation
-
Race + Aesthetic = Ethnicity
Jan 23, 2020, 11:45 AM MUST READ by Luke Weinhagen Race + Aesthetic = Ethnicity In much the same way common biological markers are a shortcut to trust (represent a reduction in costs) common aesthetic markers as a shortcut to trust. Shared aesthetic signals “I am one of you” like shared biology does. Aesthetic, in this context, is the projection of or our kinship onto our environment and behavior. Consumption of the aesthetic produces an externalization of costs onto the development of common trust. Globalist Capitalism discounts the aesthetic. – It tears down the historic church to put up an Amazon distribution center. – It sends the work to India instead of Indiana. – It ignores full-accounting to limit trade to material value. – It denies the commonality, the community, value embodied by the aesthetic. – It dissolves the bonds that aesthetic creates and supports. Globalist Capitalism consumes our trust, and it does so at a deep discount. (because the aesthetic is not common between parties under globalism, aesthetic can not be valued into trade – globalist capitalism has to deny/prevent/ignore full-accounting) Kinship Capitalism includes the demand for full-accounting that includes the value of the aesthetic. – It prevents the destruction of our history and demands restitution when that history is damaged. – It puts the burden of extra costs on the outsider bring business into the kinship. – It demands the value of a resource be measured by the cost of its loss to the community as well as any material value – It promotes and preserves the commonality, the community, value embodied by the aesthetic. – Is secures the bonds that aesthetic creates and supports. Kinship Capitalism preserves our trust, and insures our interactions to continue to increase that trust.
-
Race + Aesthetic = Ethnicity
Jan 23, 2020, 11:45 AM MUST READ by Luke Weinhagen Race + Aesthetic = Ethnicity In much the same way common biological markers are a shortcut to trust (represent a reduction in costs) common aesthetic markers as a shortcut to trust. Shared aesthetic signals “I am one of you” like shared biology does. Aesthetic, in this context, is the projection of or our kinship onto our environment and behavior. Consumption of the aesthetic produces an externalization of costs onto the development of common trust. Globalist Capitalism discounts the aesthetic. – It tears down the historic church to put up an Amazon distribution center. – It sends the work to India instead of Indiana. – It ignores full-accounting to limit trade to material value. – It denies the commonality, the community, value embodied by the aesthetic. – It dissolves the bonds that aesthetic creates and supports. Globalist Capitalism consumes our trust, and it does so at a deep discount. (because the aesthetic is not common between parties under globalism, aesthetic can not be valued into trade – globalist capitalism has to deny/prevent/ignore full-accounting) Kinship Capitalism includes the demand for full-accounting that includes the value of the aesthetic. – It prevents the destruction of our history and demands restitution when that history is damaged. – It puts the burden of extra costs on the outsider bring business into the kinship. – It demands the value of a resource be measured by the cost of its loss to the community as well as any material value – It promotes and preserves the commonality, the community, value embodied by the aesthetic. – Is secures the bonds that aesthetic creates and supports. Kinship Capitalism preserves our trust, and insures our interactions to continue to increase that trust.
-
The (Social) Church Ritual Is More Important than Dogma or Belief
The (Social) Church Ritual Is More Important than Dogma or Belief. https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/25/the-social-church-ritual-is-more-important-than-dogma-or-belief/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-25 18:52:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1264992733984436225
-
The (Social) Church Ritual Is More Important than Dogma or Belief.
Jan 24, 2020, 7:20 AM SCIENCE: Church Ritual is more important than dogma or belief. The problem is people think the opposite. If we have church rituals (surrender to the pack) where we are all rendered equal in safety for just a moment, any content will do. It causes an addiction response for the same reason pack membership causes an addiction response. Why this is complicated is beyond me. My question is how to create those experiences across the spectrum of people who need different pack responses. I feel safe around thousands of armed men. Women feel safe in a church full of chattering women. Some people feel safe in a sports arena. Some over family dinner. These are all pack-feast rituals. And we apparently need them to feel ‘whole’ (mindfulness.)
-
The (Social) Church Ritual Is More Important than Dogma or Belief.
Jan 24, 2020, 7:20 AM SCIENCE: Church Ritual is more important than dogma or belief. The problem is people think the opposite. If we have church rituals (surrender to the pack) where we are all rendered equal in safety for just a moment, any content will do. It causes an addiction response for the same reason pack membership causes an addiction response. Why this is complicated is beyond me. My question is how to create those experiences across the spectrum of people who need different pack responses. I feel safe around thousands of armed men. Women feel safe in a church full of chattering women. Some people feel safe in a sports arena. Some over family dinner. These are all pack-feast rituals. And we apparently need them to feel ‘whole’ (mindfulness.)
-
Ethnocentrism Is the Optimum Group Strategy…
Ethnocentrism Is the Optimum Group Strategy… https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/25/ethnocentrism-is-the-optimum-group-strategy/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-25 18:51:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1264992583052296194
-
Ethnocentrism Is the Optimum Group Strategy…
Jan 24, 2020, 7:45 AM
ETHNOCENTRISM IS THE OPTIMUM GROUP STRATEGY… Ethnocentrism is the optimum group evolutionary strategy however it is in competition with the need for scale, hence the continuous conflict and decline in the tribal middle east, while slow evolution in india, faster in china, and fastest in europe. Only one civilization failed.
-
Ethnocentrism Is the Optimum Group Strategy…
Jan 24, 2020, 7:45 AM
ETHNOCENTRISM IS THE OPTIMUM GROUP STRATEGY… Ethnocentrism is the optimum group evolutionary strategy however it is in competition with the need for scale, hence the continuous conflict and decline in the tribal middle east, while slow evolution in india, faster in china, and fastest in europe. Only one civilization failed.
-
The Difficulty in Cooperating on Externalities
The Difficulty in Cooperating on Externalities https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/25/the-difficulty-in-cooperating-on-externalities/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-25 18:51:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1264992475225219072