IT’S NOT FREE MARKETS ITS RULE OF LAW
Free market capitalism is not what raises people. It’s rule of law that limits irreciprocity and forces people into LIMITED MARKETS, not ‘free’ markets. Those markets are limited to the prohibition on externalities. Free market capitalism was invented by the abrahamists to circumvent those limits and to profit from false promise, baiting into harm, harmful externality, and social undermining.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-24 11:23:00 UTC
Nations grow wealthy if they are ethnocentric, cut their underclasses, and have rule of law. There is evidence that christianity prepares the underclass for rule of law. My understanding is that poor christians are better than poor anything else. But abrahamism isn’t required.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-22 22:17:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1231342310451007488
Reply addressees: @WillReturns1066 @razibkhan
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1231339954791317506
Sotomayor and Ginsberg will be gone before Trump is.
Hart Cellar was a violation of the natural law of the constitution and the means by which the postwar jewish left succeeded in immigrating dependents where marxism, socialism, postmodernism, feminism and denialism had failed.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-22 17:20:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1231267542171340801
Reply addressees: @mjs_DC @Slate
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1231065393764216833
(from twitter)
Sotomayor and Ginsberg will be gone before Trump is.
Hart Cellar was a violation of the natural law of the constitution and was the means by which the postwar jewish left succeeded in immigrating dependents where the false promises of marxism, socialism, postmodernism, feminism and denialism had failed to persuade the european people.
The Parade of undermining western civ. with pseudoscience, sophism, and lies: Cantor, Boas, Marx, Freud, Adorno-Fromm, Derrida, Friedan, and hundreds of followers and thousands of propagandists: unwarrantable, false promise, baiting into hazard, with Pilpul, Critique and “GSRRM”.
The Jewish century is over. The second fall of european civilization by the destruction of german and russian civilization will not be followed by anglo civilization.
We will restore rule of law.
And it will “happen again”
Just as it always does.
Because it is earned.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-22 12:32:00 UTC
WAR CRIME
War crimes exist only under (a) Westphalian state responsibility for actions of all citizens and their agents – a monopoly on violence. (b) Soldiers under direction of the state.
War crimes were necessary under state run warfare in order to i) license states’ wars of aggression, ii) with conscripted soldiers, and iii) protecting the populace from harm, iiv) while preventing escalation that will prohibit the population from tolerating cessation and settlement.
In other words the purpose of war crimes is to facilitate the cooperation of the population with the state in the conduct of the state’s war.
Otherwise, war is war and there are no limits on behavior, and all else is pretense and deceit.
Islam broke the Westphalian peace with islamic terrorism
Russia broke the postwar consensus by seizing Ukraine.
We are in fourth generation warfare: the end of the european domestication of warfare.
The state no longer has or can have control over the monopoly of violence.
The non-state actors are more effective at fourth generation warfare in urban environments than are states and armor in the fields.
TOTAL WAR
Total war is warfare that includes any and all civilian-associated resources and infrastructure as legitimate military targets, mobilizes all of the resources of society to fight the war, and gives priority to warfare over non-combatant needs. The Oxford Living Dictionaries defines “total war” as “A war that is unrestricted in terms of the weapons used, the territory or combatants involved, or the objectives pursued, especially one in which the laws of war are disregarded.”
Fourth-generation Warfare (Premodern Warfare)
Fourth-generation warfare (4GW) is conflict characterized by a blurring of the lines between war and politics, combatants and civilians. The term was first used in 1980 by a team of United States analysts, including William S. Lind, to describe warfare’s return to a decentralized form. In terms of generational modern warfare, the fourth generation signifies the nation states’ loss of their near-monopoly on combat forces, returning to modes of conflict common in pre-modern times.
The treaties of Westphalia brought to an end a calamitous period of European history which caused the deaths of approximately eight million people. Scholars have identified Westphalia as the beginning of the modern international system, based on the concept of Westphalian sovereignty, though this interpretation has been challenged.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-20 16:08:00 UTC
—“Liberia’s constitution is almost identical to the american constitution. Constitutions merely enumerate the process for adhering to the norms, traditions ,and genetics of the majority ethnic population, and set the terms of integration for those outside the majority ethnic population.” – A friend (today)
Neither the constitution nor the expansion of democratic republic to full franchise democracy nor coercion into social democracy are an more meaningful than the ethnicity of the groups who formed that constitution, and adapted to it.
There will be no United States without Adapting to it.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-19 14:23:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/85234800_210892573642237_5682601436119040000_o_210892566975571.jpg IN THE P-Constitution, LAW, RIGHTS, COURT PRECEDE STATE. THEY ARE NOT MUTABLE
The propertarian constitution begins with European Natural Law of Sovereigns – a Law that is not mutable and cannot be violated. Then the constitution begins with definitions and declarations about mankind, then restates that law, then the rights that stem from it, then the court process. So, rights PRECEDE the constitution of the state and its policies. This is one of the mistakes the founders made that we are correcting.
There is no method of altering the Natural Law, Definitions of Man, Statement of the Law, Rights, and Court. There is not really any way of modifying the organization of the state. The rest consists of policies.IN THE P-Constitution, LAW, RIGHTS, COURT PRECEDE STATE. THEY ARE NOT MUTABLE
The propertarian constitution begins with European Natural Law of Sovereigns – a Law that is not mutable and cannot be violated. Then the constitution begins with definitions and declarations about mankind, then restates that law, then the rights that stem from it, then the court process. So, rights PRECEDE the constitution of the state and its policies. This is one of the mistakes the founders made that we are correcting.
There is no method of altering the Natural Law, Definitions of Man, Statement of the Law, Rights, and Court. There is not really any way of modifying the organization of the state. The rest consists of policies.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-18 19:56:00 UTC
SECOND AMENDENT ENFORCEMENT
By Jerry Odom.
Any individual, governmental, private representative, or entity at any level of the government that introduces or votes to pass any new law, legislation, ordinance, or resolution on any aspects related to the bearing, holding, carrying, transportation, or storage of firearms, or, any aspect included within this amendment will be considered an act of treason.
Their position will be automatically forfeited; they shall never be allowed to serve in any function of the government whether at the Local, State, or Federal levels for the remainder of their lifetime. Local law enforcement shall remove any individual who does not self-vacate.
In the unlikely event that the local law enforcement fails to act on the same, they also will forfeit their positions immediately and can no longer serve in any capacity in the government for their lifetime as well.
Should the above occur, then any local Constitutional Militia shall have the right and duty, along with full law enforcement authority, including the use of deadly force, to remove the guilty parties and restore order.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-18 09:25:00 UTC
—“I agree with a good deal what you say. But none of this is particularly new. Propertarianism is a sort of restatement of English Common Law combined with modern Economics 101. Economics tells us that the proper role of the state is to prevent/punish externalities. English Common Law developed over centuries – albeit in a groping-in-the-dark sort of way – precisely to prevent/punish externalities even though the theory of externalities wasn’t fully understood until last century. Propertarianism seems to me to be basically true because Economics 101 is theoretically elegant as the English Common Law is empirically robust. All I’m saying is that I fail to see anything innovative in Propertarianism. What theoretical advance does Propertarianism assert for itself?”—Calixto Muni
[G]ood Question Formal operational logic, extension of commercial suppression of hazard to political speech, ending baiting into hazard, and rent seeking, and undermining of the natural law. For example, how do you test Truthful speech in court? What is the test of tort (reciprocity)? How can we prevent redefinition of legal terms that are insufficiently defined in order to circumvent the law’s dependence upon them. How can we strictly construct law closed to interpretation? How do we return undecidable cases to the legislature? How do we stop the legislature from constructing unconstitutional law before inserting it into the polity? Was via negativa constitutional monarchy really worse or better? Why do we need multiple houses for the classes instead of single house parliaments. Why has democracy failed, and where did we go wrong? What was the west’s group evolutionary strategy and why was it different from other civilizations, and why did it produced outsized responses? How do we stop another overthrow of our civlization through the abrahamic technique of undermining by false promise of escape from physical and natural law in exchange for undermining host polities and creating dark ages – this time with boasian anthropology, freudian psychology, marxism, postmodernism, feminism, denialism – the use of pseudoscience and sophism to undermine our market for cooperation between the classes at the cost of suppressing the reproduction of the underclasses, so that we can devote surpluses from those savings to the production of increasingly productive high trust commons? How do we reform the polity given what we’ve learned in the past century and a half (almost two)? The economic reforms will restore the family and the middle classes. The legal reforms will prevent future conquest of our peoples. The intellectual reforms will crush the academic-media-entertainment propaganda system of organized undermining of our people. The scientific reforms will end the incompatibility of the disciplines. You’re seeing correctly, that we restore common law, add the lessons of economics, and the lessons of the experiments with an open franchise government. What you’re not seeing is the completion of the construction of a constitution of formal natural law. You’re not seeing is the completion of the Aristotelian program, the end of the left’s second attempted dark age, and the renaissance that must result from the completion of the sciences by extension from the physical to the metaphysical (linguistic), psychological, and sociological, so that it is no longer possible to lie about the universe man and how we survive and evolve while in a condition of excellence. P is a huge program. This is why it takes someone like John Mark to explain it.I built it for intellectuals who must rule and defend against ill rule.John takes it to ordinary people who desire good rule, and to avoid ill rule.And those who cannot grasp either, must follow only because of the material benefits that will be the greatest restoration of the middle since the roman reforms.
—“I agree with a good deal what you say. But none of this is particularly new. Propertarianism is a sort of restatement of English Common Law combined with modern Economics 101. Economics tells us that the proper role of the state is to prevent/punish externalities. English Common Law developed over centuries – albeit in a groping-in-the-dark sort of way – precisely to prevent/punish externalities even though the theory of externalities wasn’t fully understood until last century. Propertarianism seems to me to be basically true because Economics 101 is theoretically elegant as the English Common Law is empirically robust. All I’m saying is that I fail to see anything innovative in Propertarianism. What theoretical advance does Propertarianism assert for itself?”—Calixto Muni
[G]ood Question Formal operational logic, extension of commercial suppression of hazard to political speech, ending baiting into hazard, and rent seeking, and undermining of the natural law. For example, how do you test Truthful speech in court? What is the test of tort (reciprocity)? How can we prevent redefinition of legal terms that are insufficiently defined in order to circumvent the law’s dependence upon them. How can we strictly construct law closed to interpretation? How do we return undecidable cases to the legislature? How do we stop the legislature from constructing unconstitutional law before inserting it into the polity? Was via negativa constitutional monarchy really worse or better? Why do we need multiple houses for the classes instead of single house parliaments. Why has democracy failed, and where did we go wrong? What was the west’s group evolutionary strategy and why was it different from other civilizations, and why did it produced outsized responses? How do we stop another overthrow of our civlization through the abrahamic technique of undermining by false promise of escape from physical and natural law in exchange for undermining host polities and creating dark ages – this time with boasian anthropology, freudian psychology, marxism, postmodernism, feminism, denialism – the use of pseudoscience and sophism to undermine our market for cooperation between the classes at the cost of suppressing the reproduction of the underclasses, so that we can devote surpluses from those savings to the production of increasingly productive high trust commons? How do we reform the polity given what we’ve learned in the past century and a half (almost two)? The economic reforms will restore the family and the middle classes. The legal reforms will prevent future conquest of our peoples. The intellectual reforms will crush the academic-media-entertainment propaganda system of organized undermining of our people. The scientific reforms will end the incompatibility of the disciplines. You’re seeing correctly, that we restore common law, add the lessons of economics, and the lessons of the experiments with an open franchise government. What you’re not seeing is the completion of the construction of a constitution of formal natural law. You’re not seeing is the completion of the Aristotelian program, the end of the left’s second attempted dark age, and the renaissance that must result from the completion of the sciences by extension from the physical to the metaphysical (linguistic), psychological, and sociological, so that it is no longer possible to lie about the universe man and how we survive and evolve while in a condition of excellence. P is a huge program. This is why it takes someone like John Mark to explain it.I built it for intellectuals who must rule and defend against ill rule.John takes it to ordinary people who desire good rule, and to avoid ill rule.And those who cannot grasp either, must follow only because of the material benefits that will be the greatest restoration of the middle since the roman reforms.