by James Dmitro Makienko [R]ule of law fixes all male-cognitives (regardless of the present level of their civilization or their background). Which enables them to fix female-cognitives through patriarchy. By giving them a framework to direct their female cognition toward raising children, stay faithful to their husbands and keeping a family unit and healthy community (gives male-cognitives something worthy of defending, fighting and if necessary dying for). This is why traditional religion can work as this framework – as it gives female cognitives a weekly ritual with someone continuously telling them how to behave (like an orthodox priest – the one in my church actually loves studying aristotle and plato, you can have a good philosophy discussion with him after service). As long as male-cognitives keep a close watch over the weekly ritual to ensure it is not used for undermining of commons by female-cognitives, and law, logic and reason remain superior. === 1) James is very talented, developing fast, and this is great stuff. 2) I am increasingly convinced that Orthodoxy works precisely because it didn’t try to fake a bridge. It’s like: … i) Orthodox = God, without interference in the state. … ii) Catholicsm = Churchanity: god and jesus plus interference in the state. … iii) Evangelical=Jesus and ignoring the state. … iv) Secular Christians = Ritual Loyalty to Christians and maybe ‘deism’
Theme: Constitutional Order
-
RT @rofujones: Propertarian Constitution Articles 1-3 with Curt Doolittle – Stre
RT @rofujones: Propertarian Constitution Articles 1-3 with Curt Doolittle – Strengtheni… https://youtu.be/W9kNBO7_Y3o We have got to get the #…
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-02 03:31:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1234320337405403137
-
Propertarian Constitution Articles 1-3 with Curt Doolittle – Strengtheni… via
Propertarian Constitution Articles 1-3 with Curt Doolittle – Strengtheni… https://youtu.be/W9kNBO7_Y3o via @YouTube
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-29 21:25:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1233865839344005120
-
IGNORANCE BY DESIGN by Daniel Roland Anderson There were maybe 10-15 people in m
IGNORANCE BY DESIGN
by Daniel Roland Anderson
There were maybe 10-15 people in my law school Constitutional Law class who’d read the entire Constitution.
Only one had ever read the Federalist Papers—and that was before undergrad, not part of undergrad.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-28 17:58:00 UTC
-
POSSIBILITIES UNDER THE LAW One cannot legislate belief(thought) One cannot legi
POSSIBILITIES UNDER THE LAW
One cannot legislate belief(thought)
One cannot legislate unbelief(thought)
One can legislate public speech(display, word, and deed)
One can legislate proselytizing(sale and distribution)
One can legislate against organized crime (undermining, social construction, addiction)
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-28 17:57:00 UTC
-
THE PROBLEM by Predmetsky Rosenborg You don’t have to be an atheist (I’m not) to
THE PROBLEM
by Predmetsky Rosenborg
You don’t have to be an atheist (I’m not) to see that it is impossible to produce a Christian constitution from Christian doctrine because it is impossible to produce Christian doctrine from Christian scriptures. A constitution requires clarity, which is impossible to accomplish with the religious texts of any religion.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-28 12:00:00 UTC
-
That’s not what the evidence says. It says that Christians cower and whine. Sold
That’s not what the evidence says.
It says that Christians cower and whine.
Soldiers, Constitutionalists, 2ndA, and Pagans show.
Either reality comes first or fantasy.
I’m an aristotelian first
A european (pagan) second.
A christian (jesus) third.
And an enemy of abrahamists.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-28 00:07:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1233181986866499585
Reply addressees: @RickyBobby_USA @ToneUnknown
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1233181259976839168
-
I would like to see a constitution for christianity. Because I bet it can’t be w
I would like to see a constitution for christianity.
Because I bet it can’t be written.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-28 00:05:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1233181419373056005
-
Our Natural Law is Sacred.
P-Law criminalizes (a) bringing a bill to violate the natural law or the constitution before the legislatures, (b) advocating for, (c) even speaking about it in public, to the public. Our Natural Law is sacred. Even speaking of violating it means loss of sovereignty, lost of reciprocity under it, loss of rights under reciprocity, and loss of defense, exposing you to extra judicial punishment within the territory and letter of marque external to it. P-Law is harsher than islamic law.
-
Our Natural Law is Sacred.
P-Law criminalizes (a) bringing a bill to violate the natural law or the constitution before the legislatures, (b) advocating for, (c) even speaking about it in public, to the public. Our Natural Law is sacred. Even speaking of violating it means loss of sovereignty, lost of reciprocity under it, loss of rights under reciprocity, and loss of defense, exposing you to extra judicial punishment within the territory and letter of marque external to it. P-Law is harsher than islamic law.