The Outstanding Issue of The Second American Constitution https://propertarianism.com/2020/06/01/the-outstanding-issue-of-the-second-american-constitution-2/
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-01 23:56:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267605966482276352
THE OUTSTANDING ISSUE OF THE SECOND AMERICAN CONSTITUTION The issue in the first american constitution was the exception of slavery. The issue in the second american constitution will be the exception of christianity. I’m just recording that this exception, like the first one, is necessary, but will lead to the same problems, without a continuation of the reformation of christianity. We have at least Religious, Fascist, Traditional, Constitutional, Ratio-economic, and Scientific ‘factions’ that we must satisfy in order to form a more perfect union. Mine must sacrifice tolerance for christian abrahamism, the fascists must tolerate monarchy via negativa instead of a strong man via positiva, and the christians must tolerate the protestantization of christianity as a folk religion, the ongoing decline (3rd Worlding) of the catholic church, and our inability to restore churches to control of family law and education because of their doctrine, in exchange for defense by the state, advocacy by the state, and competition between theological, moral, rational, and scientific practices of christianity and our ancient germanic and slavic religions of nature and the hearth. In exchange we all get restoration of our nation state(s), and the permanent destruction of the second abrahamic attack on western civilization – all civilization for that matter, by a monopoly religion of the state. HIERARCHY OF LAWS OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION (TRUTH) … > Physical Laws … … > Heathen (Pagan) Law of War … … … > Natural Law of Cooperation: Reciprocity … … … … > Christian Law Of Investment in Cooperation
THE OUTSTANDING ISSUE OF THE SECOND AMERICAN CONSTITUTION The issue in the first american constitution was the exception of slavery. The issue in the second american constitution will be the exception of christianity. I’m just recording that this exception, like the first one, is necessary, but will lead to the same problems, without a continuation of the reformation of christianity. We have at least Religious, Fascist, Traditional, Constitutional, Ratio-economic, and Scientific ‘factions’ that we must satisfy in order to form a more perfect union. Mine must sacrifice tolerance for christian abrahamism, the fascists must tolerate monarchy via negativa instead of a strong man via positiva, and the christians must tolerate the protestantization of christianity as a folk religion, the ongoing decline (3rd Worlding) of the catholic church, and our inability to restore churches to control of family law and education because of their doctrine, in exchange for defense by the state, advocacy by the state, and competition between theological, moral, rational, and scientific practices of christianity and our ancient germanic and slavic religions of nature and the hearth. In exchange we all get restoration of our nation state(s), and the permanent destruction of the second abrahamic attack on western civilization – all civilization for that matter, by a monopoly religion of the state. HIERARCHY OF LAWS OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION (TRUTH) … > Physical Laws … … > Heathen (Pagan) Law of War … … … > Natural Law of Cooperation: Reciprocity … … … … > Christian Law Of Investment in Cooperation
NO YOU DON”T UNDERSTAND UKRAINE. (REALLY) I don’t think any American who hasn’t lived in Kiev and talked with these people has the vaguest ideal how good the legislature and law is, but who owns the various judiciaries, and how corrupt the bureaucracy is, and it’s not because these are bad people, but because everyone is so poor, that it’s the only way to make a decent living: charging for government services. The Kremlin is far more byzantine than the Rada (parliament) and like the chinese communist party, far more a group of powerful families. Ukrainian power is outside of the government in the 40+ oligarchs (Gangsters), and they have more money than the state (and more men and guns). Putin could put down the Oligarchs in Russia with the Chechens, and the FSB, and so could the chinese with the red army but the conspiracy between moscow and kiev to undermine ukrainian military and bureaucracy so that they could restore the union of the two countries was so far along that once the revolution started, there is no possible way to put down the oligarchs, fight a war with russia in the east, and survive as a country without descending into internecine warfare. States need wealth for this reason. And every libertarian is completely unaware he’s advocating for the condition in Ukraine now and in the Pale in the past. Where do they think Rothbard, Rand and Mises got their ideas from? Useful idiots whether left, right, or libertarian. Edit
NO YOU DON”T UNDERSTAND UKRAINE. (REALLY) I don’t think any American who hasn’t lived in Kiev and talked with these people has the vaguest ideal how good the legislature and law is, but who owns the various judiciaries, and how corrupt the bureaucracy is, and it’s not because these are bad people, but because everyone is so poor, that it’s the only way to make a decent living: charging for government services. The Kremlin is far more byzantine than the Rada (parliament) and like the chinese communist party, far more a group of powerful families. Ukrainian power is outside of the government in the 40+ oligarchs (Gangsters), and they have more money than the state (and more men and guns). Putin could put down the Oligarchs in Russia with the Chechens, and the FSB, and so could the chinese with the red army but the conspiracy between moscow and kiev to undermine ukrainian military and bureaucracy so that they could restore the union of the two countries was so far along that once the revolution started, there is no possible way to put down the oligarchs, fight a war with russia in the east, and survive as a country without descending into internecine warfare. States need wealth for this reason. And every libertarian is completely unaware he’s advocating for the condition in Ukraine now and in the Pale in the past. Where do they think Rothbard, Rand and Mises got their ideas from? Useful idiots whether left, right, or libertarian. Edit
We Can only Be Equal in Morality and The Law to Enforce It https://propertarianism.com/2020/06/01/we-can-only-be-equal-in-morality-and-the-law-to-enforce-it/
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-01 22:20:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267581755298664454
We Can only Be Equal in Morality and The Law to Enforce It https://t.co/4leduxS30M
WE CAN ONLY BE EQUAL IN MORALITY AND THE LAW TO ENFORCE IT by Dr. Richard T. Hünerkoch Equality is an artifice, it’s a concept, an “ideal” and the problem with ideals is that they are not obtainable by mortals. Perfection does not exist in the mortal realm. Equality in it’s most literal definition is an impossibility it’s an idealistic but unrealistic goal. —“If you start with a faulty premise and try to solve problems within that premise you find that none of your solutions work. The faulty premise is “equality” and everyone proposes solutions within that world view. The people you call “racist” are trying to explain this to you.”— The best thing that you can hope to achieve is as much legal equality as you possibly can but make no mistake it’s not the similarities that make us similar it’s the differences that make us different. Men are not even equal to other men so how could women possibly measure up? Equality as the left defines it means iniquity between “privileged” and “victims.” They want to make you dumb, hamstring your physicality and put a paper bag over your head so that the smart, strong and beautiful are “equal” to the stupid, weak and ugly. That’s what they mean. Equality is a worthy goal in and of itself but the only way things can be equal is through homogeneity. The closer we get to a homogenous culture, the closer we can get to equality. If the United States has the homogeneity of Iceland, we could be closer to equals. However though, because of diversity and heterogeneity, we have to adjust our target baseline of equality because we have to account for many extraneous variables. If we didn’t need to adjust for IQ differences that are miles apart, we could all be more equal. The only kind of equality that exists on Earth is the equality of mortality. We will all die someday and while we all have that in common, that is where the similarities end. The social terrorist left is trying to make us all “mortally equal” because that’s the only equality that truly exists in the mortal realm. Needless to say, the fact that we will all die someday is not enough reason to throw away our culture with reckless abandon. In case I haven’t made my point enough. Equality, as defined by the social terrorist left, is simply just communism masquerading as compassion. Don’t fall for this facade, the true visage behind the mask is the ugly bloated face of Karl Marx himself.
WE CAN ONLY BE EQUAL IN MORALITY AND THE LAW TO ENFORCE IT by Dr. Richard T. Hünerkoch Equality is an artifice, it’s a concept, an “ideal” and the problem with ideals is that they are not obtainable by mortals. Perfection does not exist in the mortal realm. Equality in it’s most literal definition is an impossibility it’s an idealistic but unrealistic goal. —“If you start with a faulty premise and try to solve problems within that premise you find that none of your solutions work. The faulty premise is “equality” and everyone proposes solutions within that world view. The people you call “racist” are trying to explain this to you.”— The best thing that you can hope to achieve is as much legal equality as you possibly can but make no mistake it’s not the similarities that make us similar it’s the differences that make us different. Men are not even equal to other men so how could women possibly measure up? Equality as the left defines it means iniquity between “privileged” and “victims.” They want to make you dumb, hamstring your physicality and put a paper bag over your head so that the smart, strong and beautiful are “equal” to the stupid, weak and ugly. That’s what they mean. Equality is a worthy goal in and of itself but the only way things can be equal is through homogeneity. The closer we get to a homogenous culture, the closer we can get to equality. If the United States has the homogeneity of Iceland, we could be closer to equals. However though, because of diversity and heterogeneity, we have to adjust our target baseline of equality because we have to account for many extraneous variables. If we didn’t need to adjust for IQ differences that are miles apart, we could all be more equal. The only kind of equality that exists on Earth is the equality of mortality. We will all die someday and while we all have that in common, that is where the similarities end. The social terrorist left is trying to make us all “mortally equal” because that’s the only equality that truly exists in the mortal realm. Needless to say, the fact that we will all die someday is not enough reason to throw away our culture with reckless abandon. In case I haven’t made my point enough. Equality, as defined by the social terrorist left, is simply just communism masquerading as compassion. Don’t fall for this facade, the true visage behind the mask is the ugly bloated face of Karl Marx himself.
I don’t do ideology. I do constitutional reform.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-01 20:14:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267550174165032961
Reply addressees: @JodyHighRollr @RumorDr @essential_1492
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267549962751094788