This is the net reason against theocracy (individual, personal, via-positiva), just as it is the net reason for rule of law (collective impersonal, via-negativa).
I suppose I should harden this argument analytically since as you’ve indirectly suggested it’s point of demarcation.
Reply addressees: @bishkebab4
Theme: Constitutional Order
-
This is the net reason against theocracy (individual, personal, via-positiva), j
-
This is the net reason against theocracy (individual, personal, via-positiva), j
This is the net reason against theocracy (individual, personal, via-positiva), just as it is the net reason for rule of law (collective impersonal, via-negativa).
I suppose I should harden this argument analytically since as you’ve indirectly suggested it’s point of demarcation.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-04 14:58:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1312769190445621248
Reply addressees: @bishkebab4
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1312750542335041536
-
A table of the course options: Chicago – practice of law. Harvard – practice bef
A table of the course options: Chicago – practice of law. Harvard – practice before high courts. Yale – marxist-pomo advocacy to undermine the constitution (an analytical expression of the strategy of western civilization).
Reply addressees: @bishkebab4 -
A table of the course options: Chicago – practice of law. Harvard – practice bef
A table of the course options: Chicago – practice of law. Harvard – practice before high courts. Yale – marxist-pomo advocacy to undermine the constitution (an analytical expression of the strategy of western civilization).
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-01 12:22:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1311642586294169602
Reply addressees: @bishkebab4
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1311642017181519873
-
(a) Yale is an anti-natural law school, with courses designed to weaponize gener
(a) Yale is an anti-natural law school, with courses designed to weaponize generations against the constitution and western civilization. (b) After P-law, every work of legal theory is as childlike as every work of philosophy and theology. (c) Incremental Pilpul is info cancer.
-
(a) Yale is an anti-natural law school, with courses designed to weaponize gener
(a) Yale is an anti-natural law school, with courses designed to weaponize generations against the constitution and western civilization. (b) After P-law, every work of legal theory is as childlike as every work of philosophy and theology. (c) Incremental Pilpul is info cancer.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-01 11:58:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1311636560220172289
-
All that is necessary is restore rule of law to one country and let the rest fai
All that is necessary is restore rule of law to one country and let the rest fail as they desperately try to maintain the fantasy of marxism-socialism, and the minority don’t.
Reply addressees: @SPQRIUS @SepteusT @William68332190 @JFGariepy @KeithWoodsYT -
All that is necessary is restore rule of law to one country and let the rest fai
All that is necessary is restore rule of law to one country and let the rest fail as they desperately try to maintain the fantasy of marxism-socialism, and the minority don’t.
Source date (UTC): 2020-09-28 14:12:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1310583147722137600
Reply addressees: @SPQRIUS @SepteusT @William68332190 @JFGariepy @KeithWoodsYT
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1310572051023962113
-
It’s a logical necessity, and empirically evidentiary. Go ahead and try to falsi
It’s a logical necessity, and empirically evidentiary. Go ahead and try to falsify reciprocity. That’s why all legal systems are predicated upon it, and international law exclusively limited to it. Not by choice. But by logical necessity.
Reply addressees: @SPQRIUS @SepteusT @William68332190 @JFGariepy @KeithWoodsYT -
It’s a logical necessity, and empirically evidentiary. Go ahead and try to falsi
It’s a logical necessity, and empirically evidentiary. Go ahead and try to falsify reciprocity. That’s why all legal systems are predicated upon it, and international law exclusively limited to it. Not by choice. But by logical necessity.
Source date (UTC): 2020-09-28 13:19:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1310569864302649346
Reply addressees: @SPQRIUS @SepteusT @William68332190 @JFGariepy @KeithWoodsYT
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1310562251024281602