The purpose of western rule of law is the construction and preservation of self-determination, by denying via-positiva power to any and all, and granting only via-negativa power to any and all to right violations of irreciprocity: self-determination.
Theme: Constitutional Order
-
The purpose of western rule of law is the construction and preservation of self-
The purpose of western rule of law is the construction and preservation of self-determination, by denying via-positiva power to any and all, and granting only via-negativa power to any and all to right violations of irreciprocity: self-determination.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-13 16:52:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1316059182219620354
-
THE CONSTITUTIONAL TRADE WITH THE COGNITIVELY FEMININE (DYSGENIC LEFT) When Amer
THE CONSTITUTIONAL TRADE WITH THE COGNITIVELY FEMININE (DYSGENIC LEFT)
When Americans say “Unconstitutional” it’s not as in Europe where the citizens aren’t sovereign – the state is. The American Constitution imposes Natural Law (Scientific Law), under the Common Law (Market) demanding Reciprocity (Contractualism) where INDIVIDUALS are sovereign.
Why does this matter? Because the only reason to forgo conquest, enserfment, enslavement, or ‘replacement’ is the exchange of self-determination: Sovereignty. In other words, if the left won’t trade self-determination, we are free to likewise deprive them of EVERYTHING.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-13 14:15:48 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105027898455756923
-
Boost of @curtd THE CONSTITUTIONAL TRADE WITH THE COGNITIVELY FEMININE (DYSGENIC
Boost of @curtd THE CONSTITUTIONAL TRADE WITH THE COGNITIVELY FEMININE (DYSGENIC LEFT)
When Americans say “Unconstitutional” it’s not as in Europe where the citizens aren’t sovereign – the state is. The American Constitution imposes Natural Law (Scientific Law), under the Common Law (Market) demanding Reciprocity (Contractualism) where INDIVIDUALS are sovereign.
Why does this matter? Because the only reason to forgo conquest, enserfment, enslavement, or ‘replacement’ is the exchange of self-determination: Sovereignty. In other words, if the left won’t trade self-determination, we are free to likewise deprive them of EVERYTHING.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-13 14:15:48 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105752524626800450
-
Because Roberts is not a hamiltonian federal conservative constitutionalst, he’s
Because Roberts is not a hamiltonian federal conservative constitutionalst, he’s a jeffersonian constitutionalist, and wants to force the political process back to the states.
Reply addressees: @Arlecchinoswart @mattyglesias -
Because Roberts is not a hamiltonian federal conservative constitutionalst, he’s
Because Roberts is not a hamiltonian federal conservative constitutionalst, he’s a jeffersonian constitutionalist, and wants to force the political process back to the states.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-13 14:14:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1316019543995678722
Reply addressees: @Arlecchinoswart @mattyglesias
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1315997027570982916
-
When Americans say “Unconstitutional” it’s not as in Europe where the citizens a
When Americans say “Unconstitutional” it’s not as in Europe where the citizens aren’t sovereign – the state is. The American Constitution imposes Natural Law (Scientific Law), under the Common Law (Market) demanding Reciprocity (Contractualism) where INDIVIDUALS are sovereign.
-
When Americans say “Unconstitutional” it’s not as in Europe where the citizens a
When Americans say “Unconstitutional” it’s not as in Europe where the citizens aren’t sovereign – the state is. The American Constitution imposes Natural Law (Scientific Law), under the Common Law (Market) demanding Reciprocity (Contractualism) where INDIVIDUALS are sovereign.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-13 14:09:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1316018312094969858
-
(((LIES))) WATCH: THE ACA —“If conservatives think it’s ridiculous to say cons
(((LIES))) WATCH: THE ACA
—“If conservatives think it’s ridiculous to say conservative legal theorists want to toss the ACA in court why are over a dozen conservative attorneys general plus the conservative US Department of Justice arguing for it?”— Matthew Yglesias
FALSE FRAMING: They aren’t arguing FOR IT, they’re arguing that it’s not a violation of positive law (authority). Why the dispute? The constitution presumes Natural Law (Necessary Reciprocity), not Positive Law (Legitimate Authority).
The people have been intentionally deceived by you and yours.
“No more pilpul (lies).”
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-13 14:05:34 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105027858230073764
-
ITS ABOUT RULE OF LAW —“One can get around paying for the ACA [Obamacare] anyw
ITS ABOUT RULE OF LAW
—“One can get around paying for the ACA [Obamacare] anyway.”—
Doesn’t matter. What you just suggested is that laws don’t matter, and that rule of law doesn’t matter.
The court, thankfully, is smarter than you are.
Rule of law is the ONLY thing that separates the west from the rest, and public speech as TESTIMONY the origin of it.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-13 13:55:17 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105027817767114757