There is no reason why we can practice a market for consumption of individual goods but must bear a monopoly in production of common goods.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-12 11:02:00 UTC
There is no reason why we can practice a market for consumption of individual goods but must bear a monopoly in production of common goods.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-12 11:02:00 UTC
… to convert information to a commons that must be protected like earth air and sea, then this is enough.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-08 20:47:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/707306676861464576
Reply addressees: @retroch @soapjackal
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/707305908678860800
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/707305908678860800
— “one of the central problems with the formation of any ‘society’ is providing men with the incentive to defend a commons.”—
“This point is missed by most. Modern men have become soft, voyeurs (porn, gaming and sports) neglecting the martial duties of manhood. Defense of our folk is vital to our survival. Universal suffrage and feminism represent a defensive failing.” — Howard Roarrk
Source date (UTC): 2016-02-29 11:30:00 UTC
THE LIMITS OF MORAL COMMERCE AND TRADE
The Morality of Profit Ends When One Consumes Normative, Cultural Institutional, and Genetic Capital – Because at that point one is privatizing the commons.
We can punish you for that you know.
Source date (UTC): 2016-02-25 01:32:00 UTC
PROPERTARIANISM VS ANARCHISM
(promoted to post)
Points to Ponder:
Anarchism includes no institutional method within rule of law for the construction of commons. Yet rule of law itself must be constructed as a commons. In propertarianism I have tried to construct a jury system for the construction of commons just as we have used the jury system for the construction of the commons of private property.
Anarchism does not include a definition of property rights sufficient for the reasonable, rational, or empirical formation of a voluntary polity.
I believe these are the two differences.
I do not believe a state exists in propertarianism, only that a rule of law is objective for ALL matters, rather than subjective beyond physical property.
Cheers.
Source date (UTC): 2016-02-17 11:32:00 UTC
It is not clear that consumption is a common good. It appears to be the opposite. It appears that productivity only is a common good.
Source date (UTC): 2016-02-17 10:35:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/699905085506260992
It is not clear that consumption is a common good. It appears to be the opposite. It appears that productivity only is a common good.
Source date (UTC): 2016-02-17 05:36:00 UTC
THAT VIDEO MADE ME ANGRY.
No conversions. Sterilize the Commons. Sterilize Reproduction. Renunciation and Integration. Leave. Deport. Or Die.
Source date (UTC): 2016-01-24 04:34:00 UTC
War is politics by other means. It will not end. Any more than politics, production of commons, production of goods, or reproduction.
Source date (UTC): 2016-01-23 10:56:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/690850668375072769
Reply addressees: @wef
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/690844036463206400
IN REPLY TO:
@wef
What are the implications of artificial intelligence for the future of warfare? https://t.co/CbNVP0yFll #whatif #wef https://t.co/qdaWsKLIdk
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/690844036463206400
(I love to make people laugh. Or smile. Or just feel that the world is sometimes a good place because some of us care about *everyone* in the commons.)
Source date (UTC): 2016-01-23 03:15:00 UTC