Theme: Commons

  • Anarchist: “People don’t want me around becasue I’m undesirable for one reason o

    Anarchist: “People don’t want me around becasue I’m undesirable for one reason or another – really my own immaturity. But I want to claim I earned access to the benefits of commons without having paid for them. There is nothing more for me to say. Everything else in anarchism is a lie to justify my parasitism.”
  • THE PRODUCTION OF HUMANS | Animal > Slave(dependent) > Serf(self supporting) > F

    | THE PRODUCTION OF HUMANS | Animal > Slave(dependent) > Serf(self supporting) > Freeman(rights to property) > Citizen(rights to commons) > Sovereign(king/judge)
  • THE PRODUCTION OF HUMANS | Animal > Slave(dependent) > Serf(self supporting) > F

    | THE PRODUCTION OF HUMANS | Animal > Slave(dependent) > Serf(self supporting) > Freeman(rights to property) > Citizen(rights to commons) > Sovereign(king/judge)


    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-02 12:29:00 UTC

  • THE PRODUCTION OF HUMANS | Animal > Slave(dependent) > Serf(self supporting) > F

    | THE PRODUCTION OF HUMANS | Animal > Slave(dependent) > Serf(self supporting) > Freeman(rights to property) > Citizen(rights to commons) > Sovereign(king/judge)
  • THE MEANING OF “SACRED” Recent political events have brought to the fore, discou

    THE MEANING OF “SACRED” Recent political events have brought to the fore, discourse on the sacred. But what does the word ‘sacred’ mean? It means a total prohibition on privatization of the commons, or socialization of losses into the commons, in display, word, and deed. In other words, you have zero rights to those commons, zero rights in those commons, and you benefit from those commons precisely because you have no rights to them or in them – as does no one else. THE CHURCH Christianity teaches us one unique thing and teaches us one general thing. For christianity, it saturates us in narratives and rituals that ask us to extend kinship love to non kin – on an individual basis (not a political or military). It asks us to eliminate hatred from the human heart. This just happens to be the optimum cooperative strategy: exhausting investment in cooperation before engaging in retaliation, and when engaging in retaliation doing so out of necessity, and without emotion. The church, temple, or ritual experience teaches us sacredness: that there are conditions under which we have no rights of expression: in display, word, or deed. It teaches us Agency over ourselves. Those capable of agency can be taught. Those who lack agency over themselves demonstrate that they are a danger to the rest. And as most of us recall, as children, adhering to ritual in church for a single hour once a week is an exercise in self discipline that even the most well intentioned may struggle with. THE POLITY We have seen the total destruction of the sacred in pursuit avoiding the effort of developing agency over the self – such that we learn to fast, learn to constrain our actions, our minds, our words, and our displays. And this is because like the parable of the boiling frog, we cannot sense the intertemporal in the moment or even in our lives. Even if we can sense the consequences of our failure to pay the high cost (tax) of developing agency, and the sacred as one more kind of fitness. Physical Fitness (the body) Mental Fitness (mindfulness) Emotional Fitness (Sacredness) Social Fitness (Manners, ethics, morals, traditions, Rituals) Economic Fitness (the skills of measurement) Political Fitness (the natural law)
  • THE MEANING OF “SACRED” Recent political events have brought to the fore, discou

    THE MEANING OF “SACRED”

    Recent political events have brought to the fore, discourse on the sacred. But what does the word ‘sacred’ mean?

    It means a total prohibition on privatization of the commons, or socialization of losses into the commons, in display, word, and deed.

    In other words, you have zero rights to those commons, zero rights in those commons, and you benefit from those commons precisely because you have no rights to them or in them – as does no one else.

    THE CHURCH

    Christianity teaches us one unique thing and teaches us one general thing.

    For christianity, it saturates us in narratives and rituals that ask us to extend kinship love to non kin – on an individual basis (not a political or military). It asks us to eliminate hatred from the human heart. This just happens to be the optimum cooperative strategy: exhausting investment in cooperation before engaging in retaliation, and when engaging in retaliation doing so out of necessity, and without emotion.

    The church, temple, or ritual experience teaches us sacredness: that there are conditions under which we have no rights of expression: in display, word, or deed. It teaches us Agency over ourselves.

    Those capable of agency can be taught. Those who lack agency over themselves demonstrate that they are a danger to the rest. And as most of us recall, as children, adhering to ritual in church for a single hour once a week is an exercise in self discipline that even the most well intentioned may struggle with.

    THE POLITY

    We have seen the total destruction of the sacred in pursuit avoiding the effort of developing agency over the self – such that we learn to fast, learn to constrain our actions, our minds, our words, and our displays.

    And this is because like the parable of the boiling frog, we cannot sense the intertemporal in the moment or even in our lives. Even if we can sense the consequences of our failure to pay the high cost (tax) of developing agency, and the sacred as one more kind of fitness.

    Physical Fitness (the body)

    Mental Fitness (mindfulness)

    Emotional Fitness (Sacredness)

    Social Fitness (Manners, ethics, morals, traditions, Rituals)

    Economic Fitness (the skills of measurement)

    Political Fitness (the natural law)


    Source date (UTC): 2017-10-20 09:21:00 UTC

  • if you have rule of law for everyone (defensive governance) but minority rule of

    if you have rule of law for everyone (defensive governance) but minority rule of the commons, you will get less politicking.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-06 16:44:00 UTC

  • PRESENTING PROPERTARIANISM by Ivan Ilakovac You should present your work as a TE

    PRESENTING PROPERTARIANISM

    by Ivan Ilakovac

    You should present your work as a TECHNOLOGY for the construction of commons using Propertarianism, Testimonialism, and Algorithmic Natural Law.

    Present it as a neutral technology – like the violence on which it depends. Demonstrate how to rule with minority, majority and totality. Let the thousand flowers bloom.

    In that way, you will divide yourself from fringe – they don’t care about descriptive science, but for the decidability no matter the truth.

    Don’t give them any decisions, only descriptions of that which empirically works: aristocracy, republic and democracy — under the Natural Law.

    Law attracts aristocratic egalitarians due to the combination of force, creativity and wisdom it demands.

    Descriptions are for people like me who want to learn and change their own family, kin, and nation ruled by Natural Law, with different government for each nation.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-06 16:42:00 UTC

  • You know, there are debates I can win, that I do not wish to win. That said, out

    You know, there are debates I can win, that I do not wish to win. That said, out of moral obligation to the commons I must win them. But I would prefer I was never challenged to win them. No man wishes to police his fellows. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-25 06:20:00 UTC

  • Three strategies for free riding: – Marxism (on private production) – Libertaria

    Three strategies for free riding:

    – Marxism (on private production)

    – Libertarianism (on commons production)

    – Neo-Conservatism (on military expansion of markets)


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-16 16:30:00 UTC