Curt Doolittle

Theme: Commons

  • Majoritarianism (Democracy) is only reciprocal(ethical) among peoples with homog

    Majoritarianism (Democracy) is only reciprocal(ethical) among peoples with homogenous interests. Otherwise it is merely a means of circumventing cooperation by voluntary exchange, through the imposition of monopoly (Tyranny). #Trump #RevolutionComes

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-12 18:48:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/940654684951506944

  • Democracy serves only as a means of selecting investments in commons among peopl

    Democracy serves only as a means of selecting investments in commons among peoples with homogenous interests. Otherwise, only markets allow the cooperation between those with heterogeneous interests. Democracy is only useful for small homogenous polities. #Trump #RevolutionComes

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-12 18:47:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/940654281576808450

  • by William L. Benge When the state claims rights to a person’s agency, it is an

    by William L. Benge

    When the state claims rights to a person’s agency, it is an egregious offense against the commons – because first, it is untruthful and damages the informational commons; and second, the presumption doubles it’s trouble to create an even greater crime of staking a false claim on life-property (one’s means of agency); and third, stakes a claim upon agency itself.

    When should this go unanswered?

    From here, natural law insists on prosecution: doors get kicked in and guillotine blades get sharpened. Oh yeah.

    Their presumption won’t be repeated anytime soon.

    Funny how memory works like that.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-29 13:44:00 UTC

  • by William L. Benge When the state claims rights to a person’s agency, it is an

    by William L. Benge When the state claims rights to a person’s agency, it is an egregious offense against the commons – because first, it is untruthful and damages the informational commons; and second, the presumption doubles it’s trouble to create an even greater crime of staking a false claim on life-property (one’s means of agency); and third, stakes a claim upon agency itself. When should this go unanswered? From here, natural law insists on prosecution: doors get kicked in and guillotine blades get sharpened. Oh yeah. Their presumption won’t be repeated anytime soon. Funny how memory works like that.

  • by William L. Benge When the state claims rights to a person’s agency, it is an

    by William L. Benge When the state claims rights to a person’s agency, it is an egregious offense against the commons – because first, it is untruthful and damages the informational commons; and second, the presumption doubles it’s trouble to create an even greater crime of staking a false claim on life-property (one’s means of agency); and third, stakes a claim upon agency itself. When should this go unanswered? From here, natural law insists on prosecution: doors get kicked in and guillotine blades get sharpened. Oh yeah. Their presumption won’t be repeated anytime soon. Funny how memory works like that.

  • THE CHOICES a) Rule (conflict resolution), b) Government(commons production), c)

    THE CHOICES

    a) Rule (conflict resolution),

    b) Government(commons production),

    c) Market(Consumption production)

    1 – Rule of Law vs Discretionary Rule

    2 – Production of commons by a spectrum of discretion: individual, oligarchical, syndicalist, democratic.

    3 – Distribution of control of property between rulers and citizens.

    4 – Distribution of proceeds of the market between rulers and citizens. Capitalism (consumption), Socialism (commons production), Authoritarian(institutional production)

    5 – Balance of Proceeds between consumption and commons and institutions.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-12 21:47:00 UTC

  • The Choices

    a) Rule (conflict resolution), b) Government(commons production), c) Market(Consumption production) 1 – Rule of Law vs Discretionary Rule 2 – Production of commons by a spectrum of discretion: individual, oligarchical, syndicalist, democratic. 3 – Distribution of control of property between rulers and citizens. 4 – Distribution of proceeds of the market between rulers and citizens. Capitalism (consumption), Socialism (commons production), Authoritarian(institutional production) 5 – Balance of Proceeds between consumption and commons and institutions.

  • The Choices

    a) Rule (conflict resolution), b) Government(commons production), c) Market(Consumption production) 1 – Rule of Law vs Discretionary Rule 2 – Production of commons by a spectrum of discretion: individual, oligarchical, syndicalist, democratic. 3 – Distribution of control of property between rulers and citizens. 4 – Distribution of proceeds of the market between rulers and citizens. Capitalism (consumption), Socialism (commons production), Authoritarian(institutional production) 5 – Balance of Proceeds between consumption and commons and institutions.

  • Anarchist: “People don’t want me around becasue I’m undesirable for one reason o

    Anarchist: “People don’t want me around becasue I’m undesirable for one reason or another – really my own immaturity. But I want to claim I earned access to the benefits of commons without having paid for them. There is nothing more for me to say. Everything else in anarchism is a lie to justify my parasitism.”

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-11 15:00:00 UTC

  • Anarchist: “People don’t want me around becasue I’m undesirable for one reason o

    Anarchist: “People don’t want me around becasue I’m undesirable for one reason or another – really my own immaturity. But I want to claim I earned access to the benefits of commons without having paid for them. There is nothing more for me to say. Everything else in anarchism is a lie to justify my parasitism.”