Curt Doolittle

Theme: Commons

  • Sorry. I don’t make mistakes. Marxism: end of private property. Libertarianism:

    Sorry. I don’t make mistakes. Marxism: end of private property. Libertarianism: end of common property. Two wonderful fantasies neither of which can survive market competition. Which is why neither has or ever will.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-06 21:02:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1082019658381824003

    Reply addressees: @csuwildcat @GloboHomoCorp @jcjray @paulg

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1082016555339141120

    IN REPLY TO:

    @csuwildcat

    @curtdoolittle @GloboHomoCorp @jcjray @paulg Absolutely cannot be communism of the commons, given it’s based on private relationships, direct fee payments, and service subscriptions – that’s the complete opposite of what you’re asserting.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1082016555339141120

  • not only is it embarrassing but he’s polluting the informational commons, and id

    not only is it embarrassing but he’s polluting the informational commons, and idiots will run with this nonsense, polluting half our adult conversations with more relativism,

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-28 00:03:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1078441276901593089

    Reply addressees: @primalpoly @nntaleb

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1076865816631472128

    IN REPLY TO:

    @gmiller

    @nntaleb Nassim, I have huge respect for you, but you really don’t know what you’re talking about wrt intelligence. You should stop and read more. This is embarrassing. Seriously.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1076865816631472128

  • “Well, what’s the difference between NS and propertarianism?”— The similarity

    —“Well, what’s the difference between NS and propertarianism?”—

    The similarity is nationalism, intolerance, emphasis on commons rather than consumption, and identity.

    The difference is the monarchy and the traditional government, with extremely limited (and strict) constraints on the government, and liability for anyone who serves in government.

    —“I haven’t really seen how a future Propertarian government would anoint their ruler.”–

    Its because aside from monarchy, I simply list the choices of government and leadership available, and tell people to make the choice most relative for their population and its demographics. In other words, it’s under rule of law the means of producing commons (‘ruler’) varies by condition (war, normalcy, windfalls), size of the population (small, medium, large), and the demographics (high quality, medium, low quality) .

    That said everything else is the same.

    —” is Propertarianism traditionalist Libertarianism with teeth and logic? And an emphasis on spiritualism and identity?”–

    It’s the western tradition of sovereign men, updated to be pessimistic about the left.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-22 21:26:00 UTC

  • (I don’t make mistakes. it’s part of my charm – and it’s my job. And I wouldn’t

    (I don’t make mistakes. it’s part of my charm – and it’s my job. And I wouldn’t care about you clowns if you didn’t show up on my radar. But defense of the commons from yet another fraud is something I have an interest in. The left is bad enough. Don’t bring it Right. )

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-21 14:24:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1076121219739648000

    Reply addressees: @Dick71224996 @justecar @Imperius__13 @JohnMarkSays @torinmccabe @DataDistribute @MahmoudZaini @TrueDilTom

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1076042912910036992

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1076042912910036992

  • THE COMMONS OF NOMOCRACY by Bill Joslin Nomocracy (Rule of Law) is a Commons. Th

    THE COMMONS OF NOMOCRACY

    by Bill Joslin

    Nomocracy (Rule of Law) is a Commons. The forms of rule, outlined by Aristotle, describe the cycle of competition to gain a monopoly over the commons (to seize control of it).

    Nomocracy exists as a commons.

    [Nomocracy, under everyman a Sheriff (contract and criminal law separated from legislative and regulatory institutions), exists as a commons, where all contribute via participation in lawful behaviour, as well as execution of the law and all who do so reap the benefits – a type of property.)]

    An end to the many *-ocracies (forms of rule which monopolize law) could end civilizational cycles.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-30 10:48:00 UTC

  • by Bill Joslin “The commons” was initially used (or at least at the time of corp

    by Bill Joslin

    “The commons” was initially used (or at least at the time of corporatism in Germany) to mean the people. We are a product of the commons and a part of the commons – the primary part – the core.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-29 18:18:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1068207587324243968

  • by Bill Joslin “The commons” was initially used (or at least at the time of corp

    by Bill Joslin

    “The commons” was initially used (or at least at the time of corporatism in Germany) to mean the people. We are a product of the commons and a part of the commons – the primary part – the core.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-29 13:18:00 UTC

  • ART: THE CRAFTING OF THE COMMONS (updated) (Information Association) 1. Craftsma

    ART: THE CRAFTING OF THE COMMONS

    (updated) (Information Association)

    1. Craftsmanship (Craft) (Physical information)

    … Materials

    … Technology

    … Skill

    2. Design (Design) (Sensory information)

    … Pattern (Sensory Aesthetics, Order)

    … Depth (Complexity, Hand of man)

    … Decoration (form vs function)

    3. Content (Art) (Meaningful information)

    … Capturing

    … … Utility vs

    … … the Experience, vs

    … … the Moment, Time, or Era (good and bad) vs

    … … the Culture or Civilization, (good and bad) vs

    … … the Eternal Condition of Mankind

    … ie: Value Judgements

    And

    4. Beauty (The Presence of Resources)

    … Intention to Make Art (Investment in the commons)

    … Hand (Time) of Man, Degree of Investment

    … Scale (decoration to monument)

    … Innovation (Mastery)

    … Scarcity, Uniqueness, “One-ness”.

    … Signal Value

    And

    Measurement by Triangulation

    And

    … Literature

    … The Play

    … Movies

    … Music

    … Crafts

    … Fashion (technically a craft)

    … Painting, Print, (2d)

    … Sculpture, (3d)

    … Architecture (4d)

    … Monuments (5d)

    And

    … You. You and your experiences.

    Like reading text, the content you experience is a combination of your memories, with the art. ( Opera is an acquired taste. )

    —“Is this a breakdown of why art is not merely subjective?”—

    Yes. Like many things our ‘taste’ consists of personal associations (subjective) to objective measures. We can measure the quality of art. “Your taste is a measure of you, not art.” So like vocabulary, or manners, or style, or other opinion, we retain some constant values, but learn to improve our taste: a skill.

    PHYSICS IN EVERYTHING = ECONOMICS IN EVERYTHING

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-29 13:14:00 UTC

  • ART: THE CRAFTING OF THE COMMONS (Information Association) 1. Craftsmanship (Cra

    ART: THE CRAFTING OF THE COMMONS

    (Information Association)

    1. Craftsmanship (Craft) (Physical information)

    … Materials

    … Technology

    … Skill

    2. Design (Design) (Sensory information)

    … Pattern (Sensory Aesthetics, Order)

    … Depth (Complexity, Hand of man)

    … Decoration (form vs function)

    3. Content (Art) (Meaningful information)

    … Capturing

    … … Utility vs

    … … the Experience, vs

    … … the Moment, Time, or Era (good and bad) vs

    … … the Culture or Civilization, (good and bad) vs

    … … the Eternal Condition of Mankind

    … ie: Value Judgements

    And

    4. Beauty (The Presence of Resources)

    … Intention to Make Art (Investment in the commons)

    … Hand (Time) of Man, Degree of Investment

    … Scale (decoration to monument)

    … Scarcity, Uniqueness, “One-ness”.

    … Innovation (Mastery)

    … Signal Value

    And

    Measurement by Triangulation

    And

    … Literature

    … The Play

    … Movies

    … Music

    … Crafts

    … Fashion (technically a craft)

    … Painting, Print, (2d)

    … Sculpture, (3d)

    … Architecture (4d)

    … Monuments (5d)

    And

    … You. You and your experiences.

    Like reading text, the content you experience is a combination of your memories, with the art. ( Opera is an acquired taste. )

    —“Is this a breakdown of why art is not merely subjective?”—

    Yes. Like many things our ‘taste’ consists of personal associations (subjective) to objective measures. We can measure the quality of art. “Your taste is a measure of you, not art.” So like vocabulary, or manners, or style, or other opinion, we retain some constant values, but learn to improve our taste: a skill.

    PHYSICS IN EVERYTHING = ECONOMICS IN EVERYTHING

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-28 20:21:00 UTC

  • Krugman, Delong, Stiglitz, et al. “Saltwater” school for the maximization of con

    Krugman, Delong, Stiglitz, et al. “Saltwater” school for the maximization of consumption, and the prohibition on the construction of intergenerational commons, including OUR INSTITUTIONS, CULTURE, CIVILIZATION, AND GENES.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-20 19:20:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1064961790520565767

    Reply addressees: @MartialSociety

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1064931514255728640

    IN REPLY TO:

    @MartialSociety

    @curtdoolittle Which economists? Taleb compared economist to alchemist & astrologist, but he named names.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1064931514255728640