(FB 1545531996 Timestamp) —“Well, what’s the difference between NS and propertarianism?”— The similarity is nationalism, intolerance, emphasis on commons rather than consumption, and identity. The difference is the monarchy and the traditional government, with extremely limited (and strict) constraints on the government, and liability for anyone who serves in government. —“I haven’t really seen how a future Propertarian government would anoint their ruler.”– Its because aside from monarchy, I simply list the choices of government and leadership available, and tell people to make the choice most relative for their population and its demographics. In other words, it’s under rule of law the means of producing commons (‘ruler’) varies by condition (war, normalcy, windfalls), size of the population (small, medium, large), and the demographics (high quality, medium, low quality) . That said everything else is the same. —” is Propertarianism traditionalist Libertarianism with teeth and logic? And an emphasis on spiritualism and identity?”– It’s the western tradition of sovereign men, updated to be pessimistic about the left.
Theme: Commons
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1546869191 Timestamp) NATURAL LAW ON RELIGION You can do what you want in your head, but you cannot do what you want in the commons. Under natural law we would close all temples and mosques, prohibit their literature, prohibit their evangelism, and prohibit all religious display (separatism). Under natural law we would restore the church by empowering churches (dramatically) in exchange for reform, and only those churches with reform, and those that reformed would take up new generations and those that not, end with the old.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1546869191 Timestamp) NATURAL LAW ON RELIGION You can do what you want in your head, but you cannot do what you want in the commons. Under natural law we would close all temples and mosques, prohibit their literature, prohibit their evangelism, and prohibit all religious display (separatism). Under natural law we would restore the church by empowering churches (dramatically) in exchange for reform, and only those churches with reform, and those that reformed would take up new generations and those that not, end with the old.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1546961670 Timestamp) YES, PROPERTARIANISM SOLVES THE SUSTAINABILITY PROBLEM. —-“I just realized that Propertarianism solves the problem of sustainability. A propertarian society would prevent over-consumption of resources since to do so would be parasitic upon future generations (and/or on neighbouring states/groups). You’ve done it. Solved a major problem in ecology.”— Alba Rising
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1546961670 Timestamp) YES, PROPERTARIANISM SOLVES THE SUSTAINABILITY PROBLEM. —-“I just realized that Propertarianism solves the problem of sustainability. A propertarian society would prevent over-consumption of resources since to do so would be parasitic upon future generations (and/or on neighbouring states/groups). You’ve done it. Solved a major problem in ecology.”— Alba Rising
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1547589911 Timestamp) —“The information stream is one of our commons, as is a water source. It should be treated the same. Once you see that, everything falls into place. You don’t dump toxic wastes in it (lies). You don’t dump unknown products in it (speech lacking due diligence). Doesn’t matter if the polluter intended to cause damage, we simply don’t tolerate it.”—Vengefül Bobmoran
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1547589911 Timestamp) —“The information stream is one of our commons, as is a water source. It should be treated the same. Once you see that, everything falls into place. You don’t dump toxic wastes in it (lies). You don’t dump unknown products in it (speech lacking due diligence). Doesn’t matter if the polluter intended to cause damage, we simply don’t tolerate it.”—Vengefül Bobmoran
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1547748382 Timestamp) REMOVE THEM FROM THE POLITICAL COMMONS FOR THEIR SAFETY AND OURS. —“The problem with the current structure of government is that there is a buffer between choice/action and consequence. When there is no buffer between choice/action and consequence reality/nature is the best teacher, experience the best path to wisdom. Only clinically insane and deeply mentally challenged people wantonly put their hand in the fire a third time… Those are the people you need to remove from the commons for their own safety and ours.”—Anne Summers
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1547748382 Timestamp) REMOVE THEM FROM THE POLITICAL COMMONS FOR THEIR SAFETY AND OURS. —“The problem with the current structure of government is that there is a buffer between choice/action and consequence. When there is no buffer between choice/action and consequence reality/nature is the best teacher, experience the best path to wisdom. Only clinically insane and deeply mentally challenged people wantonly put their hand in the fire a third time… Those are the people you need to remove from the commons for their own safety and ours.”—Anne Summers
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1548088235 Timestamp) We need more ‘Russian’, ’cause our women have tried to make the commons too infantilized, and their women want it more masculine. Watch a video of rural russia. Watch women work the fields. Then see the photos of them going to church: beautiful. Someone posted a russian quote yesterday, which I’ll roughly translate as “What to a russian is but interesting entertainment, to a german is deadly dangerous.” Russians have the BEST sayings. lol.