Curt Doolittle

Theme: Coercion

  • is a precious resource. #libertarian #NRx #tcot

    http://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/664082628581195776/photo/1/large?utm_source=fb&utm_medium=fb&utm_campaign=curtdoolittle&utm_content=664082628581195776Violence is a precious resource. #libertarian #NRx #tcot https://t.co/0mNmKVvV6f

    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-10 09:10:00 UTC

  • “We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christ

    —“We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity. We weren’t punctilious about locating and punishing only Hitler and his top officers. We carpet-bombed German cities; we killed civilians. That’s war. And this is war.” — Ann Coulter

    (great quote really)(Not so interested in the christianity thing, but it seems to work.)

    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-09 08:11:00 UTC

  • “We not interested in should. We are interested in shall. Not in persuasion but

    –“We not interested in should. We are interested in shall. Not in persuasion but compliance. Not in tolerance but in deportation. Not in compromise but in defeat.”–

    (digging this meme)

    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-09 08:10:00 UTC

  • Is prevention of warfare by muslims (or hari krishnas ) racism? (My work is clas

    Is prevention of warfare by muslims (or hari krishnas ) racism? (My work is class-ism or eugenic.) That’s my sin not race.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-08 21:54:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/663474681241059328

    Reply addressees: @WhittierPal

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/663473238647803904

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/663473238647803904

  • Monopoly Thinking is Endemic in Democracy and Monotheism, but Not Polytheism and Propertarianism

      [I] see class theory as a set of elites in each of four disciplines of only three of which produce political coercion: 1) Violence(male conservative)/Law, 2) Gossip(female progressive)/Speech 3) Remuneration (male)/Trade, 4) Transformation(male and female)/Production-Craftsmanship. With Transformation not producing elites other than scientists (who are weak influencers). And with some groups succeeding in combining more than one means of coercion in the same group of elites. (Priest/Kings for example).

    I see humans a negotiators for their part of the spectrum of the reproductive division of perception, cognition, labor and advocacy. 1) Female consumption, short term (progressive) 2) Male biased production, medium term (libertarian) 3) Male accumulation, long term (conservative) And that through voluntary exchange we ‘calculate’ the optimum for the group, despite the fact that none of us senses the entire spectrum sufficiently to make a general judgement. I see the creative, productive, and ‘true’ processes as merely different points on the timeline of knowledge development: Knowledge Evolution | Production | Norm Evolution 0) Inspiring (sensing and perceiving) | (feeling) 1) Hypothesis |(free association) | (idea) 2) Theorizing | (experimentation) | (trial and error) 3) Law | (production) | (habit) 4) “True” | (truth statement) | (norm) So I don’t interpret a hierarchy of these different perspectives, but excellences in all three, each of which advocates for his temporal constituency. So my understanding is not one of ‘one-ness’, ‘or penultimate man’, or ‘hierarchy’, but that each of us supplies specialization in some domain. And that as needs emerge and opportunities emerge, we make use of the elites in that period with the ability to best lead us into exploiting it. In other words, I merely describe what is, not what I think should be. I don’t try to say that we should do X, only that if we want to evolve that we must NOT do things that prevent us from doing so. There is no recipe for free association (creativity). There are recipes for testing your hypotheses, such that we warranty that they are free of externality. Thanks

  • Monopoly Thinking is Endemic in Democracy and Monotheism, but Not Polytheism and Propertarianism

      [I] see class theory as a set of elites in each of four disciplines of only three of which produce political coercion: 1) Violence(male conservative)/Law, 2) Gossip(female progressive)/Speech 3) Remuneration (male)/Trade, 4) Transformation(male and female)/Production-Craftsmanship. With Transformation not producing elites other than scientists (who are weak influencers). And with some groups succeeding in combining more than one means of coercion in the same group of elites. (Priest/Kings for example).

    I see humans a negotiators for their part of the spectrum of the reproductive division of perception, cognition, labor and advocacy. 1) Female consumption, short term (progressive) 2) Male biased production, medium term (libertarian) 3) Male accumulation, long term (conservative) And that through voluntary exchange we ‘calculate’ the optimum for the group, despite the fact that none of us senses the entire spectrum sufficiently to make a general judgement. I see the creative, productive, and ‘true’ processes as merely different points on the timeline of knowledge development: Knowledge Evolution | Production | Norm Evolution 0) Inspiring (sensing and perceiving) | (feeling) 1) Hypothesis |(free association) | (idea) 2) Theorizing | (experimentation) | (trial and error) 3) Law | (production) | (habit) 4) “True” | (truth statement) | (norm) So I don’t interpret a hierarchy of these different perspectives, but excellences in all three, each of which advocates for his temporal constituency. So my understanding is not one of ‘one-ness’, ‘or penultimate man’, or ‘hierarchy’, but that each of us supplies specialization in some domain. And that as needs emerge and opportunities emerge, we make use of the elites in that period with the ability to best lead us into exploiting it. In other words, I merely describe what is, not what I think should be. I don’t try to say that we should do X, only that if we want to evolve that we must NOT do things that prevent us from doing so. There is no recipe for free association (creativity). There are recipes for testing your hypotheses, such that we warranty that they are free of externality. Thanks

  • Revolution Is A Simple Matter To Bring About

    [R]evolution requires (a) one weapon: fire (b) shorting power lines (c) blocking roads (d) making police, fire and emergency workers fear to leave their barracks (e) encouraging the military to intervene, (f) collapsing both the economy and the government by the persistence of military occupation, and slowly enfranchising the military so that they take over the government. We pushed them out of europe before. We can push them out again. If we allied with the Russians and the Chinese we could push them out of existence. They are the enemy of libertarian and authoritarian civilization alike.

    The truth is enough. The truth at all costs. One needs incentive (our genocide), moral authority (we have been lied to), something to demand (a radical restructuring of government), a plan for transition (a body of thought), and a plan by which we raise the cost of the status quo until there is no alternative. Liberty in our lifetimes.

  • Revolution Is A Simple Matter To Bring About

    [R]evolution requires (a) one weapon: fire (b) shorting power lines (c) blocking roads (d) making police, fire and emergency workers fear to leave their barracks (e) encouraging the military to intervene, (f) collapsing both the economy and the government by the persistence of military occupation, and slowly enfranchising the military so that they take over the government. We pushed them out of europe before. We can push them out again. If we allied with the Russians and the Chinese we could push them out of existence. They are the enemy of libertarian and authoritarian civilization alike.

    The truth is enough. The truth at all costs. One needs incentive (our genocide), moral authority (we have been lied to), something to demand (a radical restructuring of government), a plan for transition (a body of thought), and a plan by which we raise the cost of the status quo until there is no alternative. Liberty in our lifetimes.

  • The Intertemporal Division of Coercive Specialization

    [C]oercive Specialization: Conservative, Libertarian, and Progressive May / may not = conservative. Can / can not = libertarian. Should / should not = Progressive.
    Accumulate = conservative. Produce = libertarian. Consume = progressive. K selection = conservative.* Exchange selection = libertarian.* R selection = progressive.* Long term = conservative. Medium term = libertarian. Short term = progressive. Law = conservative. Trade = libertarian. Gossip = progressive. Commodity Money (gold) = conservative. Fiduciary Media (notes) = libertarian. Fiat Currency (shares) = progressive. Force : Law (limit on parasitism) : Conservatism. Remuneration. : Trade (utility) : Libertarianism. Gossip (shaming) : Religion and Norms ( deprivation of opportunity to cooperate) : Progressivism. There exist only three technologies of coercion. It should not surprise us that humans specialize in each. Or that we should organize into groups led by specialists in each. Of that some would master more than one : Statism: Lying(gossip), bribing(remuneration) and commanding (law). Or that mastery of a positive use of coercion would also produce mastery of a negative use of coercion. The only “truth” we can ever know in politics, is productive, fully informed voluntary exchange, free of imposition of costs by externality. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine * “K” is for carrying capacity. “r” is for rate of growth. If you have limited resources, you need competition, that’s where K excels – The male reproductive strategy. If you have free resources, your best option is to grow wildly, that’s where r excels – The female reproductive strategy. Exchange reproductive strategy refers to the strategy of ‘homo economicus’: productivity.

  • The Intertemporal Division of Coercive Specialization

    [C]oercive Specialization: Conservative, Libertarian, and Progressive May / may not = conservative. Can / can not = libertarian. Should / should not = Progressive.
    Accumulate = conservative. Produce = libertarian. Consume = progressive. K selection = conservative.* Exchange selection = libertarian.* R selection = progressive.* Long term = conservative. Medium term = libertarian. Short term = progressive. Law = conservative. Trade = libertarian. Gossip = progressive. Commodity Money (gold) = conservative. Fiduciary Media (notes) = libertarian. Fiat Currency (shares) = progressive. Force : Law (limit on parasitism) : Conservatism. Remuneration. : Trade (utility) : Libertarianism. Gossip (shaming) : Religion and Norms ( deprivation of opportunity to cooperate) : Progressivism. There exist only three technologies of coercion. It should not surprise us that humans specialize in each. Or that we should organize into groups led by specialists in each. Of that some would master more than one : Statism: Lying(gossip), bribing(remuneration) and commanding (law). Or that mastery of a positive use of coercion would also produce mastery of a negative use of coercion. The only “truth” we can ever know in politics, is productive, fully informed voluntary exchange, free of imposition of costs by externality. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine * “K” is for carrying capacity. “r” is for rate of growth. If you have limited resources, you need competition, that’s where K excels – The male reproductive strategy. If you have free resources, your best option is to grow wildly, that’s where r excels – The female reproductive strategy. Exchange reproductive strategy refers to the strategy of ‘homo economicus’: productivity.