Theme: Coercion

  • HOW MUCH SUCCESS HAVE I HAD AT PUTTING THE NEED FOR VIOLENCE BACK INTO LIBERTARI

    HOW MUCH SUCCESS HAVE I HAD AT PUTTING THE NEED FOR VIOLENCE BACK INTO LIBERTARIANISM?


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-31 09:45:00 UTC

  • ON WAR

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kwnPgscg0vUFRIEDMAN ON WAR


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-30 01:17:00 UTC

  • Criminalize a double standard in political speech and the left dies immediately

    Criminalize a double standard in political speech and the left dies immediately.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-29 16:07:00 UTC

  • “Where did the Non-Aggression Principle originate? Who was the first philosopher

    —“Where did the Non-Aggression Principle originate? Who was the first philosopher to posit this axiom?”—

    by Rik Storey

    It was a deliberately and impractically broad term to refer to the loose ethics of classical liberals and also to the legal terminology used by many libertarians. It easily adopted an abstract and pseudo religious quality and is now the scourge of sensible people on the right the world over.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-28 08:12:00 UTC

  • I would be in jail in Germany and france and fined in the UK. And all I do is ta

    I would be in jail in Germany and france and fined in the UK.
    And all I do is talk about painful truths.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-25 22:32:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/889976598518222848

    Reply addressees: @woke8yearold

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/889678242956931072


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/889678242956931072

  • the reason they liked duels was because it stopped impassioned ‘fights in the mo

    the reason they liked duels was because it stopped impassioned ‘fights in the moment’, in an era where everyone always had at least a knife and often was physically strong as only farmers are, while agreeing to fight and preserving ‘face’ – but then allowing time for cooler heads to prevail, and apologies to be issued. The material problem with the duel was the use of champions (professionals), and then using ‘constructed’ challenges to commit no better than murder by the use of champions. It was and remains, easy to fix.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-25 07:25:00 UTC

  • THE WORLDWIDE GOVERNMENT COMPETITION It’s a world-wide competition by government

    THE WORLDWIDE GOVERNMENT COMPETITION

    It’s a world-wide competition by governments to see who can make the population dumbest, fattest, most pliable, and most taxed indentured-credit slave-labor ostensibly for an abstract ‘common good’ – the consequence is to overwhelm the carrying capacity, and to drive us to extinction.

    (it’s freaking insane. the eugenicists were right.)


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-23 08:15:00 UTC

  • MARXIST AND CAPITALIST ERRORS (THE UNDERLYING ISSUE IS NATURAL LAW NOT ECONOMICS

    MARXIST AND CAPITALIST ERRORS (THE UNDERLYING ISSUE IS NATURAL LAW NOT ECONOMICS)

    Better if I list the ‘set’ of the most significant marxist errors.

    1) Labor Theory of Value vs Subjective theory of value

    2) Value of voluntarily organizing labor, vs value of labor in production

    3) Value of risk of extant capital vs value of risk of opportunity

    4) Prices and calculation without money and prices.

    5) Knowledge and Incentives with and without private property

    6) Oppression by Discretion vs Domestication by Market Means.

    7) Demonstrable superior benefit to working classes (reduced prices and increased consumption) than to middle and upper classes (capital increases).

    8) Tendencies of bureaucracies to maximize rents vs Tendencies of bureaucracies to dissipate.

    9) Greater susceptibilities of bureaucracies to corruption than markets.

    10) Demonstrated failure of all attempts at socialism and empirical evidence that the underlying causal problem is iq and trust (genetics).

    I mean, that’s JUST THE BEGINNING.

    Here is some of what’s wrong with capitalism.

    1) There are no unlimited ‘goods’, at some point one is destroying capital rather than decreasing prices. And most capitalist theory assumes endless goods – particularly consumption, just as most marxist theory assumes endless goods – particularly of human beings (a very expensive and toxic life form.)

    2) The assumption that all can survive in a competitive market when all cannot if for no other reason than every half standard deviation in IQ roughly doubles the cost of training and limits the possible scope of work, meaning that many people are increasingly dead weights on society no matter how moral their intentions.

    3) The assumption of the superiority of cities whereas it is fairly obvious that cities are IQ and ovary sinks that cause continuous damage to the gene pool (yeah, that one surprised me). The better method would have been to encourage people to return to the farm and live tax free, agrarian lives, and to increase taxes in the cities since all profitability is a function of density.

    4) The state is a horrible method of defense against abuse of markets, and bureaucracies and politicians exacerbate the problem by making privileges and rents available. For a market to function the people must have universal standing in court against companies for violations of common capital by externality, not just fraud, monetary coercion, and violence against people.

    5) The current keynesian economic models do not measure changes in the full set of capital, only largely changes in velocity of consumption. This means we are destroying genetic and cultural and institutional capital in exchange for short term consumption and downward redistribution of reproduction.

    6) We do not regulate the size of the population pool, especially the underclass, and actively immigrate underclasses reversing 4000 years of european evolution.

    7) A polity must produce sufficiently valuable market goods in order to organize a voluntary organization of production (capitalism). the problem is that the external market not the polity determines the minimum demand for goods, services, and information. As such, it is almost impossible for all but northern european and east asian economies to make use of democracy and capitalism, and socialism will always fail them, so they are all doomed unless they repair the size of their underclasses.

    That’s just a beginning. If I sit here and write about ‘evangelical capitalism’ all afternoon I’ll want to go shoot myself…..

    -Curt Doolittle


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-22 12:45:00 UTC

  • I memorized the prayers in my catechism for the simple reason that i was afraid

    I memorized the prayers in my catechism for the simple reason that i was afraid of the wrath of the nuns.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-21 15:39:00 UTC

  • THE RESTORATION OF THE DUEL: MORE HONEST AND POLITE SOCIETY I have lived in Ukra

    THE RESTORATION OF THE DUEL: MORE HONEST AND POLITE SOCIETY

    I have lived in Ukraine and spent time in russia, where a punch in the face is quick, expected, not uncommon, respected, and use of it keeps men fit. And it is a much more civil society. It is one of the principle reasons I prefer their society. For all our rule of law, without punching in the face, it is just a license for degeneracy.

    I remember when we still had a lot of punching in the face. I did quite a bit of it and received quite a bit of it. Because it was part of becoming a man: be careful with your word and deed because other men will not tolerate you. And I was small. So I get good at the ground game.

    Lessons of history are this:

    – An armed society is a safe society.

    – A punch-in-the-face society is a polite society.

    – A dueling society is an honest society.

    The duel works well because it (a) imposes constant caution in one’s words, allows for (b) immediate fights (rapid suppression), (c) immediate apologies (rapid de-escalation), (d) immediate silence, but demand for court trial instead. (e) satisfaction in a court trial. (f) far lower cost of settlement of differences and less malincentive to try to get away with impolite or dishonest words and deeds simply because the opposing party can’t resist you.

    The failure to innovate with ‘judicial dueling’ was that (a) pistols equalized the difference between swordsman or size (good), (b) but they were more deadly, where in swordfighting or knife-fighting, ‘one could collect an honorable scar’, and then surrender and apologize. (c) the combination of practice of substitutes, and the increase in size of the middle class with less ‘cultured’ (intelligent) histories and access to better weapons, was what ended it, not the practice of duelling itself. Everyone had always criticized it. But for sovereign men there is no substitute.

    This is particularly useful if not necessary for controlling the gossip, ridicule, shaming, and rallying by betas and women. Since women have no possible chance unless very highly trained, men must warranty them, and therefore take responsibility for teaching them discipline.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-20 09:16:00 UTC