Curt Doolittle

Theme: Coercion

  • REVIEW FOR NEWBS 1 – ACQUISITIONISM replaces psychology, 2 – REPRODUCTIVE DIVISI

    REVIEW FOR NEWBS

    1 – ACQUISITIONISM replaces psychology,

    2 – REPRODUCTIVE DIVISIONS of perception and methods of coercion replace Sociology

    3 – TESTIMONIALISM replaces Epistemology

    4 – PROPERTARIANISM replaces ethics

    5 – ALGORITHMIC NATURAL LAW replaces Law

    6 – MARKETS in Everything replaces internal politics

    7 – Group EVOLUTIONARY STRATEGY replaces political relations.

    Propertarianism completes science and reforms philosophy, psychology, sociology, law, politics and international relations.

    Its bigger than Marxism in scope.

    So that’s why it takes me so long.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-09 08:10:00 UTC

  • is how things work there. It is how things work better

    http://vidmax.com/video/160845-Brother-Slaps-Friend-And-Carries-Home-His-Drunk-Sister-After-A-Long-Night-Of-Drinking#.WYpn7yF7DDU.facebookThis is how things work there. It is how things work better.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-08 21:40:00 UTC

  • CAIN AND ABEL DE-ABRAHAMIZED Adam made love to his wife Eve, and she became preg

    CAIN AND ABEL DE-ABRAHAMIZED

    Adam made love to his wife Eve, and she became pregnant and gave birth to Cain. Later she gave birth to his brother Abel. And in their manhood gave Abel flocks, and Cain Soil, that his sons be fruitful and prosper.

    Now Abel kept his flocks, and Cain worked the soil. In the course of time Cain brought some of the fruits of the soil as a gift to Adam. And Abel also brought an offering—fat portions from some of the firstborn of his flock. Adam looked with favor on Abel and his gift, but on Cain and his gift he did not look with favor. So Cain was very angry, and his face was downcast.

    Then Adam said to Cain, “Why are you angry? Why is your face downcast? If you do what is right, will you not be accepted? But if you do not do what is right, you will not be accepted; greed and envy desire to have you, but you must rule over it.”

    Now Cain said to his brother Abel, “Let’s go out to the field.” While they were in the field, Cain attacked his brother Abel and killed him.

    Then Adam said to Cain, “Where is your brother Abel?”

    “I don’t know,” he replied. “Am I my brother’s keeper?”

    Adam said, “What have you done? Listen! Your brother’s blood cries out to me from the ground. Now I curse you drive you from the ground, which opened its mouth to receive your brother’s blood from your hand. You will not work the ground, and it will no longer yield its crops for you. You will be a restless wanderer on the earth.”

    Cain said to Adam, “My punishment is more than I can bear. Today you are driving me from the land, and I will be hidden from your presence; I will be a restless wanderer on the earth, and whoever finds me will kill me.”

    But Adam said to him, “Not so”; and Adam took Cain and cut his mark on Cain as he would a beast or slave. And adam said “Anyone who kills Cain will suffer my vengeance seven times over.” So Cain went out from Adam’s presence and lived in the land of Nod, east of Eden. Where he married, built a city, and prospered.

    Adam made love to his wife again, and she gave birth to a son and named him Seth, saying, “Adam has given me another child in place of Abel, because Cain has killed him.”

    Adam gave Seth his land and his flocks, and Adam, Eve, Seth and his children prospered.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-08 18:47:00 UTC

  • CRIME AND PUNISHMENT (Sketching this still) The strategy of graceful and increme

    CRIME AND PUNISHMENT (Sketching this still)

    The strategy of graceful and incremental failure.

    I have been working on ‘punishment’ for quite a while, and have come to the conclusion – obvious in retrospect – that imprisonment is as counter productive as is mixed mass education, and forcible social integration, and that enserfdom and enslavement in self governing work-on-commons camps, farming camps, training camps, where individuals are required to self-maintain, or self improve are better than imprisonment, which is merely expensive, destructive to the mind, and makes people worse than they were when they went in.

    In other words, I do not see punishment beneficial as much as insulating the markets from these people, and providing a society with normative regulations more suited to their abilities.

    It seems that for men in particular, isolation, submission, and repetition do not teach them how to negotiate a position in a dominance hierarchy by cooperation and merit, but the more aggressive the male the worse consequence this has for him. And as the military has shown for thousands of years, the most dangerous men can be tamed by other dangerous men and find a place in a hierarchy where they can succeed.

    It seems like simple infantry units comprised exclusively of ‘troubled males’ who do nothing more than small arms and patrols should once again be used as a method of ‘rescuing’ those men who have lacked discipline.

    It seems that there is vast work in the commons that can be conducted, and that we now possess the technology to equip our ‘serfs of the commons’ such that they either can be tagged and found, or tagged, shocked and found (without resorting to exploding collars so to speak.)

    It seems that as long as a court exists for the camp members, and that ‘video record is everywhere and everywhen’ that ‘outside intervention’ is always possible, and inside appeal to the court of their peers is always possible.

    It seems that as in all things, we can create an internal industry out of reformers out of practical market demand, rather than an external industry out of reforming – unsuccessfully.

    It means that camp-governance can be tribal (by kin). And it might mean that camp life can become voluntary: in that if a man chooses that camp ‘society’ is preferable, that he can stay in it, where he may be valued whereas outside of it he would not be.

    It means that if a ‘hanging’ is necessary, that it will be performed by their peers rather than by superiors in the external market.

    It seems that no electronic communication. No personal visits. Only written communications (on paper) should be permitted since this perpetuates prior anchors and perpetuates crimes.

    It seems that the teaching of mindfulness is probably the most important skill we should work on, since it is lack of mindfulness that leads to the majority of criminal activity.

    In other words, we should provide as much incentive to self maintain, and stay inside as possible, and to let communities form that serve the interests of either reforming or exterminating the individuals.

    || Beast > Barbarian > Slave > Serf > Freeman > Citizen > Peer > Sovereign > Demigod > God

    || A hostage someone waiting for ransom > a prisoner is someone waiting for justice > indentured servant someone who is working off a debt to society (work in commons) > a serf someone generally self regulating within limits but isolated from market society > A slave someone who cannot self regulate and must be regulated and isolated from the market society > Death Row: someone who must be removed from all societies.

    || Grandmother(Wisdom/Limit) < Woman (Empathy/Train) < Maiden(expressions/search) < Girl (experiences/discover) < HUMAN > Boy(heroes/Discovering) > Man( virtues/searching ) > Mature( Rules/Training) > Wise ( Outcomes/Limits )

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-07 11:06:00 UTC

  • TRANSCENDENCE (transcendence in fact: evolution) … AGENCY (physical, emotional

    TRANSCENDENCE (transcendence in fact: evolution)

    … AGENCY (physical, emotional, intellectual)

    … … SOVERIEGNTY (Via Negativa Limits)

    … … … Violence

    … … … … Law

    … … … … Allies

    … … … … Fighting (handed)

    … … … … War fighting (Armed)

    … … INVENTORY (Via Practica Limits )

    … … … Memory

    … … … … Metaphysics (Unknown assumptions)

    … … … … Information (Knowledge / Relations)

    … … … … Judgements (Values / Prejudices)

    … … … … Skills (Operations / Transformations)

    … … … … Habits (Behavior, manners)

    … … … … Will (discipline: mental and emotional)

    … … … Body

    … … … … Fitness (Physicality / Age / Desirability)

    … … … … Morphology

    … … … … Genetics

    … … … Assets

    … … … … Interests (‘paper capital’ / contracts etc.)

    … … … … Portable Capital

    … … … … Fixed Capital (inc. built / territorial)

    … … … … Organizational Capital (biz)

    … … … … Shareholder Commons (biz/etc)

    … … … Relations (Kin and Kith)

    … … … … Mate

    … … … … Offspring

    … … … … Kin

    … … … … … Clan, Tribe, Nation, Race, Mankind

    … … … … Kith

    … … … … … Friends, Neighbors, etc.

    … … … Productive Assets

    … … … … Reputation

    … … … … Customers (employment)

    … … … … Rents (yes, many of them)

    … … … … Associations

    … … … Political Assets

    … … … … Interest Holder Commons (public assets)

    … … … … Normative Commons (informal institutions)

    … … … … Civic Institutions (Banks, Insurers, Producers)

    … … … … Institutional Commons ( branches of govt )

    … … … … Citizenship Commons (insurance)

    … … … Generative Assets

    … … … … Rates of Transcendence (population ability distribution)

    … … … … Rates of Reproduction

    … … … … Rates of Production

    … … … … Rates of Adaptation

    … … … … Rates of Innovation

    … … … … Rates of Accumulation of capital

    … … … … Rates of Expansion

    … … … … Rates of Competition

    … … TRUTH (Via Positiva Limits)

    … … … Testimony

    … … … … Narratives (opportunities)

    … … … … Recipies (methods)

    … … … … Science (Measurements)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-05 17:43:00 UTC

  • Understanding is overrated. Persuasion is overrated. Force is underrated

    Understanding is overrated.

    Persuasion is overrated.

    Force is underrated.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-04 13:59:00 UTC

  • “The necessity of numbers is one of the fallacies that allows for men to do noth

    —“The necessity of numbers is one of the fallacies that allows for men to do nothing while their men, women and children are conquered. Death would be a more glorious outcome than submission or idleness.”—Bobby Roe

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-04 13:34:00 UTC

  • SURE. LET ME HELP YOU: EVOLUTION OF ARGUMENTATION —“So I’ll ask the big guy: I

    SURE. LET ME HELP YOU: EVOLUTION OF ARGUMENTATION

    —“So I’ll ask the big guy: Is libertarianism just economic determinism for the middle-class? Doesn’t it act as protectionist platform keep the welfare whores from both ends of the spectrum off backs of the productive middle class?”— A Friend

    Sure.

    THE EVOLUTION OF RESISTANCE MOVEMENTS

    Sovereignty arose in our earliest eras as a resistance against equalitarianism (free riding)

    Slavery arose in the era of farming, and liberty as a resistance against slavery. (free riding)

    Liberty arose in the era of cities, as a rebellion against over taxation. (free riding)

    Libertarianism in both european puritan and jewish anarchist forms, arose as a rebellion against *misuse of taxation* in the classical liberal and social democratic era.

    1) Equalitarianism > Sovereignty > Law and truth

    2) Slavery > Freedom > Abrahamism and deception

    3) Taxation > Liberty > Philosophy and idealism

    4) Classical Liberalism/Social Democracy > Libertarianism > Pseudo-science, pseudo-rationalism, pseudo-moralism.

    These are all means of resistance, which is why libertarianism is argued using moral language and shaming rather than the language of violence and law (aristocracy). Just as marxism and socialism and abrahamism (christianity/judaism) are argued using shaming using false narrative of oppression, superstition, idealism, and fictionalism (fictionalism is a technical term).

    The underclass was not oppressed, it was domesticated against it’s will into meritocracy and the pastoralists (lowest classes) resisted (ie:judaism and christianity and islam).

    The middle classes claimed overtaxation, as did the american colonists, in order to free ride on the aristocracy.

    Libertarianism is just restating jewish separatism and false narrative of oppression, when the jews were parasites upon the land holding classes.

    American libertarianism was just an attempt to obtain the benefits of seizing the opportunity of the new continent without paying for its (expensive) conquest and defense.

    Libertarianism is valid in the sense that it is a resistance movement that prevents downward redistribution. It is invalid in the sense that it opens borders, resists taxation, and seeks not to fight to hold the territory upon which the institutions of law and order make commerce possible.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-01 14:11:00 UTC

  • THE DIFFERENCES IN LEFT AND RIGHT ARGUMENTS? “In order to obscure or justify or

    THE DIFFERENCES IN LEFT AND RIGHT ARGUMENTS?

    “In order to obscure or justify or force an involuntary transfer, or prohibit the imposition of an involuntary behavioral cost, the LEFT uses…” (argumentative tactic)

    — vs.–

    “In order to prevent an involuntary transfer and impose an involuntary behavioral cost, the RIGHT uses…” (argumentative tactic)

    The left lacks agency physical, emotional, and intellectual. The right possesses agency: physical, emotional, intellectual.

    (thanks to Skye Stewart)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-31 19:32:00 UTC

  • The market for the choice between violence, reciprocity, and boycott. “Every man

    The market for the choice between violence, reciprocity, and boycott.

    “Every man is his own legislature”

    in other words, just as international law is governed by reciprocity today, individuals can govern one another by reciprocity in the market for the choice between violence, reciprocity, and boycott.

    They must just produce commons sufficient to defend themselves from the market of others who would institute a different order other than the sovereign.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-31 13:33:00 UTC