I have made this argument over and over again, my difference is that I do not believe the incentive exists for women to force the change unless we counter-react against crazy-women (which is a very large percentage of women) by threat of binding ALL women. Hence my emphasis on truthful reciprocal speech.
Theme: Coercion
-
You Do Not Debate Or Argue With Women. You Give Them What You Can And Deny Them What You Must.
I have made this argument over and over again, my difference is that I do not believe the incentive exists for women to force the change unless we counter-react against crazy-women (which is a very large percentage of women) by threat of binding ALL women. Hence my emphasis on truthful reciprocal speech. -
HR is to Anglosphere Business as were the French Commissaire Politique, the Sovi
HR is to Anglosphere Business as were the French Commissaire Politique, the Soviet Commissar, the Nazi Leadership Officers, and today’s Chinese Zhengwei: To Ensure Indoctrination rather than the results of competition and trade. I never allow HR in my businesses. Just recruiting.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-15 21:06:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974391361712656390
Reply addressees: @jordanbpeterson
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973697666201698304
IN REPLY TO:
@jordanbpeterson
It’s also nice to sacrifice your dignity, autonomy and voice to ideologically-possessed HR puppets. Make your choice and take the consequences… https://t.co/H99gDzUMTR
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973697666201698304
-
NEGOTIATES FROM THE PRESUMPTION OF IGNORANCE AND PRESUMPTION OF THE OPPONENT’S M
https://www.quora.com/How-did-President-Trump-choke-North-Koreas-economy-that-forced-a-meeting-between-him-and-Kim-Jong-Un-to-denuclearize/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=f7c9d48b&srid=u4QvTRUMP NEGOTIATES FROM THE PRESUMPTION OF IGNORANCE AND PRESUMPTION OF THE OPPONENT’S MALFEASANCE. HE MANUFACTURES OPPORTUNITY TO SUCCEED RATHER THAN PLANS A SPECIFIC SUCCESS.
(I know, because I do the same thing)
Kim wants legitimacy before his people. Trump wants an excuse to take severe action. The military can use that action to counter china. There are hundreds of issues at play here.
I have been in the business of negotiating business deals for most of my life – usually M&A in the low range. And trump’s method of negotiation is very transparent to me.
You just let everyone play their hand, and say anything that encourages people to take further exposure, then wait for opportunity to make use of that information, while suggesting that you’ll accept possibilities different from your central objective.
This makes it extremely hard for the opposition to rally and counter you, and ensures you have the maximum information at your disposal. This works when many people are fighting for your business, money, or approval.
And it means you do not have to pay them off or make a lot of puts in order to get the best deal. Moreover by giving them hope, and then drawing it out or letting them fail, they are weakened with their constituencies.
Most presidents and politicians do this under pretense. He just does it openly. Because the worst that happens is he gets to leave the white house which is a bit like slumming for him.
Meanwhile his base is more dedicated than any president in modern history.
He governs as does a king rather than the postmodern priesthood that’s been common since Johnson. And I am still not sure it’s a bad thing.Updated Mar 15, 2018, 12:59 PM
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-15 12:59:00 UTC
-
Trump Negotiates From The Presumption Of Ignorance And Presumption Of The Opponent’s Malfeasance. He Manufactures Opportunity To
(I know, because I do the same thing) Kim wants legitimacy before his people. Trump wants an excuse to take severe action. The military can use that action to counter china. There are hundreds of issues at play here. I have been in the business of negotiating business deals for most of my life – usually M&A in the low range. And trump’s method of negotiation is very transparent to me. You just let everyone play their hand, and say anything that encourages people to take further exposure, then wait for opportunity to make use of that information, while suggesting that you’ll accept possibilities different from your central objective. This makes it extremely hard for the opposition to rally and counter you, and ensures you have the maximum information at your disposal. This works when many people are fighting for your business, money, or approval. And it means you do not have to pay them off or make a lot of puts in order to get the best deal. Moreover by giving them hope, and then drawing it out or letting them fail, they are weakened with their constituencies. Most presidents and politicians do this under pretense. He just does it openly. Because the worst that happens is he gets to leave the white house which is a bit like slumming for him. Meanwhile his base is more dedicated than any president in modern history. He governs as does a king rather than the postmodern priesthood that’s been common since Johnson. And I am still not sure it’s a bad thing. -
Trump Negotiates From The Presumption Of Ignorance And Presumption Of The Opponent’s Malfeasance. He Manufactures Opportunity To
(I know, because I do the same thing) Kim wants legitimacy before his people. Trump wants an excuse to take severe action. The military can use that action to counter china. There are hundreds of issues at play here. I have been in the business of negotiating business deals for most of my life – usually M&A in the low range. And trump’s method of negotiation is very transparent to me. You just let everyone play their hand, and say anything that encourages people to take further exposure, then wait for opportunity to make use of that information, while suggesting that you’ll accept possibilities different from your central objective. This makes it extremely hard for the opposition to rally and counter you, and ensures you have the maximum information at your disposal. This works when many people are fighting for your business, money, or approval. And it means you do not have to pay them off or make a lot of puts in order to get the best deal. Moreover by giving them hope, and then drawing it out or letting them fail, they are weakened with their constituencies. Most presidents and politicians do this under pretense. He just does it openly. Because the worst that happens is he gets to leave the white house which is a bit like slumming for him. Meanwhile his base is more dedicated than any president in modern history. He governs as does a king rather than the postmodern priesthood that’s been common since Johnson. And I am still not sure it’s a bad thing. -
(Video making the rounds. Guy makes selfie doing some girl. Cut to her father ma
(Video making the rounds. Guy makes selfie doing some girl. Cut to her father making vido of two shotgun rounds to the head followed by a mag-dump with a pistol. I mean, the shotgun wedding, shotgun murder thing seems to work just fine. I was surprised he didn’t douse him with gasoline and light him on fire.)
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-13 19:49:00 UTC
-
(Video making the rounds. Guy makes selfie doing some girl. Cut to her father ma
(Video making the rounds. Guy makes selfie doing some girl. Cut to her father making vido of two shotgun rounds to the head followed by a mag-dump with a pistol. I mean, the shotgun wedding, shotgun murder thing seems to work just fine. I was surprised he didn’t douse him with gasoline and light him on fire.) -
(Video making the rounds. Guy makes selfie doing some girl. Cut to her father ma
(Video making the rounds. Guy makes selfie doing some girl. Cut to her father making vido of two shotgun rounds to the head followed by a mag-dump with a pistol. I mean, the shotgun wedding, shotgun murder thing seems to work just fine. I was surprised he didn’t douse him with gasoline and light him on fire.) -
From Elsewhere
On Killing Defectors… (a) Killing defectors is defensive measure against further defection (b) Not killing imprisoned defectors is merely preserving an asset for future exchange. (c) Trading defectors you will later kill is simply buying the exchange for free. (d) Letting people have false hope and live in fear is more valuable than rapidly executing them. I detest conspiracy theories. People act according to rational incentives. However, Seth Rich and Skripal hold a remote possibility of implicating Russian involvement at a time when we are sensitive to (endemic) russian, chinese, jewish, manipulation of our polity. The jewish are most successful at political interference. The chinese most successful at technological theft. The Russian most successful at undermining power in general. Russian, Jewish, Chinese, and American involvement in intelligence gathering and shaming by publication of undesirable information is endemic, and has been since the advent of the soviets.The soviets mastered propaganda from the French, then competed with the fascists for supremacy. Americans being anglo were late to develop the technique since we have a high trust society and these kinds of actions were resisted. As far as I know – and I am fairly certain of this – the collusion story is just that – an excuse to cover the failings of the democratic party in putting forward such an undesirable candidate in a time of divisiveness. Intelligence work on the american side is tediously boring really. The russians on the other hand use disaffected intellectuals (particularly on the left) to do their work for them at pennies on our dollar. And they always have done so. Americans are rather overt about our interference. Wikileaks has done us a profound favor and I only wish them a future even brighter.