Curt Doolittle

Theme: Coercion

  • PETERSON’S IDEAS IN THE CONTEXT OF INTELLECTUAL HISTORY 1 – I go slumming on all

    PETERSON’S IDEAS IN THE CONTEXT OF INTELLECTUAL HISTORY

    1 – I go slumming on all sides of the debate, and fans of correspondence with any of the three dimensions of the coercive compass are equally convinced their intuitions are supported by experience, reason, and science.

    2 – The fact that the current reaction to the status quo is not yet part of the normative canon merely repeats every other cyclic reaction to the status quo. Your confidence in a paradigm was produced by the same means in prior generations. You just arent a student of the cycle.

    3 – Peterson like Nietzsche is recreating the foundations of western civilization by restoring Stoicism in both analogical and disciplinary forms and explaining its correlation with cognitive science. I do the same in logic, science, economics, law and politics. Taleb in finance.

    4 – The size of the market for Critical Essay exposition (Taleb), Literary exposition (Peterson), Historical exposition(Hicks), and Technical Exposition (me) declines along with the population with the ability and knowledge to understand the material, is and inverse to its precision.

    5 – The effects of economics, cognitive science, and genetics since 1992 have been reversing the Marxist Socialist postmodernist feminist counter enlightenment by Boaz,Marx, Freud,Frankfurt and Derrida/Rorty against Maxwell, Darwin, Menger, Pareto, Durkheim,Spencer and Nietzsche.

    6-The pseudosciences had wider appeal because they promised an end to and reversal of social, sexual, economic, political, and military market value while retaining the proceeds of western success at the most thorough construction of markets in all aspects of life.

    7 – But this was a false promise in the future, just as abrahamic religions made false promise of life after death (of more than the memory of ones actions by survivors). The science is in, genetics, cog sci, econ, law, politics, war: The second attempt at a dark age has failed.

    8 – And that is a problem for the left. All the evidence supports the right. Which is why the left status quo is under threat of extinction, and we are living in a cold civil war very nearly turning hot. – Cheers

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 03:36:00 UTC

  • Peterson’s Ideas In The Context Of Intellectual History

    1 – I go slumming on all sides of the debate, and fans of correspondence with any of the three dimensions of the coercive compass are equally convinced their intuitions are supported by experience, reason, and science. 2 – The fact that the current reaction to the status quo is not yet part of the normative canon merely repeats every other cyclic reaction to the status quo. Your confidence in a paradigm was produced by the same means in prior generations. You just arent a student of the cycle. 3 – Peterson like Nietzsche is recreating the foundations of western civilization by restoring Stoicism in both analogical and disciplinary forms and explaining its correlation with cognitive science. I do the same in logic, science, economics, law and politics. Taleb in finance. 4 – The size of the market for Critical Essay exposition (Taleb), Literary exposition (Peterson), Historical exposition(Hicks), and Technical Exposition (me) declines along with the population with the ability and knowledge to understand the material, is and inverse to its precision. 5 – The effects of economics, cognitive science, and genetics since 1992 have been reversing the Marxist Socialist postmodernist feminist counter enlightenment by Boaz,Marx, Freud,Frankfurt and Derrida/Rorty against Maxwell, Darwin, Menger, Pareto, Durkheim,Spencer and Nietzsche. 6-The pseudosciences had wider appeal because they promised an end to and reversal of social, sexual, economic, political, and military market value while retaining the proceeds of western success at the most thorough construction of markets in all aspects of life. 7 – But this was a false promise in the future, just as abrahamic religions made false promise of life after death (of more than the memory of ones actions by survivors). The science is in, genetics, cog sci, econ, law, politics, war: The second attempt at a dark age has failed. 8 – And that is a problem for the left. All the evidence supports the right. Which is why the left status quo is under threat of extinction, and we are living in a cold civil war very nearly turning hot. – Cheers

  • No one else in the world sends a single officer after a suspect. American police

    No one else in the world sends a single officer after a suspect.
    American police are trained to escalate, an shoot in paramilitary fashion rather than encircle, deescalate, and exhaust. American policy are over equipped, over paid, and trained as paramilitary rather than police. https://twitter.com/brutalistPress/status/974637959029968901

  • Mises was only half wrong but fully irrelevant. Hayek was right and prescient: P

    Mises was only half wrong but fully irrelevant. Hayek was right and prescient: Prohibit the bad and all that is left is good.And the means of incremental empirical suppression of the bad is the dry evolutionary process we call the judge discovered common law of tort: Reciprocity.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 00:16:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974801562643070982

    Reply addressees: @FriedrichHayek @BobMurphyEcon

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974765006825832449

    IN REPLY TO:

    @FriedrichHayek

    I’m rather shocked at how many fundamental mistakes @BobMurphyEcon makes in this article on Hayek, knowledge, Mises, and calculation. Stunned actually. https://t.co/rn3JZED9pi

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974765006825832449

  • “We suffer under Universal-Suffrage Authoritarianism.”— Steve Pender

    —“We suffer under Universal-Suffrage Authoritarianism.”— Steve Pender

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-16 15:35:00 UTC

  • “We suffer under Universal-Suffrage Authoritarianism.”— Steve Pender

    —“We suffer under Universal-Suffrage Authoritarianism.”— Steve Pender

  • The problem is you can’t take a woman seriously if she (a) does not reason serio

    The problem is you can’t take a woman seriously if she (a) does not reason seriously (b) does not respect the boundary of violence. In the past, we could use violence agianst women who broke that boundary – just as we could use it against men. Our big mistake was ending slander, libel, scolding, and the duel.

  • The problem is you can’t take a woman seriously if she (a) does not reason serio

    The problem is you can’t take a woman seriously if she (a) does not reason seriously (b) does not respect the boundary of violence.

    In the past, we could use violence agianst women who broke that boundary – just as we could use it against men.

    Our big mistake was ending slander, libel, scolding, and the duel.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-16 12:49:00 UTC

  • The problem is you can’t take a woman seriously if she (a) does not reason serio

    The problem is you can’t take a woman seriously if she (a) does not reason seriously (b) does not respect the boundary of violence. In the past, we could use violence agianst women who broke that boundary – just as we could use it against men. Our big mistake was ending slander, libel, scolding, and the duel.

  • DO NOT DEBATE OR ARGUE WITH WOMEN. YOU GIVE THEM WHAT YOU CAN AND DENY THEM WHAT

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=veVONaeTBVMYOU DO NOT DEBATE OR ARGUE WITH WOMEN. YOU GIVE THEM WHAT YOU CAN AND DENY THEM WHAT YOU MUST.

    I have made this argument over and over again, my difference is that I do not believe the incentive exists for women to force the change unless we counter-react against crazy-women (which is a very large percentage of women) by threat of binding ALL women. Hence my emphasis on truthful reciprocal speech.Updated Mar 16, 2018, 12:48 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-16 12:48:00 UTC