(PARIS IS BURNING) —“…he defended the way police had handled the violence, saying little could be done to stop trouble-makers from infiltrating the crowds. “We can only detain a certain number of people who turn up like you or I in civilian clothing and then suddenly are dressed in black bloc outfits in the middle of the crowd,” he said. “We cannot keep up, even with 21 police units mobilised against movements which all of a sudden appear on a scale we’ve never seen before.” Radical leftist groups had issued a call on social media — both in French and English — for people to take part in a “revolutionary May 1″ on the 50th anniversary of the 1968 student and worker protests which nearly brought down the government of the day.”—-
Theme: Coercion
-
Revolution: Scribe the dike and let the sheer weight of the water do the work
As I’ve said before, the ratio of police to citizens is very low, and the number of casualties they will absorb before they stay in the barracks or stay home is under ten percent. They are not 19 year old single male soldiers, with combined arms, but 105 IQ working class high dominance men with families, getting overpaid with good pensions – they are mercenaries and mercenaries always fold. In a PLANNED revolution, everything depends on the demands. Make moral demands that solve the problems of political, social, and economic conflict, and those who choose sides will act rationally by those incentives not out of fear and uncertainty. In chaos people will hold order as long as they hold confidence. All humans are predictable. The proletarian anarchists will tie down the national guard and the police. If the working and middle classes are told to store food and water and medicine for three months, they have the money and credit to do so. The underclass anarchists do not. If the disruption is sufficient for the regular military to be called, the financial markets and foreign powers will do the rest. Never fight a battle directly. Scribe the dike and let the sheer weight of the water do the work. With the right direction and incentives the military will achieve in government what is in their and the people’s interests.
-
Revolution: Scribe the dike and let the sheer weight of the water do the work
As I’ve said before, the ratio of police to citizens is very low, and the number of casualties they will absorb before they stay in the barracks or stay home is under ten percent. They are not 19 year old single male soldiers, with combined arms, but 105 IQ working class high dominance men with families, getting overpaid with good pensions – they are mercenaries and mercenaries always fold. In a PLANNED revolution, everything depends on the demands. Make moral demands that solve the problems of political, social, and economic conflict, and those who choose sides will act rationally by those incentives not out of fear and uncertainty. In chaos people will hold order as long as they hold confidence. All humans are predictable. The proletarian anarchists will tie down the national guard and the police. If the working and middle classes are told to store food and water and medicine for three months, they have the money and credit to do so. The underclass anarchists do not. If the disruption is sufficient for the regular military to be called, the financial markets and foreign powers will do the rest. Never fight a battle directly. Scribe the dike and let the sheer weight of the water do the work. With the right direction and incentives the military will achieve in government what is in their and the people’s interests.
-
(((Success?))) It’s because sophistry sells, specializing in moral hazard is the
(((Success?))) It’s because sophistry sells, specializing in moral hazard is the most profitable industry, and free riding is a tremendous discount, and we are in an era of mass communication, and no defense against sophism.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-03 13:05:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/992027346831073280
-
(((Success?))) It’s because sophistry sells, specializing in moral hazard is the
(((Success?))) It’s because sophistry sells, specializing in moral hazard is the most profitable industry, and free riding is a tremendous discount, and we are in an era of mass communication, and no defense against sophism.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-03 09:05:00 UTC
-
As I’ve said before, the ratio of police to citizens is very low, and the number
As I’ve said before, the ratio of police to citizens is very low, and the number of casualties they will absorb before they stay in the barracks or stay home is under ten percent. They are not 19 year old single male soldiers, with combined arms, but 105 IQ working class high dominance men with families, getting overpaid with good pensions – they are mercenaries and mercenaries always fold. In a PLANNED revolution, everything depends on the demands. Make moral demands that solve the problems of political, social, and economic conflict, and those who choose sides will act rationally by those incentives not out of fear and uncertainty. In chaos people will hold order as long as they hold confidence. All humans are predictable. The proletarian anarchists will tie down the national guard and the police. If the working and middle classes are told to store food and water and medicine for three months, they have the money and credit to do so. The underclass anarchists do not. If the disruption is sufficient for the regular military to be called, the financial markets and foreign powers will do the rest. Never fight a battle directly. Scribe the dike and let the sheer weight of the water do the work. With the right direction and incentives the military will achieve in government what is in their and the people’s interests.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-02 22:02:00 UTC
-
THE AMBITIONS OF CATTLE —“Curt, what are your thoughts on metamodernism?”— N
THE AMBITIONS OF CATTLE
—“Curt, what are your thoughts on metamodernism?”—
No matter how you slice it, activists on the left are nothing more than human cattle seeking the monopoly of a cattle herd, the indifference (equality) of cattle in a herd, and the safety of cattle in the herd, in order to obtain a sense of ‘not being left behind’, and ‘a sense of control over a world” in which the continuous production of differences and hierarchies is constantly equilibrated by markets that are by definition out of our control, but entirely in our service.
People who obtain their direction from the movement of the herd, their information from the herd, and color their decisions from the herd, display the cognitive biases of the herd: the sentiments of women.
Meanwhile the conservative says “if we simply raise good families, and produce good commons the markets will provide by externality all that we can want or imagine”. These are the cognitive biases of the pack. The sentiments of men. It was men who made markets, property, families, marriage, continuous innovation, and the worship of the sun and stars, against the will of women, who at all times and all places seek to return us to the primitivism that is not in their interest but ours.
The left are to be sated, comforted, and disciplined, but like women, never permitted to fulfill their ambitions and return us to primitivism.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-02 21:45:00 UTC
-
“WE CANNOT KEEP UP WITH THE RADICAL LEFT” (PARIS IS BURNING) —“…he defended
“WE CANNOT KEEP UP WITH THE RADICAL LEFT”
(PARIS IS BURNING)
—“…he defended the way police had handled the violence, saying little could be done to stop trouble-makers from infiltrating the crowds.
“We can only detain a certain number of people who turn up like you or I in civilian clothing and then suddenly are dressed in black bloc outfits in the middle of the crowd,” he said.
“We cannot keep up, even with 21 police units mobilised against movements which all of a sudden appear on a scale we’ve never seen before.”
Radical leftist groups had issued a call on social media — both in French and English — for people to take part in a “revolutionary May 1″ on the 50th anniversary of the 1968 student and worker protests which nearly brought down the government of the day.”—-
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-02 20:46:00 UTC
-
On “Hitting Each Other” (Family)
Humans hit each other. I have had to teach every woman in every relationship not to hit me. Women conduct more domestic violence than men.Women are responsible for more verbal abuse than men. Women are responsible for more child abuse than men. The difference is that they aren’t dangerous – and men are. So, while I don’t do it, and I’m not cool about it, I’ve seen too many men take hits to the face from women that should have been slapped. I can definitely see slapping each other, which has been the method we used throughout history to say ‘ok, this is across the line’. And I’m not sure the world is better off without slapping each other once in a while. Why? Because slapping tends to de-escalate, and persisting in argument tends to escalate. Conflict is best settled early and clearly rather than continuously escalating through verbal and situational abuses.
COMMENTS by Ana Stowe (brilliant) —“Is hitting ok?”— Oh I see. This is a question from a man who likes women who bite and wants the thrill of taming her. It’s the same selfish line of reasoning as a woman who dates the dregs of society thinking she can “fix” him. I say “selfish” because neither thinks of the children. Have you ever even been around domestic violence? Gotten a frantic phone call from a younger sibling who’s scared because they saw dad hit mom through a crack in the bedroom door? Men who hit women have an awful effect on the children. And your wife, your children, and everyone who knew you will breathe a sigh of relief and spit on your grave when you’re dead. Stop indulging in film noire fantasies and get a woman who’s going to work with you for the wellbeing of your children
-
On “Hitting Each Other” (Family)
Humans hit each other. I have had to teach every woman in every relationship not to hit me. Women conduct more domestic violence than men.Women are responsible for more verbal abuse than men. Women are responsible for more child abuse than men. The difference is that they aren’t dangerous – and men are. So, while I don’t do it, and I’m not cool about it, I’ve seen too many men take hits to the face from women that should have been slapped. I can definitely see slapping each other, which has been the method we used throughout history to say ‘ok, this is across the line’. And I’m not sure the world is better off without slapping each other once in a while. Why? Because slapping tends to de-escalate, and persisting in argument tends to escalate. Conflict is best settled early and clearly rather than continuously escalating through verbal and situational abuses.
COMMENTS by Ana Stowe (brilliant) —“Is hitting ok?”— Oh I see. This is a question from a man who likes women who bite and wants the thrill of taming her. It’s the same selfish line of reasoning as a woman who dates the dregs of society thinking she can “fix” him. I say “selfish” because neither thinks of the children. Have you ever even been around domestic violence? Gotten a frantic phone call from a younger sibling who’s scared because they saw dad hit mom through a crack in the bedroom door? Men who hit women have an awful effect on the children. And your wife, your children, and everyone who knew you will breathe a sigh of relief and spit on your grave when you’re dead. Stop indulging in film noire fantasies and get a woman who’s going to work with you for the wellbeing of your children