There is a very great difference between transforming the state of the physical world by physical coercion (labor), and transforming the choices and organization of people using incentives (layers of entrepreneurship and management). The physical world can’t choose between options. Man can choose between options unless he is in fact a slave – thereby lacking exit. Now, one might say that exit is not itself a favorable choice, but then it is a choice for labor, and not a choice for slaves. The Communist and Socialist wants to create serf labor – lacking exit but the management (state) takes ownership for the survival of the serfs. The Democratic socialist wants to preserve voluntary organization of production but monopolize involuntary production of commons by maximum extraction of the profits of the market. The classical liberal wants to preserve the private production of goods, services, and information, and the private production of all commons it is possible to produce in that market, while limiting the involuntary production of commons to those of via-negativa constraint: Military, Justice, Law. The anarchist (libertarian) wants to prohibit the production of involuntary commons (despite this is as impossible as communism since there is no incentive to participate in an uncompetitive polity, when a polity is and of itself, a commons. We cannot restore pastoralism(zero-commons). Even if those peoples that have never succeeded at agrarianism and been through it’s evolutionary grinder, desperately want to restore it and resist civilization at every opportunity. All the potential value is created by the martial aristocracy. All the value is created by the entrepreneurial class. The vast amount of the benefit is obtained by the laboring classes, and the underclasses that would otherwise be dead. The beneficiary of civlization is largely labor. The principle benefit of the few at the top, and the minority in the middle, is signaling that preserves their identification as those who successfully organize potential, organize production distribution and trade, and organize the labor that requires little other than the physical to transform the physical world.
Theme: Coercion
-
Your Choice of Personal Philosophy Is Limited by Others Choice of Political Philosophy
Dear idiots. You don’t get to choose a personal philosophy that isn’t bound by a political philosophy agreed to by others – and still survive competition in that polity. Just as groups don’t get to choose a political philosophy that can’t survive the market for territories. It doesn’t matter what you alone think or want. A personal philosophy is, almost without exception, either a means of succeeding within a political philosophy, or a means of escapism from a political philosophy one is bound by. Further, one can create personal fantasies of escapism; personal philosophies of resistance; personal philosophies of navigation (survival); and of success (competition), and of excellence (heroism). A political philosophy ( meaning a social, economic, political, and military order) empowers enough of the people such that the group survives competition. Political philosophies change when a group either surrenders to competition (multiculturalism), resists competition, or seeks an opportunity for superior competition. But the individual is only as useful and only possesses so much choice, as his philosophy serves the interests of the body politic in the persistence of their group strategy ( what we call ‘philosophy’). So one either assists, is dead weight, or is a drag on the group’s strategy. And by and large, within the margins, one’s success is determined by the relationship one chooses wth the groups strategy. The only choice is creating a large enough group with an new enough strategy that one can disrupt the order and replace it with one that serves the same interests in the new order. In the case of the current order, we have let the evil people go too far in undermining the ‘Third Way’ provided by America in contrast to the other underclass and authoritarian civilizations. We were foolishly optimistic christians, and not empirical Aryans. As such it is very unlikely that without vast bloodshed, we will exit the next crisis with the entire continent. But we will exit the next crisis with self determination. They will decay from demographic weight alone. There is nothing they can do.
-
Your Choice of Personal Philosophy Is Limited by Others Choice of Political Philosophy
Dear idiots. You don’t get to choose a personal philosophy that isn’t bound by a political philosophy agreed to by others – and still survive competition in that polity. Just as groups don’t get to choose a political philosophy that can’t survive the market for territories. It doesn’t matter what you alone think or want. A personal philosophy is, almost without exception, either a means of succeeding within a political philosophy, or a means of escapism from a political philosophy one is bound by. Further, one can create personal fantasies of escapism; personal philosophies of resistance; personal philosophies of navigation (survival); and of success (competition), and of excellence (heroism). A political philosophy ( meaning a social, economic, political, and military order) empowers enough of the people such that the group survives competition. Political philosophies change when a group either surrenders to competition (multiculturalism), resists competition, or seeks an opportunity for superior competition. But the individual is only as useful and only possesses so much choice, as his philosophy serves the interests of the body politic in the persistence of their group strategy ( what we call ‘philosophy’). So one either assists, is dead weight, or is a drag on the group’s strategy. And by and large, within the margins, one’s success is determined by the relationship one chooses wth the groups strategy. The only choice is creating a large enough group with an new enough strategy that one can disrupt the order and replace it with one that serves the same interests in the new order. In the case of the current order, we have let the evil people go too far in undermining the ‘Third Way’ provided by America in contrast to the other underclass and authoritarian civilizations. We were foolishly optimistic christians, and not empirical Aryans. As such it is very unlikely that without vast bloodshed, we will exit the next crisis with the entire continent. But we will exit the next crisis with self determination. They will decay from demographic weight alone. There is nothing they can do.
-
THE VALUE OF THE CLASSES There is a very great difference between transforming t
THE VALUE OF THE CLASSES
There is a very great difference between transforming the state of the physical world by physical coercion (labor), and transforming the choices and organization of people using incentives (layers of entrepreneurship and management). The physical world can’t choose between options. Man can choose between options unless he is in fact a slave – thereby lacking exit. Now, one might say that exit is not itself a favorable choice, but then it is a choice for labor, and not a choice for slaves. The Communist and Socialist wants to create serf labor – lacking exit but the management (state) takes ownership for the survival of the serfs. The Democratic socialist wants to preserve voluntary organization of production but monopolize involuntary production of commons by maximum extraction of the profits of the market. The classical liberal wants to preserve the private production of goods, services, and information, and the private production of all commons it is possible to produce in that market, while limiting the involuntary production of commons to those of via-negativa constraint: Military, Justice, Law. The anarchist (libertarian) wants to prohibit the production of involuntary commons (despite this is as impossible as communism since there is no incentive to participate in an uncompetitive polity, when a polity is and of itself, a commons. We cannot restore pastoralism(zero-commons). Even if those peoples that have never succeeded at agrarianism and been through it’s evolutionary grinder, desperately want to restore it and resist civilization at every opportunity. All the potential value is created by the martial aristocracy. All the value is created by the entrepreneurial class. The vast amount of the benefit is obtained by the laboring classes, and the underclasses that would otherwise be dead. The beneficiary of civlization is largely labor. The principle benefit of the few at the top, and the minority in the middle, is signaling that preserves their identification as those who successfully organize potential, organize production distribution and trade, and organize the labor that requires little other than the physical to transform the physical world.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-16 11:00:00 UTC
-
I vividly remember my father and the rest of the men in town lining main street
I vividly remember my father and the rest of the men in town lining main street carrying shotguns – absolutely determined that “it won’t happen here”.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-15 15:17:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/996409309352415233
Reply addressees: @sapinker @POLITICOMag
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/996406844707950593
IN REPLY TO:
@sapinker
If you think the country is polarized now, remember that in ‘68-‘69 there were 700 domestic bombings. https://t.co/ceaIPQwkI1 via @politicomag
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/996406844707950593
-
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/32414065_10156355297817264_57652079
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/32414065_10156355297817264_5765207937987379200_n_10156355297812264.jpg “THE FOREST OF THE IMPALED”
Vlad (Dracula) Tepes
One of our greatest heroes.Thorsten Stuart NorgateI remember reading a few years ago…”childhood was believing Vlad the Impaler was the villain – adulthood is understanding he was the hero.”May 14, 2018 10:50amCurt Doolittlequoted sharedMay 14, 2018 10:57amJames BrittinghamKnow the name of the movie this is from?May 14, 2018 11:14amTomás Rodriguez VillegasThis is how I honor Uncle Vlad, with ink on my leg.May 14, 2018 11:57amCharlton WardI think you can still tour his castle
Tell me the OP pick isn’t optics for days, and they worked damn well at fending off Muslim invadersMay 14, 2018 12:06pmXavier WallaceVlad TepesMay 14, 2018 12:51pmSkye Stewarthttps://youtu.be/VqbagKqtbAQMay 14, 2018 7:01pmKhairunnisa SimmondsLong, but an interesting listen:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r6jGU_ZATWYMay 15, 2018 4:48amKhairunnisa Simmonds(Oops, hadn’t seen Skye’s link)May 15, 2018 4:49amKhairunnisa Simmonds(though mine is different)May 15, 2018 4:50amFortis VeroMay 15, 2018 5:00pm”THE FOREST OF THE IMPALED”
Vlad (Dracula) Tepes
One of our greatest heroes.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-14 10:39:00 UTC
-
“Water, Power, and Wire, Molotov, Fuel and Fire, Noose, Pike, and Pyre.”
“Water, Power, and Wire,
Molotov, Fuel and Fire,
Noose, Pike, and Pyre.”
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-13 22:46:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/995797437246828544
-
“Water, Power, and Wire, Fuel, Molotov, and Fire, Noose, Pike, and Pyre.”
“Water, Power, and Wire,
Fuel, Molotov, and Fire,
Noose, Pike, and Pyre.”
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-13 18:46:00 UTC
-
The only People Whose Opinions Matter Are Those Who Fight.
—“No one ever assumes they’ll be the one with a gunshot wound in the back of their head after their glorious revolution.”— ( “Wus” ) That’s not true. I think some of us just wanna see how many we can take with us first. Gutless cowards on the other hand say bullshit like that so they can feign courage or wisdom while waiting until the men with balls to the dirty work before they step into the parade, say hoo-rah, and take some of the credit as if like-mindedness is some sorta contribution to the cause…. 😉 The only people whose opinions matter are those who fight. Everyone else is either enemy or enabler…..
-
The only People Whose Opinions Matter Are Those Who Fight.
—“No one ever assumes they’ll be the one with a gunshot wound in the back of their head after their glorious revolution.”— ( “Wus” ) That’s not true. I think some of us just wanna see how many we can take with us first. Gutless cowards on the other hand say bullshit like that so they can feign courage or wisdom while waiting until the men with balls to the dirty work before they step into the parade, say hoo-rah, and take some of the credit as if like-mindedness is some sorta contribution to the cause…. 😉 The only people whose opinions matter are those who fight. Everyone else is either enemy or enabler…..