Curt Doolittle

Theme: Coercion

  • NATURAL LAW ON KILLING —“Punishment for killing someone does not necessarily i

    NATURAL LAW ON KILLING

    —“Punishment for killing someone does not necessarily imply they had any actual value . At the societal level the punishment is automatic.”— Edgar Braintree

    They are not punishing you for killing the individual, but for not getting sanction from others before doing so. In other words, they are punishing you for hubris.

    Getting a dozen men (jury) together to hang someone from a tree is very different from killing someone vengefully. If death is sanctioned then appeal exists, hubris, and error limited. What we seek to limit is unsanctioned deaths, without appeal, insured against hubris, and error.

    If you act without sanction you are a risk to the group. If you act with sanction you reduce group risk.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-20 18:57:00 UTC

  • “Never appease Marxists, it only whets their appetite.”— Edward Townes

    —“Never appease Marxists, it only whets their appetite.”— Edward Townes

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-20 18:13:00 UTC

  • If you won’t start the fight, fight, and end the fight by defeating the enemy co

    If you won’t start the fight, fight, and end the fight by defeating the enemy completely, you’re a free rider on those that do, not a man of virtue or character. The time to fight is coming.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-20 10:52:00 UTC

  • WEAPON DISCIPLINE On my body. In my pack. Under my pillow. Or behind lock and ke

    WEAPON DISCIPLINE

    On my body.

    In my pack.

    Under my pillow.

    Or behind lock and key.”

    It’s not complicated.

    Weapon Discipline Is Not Optional.

    Get your permit. Get training. Buy for Carry. Carry.

    Your body is the best place to leave a weapon.

    Shoot moving not static targets.

    Shoot short distances.

    Point Shoot.

    80% of skill is gained in the first 20% of practice.

    There is very little value in being a sharpshooter.

    All the value is in rapid flawless response in milliseconds in the distance you can throw a rock the size of a baseball.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-20 10:44:00 UTC

  • Natural Law on Killing

    —“Punishment for killing someone does not necessarily imply they had any actual value . At the societal level the punishment is automatic.”— Edgar Braintree  They are not punishing you for killing the individual, but for not getting sanction from others before doing so. In other words, they are punishing you for hubris. Getting a dozen men (jury) together to hang someone from a tree is very different from killing someone vengefully. If death is sanctioned then appeal exists, hubris, and error limited. What we seek to limit is unsanctioned deaths, without appeal, insured against hubris, and error. If you act without sanction you are a risk to the group. If you act with sanction you reduce group risk.

  • Natural Law on Killing

    —“Punishment for killing someone does not necessarily imply they had any actual value . At the societal level the punishment is automatic.”— Edgar Braintree  They are not punishing you for killing the individual, but for not getting sanction from others before doing so. In other words, they are punishing you for hubris. Getting a dozen men (jury) together to hang someone from a tree is very different from killing someone vengefully. If death is sanctioned then appeal exists, hubris, and error limited. What we seek to limit is unsanctioned deaths, without appeal, insured against hubris, and error. If you act without sanction you are a risk to the group. If you act with sanction you reduce group risk.

  • “Trolling is forced transfer, intellectual honesty is productive reciprocal exch

    —“Trolling is forced transfer, intellectual honesty is productive reciprocal exchange.”— Steven Kolpek

    (Quote of the day)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-19 22:28:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/997967248198389760

  • Well, are you saying there aren’t people who are dangerous and shouldnt be? What

    Well, are you saying there aren’t people who are dangerous and shouldnt be? What would happen if some psycho from one of your “groups” did something that caused the government to rain down pain on it? What about the idiots wearing Natsoc at Charlottesville? They cost us a year.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-19 21:32:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/997953204531945472

    Reply addressees: @Aristomedes @Imperius__13 @DSA_dienstmann

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/997928432498507777

    IN REPLY TO:

    @Aristomedes

    @curtdoolittle @Imperius__13 @DSA_dienstmann Ok, but the question is what process can we do that by that maintains trust ingroup. Doxxing destroys any & all trust because it’s not just banishing someone to the outer darkness, it’s destroying their lives. The suicide of Andrew Dobson for example.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/997928432498507777

  • So you can do whatever you want, and say whatever you want, but (a) josh is a so

    So you can do whatever you want, and say whatever you want, but (a) josh is a sociopath that threatened me and asked me to get involved inviolence (b) your little group spawns trolls that waste my time, (c) I want to distance myself from you idiots, (d) you’re going nowhere.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-19 20:30:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/997937449853706240

    Reply addressees: @Imperius__13 @Aristomedes @DSA_dienstmann

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/997934951705272320

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/997934951705272320

  • Defeat your enemy completely. Especially when they avoid argument and result to

    Defeat your enemy completely.
    Especially when they avoid argument and result to critique.
    There are only two methods of defeating critique.
    Thorough exposure of their fraud.
    Or Violence.
    I will stick with thorough exposure of their fraud.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-19 19:22:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/997920376595402752