Curt Doolittle

Theme: Coercion

  • Retweeted Outsideness (@Outsideness): “… leftism usually self destructs before

    Retweeted Outsideness (@Outsideness):

    “… leftism usually self destructs before absolutely everyone is tortured to death, but they frequently make a good start on the program.” https://t.co/dGohWkkCEx

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-06 10:23:00 UTC

  • A jury is effectively an addendum to the 2nd Amendment, which is the whole Constitution and Plan B.

    by Richard Nikoley The law is the law. It has to be that way because we can’t conceive of every possible circumstance, nor the myriad contexts in which circumstances occur. This is the whole point of a jury. The purpose of a jury is to judge the law as applied to the facts, circumstances, and context of the prosecution of the law in question against a defendant. A jury is effectively an addendum to the 2nd Amendment, which is the whole Constitution and Plan B. Having 12 people agree to nullify any law is a super peace-sustaining power. Use it. Jury Nullification. Google it, study it, know it.

  • A jury is effectively an addendum to the 2nd Amendment, which is the whole Constitution and Plan B.

    by Richard Nikoley The law is the law. It has to be that way because we can’t conceive of every possible circumstance, nor the myriad contexts in which circumstances occur. This is the whole point of a jury. The purpose of a jury is to judge the law as applied to the facts, circumstances, and context of the prosecution of the law in question against a defendant. A jury is effectively an addendum to the 2nd Amendment, which is the whole Constitution and Plan B. Having 12 people agree to nullify any law is a super peace-sustaining power. Use it. Jury Nullification. Google it, study it, know it.

  • “THE MOST INTOLERANT WINS” The Natural Law of Reciprocity or Separatism, Serfdom

    “THE MOST INTOLERANT WINS”
    The Natural Law of Reciprocity or Separatism, Serfdom, Slavery, or Conquest.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-04 15:47:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1003664621843243008

  • photos_and_videos/your_posts/34365032_10156402778252264_3916907391089639424_o_10

    photos_and_videos/your_posts/34365032_10156402778252264_3916907391089639424_o_10156402778247264.jpg FINALLY JUSTICE IS SERVED – AT LEAST AN APPETIZERLezlee DuttonI’m all for the rainbow crew marrying but you can’t force others to accept your views. We can’t have religion forced into our laws either, no Sharia law can override our lawsJun 04, 2018 12:22pmGabriel SmithHave you read the decision?Jun 04, 2018 12:29pmCurt Doolittleyeah, it’s really skating the issue. Its too narrow

    But it’s one plank at a time… And this was a good step.Jun 04, 2018 12:35pmMatt RicheyMeanwhile this happened in Portland, OR as well a couple of years ago. The family had to pay the lesbian couple $135,000 in damages.Jun 04, 2018 12:38pmRichard NikoleyWhat I dislike about the written majority opinion is the waffling over how you are somehow obliged to be nice about refusing to associate with someone.

    Such pandering.Jun 04, 2018 12:43pmCurt DoolittleVoluntary Association and Disassociation Must be Restored (its loss was a product of the unconstitutional 14th amendment).

    It is one thing to deny human beings commodities, water, and air. It is another thing altogether to force someone to engage in craftsmanship of any kind whatsoever.

    Ergo, if you package flour for distribution that’s one thing. If you make custom cakes thats something else.

    That is what separates a MARKET (production), from TRADE (craft).

    Unfortunately that is not (currently) recognized in the constitution, because it’s ASSUMED by the authors of it. The idea that we would be compelled to serve people against our will would have been an anathema.

    Secondly, it is one thing to fail to serve someone needs regardless of their biology, and another to choose not to serve someone for their beliefs, preferences, or choices, or behaviors due to that biology.Jun 04, 2018 12:45pmSH SardarThis is my concern. A win is a win but how much value is lost because they went with the religious freedom justification as opposed to FoA?Jun 04, 2018 12:46pmCurt DoolittleThey are trying to preserve market desegregation and that’s just what we have to fix. Fix that and everyone sorts as they wish to and 80% of conflicts go away.Jun 04, 2018 12:54pmRichard NikoleyWell, like I always say, ‘I unequivocally support the right of a black cafe owner to not serve crackers at the lunch counter.’Jun 04, 2018 1:23pmSteven Logan Everett-Fain”Bake the fucking cake.”

    “Get the fuck out of my store before my 12 gauge blows a lead load in your ass.”Jun 04, 2018 1:56pmSteven Logan Everett-FainYears of this forceful shit finally breaking apart.Jun 04, 2018 1:59pmTab WolframI would like to think the pendulum has reached its apex and begun its swing back towards reason and justice , but I suspect there are more horrors in store before a proper correction can truly begin .Jun 04, 2018 2:20pmZach MattoAgreed. It appears to be slowing down, but we aren’t at the apex yetJun 04, 2018 3:35pmJames SantagataMost of these laws rely on an outrageous and unconstitutional inflation and bastardization of Interstate Commerce Clause.Jun 04, 2018 5:27pmFINALLY JUSTICE IS SERVED – AT LEAST AN APPETIZER

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-04 12:09:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/34365032_10156402778252264_39169073

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/34365032_10156402778252264_3916907391089639424_o_10156402778247264.jpg FINALLY JUSTICE IS SERVED – AT LEAST AN APPETIZERLezlee DuttonI’m all for the rainbow crew marrying but you can’t force others to accept your views. We can’t have religion forced into our laws either, no Sharia law can override our lawsJun 04, 2018 12:22pmLezlee DuttonJun 04, 2018 12:22pmGabriel SmithHave you read the decision?Jun 04, 2018 12:29pmCurt Doolittleyeah, it’s really skating the issue. Its too narrow

    But it’s one plank at a time… And this was a good step.Jun 04, 2018 12:35pmRichard NikoleyWhat I dislike about the written majority opinion is the waffling over how you are somehow obliged to be nice about refusing to associate with someone.

    Such pandering.Jun 04, 2018 12:43pmCurt DoolittleVoluntary Association and Disassociation Must be Restored (its loss was a product of the unconstitutional 14th amendment).

    It is one thing to deny human beings commodities, water, and air. It is another thing altogether to force someone to engage in craftsmanship of any kind whatsoever.

    Ergo, if you package flour for distribution that’s one thing. If you make custom cakes thats something else.

    That is what separates a MARKET (production), from TRADE (craft).

    Unfortunately that is not (currently) recognized in the constitution, because it’s ASSUMED by the authors of it. The idea that we would be compelled to serve people against our will would have been an anathema.

    Secondly, it is one thing to fail to serve someone needs regardless of their biology, and another to choose not to serve someone for their beliefs, preferences, or choices, or behaviors due to that biology.Jun 04, 2018 12:45pmSH SardarThis is my concern. A win is a win but how much value is lost because they went with the religious freedom justification as opposed to FoA?Jun 04, 2018 12:46pmCurt DoolittleThey are trying to preserve market desegregation and that’s just what we have to fix. Fix that and everyone sorts as they wish to and 80% of conflicts go away.Jun 04, 2018 12:54pmRichard NikoleyWell, like I always say, ‘I unequivocally support the right of a black cafe owner to not serve crackers at the lunch counter.’Jun 04, 2018 1:23pmSteven Logan Everett-Fain”Bake the fucking cake.”

    “Get the fuck out of my store before my 12 gauge blows a lead load in your ass.”Jun 04, 2018 1:56pmSteven Logan Everett-FainYears of this forceful shit finally breaking apart.Jun 04, 2018 1:59pmTab WolframI would like to think the pendulum has reached its apex and begun its swing back towards reason and justice , but I suspect there are more horrors in store before a proper correction can truly begin .Jun 04, 2018 2:20pmZach MattoAgreed. It appears to be slowing down, but we aren’t at the apex yetJun 04, 2018 3:35pmJames SantagataMost of these laws rely on an outrageous and unconstitutional inflation and bastardization of Interstate Commerce Clause.Jun 04, 2018 5:27pmFINALLY JUSTICE IS SERVED – AT LEAST AN APPETIZER

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-04 12:09:00 UTC

  • “THE MOST INTOLERANT WINS” The Natural Law of Reciprocity or Separatism, Serfdom

    “THE MOST INTOLERANT WINS”

    The Natural Law of Reciprocity or Separatism, Serfdom, Slavery, or Conquest.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-04 11:47:00 UTC

  • “I understood Fascism to be the pairing of individualism and collectivism: agree

    —“I understood Fascism to be the pairing of individualism and collectivism: agreeing we all have to work together, that individualism can exist, and the best way to ensure collective protection, is to safely incentivize individual advancement. …. That means when individual stuff hurts the collective it is not allowed, such as rampant degeneracy, and when collective stuff hurts the individual it is not allowed either such as absurdly high taxes. ….. To put it in brainlet terms.”— Collin Turney

    In property in toto, we may not impose costs upon commons directly or indirectly. And the rewards of such cooperation are redistributed as commons.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-04 09:25:00 UTC

  • VIOLENCE ENDS THE WORDS THAT CONTROL WEAK MINDS —“The Conan the Barbarian stor

    VIOLENCE ENDS THE WORDS THAT CONTROL WEAK MINDS

    —“The Conan the Barbarian stories are interesting, especially when he is confronted with a wizard who has the ability to cast spells to control minds. The warrior is often arrayed against the wizard, and he may wish that wizards didn’t exist, but wizards do exist, and they are a force to be reckoned with.”— Bill Anderson

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-04 09:22:00 UTC

  • SOVEREIGNTY, LIBERTY, FREEDOM, AND MARKETS FOR SURVIVAL OF A POLITY Sovereignty

    SOVEREIGNTY, LIBERTY, FREEDOM, AND MARKETS FOR SURVIVAL OF A POLITY

    Sovereignty in fact – because a group has enough capacity for violence to produce sovereignty over the will or ability of any and all competitors.

    Liberty by request – because a group does not have enough capacity for violence to produce sovereignty, but can purchase liberty with fees (taxes).

    Freedom by permission – because an individual has too little violence to produce sovereignty, and too little violence to request liberty, but can purchase freedom through non-interference and payment of fees (taxes).

    Sovereignty is produced as a commons(Polity/Executive).

    Liberty is produced as a commons(Business/Managerial).

    Freedom is given to produce commons (Trades/Labor).

    Serfdom is imposed to produce commons at cost(Labor).

    Slavery is imposed to produce commons at high cost(labor).

    Whether one demonstrates a condition of Sovereignty(Aristocracy: Polity/Territory), Liberty(Citizen : capital), or freedom (Freeman: body), the production of such must be constructed top down: from commons to degree of property ownership (responsibility) since while it is most productive to have the greatest distribution of property, it is also most productive to limit the distribution of property to those who produce commons.

    Since productivity determines the ability for a polity to compete for sovereignty and territory the distribution of property therefore productivity and responsibility is determined by competitive necessity versus the abilities of the population.

    Hence the need for growth to defeat the red queen of technology and productivity, against men, and to defeat the red queen of evolution (or devolution, or extinction).

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-03 08:59:00 UTC