photos_and_videos/your_posts/34365032_10156402778252264_3916907391089639424_o_10

photos_and_videos/your_posts/34365032_10156402778252264_3916907391089639424_o_10156402778247264.jpg FINALLY JUSTICE IS SERVED – AT LEAST AN APPETIZERLezlee DuttonI’m all for the rainbow crew marrying but you can’t force others to accept your views. We can’t have religion forced into our laws either, no Sharia law can override our lawsJun 04, 2018 12:22pmGabriel SmithHave you read the decision?Jun 04, 2018 12:29pmCurt Doolittleyeah, it’s really skating the issue. Its too narrow

But it’s one plank at a time… And this was a good step.Jun 04, 2018 12:35pmMatt RicheyMeanwhile this happened in Portland, OR as well a couple of years ago. The family had to pay the lesbian couple $135,000 in damages.Jun 04, 2018 12:38pmRichard NikoleyWhat I dislike about the written majority opinion is the waffling over how you are somehow obliged to be nice about refusing to associate with someone.

Such pandering.Jun 04, 2018 12:43pmCurt DoolittleVoluntary Association and Disassociation Must be Restored (its loss was a product of the unconstitutional 14th amendment).

It is one thing to deny human beings commodities, water, and air. It is another thing altogether to force someone to engage in craftsmanship of any kind whatsoever.

Ergo, if you package flour for distribution that’s one thing. If you make custom cakes thats something else.

That is what separates a MARKET (production), from TRADE (craft).

Unfortunately that is not (currently) recognized in the constitution, because it’s ASSUMED by the authors of it. The idea that we would be compelled to serve people against our will would have been an anathema.

Secondly, it is one thing to fail to serve someone needs regardless of their biology, and another to choose not to serve someone for their beliefs, preferences, or choices, or behaviors due to that biology.Jun 04, 2018 12:45pmSH SardarThis is my concern. A win is a win but how much value is lost because they went with the religious freedom justification as opposed to FoA?Jun 04, 2018 12:46pmCurt DoolittleThey are trying to preserve market desegregation and that’s just what we have to fix. Fix that and everyone sorts as they wish to and 80% of conflicts go away.Jun 04, 2018 12:54pmRichard NikoleyWell, like I always say, ‘I unequivocally support the right of a black cafe owner to not serve crackers at the lunch counter.’Jun 04, 2018 1:23pmSteven Logan Everett-Fain”Bake the fucking cake.”

“Get the fuck out of my store before my 12 gauge blows a lead load in your ass.”Jun 04, 2018 1:56pmSteven Logan Everett-FainYears of this forceful shit finally breaking apart.Jun 04, 2018 1:59pmTab WolframI would like to think the pendulum has reached its apex and begun its swing back towards reason and justice , but I suspect there are more horrors in store before a proper correction can truly begin .Jun 04, 2018 2:20pmZach MattoAgreed. It appears to be slowing down, but we aren’t at the apex yetJun 04, 2018 3:35pmJames SantagataMost of these laws rely on an outrageous and unconstitutional inflation and bastardization of Interstate Commerce Clause.Jun 04, 2018 5:27pmFINALLY JUSTICE IS SERVED – AT LEAST AN APPETIZER