Curt Doolittle

Theme: Coercion

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1551655771 Timestamp) scold

    [skōld]

    NOUN a person, in particular a woman, who nags or grumbles constantly. “his mother was the village scold” COMMON SCOLD From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia In the common law of crime in England and Wales, a common scold was a type of public nuisance—a troublesome and angry person who broke the public peace by habitually chastising, arguing and quarrelling with their neighbours. The majority of individuals punished for scolding were women, though men could also be labelled scolds. The offence, which was exported to North America with the colonists, was punished by monetary fines, but also by methods intended to publicly humiliate such as ducking: being placed in a chair and submerged in a river or pond. Although rarely prosecuted it remained on the statute books in England and Wales until 1967. Scolding offences were commonly presented and punished in manorial and borough courts that governed the behaviour of peasants and townspeople across England. Scolds were also presented in church courts.[2] The most common punishment was a monetary fine. Various historians have argued that scolding and bad speech were coded as feminine offences by the late medieval period. Women of all marital statuses were prosecuted for scolding, though married women featured most frequently, while widows were rarely labelled scolds.[3] In some places, such as Exeter, scolds were typically poorer women, whereas elsewhere scolds could include members of the local elite.[4] Women who were also charged with other offences, such as violence, nightwandering, eavesdropping or sexual impropriety were also likely to be labelled scolds.[5] Individuals were frequently labelled ‘common scolds’, indicating the impact of their behaviour and speech on the whole community. Karen Jones identified 13 men prosecuted for scolding in Kent’s secular courts, compared to 94 women and 2 couples.[6] Men accused of scolding were often charged alongside their wives. Helen, wife of Peter Bradwall scolded Hugh Welesson and Isabel, his wife, in Middlewich in 1434, calling Isabel a “child murderer” and Hugh a “skallet [wretched] knave”. Isabel and Hugh also scolded Helen, calling her a “lesyng blebberer” (lying bletherer). All parties were fined for the offences, though Hugh and Isabel were fined jointly.[7] Like women, male scolds were often accused of many other offences, such as fornication, theft, illegal trading, and assault.[8] Note that in american law, Scolding was folded into disorderly conduct in the early 1970’s

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1551638509 Timestamp) DON”T DEMONSTRATE YOUR INCOMPETENCE BY PUNCHING RIGHT. You’re punching against what you understand as trivial violations in loyalty or solidarity, because it’s all you have the intellectual capacity of doing. And because it’s the only thing others with the same limited intellectual capacity will respond to. What you aren’t doing is punching against the enemy and then defending yourself – because you lack the intellectual capacity and knowledge to defend yourself. When you punch at Cantwell you’re jerking off. You would fold under pressure from the system. Everyone does. You would out people on your side who had undermined you. Everyone does. If you don’t t hink so you’re too inexperienced in the real world of real consequences to have an opinion. You can punch at and Peterson (soyboys) for counter signaling ethnocentrism – despite the science says it’s the optimum. You can punch Molyneux (potential men) if he overstaps into denial. But punching Others for not taking the next step is just stupid. They are just a sales funnel for slowly dragging people into the fold. I punch against ideas. I punch at specific libertarians and christians in general terms because they are allies of our ((())) ancient enemy. I try to avoid the punching right as much as possible unless someone punches me first. Be smart. Be strong. Be an army. Punch Left. Guilt Center. Don’t punch right. #post

  • Curt Doolittle shared a link.

    (FB 1551564510 Timestamp) BLAKE LIEBEL, GRAPHIC NOVELIST, LUNATIC, GETS 41M CIVIL PENALTY IN ADDITION TO LIFE WITHOUT PAROLE A Los Angeles judge has ordered Blake Leibel, a graphic novelist from a wealthy Canadian Jewish family to pay $41.6 million to the family of his slain fiancee, whom he brutally tortured and killed in 2016 just weeks after their daughter was born. ( Note: Olga was Ukrainian citizen of Persian (?) Descent) ) Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Bobbi Tillmon delivered the verdict after a bench trial in the wrongful-death lawsuit filed by Iana Kasian’s family against Blake Leibel, who carried out the gruesome slaying using a book he worked on years earlier as a blueprint. “This murder didn’t just kill one person, it really did kill the family, it shattered the family. And the family has had a hard time crawling back from this,” said Jake Finkel, an attorney representing Kasian’s family. Leibel, who is imprisoned in Tehachapi California, did not attend the trial, Finkel added, nor did an attorney or family member on his behalf. Leibel, a scion of a powerful Canadian family who once had a fledgling Hollywood career, was convicted last year of first-degree murder, aggravated mayhem and torture, and is now serving a sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole. Before sheriff’s deputies arrested Leibel at the West Hollywood apartment he shared with Kasian, he had blocked doorways with mattresses and locked himself in a bedroom with Kasian’s mangled body. Prosecutors told jurors during Leibel’s trial that he had used a sharp object — perhaps the green paring knife or bloodied razor found in the couple’s bathroom — as well as his bare hands to cut and rip pieces of Kasian’s scalp. Most of the blood had been drained from her body. She died of severe blood loss. Kasian was alive during much of the torture and died “a very slow, excruciating, painful death,” Deputy Dist. Atty. Beth Silverman said, adding that the killing was patterned after “Syndrome,” a graphic novel that Leibel helped create years earlier. Its cover shows a baby doll with a partially removed scalp. Leibel moved to California in 2004, after which he married, had a son and lived primarily off an allowance from his parents — installments that totaled $1.8 million over about seven years, according to legal documents filed after his mother’s death in 2011. He also worked on the animated series “Spaceballs,” based on the 1987 film by Mel Brooks, and collaborated with a team of writers and an illustrator to develop “Syndrome.” In July 2015, court records show, he filed for divorce from his wife and soon after, Kasian was pregnant. She called her mother, Olga, saying her longtime dream of becoming a parent was finally coming true, according to a declaration filed in the family’s lawsuit. Prosecutors argued at the trial that Leibel was jealous of the attention Kasian gave to their newborn, Diana, when he killed her. Kasian grew up in Ukraine, where she worked for several years as an attorney prosecuting tax crimes. She immigrated to the U.S. in 2014. Finkel said the payout would help Olga Kasian raise her granddaughter, who turns 3 in May, the way Iana Kasian would have wanted. The pair live in Ukraine. “The most precious thing to take away from a little girl, from a woman, is her mother. [Diana’s] mother was taken away from her before she even got a real chance to learn about her, get to know her,” Finkel said. “At one point, she’s going to learn about the reality of her mother, and what happened to her, and her biological father and what he did to her mother.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blake_Leibel

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1551655771 Timestamp) scold

    [skōld]

    NOUN a person, in particular a woman, who nags or grumbles constantly. “his mother was the village scold” COMMON SCOLD From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia In the common law of crime in England and Wales, a common scold was a type of public nuisance—a troublesome and angry person who broke the public peace by habitually chastising, arguing and quarrelling with their neighbours. The majority of individuals punished for scolding were women, though men could also be labelled scolds. The offence, which was exported to North America with the colonists, was punished by monetary fines, but also by methods intended to publicly humiliate such as ducking: being placed in a chair and submerged in a river or pond. Although rarely prosecuted it remained on the statute books in England and Wales until 1967. Scolding offences were commonly presented and punished in manorial and borough courts that governed the behaviour of peasants and townspeople across England. Scolds were also presented in church courts.[2] The most common punishment was a monetary fine. Various historians have argued that scolding and bad speech were coded as feminine offences by the late medieval period. Women of all marital statuses were prosecuted for scolding, though married women featured most frequently, while widows were rarely labelled scolds.[3] In some places, such as Exeter, scolds were typically poorer women, whereas elsewhere scolds could include members of the local elite.[4] Women who were also charged with other offences, such as violence, nightwandering, eavesdropping or sexual impropriety were also likely to be labelled scolds.[5] Individuals were frequently labelled ‘common scolds’, indicating the impact of their behaviour and speech on the whole community. Karen Jones identified 13 men prosecuted for scolding in Kent’s secular courts, compared to 94 women and 2 couples.[6] Men accused of scolding were often charged alongside their wives. Helen, wife of Peter Bradwall scolded Hugh Welesson and Isabel, his wife, in Middlewich in 1434, calling Isabel a “child murderer” and Hugh a “skallet [wretched] knave”. Isabel and Hugh also scolded Helen, calling her a “lesyng blebberer” (lying bletherer). All parties were fined for the offences, though Hugh and Isabel were fined jointly.[7] Like women, male scolds were often accused of many other offences, such as fornication, theft, illegal trading, and assault.[8] Note that in american law, Scolding was folded into disorderly conduct in the early 1970’s

  • Curt Doolittle shared a link.

    (FB 1551564510 Timestamp) BLAKE LIEBEL, GRAPHIC NOVELIST, LUNATIC, GETS 41M CIVIL PENALTY IN ADDITION TO LIFE WITHOUT PAROLE A Los Angeles judge has ordered Blake Leibel, a graphic novelist from a wealthy Canadian Jewish family to pay $41.6 million to the family of his slain fiancee, whom he brutally tortured and killed in 2016 just weeks after their daughter was born. ( Note: Olga was Ukrainian citizen of Persian (?) Descent) ) Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Bobbi Tillmon delivered the verdict after a bench trial in the wrongful-death lawsuit filed by Iana Kasian’s family against Blake Leibel, who carried out the gruesome slaying using a book he worked on years earlier as a blueprint. “This murder didn’t just kill one person, it really did kill the family, it shattered the family. And the family has had a hard time crawling back from this,” said Jake Finkel, an attorney representing Kasian’s family. Leibel, who is imprisoned in Tehachapi California, did not attend the trial, Finkel added, nor did an attorney or family member on his behalf. Leibel, a scion of a powerful Canadian family who once had a fledgling Hollywood career, was convicted last year of first-degree murder, aggravated mayhem and torture, and is now serving a sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole. Before sheriff’s deputies arrested Leibel at the West Hollywood apartment he shared with Kasian, he had blocked doorways with mattresses and locked himself in a bedroom with Kasian’s mangled body. Prosecutors told jurors during Leibel’s trial that he had used a sharp object — perhaps the green paring knife or bloodied razor found in the couple’s bathroom — as well as his bare hands to cut and rip pieces of Kasian’s scalp. Most of the blood had been drained from her body. She died of severe blood loss. Kasian was alive during much of the torture and died “a very slow, excruciating, painful death,” Deputy Dist. Atty. Beth Silverman said, adding that the killing was patterned after “Syndrome,” a graphic novel that Leibel helped create years earlier. Its cover shows a baby doll with a partially removed scalp. Leibel moved to California in 2004, after which he married, had a son and lived primarily off an allowance from his parents — installments that totaled $1.8 million over about seven years, according to legal documents filed after his mother’s death in 2011. He also worked on the animated series “Spaceballs,” based on the 1987 film by Mel Brooks, and collaborated with a team of writers and an illustrator to develop “Syndrome.” In July 2015, court records show, he filed for divorce from his wife and soon after, Kasian was pregnant. She called her mother, Olga, saying her longtime dream of becoming a parent was finally coming true, according to a declaration filed in the family’s lawsuit. Prosecutors argued at the trial that Leibel was jealous of the attention Kasian gave to their newborn, Diana, when he killed her. Kasian grew up in Ukraine, where she worked for several years as an attorney prosecuting tax crimes. She immigrated to the U.S. in 2014. Finkel said the payout would help Olga Kasian raise her granddaughter, who turns 3 in May, the way Iana Kasian would have wanted. The pair live in Ukraine. “The most precious thing to take away from a little girl, from a woman, is her mother. [Diana’s] mother was taken away from her before she even got a real chance to learn about her, get to know her,” Finkel said. “At one point, she’s going to learn about the reality of her mother, and what happened to her, and her biological father and what he did to her mother.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blake_Leibel

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1551717873 Timestamp) THE ONE SOURCE OF SOVEREIGNTY, LIBERTY, AND FREEDOM Sovereignty, Liberty, and Freedom are produced by one means, and one means only: the organized application of violence by a sufficient percentage of ordinary men, to prevent any and all alternative conditions. The law of sovereignty constitutes the logic by which that sovereignty, liberty, and freedom are preserved. An independent judiciary under the natural law of sovereignty preserves that one law of sovereignty until it no longer does. and at that point there is no recourse but those men who demand that sovereignty, liberty, and freedom regardless of cost.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1551886968 Timestamp) by Rosenborg Predmetsky Something I’ve been considering: A forceful imposition of obscenity laws that criminalizes and censors pornography and public display of sexually arousing material, because the catastrophic psychological insecurity created in women by such media is precisely what motivates them to so profoundly resent men that they engage in their sociopathic revaluation of values that privileges the morbidly obese, the ugly, the mutilated, the masculinized, etc. Men exist not only to protect women from other men, but also from the ruthlessness of intra-sexual competition between women, and we protect women from other women, because the female underclass lashes out at males when they are made to feel worthless. Women have a need to be desired, seen and recognized, and being sexually desirable is one of their main means of doing so. On the one hand, the unnatural supra-normal stimulus generated by the ubiquity of fattening food and a sedentary lifestyle, has caused women to become monstrously ugly, and on the other hand, totally unrealistic portrayals of female beauty causes even the more attractive women to be extremely insecure. So the situation we’re in is profoundly unnatural. Women need to test men to feel safe and desired, to test their loyalty and desire. But they can never feel safe or desired in our current context, and their reaction to this despair is the kind of despairing rage that is the rough equivalent of a mass incel shooting among men. I think even 2nd wave feminists are actually on to something when they argue that women shouldn’t have to shave their bodies or face. Some women will complain that men are stifling their sexual expression. And they are right. But men need to learn to say “no” to women. Cultivating a healthy limiting impulse would lead to much happier men and women alike. Patriarchy, properly understood and implemented, is a necessary precondition for a healthy society because female sexuality is always already as aggressive and dominating as men, just in different ways.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1551829765 Timestamp) —“I want leftists deplatformed from west culture and inventions.”—

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1551886968 Timestamp) by Rosenborg Predmetsky Something I’ve been considering: A forceful imposition of obscenity laws that criminalizes and censors pornography and public display of sexually arousing material, because the catastrophic psychological insecurity created in women by such media is precisely what motivates them to so profoundly resent men that they engage in their sociopathic revaluation of values that privileges the morbidly obese, the ugly, the mutilated, the masculinized, etc. Men exist not only to protect women from other men, but also from the ruthlessness of intra-sexual competition between women, and we protect women from other women, because the female underclass lashes out at males when they are made to feel worthless. Women have a need to be desired, seen and recognized, and being sexually desirable is one of their main means of doing so. On the one hand, the unnatural supra-normal stimulus generated by the ubiquity of fattening food and a sedentary lifestyle, has caused women to become monstrously ugly, and on the other hand, totally unrealistic portrayals of female beauty causes even the more attractive women to be extremely insecure. So the situation we’re in is profoundly unnatural. Women need to test men to feel safe and desired, to test their loyalty and desire. But they can never feel safe or desired in our current context, and their reaction to this despair is the kind of despairing rage that is the rough equivalent of a mass incel shooting among men. I think even 2nd wave feminists are actually on to something when they argue that women shouldn’t have to shave their bodies or face. Some women will complain that men are stifling their sexual expression. And they are right. But men need to learn to say “no” to women. Cultivating a healthy limiting impulse would lead to much happier men and women alike. Patriarchy, properly understood and implemented, is a necessary precondition for a healthy society because female sexuality is always already as aggressive and dominating as men, just in different ways.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1551829765 Timestamp) —“I want leftists deplatformed from west culture and inventions.”—