Curt Doolittle

Theme: Coercion

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1542050487 Timestamp) (humor, truism, irony) —“The oppression of libertarians is just the free market in action. Violence is a service. Their tax dollars are a good.”—John Edward lolz

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1542147958 Timestamp) —“Before all else, be armed.”–Machiavelli

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1542147958 Timestamp) —“Before all else, be armed.”–Machiavelli

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1542233531 Timestamp) What is a Three Percenter? —“The Three Percenters (aka 3%ers, III%ers, or “Threepers”) are a Patriot movement paramilitary group that pledges armed resistance against attempts to restrict private gun ownership.”—

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1542233531 Timestamp) What is a Three Percenter? —“The Three Percenters (aka 3%ers, III%ers, or “Threepers”) are a Patriot movement paramilitary group that pledges armed resistance against attempts to restrict private gun ownership.”—

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1542332558 Timestamp) WE BELIEVE WAR IS POLITICS BY OTHER MEANS AND THEY BELIEVE POLITICS IS WAR BY OTHER MEANS. by Greg Hamilton I became acutely aware of the issue about twenty years ago when I read The Western Way of War by VDH We westerners have been trained and probably genetically selected to favor one type of war, the decisive battle with terms of surrender. Basically nearly a sporting event. This led me on a big study of maneuver and asymmetry. Here my super short takeaway. Asymmetry of beliefs, values, definitions, etc is a harder asymmetry to deal with than weapons, skills, etc. We can kill the islamic terrorists 100:1 and they consider themselves the victor. And our national will is broken by the 1. Somalia pirates are savages with rifles and we cant bring ourselves to just overwhelm them and be done with it, so they actually threaten giant steel ships. Asymmetry of beliefs. Our new morals are paralyzing and suicidal. China conducts non-stop war upon us, its just doesn’t include shooting, and we roll over and take it. Because we believe war is politics by other means and they believe politics is war by other means.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1542332558 Timestamp) WE BELIEVE WAR IS POLITICS BY OTHER MEANS AND THEY BELIEVE POLITICS IS WAR BY OTHER MEANS. by Greg Hamilton I became acutely aware of the issue about twenty years ago when I read The Western Way of War by VDH We westerners have been trained and probably genetically selected to favor one type of war, the decisive battle with terms of surrender. Basically nearly a sporting event. This led me on a big study of maneuver and asymmetry. Here my super short takeaway. Asymmetry of beliefs, values, definitions, etc is a harder asymmetry to deal with than weapons, skills, etc. We can kill the islamic terrorists 100:1 and they consider themselves the victor. And our national will is broken by the 1. Somalia pirates are savages with rifles and we cant bring ourselves to just overwhelm them and be done with it, so they actually threaten giant steel ships. Asymmetry of beliefs. Our new morals are paralyzing and suicidal. China conducts non-stop war upon us, its just doesn’t include shooting, and we roll over and take it. Because we believe war is politics by other means and they believe politics is war by other means.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1542289756 Timestamp) THREE IMPORTANT IDEAS: (1. I’m not the same as my online persona, 2. I’m restoring violence to the discourse in order to teach the law, and 3. the law I have written recasts libertarians as the judges of the commons.) Stellar conversation with James Fox Higgins this morning. 100 minutes. Can’t wait to share it whenever he releases it. I learned a few things that I need to get across to the audience.

    1. Um. Please be respectful just to maintain my incentive to invest heavily in being available, but do no not be afraid of me. I am very conscious of what I am doing. When I argue online i’m acting as a judge and prosecutor on one hand, and a disciplinarian of rowdy boys on the other. I am more accommodating as a CEO and even more so as an ordinary guy in conversation. My online personality is my JOB. It is not ME. I am very different in my roles as conversationalist, CEO in business, theoretician-professor, and Prosecutor-Judge.

    2. I am very consciously restoring violence to the discourse, and a lot of my persona and positioning is to do so. Obscuring the fact that violence to force people into markest is the origin of that order we call civilization. It’s not that I enjoy or advocate violence, It’s that upon entry of women in the the political and commercial arena we overly-softened the fact that it is violence alone that creates it, and that the non-violent are RIDERS on that order created by that violence. Conversely, a very small number of men can easily alter the status quo – and have, for millennia.

    3. One of the reasons I set out to destroy the libertarian movement is to restore it to leadership of the conservative movement, by eliminating the attraction of the pacifist narrative of the rothbardian (common property marxist) message. In other words, I worked to deny libertarians the field of ideology and return them to the field of law. Biologically and socially, libertarians serve as the JUDICIAL minority between feminine consumptive, and male conservative genetic interests, by insuring that trade is remained. I WROTE THE BOOK OF LAW TO MAKE THAT JUDGEMENT POSSIBLE. Ergo, I need to drive libertarians into roles as JUDGES of the LAW, under european high trust “commons” law, not semitic low trust “ghetto” law. And that is what my work does: I wrote THE LAW. The one law of reciprocity from which western civilization evolved and out-competed other civilizations in rates of adaptation and innovation.

    Cheers Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev Ukraine

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1542289756 Timestamp) THREE IMPORTANT IDEAS: (1. I’m not the same as my online persona, 2. I’m restoring violence to the discourse in order to teach the law, and 3. the law I have written recasts libertarians as the judges of the commons.) Stellar conversation with James Fox Higgins this morning. 100 minutes. Can’t wait to share it whenever he releases it. I learned a few things that I need to get across to the audience.

    1. Um. Please be respectful just to maintain my incentive to invest heavily in being available, but do no not be afraid of me. I am very conscious of what I am doing. When I argue online i’m acting as a judge and prosecutor on one hand, and a disciplinarian of rowdy boys on the other. I am more accommodating as a CEO and even more so as an ordinary guy in conversation. My online personality is my JOB. It is not ME. I am very different in my roles as conversationalist, CEO in business, theoretician-professor, and Prosecutor-Judge.

    2. I am very consciously restoring violence to the discourse, and a lot of my persona and positioning is to do so. Obscuring the fact that violence to force people into markest is the origin of that order we call civilization. It’s not that I enjoy or advocate violence, It’s that upon entry of women in the the political and commercial arena we overly-softened the fact that it is violence alone that creates it, and that the non-violent are RIDERS on that order created by that violence. Conversely, a very small number of men can easily alter the status quo – and have, for millennia.

    3. One of the reasons I set out to destroy the libertarian movement is to restore it to leadership of the conservative movement, by eliminating the attraction of the pacifist narrative of the rothbardian (common property marxist) message. In other words, I worked to deny libertarians the field of ideology and return them to the field of law. Biologically and socially, libertarians serve as the JUDICIAL minority between feminine consumptive, and male conservative genetic interests, by insuring that trade is remained. I WROTE THE BOOK OF LAW TO MAKE THAT JUDGEMENT POSSIBLE. Ergo, I need to drive libertarians into roles as JUDGES of the LAW, under european high trust “commons” law, not semitic low trust “ghetto” law. And that is what my work does: I wrote THE LAW. The one law of reciprocity from which western civilization evolved and out-competed other civilizations in rates of adaptation and innovation.

    Cheers Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev Ukraine

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1542288731 Timestamp) THE COMING CIVIL WAR (from elsewhere) The Left Demonstrates. The Right Wars. Demonstration is cheap and incautiously undertaken. War is expensive and cautiously undertaken. The Right are simply waiting for an excuse to make an example of ANTIFA. When that happens it will be the means by which this cold civil war turns hot. The Right wants that war. As soon as possible. And ANTIFA is the excuses they need to start it. In any civil war it requires one tenth of one percent of men to fight, and between one and three percent of men to assist them. There are 30M dedicated, conservative men on the Right with nearly all of the weapons and ammunition. A significant portion have military experience, or are, or were police. 70% of the military and police will defect to the Right either outright or by holding their posts and offering feigned resistance. The right will act during the winter, and cut the power and data, the fuel transport, the food transport, and the rails. No ATM’s, no EBC cards, no heat, no fuel, no food, no water. The rest is setting fires, and letting the cities fall under their own weight. There are only two cities capable of any degree of non-normative policing and those are NY and DC. There are a total of 2M military personnel, and another 1M government personnel. Never has an empire been more fragile. Any civil war will be a slaughter. And it’s coming. Soon.