(FB 1541770222 Timestamp) THE REVOLUTIONARY RECORD Hmmmm. Mao racked up 70m, Stalin 20m, Hitler 12m, and Pol Pot at least 2m, Napoleon, Caesar, and Alexander at least 1m, each. I mean, the Chinese and the Mongols are the world masters of death tolls. With the Muslim conquest and destruction of every civilization of the ancient world EXCEPT the Chinese and to a lesser extent, the Indian. They racked up a Billion (yeah, billion), or so close to it, that it’s a rounding error. And to make a fair comparison between the Muslim conquest and the Jewish conquest under Marxism, the Marxists cumulatively got to 100m. So the Semites, between the Jews (100M), and the Muslims (1B) seem to be the most successful at the decimation of peoples. Again, we learn the lesson from the Chinese: ‘wall off the barbarians, and keep them out’. ergo, wall the Straits of Gibraltar, the Bosphorus, the Caucus Mountains, and the Ural Mountains, and contain the ‘stans, Mongolians and Chinese to their positions. Now, Romans did a sizable job, but the consequence of the dispersal catastrophic. (See image below). The only restitution being restoring the homeland (done) and repatriating the descendants (yet to be done). By comparison, Anglos are lightweights. With the War of the Roses at 40k, 25k in the Revolutionary War. 500K in the Civil War. So, you know 30m (10%) is sort of the minimum with 100m a more proportional goal. LIST OF WARS BY DEATH TOLL https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_by_death_toll
Theme: Coercion
-
To Rally Males to Constrain Alphas
(FB 1541786158 Timestamp) once males had tools, and particularly spears it was possible for females to rally males to constrain alphas – and females could gain some control of reproduction, – and contractualism could improve among males. Her argument that females were abused is a moralism – meaningless. evolution doesn’t care. groups of males possess territory and females in competition with other males who desire to take both. females can obtain ingroup status and influence more safely than outgroup. humans developed pairing off and serial monogamy out of safety since males will kill over access to females (reproduction) more so than any other incentive. agrarianism changed everything and gave us marriage and property. as well as customs and laws. we are in a post agrarian period and reverting to serial monogamy in lower classes and maintaining monogamy in the upper. this has drastically increased single motherhood, lower male loyalty to offspring, decreased household size and eliminated the middle class. women’s intuitions are cumulatively decivilizing (experiential rather than consequential) under monopoly democracy, so without creating separate houses of government for males and females, we should continue to decline into the south american model with women’s entry into the voting pool the cause.
-
not Quite Real until Codified in Law
(FB 1541782596 Timestamp) —“Social norms, group identity, customs, are ghosts – not quite real until codified in law and law doesn’t exist until there is force to make it real (consequential)…”– Bill Joslin (via Alain Dwight)
-
To Rally Males to Constrain Alphas
(FB 1541786158 Timestamp) once males had tools, and particularly spears it was possible for females to rally males to constrain alphas – and females could gain some control of reproduction, – and contractualism could improve among males. Her argument that females were abused is a moralism – meaningless. evolution doesn’t care. groups of males possess territory and females in competition with other males who desire to take both. females can obtain ingroup status and influence more safely than outgroup. humans developed pairing off and serial monogamy out of safety since males will kill over access to females (reproduction) more so than any other incentive. agrarianism changed everything and gave us marriage and property. as well as customs and laws. we are in a post agrarian period and reverting to serial monogamy in lower classes and maintaining monogamy in the upper. this has drastically increased single motherhood, lower male loyalty to offspring, decreased household size and eliminated the middle class. women’s intuitions are cumulatively decivilizing (experiential rather than consequential) under monopoly democracy, so without creating separate houses of government for males and females, we should continue to decline into the south american model with women’s entry into the voting pool the cause.
-
On the Military’s Ability to Control a Revolution
(FB 1541780322 Timestamp) ON THE MILITARY’S ABILITY TO CONTROL A REVOLUTION (from elsewhere) Of course I’ll disagree with him, and so will anyone who looks a the locations of the troops, their numbers the BIAS of those troops, the numbers of the police, and first responders, the size of the territory, the number of worldwide assets that have to be protected from hostile external factors, the fragility of the system, and the success WORLDWIDE OF EVERY 5GW revolutionary force. Look at Syria, the Arab Spring, Yemen, the problem Iran has, turkey had, the fragility of the american grids, the dependence of urban underclasses on availability of cash, food, and digital transfers. The zero savings of the population…. I mean. the entire american experiment is dependent upon maintaining economic velocity that we currently refer to as just-in-time production and distribution due to plentiful information and extremely low cost transportation. There is very little electricity, heat, food, water, and such in the supply chain. Especially if actors function in winter, entire cities can be depopulated in weeks. I mean. It’s not like it takes millions in the streets. Man-on-man warfare went out with napoleon. Industrial warfare went out with the 1990’s. Today it’s just ‘break some infrastructure’ and let population density and the fragility of the supply chain do the work of turning people into rabid animals the male underclass of which will prey on the rest. As an example, one building can consume the fire departments of multiple cities. What if in the same city someone started 100 of those fires? What if that were done while breaking hydrant heads and losing the water pressure to fight the fire? Everyone thinks of millions in the streets but what I learned in ukraine is that 100 people can do all the fighting and just fall back into those people in the streets, in homes, in workplaces, and the state cannot pursue them. I mean, I am not the only person who has studied enough on this subject to make these statements. The military can ONLY concentrate force. There are only 2m. Of those 2m who will sympathize with the state if we offer a solution that restores military influence in the state, and improves the conditions of the soldiers? So the question is, not whether you have some ‘spastic’ uprising. The question is whether you position demands THAT PEOPLE WANT ANYWAY and drive those demands such that the state resists, but he military and police AGREE WITH THEM.
-
not Quite Real until Codified in Law
(FB 1541782596 Timestamp) —“Social norms, group identity, customs, are ghosts – not quite real until codified in law and law doesn’t exist until there is force to make it real (consequential)…”– Bill Joslin (via Alain Dwight)
-
(FB 1541770222 Timestamp) THE REVOLUTIONARY RECORD Hmmmm. Mao racked up 70m, Sta
(FB 1541770222 Timestamp) THE REVOLUTIONARY RECORD Hmmmm. Mao racked up 70m, Stalin 20m, Hitler 12m, and Pol Pot at least 2m, Napoleon, Caesar, and Alexander at least 1m, each. I mean, the Chinese and the Mongols are the world masters of death tolls. With the Muslim conquest and destruction of every civilization of the ancient world EXCEPT the Chinese and to a lesser extent, the Indian. They racked up a Billion (yeah, billion), or so close to it, that it’s a rounding error. And to make a fair comparison between the Muslim conquest and the Jewish conquest under Marxism, the Marxists cumulatively got to 100m. So the Semites, between the Jews (100M), and the Muslims (1B) seem to be the most successful at the decimation of peoples. Again, we learn the lesson from the Chinese: ‘wall off the barbarians, and keep them out’. ergo, wall the Straits of Gibraltar, the Bosphorus, the Caucus Mountains, and the Ural Mountains, and contain the ‘stans, Mongolians and Chinese to their positions. Now, Romans did a sizable job, but the consequence of the dispersal catastrophic. (See image below). The only restitution being restoring the homeland (done) and repatriating the descendants (yet to be done). By comparison, Anglos are lightweights. With the War of the Roses at 40k, 25k in the Revolutionary War. 500K in the Civil War. So, you know 30m (10%) is sort of the minimum with 100m a more proportional goal. LIST OF WARS BY DEATH TOLL https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_by_death_toll
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1541986833 Timestamp) Let’s be clear. I want a civil war. We need one. And within 18 months.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1541958944 Timestamp) WHY ISN’T NEGLIGENT GENOCIDE A CRIME? by Eli Harman If “negligent homicide” is a thing? Why not “negligent genocide?” It’s possible that some misguided fools genuinely believe that a world teeming with “crossbreeds” with no identity and no culture is a good and beautiful thing. I never thought of it that way. I always appreciate the historical accomplishments of Western, meaning white, civilization and mourned their possibly inevitable future loss. I say “possibly inevitable” because when I gave my loyalty to individualist principles, similar to Jordan Peterson’s, I didn’t see any way to prevent it. Nothing to do but make that leap and hope for the best. But we have all the evidence we need now to banish hope. Not one great, city, nation, or civilization has been improved by the inclusion of dependent, third world, hordes. And everywhere the process has gotten suitably advanced is a total disaster. London used to be capital of a great empire. Now it’s the capital of acid attacks. Detroit used to be an unmatched industrial center. Now it’s rotting back into the weeds. Multiculturalism doesn’t lead to “Star Trek.” It leads to Brazil or South Africa. But it turns out that preventing that is a simple matter of abandoning unworkable and undesirable individualist principles. If any fools still don’t understand, it’s because they are willfully ignorant. That is not a valid excuse any longer. All the evidence one needs is readily available. But some of our would-be genociders are not ignorant, misguided, nor foolish. They are deadly serious. For them, “Star Trek” was never the point. Only the destruction of Western Civilization.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1541964583 Timestamp) NOT QUITE RIGHT. BENEVOLENCE IS MADE BY LAW NOT BY ACCIDENT OR INTENT —“A Benevolent Dictator is the most efficient form of government”— Justin Glanville A benevolent dictator bound by natural law tested by an independent judicial ‘cult’ of the law, and defended by a militia of the same, is the most efficient form of government.