Theme: Coercion

  • Politics is war. Always has been. It’s just by rules and accepted means. Once th

    Politics is war. Always has been. It’s just by rules and accepted means. Once the rules have been violated and the means no longer justify the ends, war is the only answer. — Curt Doolittle


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 14:19:16 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508183975178252

  • “The price of liberty is not only eternal vigilance, but eternal violence.”— J

    —“The price of liberty is not only eternal vigilance, but eternal violence.”— James Santagata


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 14:18:02 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508179112713016

  • “The secret sauce of liberty is gunpowder.”— James Santagata

    —“The secret sauce of liberty is gunpowder.”— James Santagata


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 14:17:48 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508178232520788

  • “We demand the right to self determination”– That’s all we have to say. If the

    — “We demand the right to self determination”–

    That’s all we have to say.

    If the answer is ‘no’, then, the solution is war, politicide, ethnocide, and genocide

    So start asking the question. At every opportunity. Every day.

    Separate, and pursue out separate interests – or politicide, ethnocide, genocide.

    I think that every day that goes by our preference is moving further down that series.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 14:15:43 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508170015169862

  • Elites, and professional men produce strategic ideas, that leaders of warriors m

    Elites, and professional men produce strategic ideas, that leaders of warriors make use of, to organize into groups to use violence and heady warfare until the other side capitulates, flees, or is crushed.

    So, you aren’t going to get someone that speaks your language, in your frame, satisfying the fantasies of your frame. You’re going to get a plan of action, in the language of rule, in the organization of institutions, that serve millions, that is sufficient for men of agency to use to obtain power.
    Or you’re gonna disappear from this earth.

    That’s tough love.

    I don’t really want to do this. I don’t matter. The work does. I haven’t found anyone else that is doing this job – and I would love it if someone else did. It’s not that I’m anything(smart, heroic, a great leader, ambitious). It’s that I am trying to restore aristocracy and rule of law and in the process ave my people and our civilization and possibly the future of mankind. So get someone else. Get a better plan. Get better solutions ANd evidence of them, rather than promises or wishful thinking. But stop coming to my intellectual doorstep with an empty dirty sack of failed frames asking me to pat you on the head and tell you your right, that you’re ok, that you matter.

    You’re not getting away with demanding I pander to you and your petty frame of low agency.
    Or that I will not stomp on your cowardliness, pettiness, selfishness and ignorance if you try.
    Or that I”ll let you play the ‘Please appeal to me on my democratic terms game’ – because you’re no better than the enemy who uses the same plea.

    I’m writing the philosophy of western civilization in scientific terms. I want it to compensate for our failure to produce a western canon -a bible in our strategy and language of law. I’m HOPEFUL that this will be useful in a revolution to come.

    So I can either ban every idiot that comes along.
    Or I can keep on shaming those still wanting pandering.
    Or I can keep on TEACHING.

    And if you can find someone with a better solution, that is more possible, and a plan that is more possible then fine. I’ll just work on my strictly constructed law happily for the rest of my life.

    And for now, I’m going to try to do what I have been doing.

    Except maybe I’ll ban ‘the left behind and cowardly’ rather than waste my time with them?

    And if it ends up that I’m writing on my own in a little apartment somewhere like wittgenstein or nietzsche I’m perfectly happy with that. In fact, I’m happier to do that. So please find someone else to do a better job so I don’t have to. So far the right has been a train wreck of sentimental, sophomoric, cuckolded christian wishful thinking and cowardly pacifism, in the dead language of medieval moralism, like a bunch of old women at the spinning wheel.

    OK?

    GROW THE F*K UP.
    SHOW THE F*K UP.
    FIGHT
    WE WIN.

    Thanks.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 14:02:12 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508116788209307

    Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508110582615842


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtd

    IF YOU CAN FIND SOMEONE BETTER, THEN HAVE AT IT. (rant) —“I found him online by listening to a John Mark video. I’ve recently started to notice he seems more into himself and his own status as “super genius “ than helping his fellow wypipo.”— Tiffany Tiffany Well someone actually hit a nerve. 😉 I have them. lol That hurt. I am doing the best I know how to do. Mostly it works. And I’m pretty good at what it is I do – not what you want me to do – which is be a priest with secular christian message of hopefulness that panders to your frame of reference and expectations I play king of the hill games. It is how to teach men by dominance play. It is the best way to teach men, because you do not waste your time on the failures – meanwhile those who have potential can watch and learn until they are able to try. And even when they fail they come back after a year or two once they learn enough to play the game. and that frame is male Meritocracy: Heroism, Excellence. Superiority. And the problem is that this technique is definitely an issue for – Women (equality, terror at losing face) – Christians (equality, pacifism , terror at falsification) – Working, Laboring, Underclass, Undesirable Men who feel left behind. (desperation for peer leadership,on their terms,) 1. And that is because we want collective victory on the terms of our FRAMES. 2. And that is because we all discover and use the FRAMES that reflect our gender, sexual, social, economic, and political, market values. 3. And because (importantly) western civilization provides a market for frames, so we have frames to choose from – despite everyone wanting their frame to take priority. 4. And that is because we all want leaders in our frame – except those FRAMES HAVE ALL FAILED. 5. The West has (Europeans) generally succeeded when rallying all markets for FRAMES against a common enemy, or in pursuit of a common opportunity (indo european expansion, resistance to persia and , greco roman expansion, resistance to islam, arabs, and turks, colonial expansion, world wars, industrial technological market expansion.) Because it is the only time we create a monopoly instead of a market – and this vacillation between monopoly in war, and market in all else is what makes is different, more adaptive, and faster evolving than the rest of mankind. You WANT and all mankind wants MONOPOLY which is only achievable in supernatural or sophomoric or pseudoscientific ignorance, poverty, and equality in ignorance and poverty. This is the muslim religion’ strategy. To drag everyone to the bottom where they are equal in ignorance, poverty and dysgenia. Whereas the CHinese and Indian are merely stagnation, our is continuous competition, adaptation, innovation – and that is why our law is ‘scientific’ and why , as a consequence, we developed reason and science: because markets cannot function by any other means – particularly markets between frames that reflect a hierarchy of abilities. ( … )

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508110582615842

  • Aristocracy’s duty is the service of the interests of our people – not to tolera

    Aristocracy’s duty is the service of the interests of our people – not to tolerate their frames. Instead, when necessary, in sheriff, court, sargeant, general, and king, to use the law, and military truth – meaning reporting – meaning testifying to only what is observable. To produce the ONE monopoly we must: preservation of our market from all competition internal and external, foreign and domestic.

    And to let you all search for your leadership in your frames outside of law, politics, and war.

    Where we made our mistake in opening democracy is letting y’all think that your frames have any value outside of your heads. In matters of law, politics and war, there is no ‘equality’ there is just your silly little frames of reference necessary for you to feel good cooperating with others at whatever scale of agency you possess. Because that’s all they are. Guidebooks for different levels (Grades) of our people, at the ‘reading level’ that they can comprehend, remember, and make use of, without thinking too hard. That’s truthful tough love.

    TOUGH LOVE

    So what am I doing?

    I stopped the lying. I stopped practicing the big lie of the enlightenment – that we are equal. That opinions matter. Tah frames matter. That pandering was helpful to our people. That classes aren’t real or material or genetic. That tripartism and quadripartism weren’t superior to equality.

    I speak in the language I’m restoring: the aristocracy: soldier, warrior, sergeant, captain, general, lawmaker, Nobility and King. The language of war: truthful, empirical, scientific, and totally unforgiving. This is hierarchy. So adapt to the language and frame of hierarchy. Economics, Institutions, Law, Politics, War, Strategy, Logistics.

    And this is war. War for our race, our civilization, our culture, and our kin. This isn’t a pretense we’re equal as other than kin. This isn’t an exercise in democratic appeal. I’m not trying to make you feel good about your little illusions, like every other democratic panderer.

    Democracy is over.
    They told you your opinion was worthwhile. It isn’t.
    Your value is as kin. And as soldier or warrior.
    You can either demonstrate your knowledge or you can’t.
    You can demonstrate achievement or you can’t.
    You either have a war plan, a constitution for running a government, a means of transition, or even a leadership team ready to manage an empire without time to ramp up on it – or you are jerking off.
    All you have to offer is “Yes I am kin, and yes I will show up, and yes I will fight”.

    Pandering is over.

    The undesirable, the left behind, the cowardly, the disenfranchised, the priestly, the feminine, the middle class, the desperate for leadership NEVER EVER LEAD, and always FAIL. Always. They just rant and gossip and commiserate – and as history shows – do nothing.

    ( … )


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 14:02:02 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508116175324611

    Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508110582615842


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtd

    IF YOU CAN FIND SOMEONE BETTER, THEN HAVE AT IT. (rant) —“I found him online by listening to a John Mark video. I’ve recently started to notice he seems more into himself and his own status as “super genius “ than helping his fellow wypipo.”— Tiffany Tiffany Well someone actually hit a nerve. 😉 I have them. lol That hurt. I am doing the best I know how to do. Mostly it works. And I’m pretty good at what it is I do – not what you want me to do – which is be a priest with secular christian message of hopefulness that panders to your frame of reference and expectations I play king of the hill games. It is how to teach men by dominance play. It is the best way to teach men, because you do not waste your time on the failures – meanwhile those who have potential can watch and learn until they are able to try. And even when they fail they come back after a year or two once they learn enough to play the game. and that frame is male Meritocracy: Heroism, Excellence. Superiority. And the problem is that this technique is definitely an issue for – Women (equality, terror at losing face) – Christians (equality, pacifism , terror at falsification) – Working, Laboring, Underclass, Undesirable Men who feel left behind. (desperation for peer leadership,on their terms,) 1. And that is because we want collective victory on the terms of our FRAMES. 2. And that is because we all discover and use the FRAMES that reflect our gender, sexual, social, economic, and political, market values. 3. And because (importantly) western civilization provides a market for frames, so we have frames to choose from – despite everyone wanting their frame to take priority. 4. And that is because we all want leaders in our frame – except those FRAMES HAVE ALL FAILED. 5. The West has (Europeans) generally succeeded when rallying all markets for FRAMES against a common enemy, or in pursuit of a common opportunity (indo european expansion, resistance to persia and , greco roman expansion, resistance to islam, arabs, and turks, colonial expansion, world wars, industrial technological market expansion.) Because it is the only time we create a monopoly instead of a market – and this vacillation between monopoly in war, and market in all else is what makes is different, more adaptive, and faster evolving than the rest of mankind. You WANT and all mankind wants MONOPOLY which is only achievable in supernatural or sophomoric or pseudoscientific ignorance, poverty, and equality in ignorance and poverty. This is the muslim religion’ strategy. To drag everyone to the bottom where they are equal in ignorance, poverty and dysgenia. Whereas the CHinese and Indian are merely stagnation, our is continuous competition, adaptation, innovation – and that is why our law is ‘scientific’ and why , as a consequence, we developed reason and science: because markets cannot function by any other means – particularly markets between frames that reflect a hierarchy of abilities. ( … )

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508110582615842

  • That which is owned is so because of one possesses the violence necessary to den

    That which is owned is so because of one possesses the violence
    necessary to deny others ownership. There is nothing more to ownership
    than that. Rights do not exist except in voluntary exchange with allies –
    easily repossessed. A competitor is an enemy you’re not fighting – yet.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 13:59:11 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508105024324543

  • AN EXAMPLE: WHY DO ECHO CHAMBERS MATTER? —“Sounds like fancy-talk for an echo

    AN EXAMPLE: WHY DO ECHO CHAMBERS MATTER?

    —“Sounds like fancy-talk for an echo chamber.”—Alan Levinovitz

    What you mean is, you want to be able to coerce people with disapproval, shaming, rallying, moralizing, psychologizing, reputation destruction, sophism, and pseudoscience rather than exchange value with them in the markets private or common(government).

    I mean, why does it matter what they say to each other. what have you got to trade, and why aren’t you offering to trade, instead of engaging in sophisms of pilpul and critique (straw manning)? Right? I mean, why words not deeds? To preserve the ability to coerce, cheat, lie?

    There are no political questions that cannot be answered by this simple question of ‘what do you have to trade?’. Conversely, any OTHER attempt is merely out of necessity an attempted act of lying, cheating, or fraud.

    So what do you have to trade instead of engaging in the straw man critique of “echo chamber” as an act of sophistry to distract from having nothing to exchange, or trying to ‘cheat’ them, when the only moral constraints that exist are those between cooperators not their enemies?


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 13:50:02 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508068996006457

  • “So, then, “no” to reparations?”—Lee C Waaks The other way ’round. Force them

    —“So, then, “no” to reparations?”—Lee C Waaks

    The other way ’round. Force them to pay for their legacy of thousands of years of bad decisions, by limiting or prohibiting their reproduction in exchange for material subsidy given their ‘birth defect’ of genetic heritage.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 13:44:53 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508048799497374

  • There are no political questions that cannot be answered by this simple question

    There are no political questions that cannot be answered by this simple question of ‘what do you have to trade?’. Conversely, any OTHER attempt is merely out of necessity an attempted act of lying, cheating, or fraud.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 00:04:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1154542915399626752

    Reply addressees: @AlanLevinovitz @EPoe187

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1154542543557632001


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @AlanLevinovitz @EPoe187 I mean, why does it matter what they say to each other. what have you got to trade, and why aren’t you offering to trade, instead of engaging in sophisms of pilpul and critique (straw manning)? Right? I mean, why words not deeds? To preserve the ability to coerce, cheat, lie?

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1154542543557632001


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @AlanLevinovitz @EPoe187 I mean, why does it matter what they say to each other. what have you got to trade, and why aren’t you offering to trade, instead of engaging in sophisms of pilpul and critique (straw manning)? Right? I mean, why words not deeds? To preserve the ability to coerce, cheat, lie?

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1154542543557632001