Elites, and professional men produce strategic ideas, that leaders of warriors make use of, to organize into groups to use violence and heady warfare until the other side capitulates, flees, or is crushed.
So, you aren’t going to get someone that speaks your language, in your frame, satisfying the fantasies of your frame. You’re going to get a plan of action, in the language of rule, in the organization of institutions, that serve millions, that is sufficient for men of agency to use to obtain power.
Or you’re gonna disappear from this earth.
That’s tough love.
I don’t really want to do this. I don’t matter. The work does. I haven’t found anyone else that is doing this job – and I would love it if someone else did. It’s not that I’m anything(smart, heroic, a great leader, ambitious). It’s that I am trying to restore aristocracy and rule of law and in the process ave my people and our civilization and possibly the future of mankind. So get someone else. Get a better plan. Get better solutions ANd evidence of them, rather than promises or wishful thinking. But stop coming to my intellectual doorstep with an empty dirty sack of failed frames asking me to pat you on the head and tell you your right, that you’re ok, that you matter.
You’re not getting away with demanding I pander to you and your petty frame of low agency.
Or that I will not stomp on your cowardliness, pettiness, selfishness and ignorance if you try.
Or that I”ll let you play the ‘Please appeal to me on my democratic terms game’ – because you’re no better than the enemy who uses the same plea.
I’m writing the philosophy of western civilization in scientific terms. I want it to compensate for our failure to produce a western canon -a bible in our strategy and language of law. I’m HOPEFUL that this will be useful in a revolution to come.
So I can either ban every idiot that comes along.
Or I can keep on shaming those still wanting pandering.
Or I can keep on TEACHING.
And if you can find someone with a better solution, that is more possible, and a plan that is more possible then fine. I’ll just work on my strictly constructed law happily for the rest of my life.
And for now, I’m going to try to do what I have been doing.
Except maybe I’ll ban ‘the left behind and cowardly’ rather than waste my time with them?
And if it ends up that I’m writing on my own in a little apartment somewhere like wittgenstein or nietzsche I’m perfectly happy with that. In fact, I’m happier to do that. So please find someone else to do a better job so I don’t have to. So far the right has been a train wreck of sentimental, sophomoric, cuckolded christian wishful thinking and cowardly pacifism, in the dead language of medieval moralism, like a bunch of old women at the spinning wheel.
OK?
GROW THE F*K UP.
SHOW THE F*K UP.
FIGHT
WE WIN.
Thanks.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 14:02:12 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508116788209307
Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508110582615842
IN REPLY TO:
@curtd
IF YOU CAN FIND SOMEONE BETTER, THEN HAVE AT IT. (rant) —“I found him online by listening to a John Mark video. I’ve recently started to notice he seems more into himself and his own status as “super genius “ than helping his fellow wypipo.”— Tiffany Tiffany Well someone actually hit a nerve. 😉 I have them. lol That hurt. I am doing the best I know how to do. Mostly it works. And I’m pretty good at what it is I do – not what you want me to do – which is be a priest with secular christian message of hopefulness that panders to your frame of reference and expectations I play king of the hill games. It is how to teach men by dominance play. It is the best way to teach men, because you do not waste your time on the failures – meanwhile those who have potential can watch and learn until they are able to try. And even when they fail they come back after a year or two once they learn enough to play the game. and that frame is male Meritocracy: Heroism, Excellence. Superiority. And the problem is that this technique is definitely an issue for – Women (equality, terror at losing face) – Christians (equality, pacifism , terror at falsification) – Working, Laboring, Underclass, Undesirable Men who feel left behind. (desperation for peer leadership,on their terms,) 1. And that is because we want collective victory on the terms of our FRAMES. 2. And that is because we all discover and use the FRAMES that reflect our gender, sexual, social, economic, and political, market values. 3. And because (importantly) western civilization provides a market for frames, so we have frames to choose from – despite everyone wanting their frame to take priority. 4. And that is because we all want leaders in our frame – except those FRAMES HAVE ALL FAILED. 5. The West has (Europeans) generally succeeded when rallying all markets for FRAMES against a common enemy, or in pursuit of a common opportunity (indo european expansion, resistance to persia and , greco roman expansion, resistance to islam, arabs, and turks, colonial expansion, world wars, industrial technological market expansion.) Because it is the only time we create a monopoly instead of a market – and this vacillation between monopoly in war, and market in all else is what makes is different, more adaptive, and faster evolving than the rest of mankind. You WANT and all mankind wants MONOPOLY which is only achievable in supernatural or sophomoric or pseudoscientific ignorance, poverty, and equality in ignorance and poverty. This is the muslim religion’ strategy. To drag everyone to the bottom where they are equal in ignorance, poverty and dysgenia. Whereas the CHinese and Indian are merely stagnation, our is continuous competition, adaptation, innovation – and that is why our law is ‘scientific’ and why , as a consequence, we developed reason and science: because markets cannot function by any other means – particularly markets between frames that reflect a hierarchy of abilities. ( … )
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508110582615842
Leave a Reply