Curt Doolittle

Theme: Coercion

  • The only cost of those markets is the suppression of the reproduction of those u

    The only cost of those markets is the suppression of the reproduction of those unfit for those markets in compensation for their care because of their unfitness.

    That is the only solution to the gods law of evolution.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-12-08 20:56:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1468685893334712331

    Reply addressees: @claystaggs @TheAutistocrat @NoahRevoy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1468685672798167045

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @claystaggs @TheAutistocrat @NoahRevoy The Laws of nature evove into the Natural Law of Cooperation: the maximization of evolutionary computation by the reciprocal insurance of self determination by self determined means by sovereignty in demonstrated interests, reciprocity in display word and deed and markets in all.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1468685672798167045

  • @TheKurgan Are you saying you want to fight me?

    @TheKurgan Are you saying you want to fight me?

    Source date (UTC): 2021-12-08 01:21:22 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107408685957499491

  • This is the political science equivalent of ‘watching the pennies and the dollar

    This is the political science equivalent of ‘watching the pennies and the dollars will watch themselves’ or ‘maintain legal intolerances like jaywalking and maners and the morals and ethics will take care of themselves.’ https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1468359412972724226

  • Group Strategy, the Mythology(narrative) and Religion (oaths, rituals, festivals

    Group Strategy, the Mythology(narrative) and Religion (oaths, rituals, festivals) as a system of measurement, via-negativa limit the domain of conflict by coercing the surplus proceeds of millions of tiny actions every day to further the group’s interest. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1468358570467016706

  • NATURAL LAW JUDGEMENT OF THE VACCINE QUESTION I avoided the ‘vax’ controversy be

    NATURAL LAW JUDGEMENT OF THE VACCINE QUESTION

    I avoided the ‘vax’ controversy because I said nothing could be said without empirical evidence and a crime created by the denial of that evidence.

    So as far as I know, the empirical evidence has spoken: Unless a dramatic difference in contagion between vaccinated and non exists, then there is no case for masks or vaccines. And there is no such evidence. The opposite is true.

    What are the crimes the governments are engaged in?

    a) Given Rule of Law: Self Determination, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, Duty, Markets.

    b) Uninsurability and unwarrantability of vax externalities no matter how small.

    c) State violation of the Rule of Non-Aggression.

    d) State violation of Rule of False Promise of freedom from the laws of nature (fraud).

    e) State violation of the Rule of interfering with adaptation of the population to the laws of nature (immorality).

    f) State mixture of government, and state-religion, by the use of pandering, by propagating falsehoods, in order to satisfy neuroticism, provide mindfulness by symbolism, rather than propagating truths and encouraging, training, and adaptation.

    g) so under the natural law, the law of the european peoples, the germanic law, the English law, and the american law, the state is engaging in a series of crimes which violate all those laws, and as such are evidence of the failure of rule of law, failure of the empirical state.

    h) as such the present state is a clerisy not a government, and is ruling by sophistry, pseudoscience, and deceit, to justify itself and its abuse of powers, in order to obtain attention and approval from the neurotic ending the empirical state.

    Ending the empirical state means ending the rule of law, where the rule of law by the natural law is not a philosophy or an ideology but the science of human cooperation, and the organization of human cooperation by that science.

    So in conclusion, the matter is now settled unless the overwhelming evidence says otherwise. Even if so, then the state has the responsibility to isolate the fragile not the entirety of the polity.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-12-04 01:27:03 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107386059092267083

  • c) State violation of the Rule of Non-Aggression. d) State violation of Rule of

    c) State violation of the Rule of Non-Aggression. d) State violation of Rule of False Promise of freedom from the laws of nature (fraud). e) State violation of the Rule of interfering with adaptation of the population to the laws of nature (immorality).

    Source date (UTC): 2021-12-03 21:35:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1466883893076840449

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1466883891885658118

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    Unless a dramatic difference in contagion between vaccinated and non exists, then there is no case for masks or vaccines.

    Why? a) Self Determination, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, Duty, Markets. b) Uninsurability and warrantability of vax externalities no matter how small.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1466883891885658118

  • @LogicalExtremist My argument was, is, and will be, that it will take a minimum

    @LogicalExtremist
    My argument was, is, and will be, that it will take a minimum number of actors that is sufficient to require at least the potential for military mobilization, in order to capture the attention and control the public discourse. And to force a discourse on political solutions not just venting or childish appeals to fundamentalism or authoritarianism.

    The positive strategy is Mao’s (causes internal advocacy) the Negative is ISIS’s (causes internal opposition). Both strategies do not depend on permissive media. They recruit in-person, in context. They provide constant self reinforcing membership, inclusion, inspiration, and confidence.

    The problem has been that the right has no set of actionable demands that it’s possible to institutionalize. (Hence why I work on actionable demands).

    Start with small demands, get attention, escalate demands. The state will preserve itself by sacrificing the financial sector and restoring freedom of speech (political bias as protected class). After that it’s just a matter of incremental reformation of media, academy, education.

    The right cannot run, separate, or wait. The jewish Christians destroyed the empire by the same means they’re destroying ours. They jewish Marxists destroyed the russians by the same means. They’ve destroyed the germans by the same means. They’ve assisted the french by the same means.

    History is rather obvious about such things.

    @stoner713@RadioFreeNorthwest@ChrisLangan@realnickjfuentes

    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-30 17:01:11 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107367082954290314

  • GLOBALIST FASCISTS? OR FASCISTS RESISTING THE NEW GLOBALISTS? Well, the US Gover

    GLOBALIST FASCISTS? OR FASCISTS RESISTING THE NEW GLOBALISTS?

    Well, the US Government is the primary vehicle by which the globalists have obtained sufficient economic power to buy the government, academy, and media, to advance the globalist agenda at the cost of the working and middle classes. Now, it’s important to realize that the globalist agenda has no chance outside of Europe, so that the globalist agenda is just an ant-european agenda – an upper caste application of marxism: the destruction of western civilization’s martial meritocracy.

    The science is what it is (a) ethnocentric states produce the optimum outcomes and heterogeneous states produce the worst outcomes. (b) rule of law majority middle class states require full integration because religions are all macro-political institutions. (c) only majority middle-class ethnocentirc states produce optimum outcomes. (b) the USA was designed as a continuation of the UK and the Holy Roman Empire, consisting of a federation of states under the traditional rule of law which only survives in the anglosphere as the common law. (d) the anglo system is the most behaviorally expensive but it produces the highest trust, highest monetary velocity. highest innovation, and highest standard of living. (e) the painful truth is that the median of the distribution determines the groups competitive competency, and it turns out that each racial group both favors its own above other groups, and has a different demographic distribution of competency. (f) different demographic distributions of competency mean superior or inferior adaptability to high trust norms and institutions (g) non-white and non-asian groups appear to be unable or unwilling to pay the high costs of anglo-germanic civilization BUT want the benefits of living in a high cost high trust anglo-germanic civilization. (h) this means that the white folk have to pay for the non white folk and it’s destroying the white middle class to do so. (i) So is self-defense fascism? Well, fascism was a self-defense political system to protect Germanic (nationalist) countries from communist (globalist) countries.

    Is fascism bad? Apparently, despite that we won’t admit it, it won the argument of the 20th century over the optimum method of political organization. China is a fascist state. Given the collapse of the anglo project to unify the world under Smithian economic reciprocity, the result is, as predicted, a return to the conflict of civilizations (where civilizations represent macro races), and a return to nationalism (civilizational-ism).

    That this is a deterministic outcome is rather obvious to every synthetic historian.

    So in other words, you’re effectively practicing a pseudoscientific religion that is being replaced by scientific evidence and you’re rebelling against it.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-30 16:49:52 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107367038485135877

  • Where did you get that? The case for sound money is trivial: that it interferes

    Where did you get that? The case for sound money is trivial: that it interferes with the intertemporal organization of production by involuntary transfer out of the productive classes in favor of upper rent seeking and lower redistribution seeking classes.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-27 15:57:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1464624385671761921

    Reply addressees: @TheStalwart

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1464604729699446786

  • It would make speaking of advocacy of proposal of, and action that produces para

    It would make speaking of advocacy of proposal of, and action that produces parasitism in display word or deed, illegal, easily testable, and easily punishable, by limiting us to truthful reciprocal speech in public to the public in matters public.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-26 14:32:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1464240687440932865

    Reply addressees: @EricLiford

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1464239380298612738