RT @EPoe187: Many on the left ignore that the basic human motivation is not for wealth/accumulation; It is for status. And since status is…
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-17 22:51:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636862890102718468
From the class and IQ spectrum, people independently obtain information by self-judgment, to at the bottom, they obtain information by the AGREEMENT of peers. So for example, I work on very complex material across all disciplines (“universally commensurable, value neutral paradigm, vocabulary, and logic, across all disciplines in the four sciences: physical, behavioral, evolutionary, and the spectrum of logics we describe them with.” ) It takes a reasonably high IQ with an extreme male brain ( high systematizing ) about four years to become competent and a little longer to use it well. That’s not socially constructed. yet, for example the feminist-to-woke is imitated and recited not learned. It’s social constructed and has to be because it’s false.
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-17 18:00:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636789502336180225
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636786873942298626
From the class and IQ spectrum, people independently obtain information by self-judgment, to at the bottom, they obtain information by the AGREEMENT of peers. So for example, I work on very complex material across all disciplines (“universally commensurable, value neutral paradigm, vocabulary, and logic, across all disciplines in the four sciences: physical, behavioral, evolutionary, and the spectrum of logics we describe them with.” ) It takes a reasonably high IQ with an extreme male brain ( high systematizing ) about four years to become competent and a little longer to use it well. That’s not socially constructed. yet, for example the feminist-to-woke is imitated and recited not learned. It’s social constructed and has to be because it’s false.
Reply addressees: @EnjoyerMoirai
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-17 18:00:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636789502222950400
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636786873942298626
As if the number of people who like you matter more than who likes you. If you manage any life achievements you might have people who matter like you too. (Truthfully most people tend to be intimidated).
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-17 02:18:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636552621241540612
Reply addressees: @MaybeAnnatar @cyberlich420 @iamzheanna
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636549001548890112
This is too much fun.
Slumming with the peasants.
It’s good to remember how the other half lives.
I’d say the same for ‘thinks’ but there isn’t enough thinking among you to observe. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-17 01:31:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636540799662841857
Reply addressees: @JackProbiotic @iamzheanna
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636532982851964929
MARX AND HUMAN NATURE.
Preamble: Technically speaking, I’m a genius by every known measure. But that doesn’t covey omniscience or omnicompetence. But it does mean I can entertain myself by slumming with you common folk, now and then. ;). With that out of the way, let’s get on with Mr. Marx.
MARX ON HUMAN NATURE
Marx just repeated Feuerbach, by claiming that human nature was predominantly socially constructed. Which like every other pseudoscientific fraud Marx attempted to impose on us, we know is false, since we understand the origin of human behavior as the sex differences, the genetics of class differences (lower class genetic load), the race differences (neoteny, and pre-neotenic genetic load), and that civilizational differences were the result of about eight or so local environmental influences, and social differences the result of economies possible under that strategy, at present levels of technology, and with present levels of trade.
ORIGINS OF INSTITUTIONAL DIFFERENCES
Unfortunately, the path dependence of institutional formation anchors on the first institution, so religion first, state first, contract (law) first, civilizations are stuck from their origins and slow, medium, and fast rates of adaptation, which explains the rates of development of different (primary) civilizations: Africa > MENA > India > China > Europe.
MARX’S DECEPTIONS
Marx’s strategy, and one of deception, was to create the pretense that society consists of interpersonal debts as do families, so that he could argue that members of a society are somehow obligated to one another, instead of a collection of families clans tribes, classes and sometimes nations, that cooperated for common interest despite that they had no obligations to one another as do families, because only relations do and only relations need to practice kin preference and kin selection.
This deception mirrors is his other deception: the labor theory of value instead of, as we understand, marginalism and subjective value. In fact labor has almost no value (as we have seen) since the value is almost entirely created by the organization of speculation, inputs, production, outputs, sale, distribution, and transaction.
If we go through Marx, we see consistency in the effort of trying to create parasitic relations out of voluntarily cooperative relations. There are cultural reasons for the difference between Jewish diasporic traditions, and European territorial traditions. Since we are unaware of these differences we assume they are natural to mankind rather than accidents of history that merely modify our relations despite human nature.
Cheers
Reply addressees: @zonexkiller @ConceptualJames
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-17 00:42:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636528513003012096
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636510858099535874
RT @curtdoolittle: @AlpsmanNorth @elagabalus__ @TheAutistocrat WHY DO NY, CAL, AND DC PRODUCE TAXABLE INCOME?
(and why are they organized c…
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 18:07:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636066498799124480
WHY DO NY, CAL, AND DC PRODUCE TAXABLE INCOME?
(and why are they organized crime syndicates under pretense of city states? How are they even worse than tax havens?)
Interesting decomposition into causes?
(a) Why does consumer credit require paying interest to banks if we’re just borrowing from ourselves in the future through the treasury? (rent seeking)
(b) Why does the private sector profit from investing insurance and pensions but neither are ‘covered’, and instead insured by the government? (privatizing commons, socializing losses)
(c) Why do we give copyright protections when the original purpose was only to provide a means of taxation? There is no reason for copyright protections. Instead only for creative commons protections. (rent seeking) And why can the entertainment industry engage in organized sedition?
(d) Why can the academy sell diplomas without warranty of (certification) of competency for employment AND guarrentee of employment? Worse, why can teh academy teach anything that’s false and irreciprocal rather than not false and reciprocal (true, and moral)? (fraud) And why can the academy and education industry engage in organized sedition?
REVOKE THE LEFT’S PERMISSION FOR CONDUCTING ORGANIZED CRIME
If we took away those four ‘privileges’ how would the left, who, does not engage in any productive work, survive? So why do we allow ourselves to fund the left, when by rent seeking, privatization of commons and socialization of losses, and systemic fraud, they constitute a vast organized crime syndicate using ‘baiting into hazard’ without liability for the harms done by their false promises?
Cheers
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 18:04:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636065752317935616
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636061670521860098
WHY DO NY, CAL, AND DC PRODUCE TAXABLE INCOME?
(and why are they organized crime syndicates under pretense of city states? How are they even worse than tax havens?)
Interesting decomposition into causes?
(a) Why does consumer credit require paying interest to banks if we’re just borrowing from ourselves in the future through the treasury? (rent seeking)
(b) Why does the private sector profit from investing insurance and pensions but neither are ‘covered’, and instead insured by the government? (privatizing commons, socializing losses)
(c) Why do we give copyright protections when the original purpose was only to provide a means of taxation? There is no reason for copyright protections. Instead only for creative commons protections. (rent seeking) And why can the entertainment industry engage in organized sedition?
(d) Why can the academy sell diplomas without warranty of (certification) of competency for employment AND guarrentee of employment? Worse, why can teh academy teach anything that’s false and irreciprocal rather than not false and reciprocal (true, and moral)? (fraud) And why can the academy and education industry engage in organized sedition?
REVOKE THE LEFT’S PERMISSION FOR CONDUCTING ORGANIZED CRIME
If we took away those four ‘privileges’ how would the left, who, does not engage in any productive work, survive? So why do we allow ourselves to fund the left, when by rent seeking, privatization of commons and socialization of losses, and systemic fraud, they constitute a vast organized crime syndicate using ‘baiting into hazard’ without liability for the harms done by their false promises?
Cheers
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
Reply addressees: @AlpsmanNorth @elagabalus__ @TheAutistocrat
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 18:04:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636065752129183748
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636061670521860098
Of course. See the reply I just posted.
Interesting.
I’m from the eenglish equivalent.
We have 1 point higher IQ in our class than ashkenazi
But ashkenazi have 1.5 points in wider distribution.
And that distribution results in verbal acuity rather than systemizing.
There are also more askenazi than my class of anglos (Anglicans)
So what we see is what you’d expect: ashkenazi replacement of anglos in credentialism (adademy) and consistent preservation of anglos in military and industry.
Fascinating.
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-14 18:06:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635704082525454351
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635703072839041040