Curt Doolittle

Theme: Class

  • Of course. See the reply I just posted. Interesting. I’m from the eenglish equiv

    Of course. See the reply I just posted.
    Interesting.
    I’m from the eenglish equivalent.
    We have 1 point higher IQ in our class than ashkenazi
    But ashkenazi have 1.5 points in wider distribution.
    And that distribution results in verbal acuity rather than systemizing.
    There are also more askenazi than my class of anglos (Anglicans)
    So what we see is what you’d expect: ashkenazi replacement of anglos in credentialism (adademy) and consistent preservation of anglos in military and industry.
    Fascinating.

    Reply addressees: @superkanga @KiwiBreeder

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-14 18:06:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635704082370265091

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635703072839041040

  • JEFFERSONIAN How odd you would accuse one of the principle critics of the jewish

    JEFFERSONIAN
    How odd you would accuse one of the principle critics of the jewish spectrum of behavioral, economic, and political pseudosciences of randianism? (Or rothbardianism for that matter.)
    Undermining from Within > Marxism(lower) > NeoMarxism(culture) > Postmodernism(truth) > Trotsky-NeoConservativsm(upper) > Libertarianism(middle) > Anti-Male Feminism(female) > Woke(Race marxism) > Anti-Western > Anti White Male > White Replacement.
    Repeats:
    Female Strategy of Undermining from Within > Judaism > Jewish Chrisianity > Byzantine Christianity > Islamism seditions against reason and meritocracy of the ancient world. I mean, it worked well enough to destroy eight civilizations of the ancient world, and it’s destroyed german, russian, chinese, and now western in the modern world.
    I’m a jeffersonian: Normal, Boring, Anglo Natural Law, Rule of Law, the common law, concurrent legislation, Independent judiciary, houses of the classes as a market between the classes, monarchy as judge of last resort, universal citizen militia and thorougly aristotelian (empirical).

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-14 17:03:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635688053128802314

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635679024176566273

  • JEFFERSONIAN How odd you would accuse one of the principle critics of the jewish

    JEFFERSONIAN
    How odd you would accuse one of the principle critics of the jewish spectrum of behavioral, economic, and political pseudosciences of randianism? (Or rothbardianism for that matter.)
    Undermining from Within > Marxism(lower) > NeoMarxism(culture) > Postmodernism(truth) > Trotsky-NeoConservativsm(upper) > Libertarianism(middle) > Anti-Male Feminism(female) > Woke(Race marxism) > Anti-Western > Anti White Male > White Replacement.
    Repeats:
    Female Strategy of Undermining from Within > Judaism > Jewish Chrisianity > Byzantine Christianity > Islamism seditions against reason and meritocracy of the ancient world. I mean, it worked well enough to destroy eight civilizations of the ancient world, and it’s destroyed german, russian, chinese, and now western in the modern world.
    I’m a jeffersonian: Normal, Boring, Anglo Natural Law, Rule of Law, the common law, concurrent legislation, Independent judiciary, houses of the classes as a market between the classes, monarchy as judge of last resort, universal citizen militia and thorougly aristotelian (empirical).

    Reply addressees: @BigTParker @KiwiBreeder

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-14 17:03:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635688052973613066

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635679024176566273

  • I’m not quite sure why we should object to the return to the conflict of civiliz

    I’m not quite sure why we should object to the return to the conflict of civilizations. Our attempts at universalism by universalizing a single class modely of cooperation whether authoritarian socialism(upper), liberalism(upper middle), communism(working) or islamismI(underclass) are all failures. We can spread technology of production but not of governance.

    And if the west should learn one thing it’s that western civ’s group strategy is the most emotionally, psychologically, and intellectually burdensome, and that the rest of the world is unfit for it. And that the only reason we fail, is Aryanism even when cloaked with Christianity, or liberalism, drives us to overextension. We can replace other peoples (europe, americas) but we cannot domesticate, administer, govern, or rule people unfit for our civilizational model that requries maximization of individual rsponsibility for the commons and maximization of truth before face in the commons, and maximization of trust necessary under both. People need temperament and iQ for it, and only eruopeans, the japanese, and koreans are demonstrably fit for it.

    As for Ukraine, Russia. As a ‘resident’ ukrainians are Ruthenians (closer to Poles) not Russians. The russians are closer to muslims and asians in their scope of responsiiblity (family and fence-line), and they are a low trust people who fail the lie-responsibility test.

    America isn’t a civilization. It’s the other side of the river from european civilzation. And neither of us survive without the other over the long term.

    IMO the right favors russia only because they hate their own and are two cowardly and timid to solve the problem of the left at home. While russians are right on culture, they are wrong on politics and economics. And they are so becuase they are a low trust people, who have never built a majority middle class, and have been free of serfdom only for a short window in the late 1800s prior the the bolsheviks, and a short window between 1990 and 2010.

    The family is the priority, not the individual.
    That’s an easy codification to put in place.
    If y’all aren’t too cowardly to show up in numbers and force it.

    Cheers

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-14 16:05:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635673496557584388

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635649197230927872

  • I’m not quite sure why we should object to the return to the conflict of civiliz

    I’m not quite sure why we should object to the return to the conflict of civilizations. Our attempts at universalism by universalizing a single class modely of cooperation whether authoritarian socialism(upper), liberalism(upper middle), communism(working) or islamismI(underclass) are all failures. We can spread technology of production but not of governance.

    And if the west should learn one thing it’s that western civ’s group strategy is the most emotionally, psychologically, and intellectually burdensome, and that the rest of the world is unfit for it. And that the only reason we fail, is Aryanism even when cloaked with Christianity, or liberalism, drives us to overextension. We can replace other peoples (europe, americas) but we cannot domesticate, administer, govern, or rule people unfit for our civilizational model that requries maximization of individual rsponsibility for the commons and maximization of truth before face in the commons, and maximization of trust necessary under both. People need temperament and iQ for it, and only eruopeans, the japanese, and koreans are demonstrably fit for it.

    As for Ukraine, Russia. As a ‘resident’ ukrainians are Ruthenians (closer to Poles) not Russians. The russians are closer to muslims and asians in their scope of responsiiblity (family and fence-line), and they are a low trust people who fail the lie-responsibility test.

    America isn’t a civilization. It’s the other side of the river from european civilzation. And neither of us survive without the other over the long term.

    IMO the right favors russia only because they hate their own and are two cowardly and timid to solve the problem of the left at home. While russians are right on culture, they are wrong on politics and economics. And they are so becuase they are a low trust people, who have never built a majority middle class, and have been free of serfdom only for a short window in the late 1800s prior the the bolsheviks, and a short window between 1990 and 2010.

    The family is the priority, not the individual.
    That’s an easy codification to put in place.
    If y’all aren’t too cowardly to show up in numbers and force it.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @TOOEdit

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-14 16:05:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635673496058580997

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635649197230927872

  • The peasants always signal virtues they do not possess

    The peasants always signal virtues they do not possess.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-14 03:28:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635482891218976768

    Reply addressees: @Ricardo_Gozinya @ToddQuick8080 @katzfan71 @KiwiBreeder

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635481472655302656

  • It has to do with IQ, conscentiousness and high investment parenting, and theref

    It has to do with IQ, conscentiousness and high investment parenting, and therefore asymmetric class reproduction given that our best women aren’t reproducing. Low income owmen reproduce because children place no marginal difference on their standard of living. Conversely, college education delays reproduction, college debt delays reproduction, and ‘experimentation’ in the market for sexual relations delays reproduction. Worse humans are most adaptable to one another prior to full maturity at 22/23 and become more self saisfying, elss adaptive, with lower bonding capacity as they age. And within a few years half of all women will be childless, and of those a large percent (its incdreasing) will be sterile. SIngle motherhood is a statistically significatnt catastrophe. I fyou want the gains of maturity we need above replacment level reproductoin, or as we’re seeing occur in other advanved countries with graeter population collpases, there is no way to pay for retirement and medical care of the aged.

    The left succeeded in ‘presentism’.
    Other than dumbing down education so that differences in capability weren’t visible, it’s the primary means by which we were dumbed down.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-13 23:18:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635420047941197824

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635418150618685440

  • It has to do with IQ, conscentiousness and high investment parenting, and theref

    It has to do with IQ, conscentiousness and high investment parenting, and therefore asymmetric class reproduction given that our best women aren’t reproducing. Low income owmen reproduce because children place no marginal difference on their standard of living. Conversely, college education delays reproduction, college debt delays reproduction, and ‘experimentation’ in the market for sexual relations delays reproduction. Worse humans are most adaptable to one another prior to full maturity at 22/23 and become more self saisfying, elss adaptive, with lower bonding capacity as they age. And within a few years half of all women will be childless, and of those a large percent (its incdreasing) will be sterile. SIngle motherhood is a statistically significatnt catastrophe. I fyou want the gains of maturity we need above replacment level reproductoin, or as we’re seeing occur in other advanved countries with graeter population collpases, there is no way to pay for retirement and medical care of the aged.

    The left succeeded in ‘presentism’.
    Other than dumbing down education so that differences in capability weren’t visible, it’s the primary means by which we were dumbed down.

    Reply addressees: @pedantic_grue @FrailSkeleton

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-13 23:18:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635420047811268610

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635418150618685440

  • 1) The three world model at present is commonly restated as the developed(first)

    1) The three world model at present is commonly restated as the developed(first) and developing(third) world. However, in econ and finance we use it to refer to nations that fall between first and third world countries in terms of their development status and economic indicators.
    2) IQ is a perfect predictor of every measurable between countries. And that’s in no small part because IQ is a reflection of the relative sizes of the classes. The primary difference between countries, regions, and continents is the size of the underclass. A competitive advantage of advanced civilizations is the “smart fraction”. For example, Japan has a half SD increase over the USA. But with ~40% of the population. This means the number of ‘smart people’ (over 125 capable of engineering, technology, and science ) is biased in favor of Japan. And while China is going through a similar IQ decline just as europeans have for the same reasons, there are reasons why china has not only large numbers but larger numbers of engineers (whole cities).
    3) FWIW: and I don’t particularly like knowing this, the rate decline of basic logical cause and effect under 105 accelerates rapidly to the point where by 85 it all but doesn’t exist. At present (and we see this) that means a sixth of the population is not regularly employable in and advanced economy. And as automation increases the displacment will continue. So much so that we already can’t fill the low level technical jobs we have open, and we are going through the greatest (re)industrialization since the second world war as globalism and global trade collapse given our loss of comparative advantage in production.
    4) Lesser developed cultures are largely lesser developed because the size of the classes unable to learn and compete in global trade sufficient to produce other than a local consumption economy, and so cannot produce sufficient surpluses to invest in capital structures necessary to make large leaps.

    ie: If you knew what you were talking about you wouldn’t even question for a moment what I said. Beause it’s the equivalent of saying the sky is blue.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-13 23:13:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635418882251915264

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635408695940222976

  • 1) The three world model at present is commonly restated as the developed(first)

    1) The three world model at present is commonly restated as the developed(first) and developing(third) world. However, in econ and finance we use it to refer to nations that fall between first and third world countries in terms of their development status and economic indicators.
    2) IQ is a perfect predictor of every measurable between countries. And that’s in no small part because IQ is a reflection of the relative sizes of the classes. The primary difference between countries, regions, and continents is the size of the underclass. A competitive advantage of advanced civilizations is the “smart fraction”. For example, Japan has a half SD increase over the USA. But with ~40% of the population. This means the number of ‘smart people’ (over 125 capable of engineering, technology, and science ) is biased in favor of Japan. And while China is going through a similar IQ decline just as europeans have for the same reasons, there are reasons why china has not only large numbers but larger numbers of engineers (whole cities).
    3) FWIW: and I don’t particularly like knowing this, the rate decline of basic logical cause and effect under 105 accelerates rapidly to the point where by 85 it all but doesn’t exist. At present (and we see this) that means a sixth of the population is not regularly employable in and advanced economy. And as automation increases the displacment will continue. So much so that we already can’t fill the low level technical jobs we have open, and we are going through the greatest (re)industrialization since the second world war as globalism and global trade collapse given our loss of comparative advantage in production.
    4) Lesser developed cultures are largely lesser developed because the size of the classes unable to learn and compete in global trade sufficient to produce other than a local consumption economy, and so cannot produce sufficient surpluses to invest in capital structures necessary to make large leaps.

    ie: If you knew what you were talking about you wouldn’t even question for a moment what I said. Beause it’s the equivalent of saying the sky is blue.

    Reply addressees: @ikepigott @KiwiBreeder

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-13 23:13:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635418882046304259

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635408695940222976