Theme: Class

  • “In the case of Lindsay, I’ve described elsewhere, that New Discourses is an enc

    –“In the case of Lindsay, I’ve described elsewhere, that New Discourses is an encyclopedic demonstration that Critical Theory is pseudoscience.”– Alan Post

    The entire marxist sequence is pseudoscience.
    The jewish-abrahamic synthesis of european systematizing with semitic magical thinking was a novelty and the world was victimized by it. The marxist sequence just repeats the abrahamic sequence and is doing the same: detroying the world.

    Masculine systematizing is persuasive but falsifiable. Feminine empathizing, magical thinking, and mythologizing, and social construction is too. But combine the two techniques in either Abrahamic theology or Marxist pseudoscience, and in both cases you end up with a religion of death.

    Like I said.
    I don’t know if a god exists.
    I know that if a devil exists,
    We know his name.
    It’s Abraham.
    And he was from Ur.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-26 20:18:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640085894169329664

  • “Socialists steal private property; libertarians steal public property.”–Willia

    –“Socialists steal private property; libertarians steal public property.”–William Shockley

    Correct. Let’s break it down even further:

    (+) Conservatives(Established Male, Meritocratic): Natural Aristocracy: Produce private property because it produces the most commons, and commons reduce costs for all regardless of ability or property.

    (=) Libertarians(Young Male, Egalitarian): Middle-class monopoly: Marxists of the commons: either steal from the commons, privatize the commons, socialize losses into the commons, rent-seek on, free ride on, and prevent the production of commons.

    (-) Socialists (Female, Equalitarian): Underclass Monopoly: Marxists of private property: either steal, socialize the gains of private property, socialize losses onto private property, rent-seek or privatize on the gains of private property, and prevent the formation of private property.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute

    Reply addressees: @William68332190 @VelenskiMeir


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-26 17:51:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640048842224680961

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639998007352369152

  • “Socialists steal private property; libertarians steal public property.”–Willia

    –“Socialists steal private property; libertarians steal public property.”–William Shockley

    Correct. Let’s break it down even further:

    (+) Conservatives(Established Male, Meritocratic): Natural Aristocracy: Produce private property because it produces the most commons, and commons reduce costs for all regardless of ability or property.

    (=) Libertarians(Young Male, Egalitarian): Middle-class monopoly: Marxists of the commons: either steal from the commons, privatize the commons, socialize losses into the commons, rent-seek on, free ride on, and prevent the production of commons.

    (-) Socialists (Female, Equalitarian): Underclass Monopoly: Marxists of private property: either steal, socialize the gains of private property, socialize losses onto private property, rent-seek or privatize on the gains of private property, and prevent the formation of private property.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-26 17:51:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640048842350419970

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639998007352369152

  • The other fellow. I don’t tolerate slurs or other violations of decorum. I frequ

    The other fellow. I don’t tolerate slurs or other violations of decorum. I frequently discuss the hard problems of sex, class, culture and ethic conflict in value neutral terms. Maintaining civil decorum is required or conversations that teach us about ourselves degenerate.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-25 20:28:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639726009078501379

    Reply addressees: @VelenskiMeir @MythosMap

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639688357495164929

  • RT @JamesCRussell: WHITE AWAKENING COMING? Glenn Loury, an economist and profess

    RT @JamesCRussell: WHITE AWAKENING COMING?
    Glenn Loury, an economist and professor at Brown University, who is black, called Democrats’…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-24 18:40:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639336444874326036

  • No, but it doesn’t matter becasue if you didn’t know already, the trend reversed

    No, but it doesn’t matter becasue if you didn’t know already, the trend reversed aggressively becasue the woke academy considers ashkenazim ‘white’. So jewish dominance in the academy is evaporating quickly.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-24 14:36:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639275081758064641

    Reply addressees: @NorseJarl @whatifalthist

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639273694823436291

  • The Current Elites are Beyond Redemption Academic Agent producing a series of ex

    The Current Elites are Beyond Redemption
    https://youtube.com/shorts/ZDAnWH0xOKc
    Academic Agent producing a series of excellent topic by topic shorts.
    @academicagenct


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-24 11:33:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639228870845931521

  • The only solution is fighting. Yes. But then the ‘global elite’ are on their las

    The only solution is fighting. Yes. But then the ‘global elite’ are on their last legs. And we are returning to normal with civilizational and perhaps just national elites. Americans won’t and probably can’t maintain the free trade system they created that raised the world out of…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-24 11:08:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639222736781209600

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639221909362491398

  • Q: “Curt: –What do you mean by “class” as in “the success at selection (differe

    Q: “Curt: –What do you mean by “class” as in “the success at selection (differences in class sizes)”?–

    Ugh, Didn’t complete answering your question.
    1) As man spread out from east Africa, we see four speciation events, that resulted in ‘subspecies’ (races) adapting to local environments. Speciation requires isolation events. They were east Africa, the dry Persian gulf, the Tibetan plateau?, the European plain, and the Ob river region(?) of northern (polar) Russia. In about that order.

    2) the direction of all human evolution appears to have been for endurance running(hunting) by heat dissipation, and sacrificing of digestion for higher quality (denser) foods, and then for neoteny to lower aggression and increase patience, agency, and cooperation (think time).

    3) While neoteny is physically obvious and east asians the most neotenous, there is a correlation between coloring (returning to having white skin) to absorb Vitamin D, and preventing birth defects due to lack of related natal molecules, and temperament due to living in cold climates in close quarters, and higher isolation and selection pressure in those conditions.

    4) The result is the rather (huge) difference between the African subraces(60-70), the south Eurasian (low 80s), the hybrid peoples (low 90s), and the Europeans and east Asians (low 100s).

    5) IQ is a rough approximation of Neoteny. Though it also appears there are upper limits to our biological ability to increase neural density, size of cranium, rate, and depth of maturity, given our caloric capacity and the high cost of the brain vs all other organs.

    6) Societies MUST develop metaphysics, myths, rituals, traditions, norms, values, and institutions that reflect the median of the distribution of the population. And they all do.

    SO: Success at selection means “capacity for isolation, speciation, and neotenization events that cause domestication syndrome, and the resulting institutional formation necessary for the group”.

    IOW don’t hold out too much hope for those countries that haven’t had the benefit of colonization to rapidly change, escape poverty, and despotic government. AND worse, expect if the US ends (continues to end) the postwar construction of world free trade, that the despotic governments will continue to exploit people who are not productive enough to compete or even survive (not starve) in a world without free trade.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-22 18:33:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638609851591827473

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638600459287166977

  • Q: “Curt: –What do you mean by “class” as in “the success at selection (differe

    Q: “Curt: –What do you mean by “class” as in “the success at selection (differences in class sizes)”?–

    Ugh, Didn’t complete answering your question.
    1) As man spread out from east Africa, we see four speciation events, that resulted in ‘subspecies’ (races) adapting to local environments. Speciation requires isolation events. They were east Africa, the dry Persian gulf, the Tibetan plateau?, the European plain, and the Ob river region(?) of northern (polar) Russia. In about that order.

    2) the direction of all human evolution appears to have been for endurance running(hunting) by heat dissipation, and sacrificing of digestion for higher quality (denser) foods, and then for neoteny to lower aggression and increase patience, agency, and cooperation (think time).

    3) While neoteny is physically obvious and east asians the most neotenous, there is a correlation between coloring (returning to having white skin) to absorb Vitamin D, and preventing birth defects due to lack of related natal molecules, and temperament due to living in cold climates in close quarters, and higher isolation and selection pressure in those conditions.

    4) The result is the rather (huge) difference between the African subraces(60-70), the south Eurasian (low 80s), the hybrid peoples (low 90s), and the Europeans and east Asians (low 100s).

    5) IQ is a rough approximation of Neoteny. Though it also appears there are upper limits to our biological ability to increase neural density, size of cranium, rate, and depth of maturity, given our caloric capacity and the high cost of the brain vs all other organs.

    6) Societies MUST develop metaphysics, myths, rituals, traditions, norms, values, and institutions that reflect the median of the distribution of the population. And they all do.

    SO: Success at selection means “capacity for isolation, speciation, and neotenization events that cause domestication syndrome, and the resulting institutional formation necessary for the group”.

    IOW don’t hold out too much hope for those countries that haven’t had the benefit of colonization to rapidly change, escape poverty, and despotic government. AND worse, expect if the US ends (continues to end) the postwar construction of world free trade, that the despotic governments will continue to exploit people who are not productive enough to compete or even survive (not starve) in a world without free trade.

    Reply addressees: @patriciamdavis @enigma3078


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-22 18:33:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638609851340275713

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638600459287166977