Curt Doolittle

Theme: Class

  • CULTURAL MARXISM IS THE STATUS QUO. So that means we reactionaries are the progr

    CULTURAL MARXISM IS THE STATUS QUO.

    So that means we reactionaries are the progressives.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-10 13:31:00 UTC

  • So the difference is whether we are colonized by the underclass by dysgenic repr

    So the difference is whether we are colonized by the underclass by dysgenic reproduction and superstition, or we colonize by eugenic upper class by force and law?

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-08 14:01:00 UTC

  • “Monarchy consists of creating aristocracies within aristocracies until it is no

    —“Monarchy consists of creating aristocracies within aristocracies until it is no longer possible”— Joel Davis

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-06 16:56:00 UTC

  • Any Group Can Cull Its Lower Classes

    –“What I’ve interpreted by reading Curt Doolittle’s posts so far regarding Race and IQ. The average IQ of a certain race represents more of an population make up. What portion of a certain race of people possess agency, thus seeking liberty or sovereignty. Aka how much of them can make into the “aristocratic” class. The West(whites), through their strategy(law and culture) effectively culled the lower tier(less beneficial to a cooperative society)gene pool, enough so that they were able to make enough progress to dominate the entire globe. The other races simply didn’t have the chance to do so, hence the difference in average IQ.”— Liu Gx Liu Gx : Well, that’s the idea, yes. In addition: 1) Any group can cull its lower classes through various means – and transcend their median/average IQ. And nationalism will encourage (force) that to occur, while globalism and ‘tolerance’ creates permanent parasitic classes that can eventually overwhelm the aristocratic classes (the curse of agrarianism). 2) Immigration is a MULTIPLIER ON DAMAGES if we look at average iQ and the consequences of decline in average IQ. 3) Ashkenazi verbal ability, aggression and clannishness, Han spatial ability and conscientiousness, white balance spatial/verbal and creativity and lack of clannishness, african athleticism, extroversion and verbal weakness will always differentiate the groups because these seem to be material differences evident at the extremes.

  • Any Group Can Cull Its Lower Classes

    –“What I’ve interpreted by reading Curt Doolittle’s posts so far regarding Race and IQ. The average IQ of a certain race represents more of an population make up. What portion of a certain race of people possess agency, thus seeking liberty or sovereignty. Aka how much of them can make into the “aristocratic” class. The West(whites), through their strategy(law and culture) effectively culled the lower tier(less beneficial to a cooperative society)gene pool, enough so that they were able to make enough progress to dominate the entire globe. The other races simply didn’t have the chance to do so, hence the difference in average IQ.”— Liu Gx Liu Gx : Well, that’s the idea, yes. In addition: 1) Any group can cull its lower classes through various means – and transcend their median/average IQ. And nationalism will encourage (force) that to occur, while globalism and ‘tolerance’ creates permanent parasitic classes that can eventually overwhelm the aristocratic classes (the curse of agrarianism). 2) Immigration is a MULTIPLIER ON DAMAGES if we look at average iQ and the consequences of decline in average IQ. 3) Ashkenazi verbal ability, aggression and clannishness, Han spatial ability and conscientiousness, white balance spatial/verbal and creativity and lack of clannishness, african athleticism, extroversion and verbal weakness will always differentiate the groups because these seem to be material differences evident at the extremes.

  • Promises

    PROMISES Promise salvation to the underclasses. Promise plunder to the laboring classes. Promise opportunity to the merchant classes. Promise rents to the priestly and intellectual classes. Promise conquest to the aristocratic classes.

  • Promises

    PROMISES Promise salvation to the underclasses. Promise plunder to the laboring classes. Promise opportunity to the merchant classes. Promise rents to the priestly and intellectual classes. Promise conquest to the aristocratic classes.

  • Political Classes

    Dependent

    • Non self supporting

    Independent(Freeman)

    • Self Supporting
    • Militia, Emergency, or Hospitalier Service, Continuing Male Regimental Service
    • Self Supporting, Married, three children, Continuing Male Regimental Service
    • Self Supporting, Married, three children, Male Regimental Service, Employs 25 or more non-kin in the commercial production of goods, services, and information.
    • Self Supporting, Married, More than three Children, Continuing Male Regimental Service, four consecutive generations of Burghers, Territorial Governor
    • Married, Six or more children, Male Regimental Service, Noble Family

    Citizen Burgher Nobility Monarchy

  • Political Classes

    Dependent

    • Non self supporting

    Independent(Freeman)

    • Self Supporting
    • Militia, Emergency, or Hospitalier Service, Continuing Male Regimental Service
    • Self Supporting, Married, three children, Continuing Male Regimental Service
    • Self Supporting, Married, three children, Male Regimental Service, Employs 25 or more non-kin in the commercial production of goods, services, and information.
    • Self Supporting, Married, More than three Children, Continuing Male Regimental Service, four consecutive generations of Burghers, Territorial Governor
    • Married, Six or more children, Male Regimental Service, Noble Family

    Citizen Burgher Nobility Monarchy

  • Our Medieval Religion as Specialization in a Market for Rule of Classes

    In evaluating our medieval religion, we must separate the term “religion” into the strategy, the philosophy, the mythology, the administration, and the rule. And then we must compare it to the alternatives developed in the ancient world, and our traditional religions prior to their destruction by the ancient world. The christian religion was a source of ignorance by providing a false high context narrative that impeded the advancement of knowledge, and imposing the ability to rule by deceit.

    The church was a source of (weak) administration. The church’s philosophy was adequate for uniting european tribes. But it was not in any way a replacement for greco-roman civilization, or the megalithic-pagan civilization that both so diligently exterminated. The church was not in fact all that hostile to science. The state was an advocate, and investor in technology. The state and the people were more dependent upon law and technology than religion and the church. The church created an informational monopoly then as the academy/media/state monopoly now, tended to produce all the narratives – almost all of which are false histories. The restoration of our ancient civilization provided the restoration of our technological knowledge (low context high precision), but what we struggle with today, is providing the narrative (high context low precision) by which we identify and seize opportunities. Demonstrably, our ancient religion (super-normalism), philosophy (stoicism and epicureanism), epistemology (science, reason, naturalism), cooperation(natural, common, law of torts), and virtues (heroism, truth, goodness and beauty), were superior to the medieval church’s. The church provided government for the underclasses just as the warrior aristocracy provided a government for the aristocratic classes. It was this combination that served our people such that both the warrior aristocracy, the practicality of commercial government, and the rule of the underclasses could for ‘specializations’ in a ‘market for rule’. Demonstrably, they are superior to all other cultural portfolios, in one dimension or the other. Unfortunately, our technology needs a narrative. And the one provided by the cosmopolitans is … to put it bluntly… “Evil”.