Theme: Class

  • THERE IS NO EXPLOITATION – JUST FARMING It is simply more profitable to construc

    THERE IS NO EXPLOITATION – JUST FARMING

    It is simply more profitable to construct markets than it is serfdom and slavery.

    But make no mistake about it.

    You are ruled for profit.

    The lies of Religion.

    The forces of Law.

    The hazard of Credit.

    I choose to RULE.

    I choose to RULE by denying rule to others.

    If possible I desire to rule by denying rule to all.

    And by denying rule to all we are left with markets.

    Markets for association, cooperation, reproduction, production, commons and polities.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-24 14:16:00 UTC

  • I ADVOCATE THE MOST MORAL SOLUTION TO THE PROBLEM OF THE HIGH COST OF DYSGENIA.

    I ADVOCATE THE MOST MORAL SOLUTION TO THE PROBLEM OF THE HIGH COST OF DYSGENIA.

    I’m advocating the most moral means of preventing the harm of the lower and underclasses, and the whims of women: pay for one child or zero child, rather than allow the vast harm that their reproduction imposes upon the rest of us.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-24 13:41:00 UTC

  • You mean the working class does not trade their labor for money? Meaning *profit

    You mean the working class does not trade their labor for money? Meaning *profit*?


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-24 12:59:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/867364492086325248

    Reply addressees: @BernardoGrando @EasternMarxist

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/867313343526318080


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/867313343526318080

  • The only reason to embrace Marxism is an admission that you are genetically infe

    The only reason to embrace Marxism is an admission that you are genetically inferior and cannot climb the dominance hierarchy via merit.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-24 12:55:00 UTC

  • CONVERSATION WITH A MARXIST Communism is impossible because of incentives, calcu

    CONVERSATION WITH A MARXIST

    Communism is impossible because of incentives, calculation, competition, and climbing the dominance hierarchy for status and mates.

    —“in short : Communism is impossible because bananas don’t taste purple”— Marxist

    So no. Because of competition, calculation, and incentives. You cannot eliminate male need to climb the dominance hierarchy. Sorry.

    —“Just throwing around baseless biological assertions. You may be able to lie about philosophy and economics, but biology is on you can’t get.”— Marxist

    So you are saying competition, calculation, incentives to produce, an climing dominance hierarchy among men do not exist, or needn’t exist?

    —“Given you adhere to neoclassical economics it’s not surprising you wouldn’t know the answer to your own question.”— Marxist

    I don’t know what neoclassical means. I know the difference between that which is calculable (individual) and that which is not (common).

    And I know the difference between kin, community, competitor, and enemy, as well as dysgenic and eugenic reproduction.

    And the difference between kin, community, competitor and enemy is determined by reproduction, cooperation, parasite, and predator.

    You see, your entire hierarchy of argument presumes that those who seek parasitism and predation have some ‘value’ or other.

    I start all ethical reasoning with the question of ‘Why don’t I take from, enslave, or kill you and yours?’ Not claims of moral obligation.

    I don’t seek to provide sustenance to parasites at the cost of me and my kin. I seek cooperation of those with whom productivity results.

    A claim that we share some commons, common interest, or moral obligation is simply a lie by which to entreat the simple, weak, and women.

    I make no such claims. I state only that if we cooperate via sovereignty that the meritorious will survive and those lacking merit will die.

    And if that means your death, that is good for mankind.

    At this point in my work there is a great deal I do not know, but precious little that I don’t understand. And economics, I understand.

    I do not seek to rally allies among the simple, weak, and women, against the strong and the male. I seek allies in the transcendence of man through the elimination of parasitism that prevents our transcendence.

    “Via-Negativa.” Eliminate the bad and only good remains Eliminate the parasitic and only the productive remain.

    Kill the enemy

    Punish Parasitism

    Constrain the weak.

    And Transcend Family, Kin, Clan, Tribe and Man.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-24 10:40:00 UTC

  • PROPERTARIAN CLASS STRUCTURES = DOMINANCE HIERARCHIES. What dominance hierarchie

    PROPERTARIAN CLASS STRUCTURES = DOMINANCE HIERARCHIES.

    What dominance hierarchies (classes) can man climb?

    1) Physical (force)

    2) Economic (exchange)

    3) Gossip (insurance, inclusion, exclusion)

    We can climb all three of them – and we do. If we can.

    I’m short but not easy on the physical force thing.

    Economically I’ve done pretty well.

    Gossip (this stuff you’re reading) i’m pretty damned good at.

    You can rate men on the scale of 1-10 in each of these and determine his social status.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-23 12:29:00 UTC

  • RANGE OF GOVERNMENT by Joel Davis Overton’s window boils down to Meritocracy vs.

    RANGE OF GOVERNMENT

    by Joel Davis

    Overton’s window boils down to Meritocracy vs. Egalitarianism.

    Right Meritocracy (Aristocracy/Fascism) vs. Left Meritocracy (Jeffersonian Classical Liberalism) would be a highly functional system of government.

    The left in times of peace and expansion, the right in times of war and hardship.

    That’s what you’ll get when you limit the demos to property owning militia members.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-23 06:25:00 UTC

  • DEFINITION: ‘CUCKSERVATIVE’ (from elsewhere) Um. Let me ‘enhance’ this a bit by

    DEFINITION: ‘CUCKSERVATIVE’

    (from elsewhere)

    Um. Let me ‘enhance’ this a bit by using a series:

    1) A cuck refers to a ‘cuckhold’ – a man that attempts to obtain feminine attention by conforming to feminine whims. A man who is sexually emasculated.

    2) The portmanteau ‘cuckservative’ refers to a man that attempts to obtain feminine approval by conforming to feminist whims in politics. ie: A man who is politically emasculated.

    3) And the extension of ‘cuckservative’ to outgroups: jews/neocons/globalists extends this criticism to currying favor by political submission. ie: A man who is nationally and culturally emasculated.

    4) And the references to higher testosterone, more muscular, larger, and larger-phallic blacks is a means of further ridiculing and humiliating these men.

    5) And the graphic accusations of watching (superior) black males having sex with their wives and girlfriends (or daughters for that matter) is just an extreme accusation of their physical, political and national inferiority.

    😉


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-22 13:36:00 UTC

  • The reason the left has to lie is inferiority. So meritocracy is unacceptable an

    The reason the left has to lie is inferiority. So meritocracy is unacceptable and parasitism is necessary.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-22 13:22:00 UTC

  • Q:”Does Propertarianism rely on markets for healthcare?”— 1) subsidy for survi

    —Q:”Does Propertarianism rely on markets for healthcare?”—

    1) subsidy for survival(underclass),

    2) insurance against tragedy(working class),

    3) commercial insurance (middle class), and

    4) commercial insurance and payment for research and development (upper class).

    That is what I recommend. These are all market solutions. And they are the best market solutions that I can define.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-22 12:12:00 UTC