Curt Doolittle

Theme: Class

  • PROPERTARIANISM’S CLASS STRUCTURE MATRIX HORIZONTAL CLASSES 1) Genetic Class (ge

    PROPERTARIANISM’S CLASS STRUCTURE MATRIX

    HORIZONTAL CLASSES

    1) Genetic Class (genetic)

    2) Social Class (cultural)

    3) Occupational Class (learned)

    4) Economic Class (achieved)

    VERTICAL CLASSES

    1) Aristocratic (Force) : Nobility, Martial, Legal, Sheriff, Militia.

    2) Economic (Remuneration) : Finance, Entrepreneur, Professional, Craftsman, Laborer

    3) Priestly (Gossip) : Academic, Public Intellectual, Politician, Priest, Teacher

    4) Caretaker (Care): Doctor, Nurse, Mother, Domestic

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-21 15:25:00 UTC

  • THE SINGLE BEST THING YOU CAN DEVOTE YOUR LIFE TO? The most important thing you

    THE SINGLE BEST THING YOU CAN DEVOTE YOUR LIFE TO?

    The most important thing you can do for the current and future benefit of your people is to decrease the size of the underclass.

    PERIOD.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-21 12:31:00 UTC

  • THIS IS THE REASON FOR NATIONALISM, AND SEPARATISM: BECAUSE PEOPLE TAKE CARE OF

    THIS IS THE REASON FOR NATIONALISM, AND SEPARATISM: BECAUSE PEOPLE TAKE CARE OF THEIR LOWER CLASS KIN – ELITES CARRY THE REST.

    “Q: Do you think segregation has any benefits?”

    Answer by Jeremy M. Thompson

    I interviewed my grandmother back in 1999 for an African American Studies course. I specifically asked her this question. She felt that segregation was good and bad. Here are her answers.

    THE GOOD

    The good reasons for segregation.

    1) The Black American community was more united. It didn’t matter how much education, money or status you had, you were forced to live in an all Black community. People looked out for each other.

    2) Black communities were self-sufficient. They had Black-owned banks, universities, hospitals, newspapers, construction companies, fast food restaurants, people working in the trades, radio stations, entrepreneurs of all kinds, grocery stores, shopping centers, clubs, restaurants, swimming pools and on and on.

    3) Your children went to school in the local neighborhood. They were taught by teachers that looked like them. Those teachers lived in the same neighborhood. The teachers were concerned about your children, treated them like their children, nurtured them and truly loved them.

    THE BAD REASONS

    The bad reasons for desegregation.

    1) It splintered the Black American community. Most of the pillars of the community decided to move out of the neighborhood. Doctors, lawyers, accountants, engineers, and other white collar professionals quickly left. Many neighborhoods were left without balance. The children were mostly left with drug dealers, pimps and gang members. Many of them could no longer see that it was possible to be a doctor, lawyer, accountant, engineer or other white collar position.

    2) Many of the Black American communities were drained of their self-sufficiency. Many of the businesses left the formerly segregated Black community. They were lured by the money that they could make in the white American areas, the “better” school systems and the “better” neighborhoods. You can still see the impact of businesses leaving from back then today in predominant Black areas.

    3) Your children were now bused many miles away from their community. Parents could no longer quickly walk to see or get their children in the local community if necessary due to sickness or for any other reason.

    My grandmother believes that desegregation is wonderful. She understands why it was necessary for the USA to progress in that direction. She would never want to go back to living in segregation. But she does want to see more Black American unity, Black American entrepreneurship and anything else that strengthens the Black American community.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-21 12:13:00 UTC

  • “We tried meritocracy. It turned into equality, which is ruinous. But it turns o

    —“We tried meritocracy. It turned into equality, which is ruinous. But it turns out meritocracy was already too generous.”— Eli Harman

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-18 06:05:00 UTC

  • I suppose it’s hard to accept, that after a century of selling the fictitious vi

    I suppose it’s hard to accept, that after a century of selling the fictitious virtues of the genetic underclasses in order to profit from their consumption, indoctrination, and votes, that the single best action we can take to improve the lot of individual, family, community, nation, and mankind, is to reduce their number.

    World Systems Theory is an odd, Marxist, term for expressing evolution by the replacement of physical warfare with economic warfare, with informational warfare, with reproductive warfare. But evolution remains evolution; devolution devolution; and extinction extinction whether early or late in the process of speciation.

    But then, like the first generations of Abrahamism, Marxism and Critical Theory are just another form of information warfare in which the false promise of universal equality replaces the false promise of socialist prosperity, which replaced the false promise of heavenly life after death.

    Evolve. Kill them all.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-17 09:01:00 UTC

  • “Marx, Freud, Nietzsche. Their purpose, is a specific type of orthodoxy. They ho

    —“Marx, Freud, Nietzsche. Their purpose, is a specific type of orthodoxy. They hold, in a manifold of variations on the same theme, that a well-ordered political community is impossible without the concept of transcendence; that any scientific or political enterprise since the Enlightenment tacitly presupposes the categories that only theology can provide; and that any deviant view is a heresy.”—

    Transcendence is just a code word for evolution. And evolution and transcendence merely provide us with decidability in matters political.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-14 11:32:00 UTC

  • Why we fight? We can’t be bought off by the state, academy, media, financial com

    Why we fight? We can’t be bought off by the state, academy, media, financial complex.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-12 15:47:00 UTC

  • “The only difference between class and caste is that one allows for more excepti

    —“The only difference between class and caste is that one allows for more exceptions in movement.”—Jerrick Harald

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-12 12:31:00 UTC

  • A POLITICAL APHORISM FOR THE AGES Political organizations shift the contents of

    A POLITICAL APHORISM FOR THE AGES

    Political organizations shift the contents of policy portfolios in order to obtain power whether under totalitarian alliances, oligarchical factions, or democratic parties. But the equilibria between the genders and the classes, whereby the top and male attempt to preserve genetic and cultural gains instead of having them regressed to the mean by the bottom and female does not change.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-12 07:27:00 UTC

  • MORE ON POLYGAMY (possibly important) Polygamy provides an UNDERCLASS and OUTLIE

    MORE ON POLYGAMY

    (possibly important)

    Polygamy provides an UNDERCLASS and OUTLIER solution to specific problems given general failures of the society. At present, that I know of, something like 5% of white westerners have some sort of continuous non exclusive relationship; some larger percentage ‘cheats’ frequently, at least 1/3 ‘cheat’ at some point, and about half of marriages end in divorce.

    As we move down the IQ spectrum to increasingly ‘darker’ peoples, we see the center of the distribution change, so that the percentage of long term exclusivity decreases proportionally with intelligence and discipline. We should see increases in polyamory(promiscuity), polygamy(limited promiscuity), serial marriage (more limited promiscuity), and divorce (more limited promiscuity)… and that is what we DO see.

    So it is more appropriate to say that we observe a normal distribution of exclusivity and non-exclusivity, with declines in promiscuity and increases in monogamy as the quality of the gene pool increases. But we will never see an end to some % of promiscuity at the top and bottom of the spectrum no matter what we do.

    So as an individual and a libertarian I hold the position that

    (a) you should do what you want to do.

    (b) what you want to do may or many not be ‘good’ objectively, merely preferable for you.

    (c) that the community will always favor exclusivity except at the bottom where it is impossible and top where it is unnecessary.

    (d) and that as a political question the ‘interests’ of the social group are absolutely in favor of limited promiscuity, which increases the responsibility of intergenerational care taking to the clan, rather than redistributing it to the society.

    That said, some of us have shitty families and shitty gene pools so collecting together into polygamous contractual relationships is simply good evolutionary strategy even if it is a bad normative strategy, and as such we should not interfere with those relations, even if we do not sanction them.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-11 18:02:00 UTC