—“The left tests the limits capital accumulation. The right tests the limits of capital outlay (consumption).”— Skye Stewart
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-18 17:30:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1064209137201004544
—“The left tests the limits capital accumulation. The right tests the limits of capital outlay (consumption).”— Skye Stewart
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-18 17:30:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1064209137201004544
(from elsewhere)
I dunno, I lived in rural america during the cold war, undermining of the education system, and underclass conquest (civil rights movement). I lived in suburban new england and Boston during the reagan revolution, star wars, and the american restoration. I lived in seattle during the microcomputer boom and the insane wealth it generated. In ukraine during the ukrainian revolution. And it looks like America during the second american civil war. interesting times.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-17 12:33:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46477073_10156782508967264_8811414652316549120_n_10156782508962264.jpg THE PROGRESSION OF LEFTIST ARGUMENTCurt Doolittle(From a friend that wants to remain anonymous)Nov 16, 2018, 1:55 PMSkye StewartOf course this is exactly what lefties say about their opponents. What’s the cleanest data we have that exhibits demographic density of these tendencies?Nov 16, 2018, 2:03 PMCurt DoolittleRight uses eugenic moralizing, left uses dysgenic denialism.
hard to argue that the right abuses the courts and the state as do the left.Nov 16, 2018, 2:04 PMBryan Nova BreyWell I’ll be damned…
It’s a meme on Curt Doolittle’s timeline! 😜Nov 16, 2018, 2:12 PMCurt Doolittletechnically speaking it’s an illustrated series (an argument in series). So yeah. It makes the grade.Nov 16, 2018, 2:14 PMBryan Nova BreyMy son has been asked to provide some memes to his teacher and explain the pop-culture references, and likely the value of memes for learning and transmitting information.Nov 16, 2018, 2:19 PMMichael D. AbbottMemes are extremely tacky–and yet, on the other hand, they are similar to cave paintings and other ancient forms of simple communication.Nov 16, 2018, 2:22 PMCharles LamptonKeeping several horses is making sense.Nov 16, 2018, 3:37 PMAndrew ClaytonUniverse Brain: Throwing faeces at you opponentNov 16, 2018, 3:59 PMFawzi M. ChalaNov 17, 2018, 5:51 PMTHE PROGRESSION OF LEFTIST ARGUMENT

Source date (UTC): 2018-11-16 13:54:00 UTC
by James Santagata
A glimpse into a “hot” US Civil War.
If we expect the initial hostilities to fall along political ideology, left vs right (parasite vs producer), then we can see by the ideology maps that the leftists primarily occupy major cities.
Dense, urban settings. The thing is, even in today’s “functioning” leftist cities, crime is rampant as is refuse and human waste. Some cities like San Diego has recurring hepatitis outbreaks now….
San Fran is swimming in human feces.
Now imagine when the power goes down, the lights go dark, the water stops flowing, the water becomes non-potable, the store shelves run bare and resupplies are sporadic if at all.
That will happen with a week of a shut down.
Power substations hit, key power transmission lines taken out, roadways barricaded or railways lines sabotaged.
It really doesn’t take much for the whole system to screech to a halt.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-16 10:49:00 UTC
Or what Fascism means is national socialism not world communism. Fascism evolved to combat world communism. Or more simply Fascism = Eugenic, and Communism = Dysgenic, and it’s no more complicated than that.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-15 17:50:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1063127204312297477
Reply addressees: @Goldenseed13
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1063116951923408902
IN REPLY TO:
@Goldenseed13
@curtdoolittle Fascists waiting for a reason to “make an example of” the people who oppose them (Anti-Fascists) …. Sounds like exactly what fascists would do.
Also fascist: advocating the virtues of violence over the democratic norms/rights of civil demonstration and discourse.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1063116951923408902
THE GENETIC – DENIERS AND PLOMIN’S UNCOMFORTABLE TRUTH
(important sequence of arguments)
There are reasons why so many people in the postwar, postmodern, feminist, and underclass movements are rigid deniers of our indifference from breeding of any other domesticated animals, and the similar differences in trait expression. We know those reasons. The fact that people believe the ‘nurture’ fallacy correlates with all other similar social cognitive biases and related fallacies, because people actively select for these falsehoods because their genes encourage and force them to. Even if confronted with the overwhelming evidence that the pseudosciences of Boas, Marx, Freud, Adorno, Derrida et all, they will admit the science but deny its application in order to defend their genetic drives. We can easily measure these differences in brain structure with female biased brains favoring this “herd-prey illusion” and male brains favoring the purely empirical “pack-hunter” bias. Evolution gave us those genetic biases for obvious reasons given the distribution of reproductive responsibilities.
Genese do not exist in isolation, no, however:
(a) modification of genetic disposition is endocrine and developmental it does not modify the genome
(b) In the nature-nurture debate it’s 80% nature, and the rest adaptation to circumstances that FAVOR that nature.
(c) Nurture can only HARM but not improve the individual
(d) Education only falsifies tests but over time all of us grow into (form to) our genes.
(e) The most important decision you can make for your children is who you mate with, since regression to the mean is impossible to avoid without controlled breeding (what europeans did for the past 1300 years until 1960)
(f) This is contrary to mother’s instincts (they intuit everything through amplified perception because they must given the fragility of young, and high pre-modern child mortality rates) and contrary to the instincts of feminized males, but it is incontrovertible in the data. This amplified perception begins in puberty, and is the source of the overwhelmingly common female mental illness when women are not supplied with sufficient child rearing responsibilities in order to burden the cognitive-emotional load.
(g) These facts are impossible for the pseudoscientists and sophists (created by Boas, Marx, Freud, Adorno, Derrida et al) in the marxist, postmodern, feminist movements to accept because it means (correctly) that:
i) man was not oppressed but domesticated like every other animal and plant, and that those who are on the left are still incompletely domesticated.
ii) classes are natural reflections of necessity given the abilities of the individuals to both process information and suppress animal impulses, the most common of which is gratification-delay,
iii) no marxist, postmodern, feminist revolution is possible because the competence structure necessary for the preservation of human standards of living cannot tolerate any other distribution than the Pareto.
iv) the optimum possible social order requires continuation of the Truth over Face of western civilization that requires we all understand our sexual, social, economic, political, and military market value (our ‘status’) is genetically determined, and that we can only create small homogenous ethnocentric polities that due to kin selection are biased to the highly redistributive. But that you are stuck with your ‘status’ at birth unless you are overwhelmingly lucky to match extreme effort with extreme luck.
So no, Plomin tries very hard to mollify the Genetic-Denialist movement but the data is in and incontestable – Genetic determinism is what it is and we are no different from breeds of dogs, and the differences between individuals as well as groups is the same as the difference between breeds of animals, or in the case of great apes, that we are effectively as different a series of species as are bonobos and chimpanzees.
This is totally intolerable to the feminine-marxist-postmodernist-feminist dysgenic religion of pseudoscience, sophism, and denialism, invented by boas, marx, freud, adorno, and derrida etc as a counter-revolution against Darwin, Spencer, Nietzsche, Maxwell, Poincare, and the second, german, scientific revolution.
The eugenicists were right and the chinese will get there first and they will win the war – unless we end the pseudoscience, sophism, denial, and deceit of the left cult of equality.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-15 13:27:00 UTC
Mesopotamian (Semitic) literature is underclass the same way that greek literature is upper class and roman literature (and english for that matter) is middle class. River lands and Forests are wonderful. Deserts suck. People are ignorant, dirty, superstitious poor, and tribal. Disease is rampant. Violence endemic. Thieving heroic. There is a vast difference between the wealthy and the poor. This is not so true in western civilization for geographic and demographic reasons. Just as it was not true in east asia. Just as it was less true in india. So while western lit is heroic (early european, aryan european, greek, roman… all of these are heroic literatures. They are not the submissive literatures of the mesopotamians and the egyptians. Whatever happens along the euphrates and the nile, we can certainly see in Gobekli Tepe and in all of the cities in the near east. Submission. This is not the literature of the hittites (anatolians), old europeans (balkans),
There is a relationship between the russian steppe people, the mongols, and the turkic raiders, in levels of development and harshness of nature, but also an influence and more genetic similarity with the other post-ice-age peoples of europe, which were more influential via the scandinavians, pole-germans, germans, and even french.
The church came into slavic peoples without being able to create an extractive political order as they were in europe. The bad people were the boyars, not the church. Where europeans took out their anger on the church and the aristocracy, americans did it on the aristocracy, europe in general, but were fully protestant and lacking central church political power, so without need to rebel against.
During the period where east slavic people would have rebelled they had ‘better enemies’ to rebel against than the church. SO they did.
Not very difficult really once you understand it but it has been very hard for me to understand it for some reason.
So, the literature of suffering seems to be a continental thing, where the scandinavians are just pagan in spirit still. Germans are nauseating sometimes because of it. Russians nihilistic. And americans (and brits) have no cognizance of it whatsoever. Because we believe the world is under our control if we want it to be.
So I am hostile to the submissive narratives for our people. Tragedy is a better substitute (and a western invention by the way), and tragedy calls upon us to fight together, not just suffer.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-15 08:55:00 UTC
—“They feel free to pursue and promote radical ideas because to them the whole world is a hotel room with somebody else picking up the tab.”—Andrey Sokoloff
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-14 21:33:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1062820720722485253
—“They feel free to pursue and promote radical ideas because to them the whole world is a hotel room with somebody else picking up the tab.”—Andrey Sokoloff
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-14 16:32:00 UTC
(Going to be interesting to watch how white women respond now that the left has targeted white women as they have targeted white men. Traitors always pay double. )
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-14 16:09:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1062739191371587585