Curt Doolittle

Theme: Class

  • THEY CAN”T UNDERSTAND US – WE ARE ANTIFRAGILE by John Mark “They have no idea wh

    THEY CAN”T UNDERSTAND US – WE ARE ANTIFRAGILE

    by John Mark

    “They have no idea what is coming”

    —RE: “I thrive on attacks”– Curt

    This is an area where, from what I can tell, the Left truly does not understand the Right, especially the hard Right.

    We are antifragile. Because we have agency. A very large percentage (probably a majority) of our group are men of agency. If we did not have it, most of us would not be part of the hard right, because NPCs are incapable of paying the price one must pay – dedication to seeking the truth regardless of cost.

    Because leftists and NPCs lack agency, they have difficulty grasping what they are dealing with when they encounter a man of agency in the political realm. Most leftists alive today have never dealt with a political opponent like Trump in their lifetimes. (Reagan was a light version, but America was very different then.) The Left has no idea how to handle him except to double down on the same tactics, which merely energize him.

    My theory is, *they underestimate us* largely because *they cannot imagine being like us*. If *they* were subjected to the shaming they hurl at us, *they* would cower and conform. They cheer every time they censor one of us successfully, not realizing they are sowing the seeds of their own destruction. Because they are feeding the energy of the antifragile beast: men of agency of the West.

    Imagine being an NPC. You’ve never questioned the “popular accepted” narrative in your life. How could you have any idea what you’re dealing with when you’re dealing with Men of Agency of the West?

    They have no idea what’s coming. Just like they had no idea Trump would win, and could not fathom it, they cannot fathom the forces they have awakened by attacking us, our civilization, our honor, and our forefathers’ honor.

    WE LOVE THE FIGHT.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-13 15:53:00 UTC

  • “…you need us…”— the left No we don’t. We don’t need you. We don’t WANT YO

    —“…you need us…”— the left

    No we don’t. We don’t need you. We don’t WANT YOU – AT ALL. You are disgusting. Really. You ruin everything. Our neighborhoods, our schools, our city streets, our workplaces, our public buildings and parks, our history, our academy, our governments, our religion, our festivals, are armies, or civic order, even our gene pool… .. I mean…. you’re just bad, disgusting, primitive people. We don’t want you. You are like locusts that consume everything beautiful. You are a plague against our people, our civilization, and the efforts of our ancestors. So no. We don’t need you. You have no value. You are more than a cost, you are a disease. Civilizations prosper most by getting rid of the underclass through harsh prosecution, harsher winter starvation, and the harshest possible taxation. And the fewer of you the better for us and for the planet, and for the future of mankind. You are a living breathing waste of the planet’s mankind’s and the universe’s potential.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-13 11:39:00 UTC

  • My argument is always the same. Separate the feminine/r-selected/herd/dysgenic p

    My argument is always the same. Separate the feminine/r-selected/herd/dysgenic pool from the masculine/k-selected/pack/eugenic pool. We are wealthy enough to afford the production of preferred but DIFFERENT commons, and if the dysgenic herd wants to produce their preferred commons and the eugenic pack wants to produce their preferred commons the only thing preventing both achieving their goals is the current monopoly commons. The solution is to separate (secede) and devolve normative regulation and commons production to the groups and let them speciate. The question MIGHT be race, but it’s not. It’s genetic strategy. The dysgenic and the eugenic. I’m perfectly happy if you folks want to construct india and brazil as long as those of us who want otherwise continue the western tradition of eugenic social order and continuous production of prosperity.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-12 18:41:00 UTC

  • The underclass is so because of low sexual, social, economic, political, and mil

    The underclass is so because of low sexual, social, economic, political, and military value. We hung them in droves before women had the right to vote. But having the right to vote, women did what they always do….

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-12 12:25:03 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/9044430340880426

  • Well I mean, white men ADDED to humanity lifting all. But Adding women and under

    Well I mean, white men ADDED to humanity lifting all. But Adding women and underclasses to the workforce has not been an increase for men, it has been a redistribution from men to women and underclasses – a LOSS.

    It is one thing to redistribute to your kin. It is another to redistribute to the enemy who seeks to eradicate you.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-11 20:16:00 UTC

  • THE RIGHT- Hard Right (Aristocratic, Martial, Judicial[prosecutorial]) … Middl

    -THE RIGHT-
    Hard Right (Aristocratic, Martial, Judicial[prosecutorial])
    … Middle Right (Commercial, Reciprocal, Legal[contractual])
    … … Soft Right (Priestly, Moral, Religious[adherent])

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-11 16:56:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1061663981071425543

  • Soldiers, Artists, Craftsmen, Businessmen, Lawyers, Preachers, Statesmen. The pe

    Soldiers, Artists, Craftsmen, Businessmen, Lawyers, Preachers, Statesmen.
    The people who kept you peasants in line. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-11 14:49:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1061632094609256455

    Reply addressees: @Gamerbushi9 @LutherRockwell @HumanProgress

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1061461130286170112

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1061461130286170112

  • “Peterson disgusts me, his entire job is to net the young men that are dropping

    —“Peterson disgusts me, his entire job is to net the young men that are dropping out, pick them up, dust them off, put them back on the conveyer belt to get chewed up and spat out by modern women while wealth is extracted from them for the globo-homo machine. A machine he fully endorses at its fundamental core.”—Jacob Bastion

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-11 14:37:00 UTC

  • THE RIGHT: TRIPARTISM LIVES ON- Hard Right (Aristocratic, Martial, Judicial[pros

    -THE RIGHT: TRIPARTISM LIVES ON-

    Hard Right (Aristocratic, Martial, Judicial[prosecutorial])

    … Middle Right (Commercial, Reciprocal, Legal[contractual])

    … … Soft Right (Priestly, Moral, Religious[adherent])

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-11 11:56:00 UTC

  • JORDAN PETERSON’S STRATEGY EXPLAINED FOR THE HARD (ARISTOCRATIC, MARTIAL, JUDICI

    JORDAN PETERSON’S STRATEGY EXPLAINED FOR THE HARD (ARISTOCRATIC, MARTIAL, JUDICIAL) RIGHT

    Peterson preserves his ability to maintain a low intensity conflict, under the illusion that it is merely a low intensity conflict, as a defensive means of CONTINUING a low intensity conflict for a long period, and thereby accumulating attrition upon the enemy by continuous, incremental, cumulative means.

    THE RIGHT’S INTERPRETATION OF HIS ACTIONS

    The Aristocratic (Truth Telling Warrior) and Judicial (Truth Telling Natural Law) and Defensive Function (truth as extension of disgust, purity, loyalty) of both Martial and Judicial Aristocracy (“The Right”) objects to this technique – but in doing so, illustrates why Sun Tzu, Machiavelli, Darwin, Nietzsche, and Military Grand Strategy are necessary courses of study: so that we do not confuse the moral, ideal, and eternal with the scientific, the real, and the temporal: we must retain REASON and AGENCY because of the PARTICULAR CASE, and not resort to HABIT and INTUITION because of the GENERAL standards of measure we rely upon for our group strategy.

    THE CORRECT CRITICISM OF PETERSON (AND HIS PEERS)

    My complaint against Peterson is consistent: (1) Truth proper is enough for western civilization because it is the source of the uniqueness of western civilization, and (2) his claim that wisdom (choice) is the same as truth (decidability) in order to (3) preserve his malinvestment in middle eastern literature (intuitionism) instead of exclusively western literature (reason), because (4) he practices his method of cognitive behavioral therapy (stoicism), by using storytelling (providing the objectivity of the observer) as a means of suggestion (which does succeed), instead of action ( demonstration), and self authority. And he does this because (5) he is artful in the technique of manipulation by suggestion using narrative analogy, and *possess moral intent* – but (6) failing to grasp that the entirety of the problem facing western civilization is that by not forbidding that technique of suggestion, we leave open the MAJORITY USE OF IT, by those who have *possessed immoral intent*: the abrahamists, marxists, feminist, and postmodernists. Because (7) we evolved to be suggestable by mothers using the feminine speech pattern, and it is the weaponization of that speech pattern under Abrahamism, Marxism, postmodernism, feminism – what we call ‘religious thought’ that has exploited the weakness not only in the modern Marxist, Postmodernist, Feminist era, but also in the ancient Zoroastrian, Abrahamic (jewish, christian, islamic) era, that brought about the dark ages, leaving ONLY THE FAR EAST (by design) and sub-saharan africa (by cost of access) insulated from the exploitation of this vulnerability.

    THEREFORE

    Think of Peterson as tying some number of the enemy down in the the narrows (Thermopylae) while we (the army and navy) martial our intellectual (strategic) and physical (revolt, civil war). They cannot afford to lose this battle with him. (and they are losing it). But it is up to us to defeat them, crush the army of deceit (Abrahamic, Marxist, Postmodernist, Feminist) and to restore Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, Duty, The Rule of Natural Law, and Markets in Everything that result from all of the above, with TOTAL DENIAL OF THE ENEMY of the field of exploiting our people’s weakness to suggestion by ‘want of the comforting and desirable narrative of our mothers that calms us in times of stress’.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Natural Law of Reciprocity

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-11 10:40:00 UTC