Curt Doolittle

Theme: Class

  • And I have, we have, had enough of the sophism of relativism and the pseudoscien

    And I have, we have, had enough of the sophism of relativism and the pseudoscience of equalitarianism, and the pseudosciences of man: Boas et all, Marx et al, Freud et al, Cantor and the Logicians, Mises and the libertarians, Adorno et al, Keynes, Derrida et al, neocons et al.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-06 22:37:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1070809390201143297

    Reply addressees: @BretWeinstein

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1070127960009564160

    IN REPLY TO:

    @BretWeinstein

    This is a modern creation myth, delivered as if it were an analysis.

    It is as inaccurate and self-serving the intersectionalist’s claim that all disparities arise from oppression.

    Those pushing these stories persuade through flattery. Don’t be fooled. Don’t take the bait. https://t.co/DH8e85dlOq

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1070127960009564160

  • Just like the Classes, some Civilizations are innovators, some producers, some s

    Just like the Classes, some Civilizations are innovators, some producers, some some consumers, some free riders, some parasites, some predators, and some cancers.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-06 22:33:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1070808412911493120

    Reply addressees: @BretWeinstein

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1070127960009564160

    IN REPLY TO:

    @BretWeinstein

    This is a modern creation myth, delivered as if it were an analysis.

    It is as inaccurate and self-serving the intersectionalist’s claim that all disparities arise from oppression.

    Those pushing these stories persuade through flattery. Don’t be fooled. Don’t take the bait. https://t.co/DH8e85dlOq

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1070127960009564160

  • THESE STRATEGIES MAP TO THE THREE ROLES 1 – Ascendant-Male (Libertarian Producti

    THESE STRATEGIES MAP TO THE THREE ROLES

    1 – Ascendant-Male (Libertarian Productive),

    2 – In-Demand-Male (Conservative), and;

    3 – Female-and-Female-Allied-Male (Consumptive).

    Physics and Economics in Everything.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-02 09:32:00 UTC

  • THE ABUSE OF THE TERM “NATION” IN ITS HISTORICAL AND MARXIST-POSTMODERN-FEMINIST

    THE ABUSE OF THE TERM “NATION” IN ITS HISTORICAL AND MARXIST-POSTMODERN-FEMINIST CONTEXT

    (Note: I try to collapse one of the major the cycles of history here, and repeat the same idea from different angles because while the underlying causes are not that difficult, it seems relatively difficult for most of us. Repetition solves that problem.)

    So Nation = A Race or Subrace or Tribal Group of Similar Genetics, Language, Culture, Traditions, Institutions, and Group Evolutionary Strategy. Period.

    Everything Else is Just more sophomoric postmodern term abuse.

    |KIN| Individual > Family > Clan > Tribe > Nation > Race > Man.

    |TERRITORY| Land > Lands > Country > Empire

    |RULE| Warriors > Militia > Military (Insurers of Last resort) > Rule(Decidability, monopoly on power) > Government (Management, monopoly on commons) > State (Corporation holding Assets, monopoly on foreign relations) > Empire.

    In the context of this discussion, either you have a Nation-State, or an Empire. Nation (people), Nation-State (political order), Empire (multi-national political order).

    We use the term International as a shorthand for inter-imperial, stat, and national. Largely because our terminology evolved during the era of nation states dominated by european nation states – each of which was and always has been an empire, forcibly created by napoleon in france, by the invention of total war, and causing the rest of the world to react to scale in order to produce militaries of capability to resist them.

    America, Russia, China, and India are Empires. The UK is either a Federation or an Empire, and increasingly demonstrably a Federation. Italy consists of the north and the south – although Federated or Imperial a question unresolved. Spain because – because of her regional conflicts, an empire. France because of Brittany and algeria an empire.

    The Universalist (pseudoscientific-marxist and sophist-postmodernist and denialist-feminist) movements attempt to construct a redefinition of terms to fool the idiots into working against their interests by reversing eugenic paternalism.

    The Particularist (scientific, empiricist, paternalist) order simply states what exist, and asks us to choose which order is in our interests, advocating the preservation of eugenic paternalism.

    It’s not complicated. It’s the pseudoscientists, sophists, denialists, and outright liars and idiots that make the current world APPEAR complicated by layers of loading, framing, suggestion, obscurantism, fictionalism, and deceit.

    These questions are all open to simple answer. But the dysgenic left kleptocracy attempts to achieve by pseudoscience sophism denialism and deceit, that which the jewish, christians, and islamists achieved by supernaturalism, sophism, denialism and deceit: another dark age, in the multi-millennial war between the eugenic indo europeans, and the dysgenic afro-asiatics.

    REVOLT ONE

    Indo European Expansion by Heroic Paternal Militarism vs Semitic invention of Religious Resistance

    REVOLT TWO

    Greco Roman Expansion of Empiricism vs Semitic Religious Resistance

    REVOLT THREE

    Anglo-European Expansion of Science, Law, Accounting, and Technology vs Semitic Pseudoscientific, Sophist (pseudo-rational), Denialist, Resistance.

    Just the eugenic masculine heroic aristocracy against the dysgenic feminine resistance.

    Male vs Female at Scale.

    Males fight ingroup for position (pack strategy ). Females fight ingroup to Destroy and never stop (herd strategy).

    Males fight outgroup to cooperate or destroy. Females encourage outgroup to undermine ingroup. None of this rational choice but purely genetic and evolutionary in influence.

    Surviving Europeans, the Conquered Persians, and Lost Indo-Aryans applied the male strategy of colonize and domesticate for profit. Semites (afro-asiatics), apply the female strategy and use disapproval, shaming, ridicule, gossip, and reputation destruction to excite the underclasses to rebel against those who have made their circumstance possible.

    The story of Cain and Able is the story of paternal urban agrarian vs maternal herding wanderer. And the different moral intuitions between them and between men and women continue to determine our cyclical competition.

    Unfortunately, the female intuition is only useful at social scale, and the male intuition at political scale. And when the feminine wins, as we have seen, the great civilizations are destroyed, just as much from plague and war without but from undermining within.

    Version Two

    Jews (undermine) > Christians (acquiesce) > Muslims (conquer and replace)

    Version Three

    Marxists (undermine) > Postmodernists (acquiesce) > Islamists (conquer and replace)

    The test of Racial competition of whom only the east asians and indians seem willing to resist by cultural means in india(culturo-centrism), and by state means in china, japan, and Korea (ethnocentrism)

    That is the explanation of the cycles of history at scale.

    Cheers

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-30 22:52:00 UTC

  • HOW DID THEY DO IT AND WHY CAN’T WE? Having divorced themselves from the burden

    HOW DID THEY DO IT AND WHY CAN’T WE?

    Having divorced themselves from the burden of carrying territory, the classes necessary to defend it, police it, govern it, and the classes necessary to engage in production to pay for it, they were free to specialize in predation upon the host – primarily through various forms of usury, rent seeking, and conspiracy with the state against the people, and just as we redistributed lower class reproduction to the upper classes, they invested ALL of their reproduction in the parasitic classes.

    That’s the net of it right there.

    We can’t do that because we need to hold territory, fight for it, and pay for fighting for it, while continuously improving our condition. Ergo we produce commons and they parasitically consume and destroy commons.

    I mean. That’s the economics of it right there.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-29 17:14:00 UTC

  • MORE ON DE-PROPAGANDIZING “CAPITALISM” (required reading) 1. Trade has always ex

    MORE ON DE-PROPAGANDIZING “CAPITALISM”

    (required reading)

    1. Trade has always existed (generating exchange)

    2. Markets have almost always existed (generating prices).

    3. Capitalists have existed as long as there have been markets (generating means of production).

    4. Northern Europeans (Venetians less so. Saxons largely, the Hansa in particular, the English systematically, the Dutch first at political scale), developed rule of law – which is why they escaped the church with the reformation.)

    5. Capitalism consists of rule of law consisting nearly entirely of markets, and socialism of rule of men eliminating or vastly reducing markets – but all polities have some mixed economy and must do so. The problem is that the state is superior at investing in some commons, but the private sector is far better at allocating and maximizing the returns on capital.

    6. So capitalism and socialism only evolved once the industrial revolution came into play – and the socialists demanded control over production. Capitalism then was the name they used for ‘market bias under rule of law’ , and socialism ‘state bias under rule of men’.

    So any statement about when was capitalism invented, is rater ‘stupid’ really. The answer is very simple: capitalism was the ‘jewish’ view of markets, and socialism the ‘jewish’ view of the state. And suckers bought into this false dichotomy. The question is and always will be the utilities of the state monopoly vs the private sector market. And as it stands, the lesson is quite clear: when it is simple and you know how to do it, but it’s risky and expensive, the state can provide startup capital and market protections. Once that investment is running, it can be ‘sold’ to the private sector who can then maximize its potential.

    The USA has mastered the art of moving this high risk investment into the private sector, but this has had the effect of hollowing out predictable sectors of the economy. So it appears that once again, there are those things it is better for the state to produce (labor-consuming and strategic companies, that are less speculative and produce slower longer returns), and things that it is better for the private sector to produce (IQ consuming and highly speculative things with shorter higher returns.)

    CONVERSELY

    The flood river and irrigation valleys of the fertile, crescent, pakistan-india, and china, could produce state-capital easily, just as the west could produce private-capital easily. The west and east homogenous peoples higher trust. The center tribal heterogenous people lower trust.

    It’s not complicated. You do what you can with the people and geography you have.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-28 12:10:00 UTC

  • TRIPARTISM Tripartism: Those who Rule (Army) – Force: Freedom/Threat . Those who

    TRIPARTISM

    Tripartism:

    Those who Rule (Army) – Force: Freedom/Threat .

    Those who Teach (Academy) – Words: Oppy./Ostracization.

    Those who Labor (Family) – Trade: Consumption/Deprivation.

    Labor divided into the hierarchy we call the economy: Investment, Finance, Banking, Organizing, Managing, Laboring, Trading, Distributing. (Libertarian)

    The Academy evolved into the Academy, Media, State (clerical), Bureaucracy. (Feminine)

    The Army Evolved into the Political and Judiciary, intelligence, military, and the military industrial complex. (Masculine)

    Such that we still possess all three classes but that most of us participate in more than one. This is why class hierarchies are conflated: one can participate in a role in each, and shift our allegiance to whatever elite as is in our advantage. We are not anchored except by our social, sexual, economic, political, and military value to one group or another.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-25 17:48:00 UTC

  • NAIL IN THE OBVIOUS COFFIN…. LATER MARRIAGE LEADING TO PAIRING OFF, AND INCREA

    NAIL IN THE OBVIOUS COFFIN…. LATER MARRIAGE LEADING TO PAIRING OFF, AND INCREASING INCOME DIFFERENCES

    The best results on assortative mating and inequality I have seen

    by Tyler Cowen

    This paper studies the evolution of assortative mating in the permanent wage (the individual-specific component of wage) in the U.S., its role in the increase in family wage inequality, and the factors behind this evolution. I first document a substantial trend in assortative mating, as measured by the permanent wage correlation of couples, from 0.3 for families formed in the late 1960s to 0.52 for families formed in the late 1980s.

    I show that this trend accounts for more than one-third of the increase in family wage inequality across these cohorts of families. I then argue that the increase in marriage age across these cohorts contributed to the assortative mating and thus to the rising inequality.

    Individuals face a large degree of uncertainty about their permanent wages early in their careers. If they marry early, as most individuals in the late 1960s did, this uncertainty leads to weak marital sorting along permanent wage. But when marriage is delayed, as in the late 1980s, the sorting becomes stronger due to the quick resolution of this uncertainty with work experience.

    After providing reduced-form evidence on the impact of marriage age, I build and estimate a marriage model with wage uncertainty and show that the increase in marriage age can explain almost 80% of the increase in assortative mating.

    https://sites.google.com/site/alparslantuncay2018/research

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-22 18:06:00 UTC

  • The military mind is easy to identify. The law enforcement mind is easy to ident

    The military mind is easy to identify. The law enforcement mind is easy to identify. The bureaucratic mind is easy to identify. The house-spook or field-spook mind is easy to identify. The entrepreneurial mind is easy to identify. The working class mind is easy to identify. The labor mind is easy to identify. The (((tribal))) and female minds are easy to identify – on the use of frame alone, and the age and generation minds are easy to identify. The ease of identifying a class of mind is merely experience in doing so and reading the tells. You learn by LISTENING.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-20 07:21:00 UTC

  • ANCIENT ORIGINS THE STRONG (MARTIAL) AND THE WEAK (PRIESTLY)

    https://propertarianism.com/2018/05/11/our-ancient-origins/OUR ANCIENT ORIGINS THE STRONG (MARTIAL) AND THE WEAK (PRIESTLY)

    https://propertarianism.com/2018/05/11/our-ancient-origins/

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-19 19:59:00 UTC