Theme: Civilization

  • (from elsewhere) –“The higher in social class, the more agreeableness upon comm

    (from elsewhere)
    –“The higher in social class, the more agreeableness upon commerce. The more central contact is situated upon commerce, the greater the buffer between Individualism and Proximity pathogen. The more dependency on Reciprocity in commerce, the more likely the Sustainability of Productivity. The higher the social class, the greater the Retention Buffer.”–Aisle Two (alias)

    This is a good example what we are trying to teach:
    Enumeration, Serialization, Equilibria, Summarization.
    “Pathogen” is an analogy and should be operationalized. But otherwise, you can see how The Method (P-Method) is working through the followers (students).


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-11 16:10:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634587504178352128

  • China’s geography makes it a virtual island, in the sense that it’s on the edge

    China’s geography makes it a virtual island, in the sense that it’s on the edge of thecontinent surrounded by tundra and desert. So china is dependent on sea transport to survive. It’s relatively easy to prevent china from obtaining resources.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-11 01:58:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634373085234077697

    Reply addressees: @MonsantoEnjoyer @ksadjadpour

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634371535895949314

  • (western civ) WHY CHRISTIANITY ISN’T ENOUGH 1) Western civ has always been trifu

    (western civ)
    WHY CHRISTIANITY ISN’T ENOUGH

    1) Western civ has always been trifunctional, in that we preserve competition between religion(feminine, familial), law (political, commercial) and aristocracy (war). This forms a market competition between social, economic, and military elites, that promotes competitive innovation, and prevents corruption and stagnation through a balance of powers.

    2) Western civ whose origins are best understood by study of the Spartans, then maturing thru trade into the Athenians, as an upper class of horse-riding warriors (aristocracy) financed by their extended families (oligarchy), over some number of footsoldiers (citizens) and a conquered set of farm workers and laborers (slaves).

    3) Christian religion was an innovation because it provided the underclasses (women, serfs, slaves) a means of obtaining status by simply doing no wrong, rather than possessing wealth and power – and it was made possible by the wealth increase generated by the roman empire, roman roads, roman administration, and roman trade. Thus reducing alienation between the classes, and lowering the cost of administering increasingly larger polities. While the church was successful in undermining roman institutions of cultural production – just as woke is doing today, the military and the law and trifunctionalism remained.

    4) The germanic aristocracy captured the Church as a holding company for land under primogeniture, and so the aristocracy (military and land), traders and transporters (law), and nobility(church and peasantry), maintained the trifunctional equilibrium. (There is no means of concentrating capital as in the flood river valley civs, so it means federations of aristocracy were necessary – especially in Germany.)

    5) As such the church failed to fully reform into the acquinian and scholastic model of natural law, uniting Christianity and science, in response to darwin. The French left in response to the french revolution, and the Jewish left in response to the world wars, were successful in disintermediating the aristocracy and the military ending trifunctionalism and driving to Jewish and french authoritarianism (positive law) – replacing the church, by merging it with the secular state.

    6) The Jewish left then captured the institutions, and converted them from vehicles for training the aristocracy, nobility, and upper middle class into responsibility for the administration of the state, economy, and polity, into CREDENTIALISM which allowed Jewish intellectuals to be pseudo-intellectuals whose purpose was to destroy the institutions of cultural production in Europe,m replacing trifunctionalism with authoritarian clerisy.

    So the correct answer is that Christianity ALONE is too weak to resist the authoritarian religion of the left, and requires military aristocracy, and rule of law, and demonstrated competency in real life instead of certification by credentialism (academies).

    My work attempts to fix this problem and reverse the process of destruction of our civilization. Because we must both repair our law, restore meritocracy over credentialism, restore our military aristocracy, and complete the unification of Christianity and science started by Aquinas, nearly completed by Blackstone, Smith, Hobbes-Locke, and Hume: the natural law (as I define it): “the law of man, of nature, and nature’s god.”

    There is no other solution.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-10 22:48:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634325501249568770

  • (western civ) WHY CHRISTIANITY ISN’T ENOUGH 1) Western civ has always been trifu

    (western civ)
    WHY CHRISTIANITY ISN’T ENOUGH

    1) Western civ has always been trifunctional, in that we preserve competition between religion(feminine, familial), law (political, commercial) and aristocracy (war). This forms a market competition between social, economic, and military elites, that promotes competitive innovation, and prevents corruption and stagnation through a balance of powers.

    2) Western civ whose origins are best understood by study of the Spartans, then maturing thru trade into the Athenians, as an upper class of horse-riding warriors (aristocracy) financed by their extended families (oligarchy), over some number of footsoldiers (citizens) and a conquered set of farm workers and laborers (slaves).

    3) Christian religion was an innovation because it provided the underclasses (women, serfs, slaves) a means of obtaining status by simply doing no wrong, rather than possessing wealth and power – and it was made possible by the wealth increase generated by the roman empire, roman roads, roman administration, and roman trade. Thus reducing alienation between the classes, and lowering the cost of administering increasingly larger polities. While the church was successful in undermining roman institutions of cultural production – just as woke is doing today, the military and the law and trifunctionalism remained.

    4) The germanic aristocracy captured the Church as a holding company for land under primogeniture, and so the aristocracy (military and land), traders and transporters (law), and nobility(church and peasantry), maintained the trifunctional equilibrium. (There is no means of concentrating capital as in the flood river valley civs, so it means federations of aristocracy were necessary – especially in Germany.)

    5) As such the church failed to fully reform into the acquinian and scholastic model of natural law, uniting Christianity and science, in response to darwin. The French left in response to the french revolution, and the Jewish left in response to the world wars, were successful in disintermediating the aristocracy and the military ending trifunctionalism and driving to Jewish and french authoritarianism (positive law) – replacing the church, by merging it with the secular state.

    6) The Jewish left then captured the institutions, and converted them from vehicles for training the aristocracy, nobility, and upper middle class into responsibility for the administration of the state, economy, and polity, into CREDENTIALISM which allowed Jewish intellectuals to be pseudo-intellectuals whose purpose was to destroy the institutions of cultural production in Europe,m replacing trifunctionalism with authoritarian clerisy.

    So the correct answer is that Christianity ALONE is too weak to resist the authoritarian religion of the left, and requires military aristocracy, and rule of law, and demonstrated competency in real life instead of certification by credentialism (academies).

    My work attempts to fix this problem and reverse the process of destruction of our civilization. Because we must both repair our law, restore meritocracy over credentialism, restore our military aristocracy, and complete the unification of Christianity and science started by Aquinas, nearly completed by Blackstone, Smith, Hobbes-Locke, and Hume: the natural law (as I define it): “the law of man, of nature, and nature’s god.”

    There is no other solution.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-10 22:48:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634325501631234054

  • WHY THE WORLD ABANDONS THE WEST? Does the world hate the west (natural law, rule

    WHY THE WORLD ABANDONS THE WEST?

    Does the world hate the west (natural law, rule of law, republican government, democratic elections, global trade, and the prosperity that results)? Or does the world hate the degeneracy of neoMarxism, Multiculturalism, Postmodernism, Feminism, Hedonism, and Woke?

    OK, let’s make the question even worse? What culture (civ) did natural law, rule of law, republican government et al arise from? (Western), and what culture (civ) did Marxism, neoMarxism, Multiculturalism, Postmodernism, Feminism, Hedonism, and Woke et al arise from? (Jewish)

    And if the Western people, or at least, Western women, are vulnerable to the revolution against Western civ by Jewish influence; and if the West is providing the vehicle for the propagation of this influence, then it’s rational for the ‘moral’ world to resist “the whole package”.

    So is the world against western culture and its institutions? Or is it against Jewish culture and its war against western institutions, and the moral institutions of the rest of the world, via western institutions? It’s obvious. It’s also fixable: Outlaw immoral cultural sedition.

    So disambiguate between the west and western high-trust institutions that continue traditional morals that maintain the primacy of the intergenerational family as the purpose of policy, and restore the prohibition of ‘hazarding’ our young from the commons.

    We are not criminals until we are aware we’re committing a crime. The rule of law states “no law no crime”. However this doesn’t apply to torts. If damage is don’t then restitution is due.

    How do we collect restitution from the Marxist, pomo, woke, cult?


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-10 22:42:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634323800283136000

  • WHY THE WORLD ABANDONS THE WEST? Does the world hate the west (natural law, rule

    WHY THE WORLD ABANDONS THE WEST?

    Does the world hate the west (natural law, rule of law, republican government, democratic elections, global trade, and the prosperity that results)? Or does the world hate the degeneracy of neoMarxism, Multiculturalism, Postmodernism, Feminism, Hedonism, and Woke?

    OK, let’s make the question even worse? What culture (civ) did natural law, rule of law, republican government et al arise from? (Western), and what culture (civ) did Marxism, neoMarxism, Multiculturalism, Postmodernism, Feminism, Hedonism, and Woke et al arise from? (Jewish)

    And if the Western people, or at least, Western women, are vulnerable to the revolution against Western civ by Jewish influence; and if the West is providing the vehicle for the propagation of this influence, then it’s rational for the ‘moral’ world to resist “the whole package”.

    So is the world against western culture and its institutions? Or is it against Jewish culture and its war against western institutions, and the moral institutions of the rest of the world, via western institutions? It’s obvious. It’s also fixable: Outlaw immoral cultural sedition.

    So disambiguate between the west and western high-trust institutions that continue traditional morals that maintain the primacy of the intergenerational family as the purpose of policy, and restore the prohibition of ‘hazarding’ our young from the commons.

    We are not criminals until we are aware we’re committing a crime. The rule of law states “no law no crime”. However this doesn’t apply to torts. If damage is don’t then restitution is due.

    How do we collect restitution from the Marxist, pomo, woke, cult?


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-10 22:42:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634323800551563266

  • “Oh… you’re one of those.” “Those what?” “Those alive due to modernity” (puzzl

    “Oh… you’re one of those.”
    “Those what?”
    “Those alive due to modernity”
    (puzzled)
    (satisfied) moves on.

    #humor


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-10 22:21:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634318540089032705

  • “Quakers are better. Yankees be cringe”– Trying to figure ut how to respond to

    –“Quakers are better. Yankees be cringe”–
    Trying to figure ut how to respond to this.
    Best I can do is:
    “Maybe, but we were allowed to ‘dress proudly’ and could wear fancier clothes.”


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-10 22:09:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634315658480562182

    Reply addressees: @whatifalthist

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633747370759389187

  • RT @JFGariepy: Very important concept this “Alive due to modernity.” Never heard

    RT @JFGariepy: Very important concept this “Alive due to modernity.” Never heard the phrase before but it’s right on target.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-10 20:14:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634286584076947470

  • (from elsewhere) –“ANGLOS NEED TO GET OVER JEWS”– Hopefully my work will canon

    (from elsewhere)
    –“ANGLOS NEED TO GET OVER JEWS”–
    Hopefully my work will canonize european civilization as the science of cooperation at scale, and prevent further warfare against the only civilization that has dragged mankind out of ignorance and poverty. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1634257355759034375