Theme: Civilization

  • Well, that’s simply not true. Compare Jewish and Anglo ethics. And Jewish and An

    Well, that’s simply not true. Compare Jewish and Anglo ethics. And Jewish and Anglo industries. And Jewish and Anglo wealth origins. And Jewish and Anglo innovation. And Jewish and Anglo Governments. And Jewish and Anglo truthfulness, and Trustworthiness. Jewish and anglo philosophy. Jewish and anglo law. And then Jewish (cosmopolitan heterogenous low trust authoritarian feminine) and anglo (total market, homogeneous, high trust, reciprocal, masculine) group strategies.

    That comparison among others is telling.
    We live in an era where verbal acuity is more rewarded than at any time in history. Where finanicalism and baiting into hazard are most licensed in history. And where suppression of sedition is least practiced in history. This age is a luxury of Christian ethics and the hole in law created by European trifunctionalism’s tolerance of political competition. And combined with the introduction of women in to workforce and polity at the same time as Jewish (feminine competitive and conflict strategy)

    We have simply failed to outlaw the female means of anti-social, anti-political, anti-cultural sedition and treason as thoroughly as we have outlawed the masculine versions. But the ‘feminine experiemnt’ is coming to an end, and we have learned how to reform our laws to eliminate feminine seditino and warfare as we have masculine.

    So, what’s happening at the moment is the great Jewish DISPLACEMENT from the academy and government, is following the great white displacement – because Jews opened the door to Jewish feminine verbal CREDENTIALISM over anglo masculine existential DEMONSTRATED COMPETENCY in military and industry. And that only occurred because of anglo Christian moral conviction, and especially anglo aristocratic tradition of aristocratic egalitarianism. (rotation)

    As far as I know, there are only two of us in the world who understand these subjects at extraordinary depth. I’m probably a bit better at explaining it.

    But you know, there is a reason Jews have failed at large-scale organizational construction, military construction, state construction, artistic, and mechanical, engineering, and technical innovation. And only began contributing to science when the franchise was opened. Yet Jews immediately began to undermine by producing the entire corpus of behavioral social and economic and legal pseudoscience that are the source of 19th and 20th conflicts both domestic and foreign.

    So perhaps we would like to see something positive other than Einstien (who along with Bohr re-platonized mathematics and so he harmed as much as he helped.)

    Anglos invented the modern state, rule of law by the natural law, and the agrarian, transportation, commercial, financial, scientific, industrial, and technological revolution within decades of the printing press and literacy. Jews contribute nothing to mankind despite literacy (other than subculture as organized crime syndicate by baiting into hazard).

    Our core competency is civilization by trust formation.
    Can you make the same claim?

    We all know better.
    But then the evolutionary conflict between Masculine systematizing over time and truth before face, and feminine empathizing in time and face before truth continues.

    We don’t have a problem overcoming our sins.
    Why do you? Feminine intolerance for self-reflection and subsequent adaptation?

    Genetics in everything.

    -Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-10 18:18:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634257355759034375

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632887691749605377

  • Well, that’s simply not true. Compare Jewish and Anglo ethics. And Jewish and An

    Well, that’s simply not true. Compare Jewish and Anglo ethics. And Jewish and Anglo industries. And Jewish and Anglo wealth origins. And Jewish and Anglo innovation. And Jewish and Anglo Governments. And Jewish and Anglo truthfulness, and Trustworthiness. Jewish and anglo philosophy. Jewish and anglo law. And then Jewish (cosmopolitan heterogenous low trust authoritarian feminine) and anglo (total market, homogeneous, high trust, reciprocal, masculine) group strategies.

    That comparison among others is telling.
    We live in an era where verbal acuity is more rewarded than at any time in history. Where finanicalism and baiting into hazard are most licensed in history. And where suppression of sedition is least practiced in history. This age is a luxury of Christian ethics and the hole in law created by European trifunctionalism’s tolerance of political competition. And combined with the introduction of women in to workforce and polity at the same time as Jewish (feminine competitive and conflict strategy)

    We have simply failed to outlaw the female means of anti-social, anti-political, anti-cultural sedition and treason as thoroughly as we have outlawed the masculine versions. But the ‘feminine experiemnt’ is coming to an end, and we have learned how to reform our laws to eliminate feminine seditino and warfare as we have masculine.

    So, what’s happening at the moment is the great Jewish DISPLACEMENT from the academy and government, is following the great white displacement – because Jews opened the door to Jewish feminine verbal CREDENTIALISM over anglo masculine existential DEMONSTRATED COMPETENCY in military and industry. And that only occurred because of anglo Christian moral conviction, and especially anglo aristocratic tradition of aristocratic egalitarianism. (rotation)

    As far as I know, there are only two of us in the world who understand these subjects at extraordinary depth. I’m probably a bit better at explaining it.

    But you know, there is a reason Jews have failed at large-scale organizational construction, military construction, state construction, artistic, and mechanical, engineering, and technical innovation. And only began contributing to science when the franchise was opened. Yet Jews immediately began to undermine by producing the entire corpus of behavioral social and economic and legal pseudoscience that are the source of 19th and 20th conflicts both domestic and foreign.

    So perhaps we would like to see something positive other than Einstien (who along with Bohr re-platonized mathematics and so he harmed as much as he helped.)

    Anglos invented the modern state, rule of law by the natural law, and the agrarian, transportation, commercial, financial, scientific, industrial, and technological revolution within decades of the printing press and literacy. Jews contribute nothing to mankind despite literacy (other than subculture as organized crime syndicate by baiting into hazard).

    Our core competency is civilization by trust formation.
    Can you make the same claim?

    We all know better.
    But then the evolutionary conflict between Masculine systematizing over time and truth before face, and feminine empathizing in time and face before truth continues.

    We don’t have a problem overcoming our sins.
    Why do you? Feminine intolerance for self-reflection and subsequent adaptation?

    Genetics in everything.

    -Cheers

    Reply addressees: @DiscntTomCruise


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-10 18:18:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634257355339603982

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632887691749605377

  • It’s hard to tell. Trust spread eastward from the germanic countries with commer

    It’s hard to tell. Trust spread eastward from the germanic countries with commerce. Russian ‘nobility’ was so heavily corrupt and abusive of the peasantry that they never developed the ‘commons’ attitudes of Germania. They were only freed from serfdom in 1861. About the same time as American slaves. That said, they were pretty devout Christians. Communities were integral if very poor. And AFAIK it was the soviet union and the pervasive corruption and threat of ‘being reported’ that did the number on them. But throughout the 50’s and 60s when russia was ‘looking good’ it was a quality of life improvement for millions, who felt that change more so than those who were resentful. And today’s Russia has the LOWEST institutional trust in the WORLD.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-10 03:57:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634040807077412866

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634035519167377410

  • It’s hard to tell. Trust spread eastward from the germanic countries with commer

    It’s hard to tell. Trust spread eastward from the germanic countries with commerce. Russian ‘nobility’ was so heavily corrupt and abusive of the peasantry that they never developed the ‘commons’ attitudes of Germania. They were only freed from serfdom in 1861. About the same time as American slaves. That said, they were pretty devout Christians. Communities were integral if very poor. And AFAIK it was the soviet union and the pervasive corruption and threat of ‘being reported’ that did the number on them. But throughout the 50’s and 60s when russia was ‘looking good’ it was a quality of life improvement for millions, who felt that change more so than those who were resentful. And today’s Russia has the LOWEST institutional trust in the WORLD.

    Reply addressees: @NorseJarl


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-10 03:57:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634040806976765952

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634035519167377410

  • RT @desilva_frank: #ArcheologyandAncestors👇

    RT @desilva_frank: #ArcheologyandAncestors👇


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-10 03:37:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634035665250729984

  • Read books written by my ancestors in the 16-1700’s and they were very ‘hard’ pe

    Read books written by my ancestors in the 16-1700’s and they were very ‘hard’ people. After 1830 knowledge was incdreasing rapidly. But they were much ‘harder’ than we are. Mine would be awed by what I know, but not my demeanor. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-10 03:28:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634033519532834816

    Reply addressees: @A_E_Winslow

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633896915917058048

  • TRUST: WHY DOES DUGIN SEEK A NEW PHILOSOPHY FOR RUSSIA? (easy answer that applie

    TRUST: WHY DOES DUGIN SEEK A NEW PHILOSOPHY FOR RUSSIA?
    (easy answer that applies to every civilization)

    1) The principle difference between civilizations is the degree of trust: meaning the trustworthiness of each individual in personal, private, social, economic, and political life.. Russia is a low-trust civilization. China is a lower-trust civilization. India is an even lower-trust civilization. The middle east (MENA) is a much much lower-trust civilization. Sub Saharan Africa is a trustless civilization. The Japanese, South Koreans, and the Europeans (mostly northern Europeans) are the only high-trust civilizations.

    2) Russia is a low trust civ. Duggin is looking for a justification for Russian imperial authoritarianism that is necessary for a low-trust population to maintain a geographic extreme of eleven time zones, when there is no means of political, social, economic, and cultural, competition against competitors. In other words, (just like Canadians virtue signal over Americans) Russians need a means of excusing their untrustworthiness and not developing trustworthiness.

    3) Those civilizations that experimented with communism and socialism ‘blew the window’ of modernizing, where they hade but a century to seize their share of incentives to create a majority middle-class society, before market differences between civilizations eliminated any chance of an advantage. Now they have built up consumption, but they have no capital to use to transform, and no market means of transformation. So most will choose like Dugin to double down on ideology religion or authority to compensate. Some others will knuckle under (India) and develop quickly. Others more slowly.

    -Curt Doolittle


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-10 02:15:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634015030441123840

  • TRUST: WHY DOES DUGIN SEEK A NEW PHILOSOPHY FOR RUSSIA? (easy answer that applie

    TRUST: WHY DOES DUGIN SEEK A NEW PHILOSOPHY FOR RUSSIA?
    (easy answer that applies to every civilization)

    1) The principle difference between civilizations is the degree of trust: meaning the trustworthiness of each individual in personal, private, social, economic, and political life.. Russia is a low-trust civilization. China is a lower-trust civilization. India is an even lower-trust civilization. The middle east (MENA) is a much much lower-trust civilization. Sub Saharan Africa is a trustless civilization. The Japanese, South Koreans, and the Europeans (mostly northern Europeans) are the only high-trust civilizations.

    2) Russia is a low trust civ. Duggin is looking for a justification for Russian imperial authoritarianism that is necessary for a low-trust population to maintain a geographic extreme of eleven time zones, when there is no means of political, social, economic, and cultural, competition against competitors. In other words, (just like Canadians virtue signal over Americans) Russians need a means of excusing their untrustworthiness and not developing trustworthiness.

    3) Those civilizations that experimented with communism and socialism ‘blew the window’ of modernizing, where they hade but a century to seize their share of incentives to create a majority middle-class society, before market differences between civilizations eliminated any chance of an advantage. Now they have built up consumption, but they have no capital to use to transform, and no market means of transformation. So most will choose like Dugin to double down on ideology religion or authority to compensate. Some others will knuckle under (India) and develop quickly. Others more slowly.

    -Curt Doolittle


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-10 02:15:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634015030545899529

  • RT @EricMorganCoach: @unbiasedbrad @JoshuaLisec European was most resilient. Tru

    RT @EricMorganCoach: @unbiasedbrad @JoshuaLisec European was most resilient.

    Truth before face. Duty. Responsibility. Reciprocity. Scient…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-09 23:33:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633974278138781701

  • They do not demonstrate the ability to access that high culture, any more than t

    They do not demonstrate the ability to access that high culture, any more than those who cannot obtain access to law school demonstrate the ability to access it. Worse humans are no different from other domesticated animals, in that putting the best in with the rest does not improve the rest but undermines and infects the best.

    Now, you could make an argument that the curriculum of the Grammar schools should be applied to ordinary government schools. But then, the majority of students would fail. We have already seen vast dumbing-down of the curriculum in all English speaking countries. Because god forbid we should produce evidence of the difference between the classes, and that those differences are from genetic load.

    Reply addressees: @geoff19542 @shermanklumpp


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-09 14:49:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633842570471309312

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633839161722671106