Curt Doolittle

Theme: Civilization

  • WHAT IS PHILOSOPHY FOR? The evolutionary sequence of: Mythology and Religion for

    WHAT IS PHILOSOPHY FOR?
    The evolutionary sequence of:
    Mythology and Religion for interpersonal subjective intuition and emotion,
    Literature and Philosophy for social and ideal reason and preference,
    History and Science for objective economic and political logic and calculation,
    produce consistent systems of weights and measures,
    that assist us in understanding, prediction, choice, and action,
    that increasingly converge with the laws of nature,
    by increasing precision,
    as we age and mature,
    as we possess increasing knowledge,
    and increasing scope of agency,
    in the persuit of our evolving preferences,
    within the limits of our abilities.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-02 14:10:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653401499370659845

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653396426896863237

  • WHAT IS PHILOSOPHY FOR? The evolutionary sequence of: Mythology and Religion for

    WHAT IS PHILOSOPHY FOR?
    The evolutionary sequence of:
    Mythology and Religion for interpersonal subjective intuition and emotion,
    Literature and Philosophy for social and ideal reason and preference,
    History and Science for objective economic and political logic and calculation,
    produce consistent systems of weights and measures,
    that assist us in understanding, prediction, choice, and action,
    that increasingly converge with the laws of nature,
    by increasing precision,
    as we age and mature,
    as we possess increasing knowledge,
    and increasing scope of agency,
    in the persuit of our evolving preferences,
    within the limits of our abilities.

    Reply addressees: @philosophytweet

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-02 14:10:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653401499253309442

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653396426896863237

  • Do you know why your ancestors were prohibited ownership of property? Or why lim

    Do you know why your ancestors were prohibited ownership of property? Or why limited to unfavorable conditions? Despite originally being valued by the aristocracy and trading in high value goods, and providing banking – at least prior to and after the templars?

    I am confident I know your history better than you do. 😉
    Because I study economic and legal records throughout history. Though I’d suggest you read Benjamin Ginsberg’s “Fatal Embrace”. You probably can’t tolerate Solzhenitsyn’s “200 years together” or MacDonald’s “Culture of Critique” series.

    Learn three words: “Baiting Into Hazard”
    What is the female strategy? Seduction. (Baiting into hazard)

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-02 01:07:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653204632489869313

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653201987557638144

  • Do you know why your ancestors were prohibited ownership of property? Or why lim

    Do you know why your ancestors were prohibited ownership of property? Or why limited to unfavorable conditions? Despite originally being valued by the aristocracy and trading in high value goods, and providing banking – at least prior to and after the templars?

    I am confident I know your history better than you do. 😉
    Because I study economic and legal records throughout history. Though I’d suggest you read Benjamin Ginsberg’s “Fatal Embrace”. You probably can’t tolerate Solzhenitsyn’s “200 years together” or MacDonald’s “Culture of Critique” series.

    Learn three words: “Baiting Into Hazard”
    What is the female strategy? Seduction. (Baiting into hazard)

    Reply addressees: @AmKsheOref @Hamishtadel1 @Vessel_of_Glass

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-02 01:07:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653204632393400321

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653201987557638144

  • Correct. The difference is that only ashkenazi and europeans produce world thoug

    Correct. The difference is that only ashkenazi and europeans produce world thought leadership especially in ethics and politics.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-01 23:05:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653173846508294146

    Reply addressees: @Slezkinite @JFGariepy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653152328294322177

  • @razibkhan Beautiful take and reminder. And I’m not a fan of criticizing the per

    @razibkhan
    Beautiful take and reminder.
    And I’m not a fan of criticizing the persians other than the conversion of order vs chaos to good vs evil.
    That said, if you are unfortunate enough to study the evolution of human lying, fraud, and baiting into hazard you will have a very different understanding of the influence of religion, and especially the Abrahamic religions, on human history. And wonder, why they so easily spread where and when they did, despite the Hindu, Buddhist, Confucian, and Greek – especially stoic – alternatives.
    Teaching mankind how to lie at scale isn’t something that produced positive outcomes.

    Reply addressees: @razibkhan

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-01 18:08:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653099017847406592

  • “Q: WHAT MESSAGE ARE YOU STAYING ON?” The message I’m ‘Staying On’ is that weste

    “Q: WHAT MESSAGE ARE YOU STAYING ON?”
    The message I’m ‘Staying On’ is that western government, especially the english invention of the modern rule of law state, creates a market between the classes of different responsibilities for the voluntary exchange and production of commons otherwise not producible by private means – either because of conflict, competing ideas, or cost.

    As such, when adding a new ‘class’ to the ‘market’ (voting pool) the solution is to add a new ‘house’ for that class. Forcing the need for consent between houses. This is called “concurrency” in legislation, just as we use house, senate, and electoral college to determine concurrency in elections. As such we live in a concurrent democracy not a majority democracy for good reasons. This prevents a race to the bottom under mass democracy. – which is what we have seen, especially since the introduction of women. Why? women seek irresponsibility the way men seek responsibility.

    This is not to claim that this is the only solution. It’s to explain that the only means of decidability on investments in the commons by political means is some organized market that is most resistant to responsibilities for the capital that results from social, economic, and political orders.

    Instead, it provides a basic framework for solving the problem of divergent interests between sexes, classes, ethnicities, and yes, races.

    Because the alternative, universally is either a race to the bottom resulting in authoritarianism or the production of authoritarianism regardless.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-01 17:35:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653090836576452615

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653087652923740160

  • No. There are no contradictions. The only things we’ve discovered are the back a

    No. There are no contradictions. The only things we’ve discovered are the back and forth gene flow out of and into africa. And we have slightly more clarity on human migration, isolation, speciation, and hybridization events.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-01 02:19:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652860362658664450

    Reply addressees: @DeliaCore @KurtosisEnjoyer

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652856223908102146

  • TERNARY LOGIC AND TRIFUNCTIONALISM (Another Toy) . . . . . . . . . . . Differenc

    TERNARY LOGIC AND TRIFUNCTIONALISM
    (Another Toy)

    . . . . . . . . . . . Differences in Prosperity
    . . . . . . . .Differences in Energy Per Capita
    . . . . . . . .Rates of Civilizational Evolution
    . . . . . . . . . . . Civilizational Differences
    . . . .Trifunctional Institutional Path Dependence
    . . . . . . . . .Trifunctional Formal Institutions
    . . . . . . . . Trifunctional Elites by Influence
    . . . . . . Three Means of Influence-Coercion
    . . . . . . . .Talking, Working Fighting Classes
    . . . . . . . . . . Family, Clan, Tribe, Nation
    . . . . . . . . . . . . Informal Institutions
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Organization
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Reproduction
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Reciprocity
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Cooperation
    . . . . . . . . . . .(F-) Sex Differences (M+)
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Acquisition
    . . . . . . . . . . . Demonstrated Interests
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..|.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    Before . . . . . . . . . . . . During . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . After
    Physical Laws …. Behavioral Laws …. Evolutionary Laws
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..|.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Logical Laws
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..|.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Ternary Logic
    . . . . . . . . . . . . Ternary First Principles
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Science (Testimony)
    . . . . . . . . . . .The Grammars (Language)
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The Disciplines
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Outliers

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-30 20:02:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652765469567340549

  • TERNARY LOGIC AND TRIFUNCTIONALISM (Another Toy) . . . . . . . . . . . Differenc

    TERNARY LOGIC AND TRIFUNCTIONALISM
    (Another Toy)

    . . . . . . . . . . . Differences in Prosperity
    . . . . . . . .Differences in Energy Per Capita
    . . . . . . . .Rates of Civilizational Evolution
    . . . . . . . . . . . Civilizational Differences
    . . . .Trifunctional Institutional Path Dependence
    . . . . . . . . .Trifunctional Formal Institutions
    . . . . . . . . Trifunctional Elites by Influence
    . . . . . . Three Means of Influence-Coercion
    . . . . . . . .Talking, Working Fighting Classes
    . . . . . . . . . . Family, Clan, Tribe, Nation
    . . . . . . . . . . . . Informal Institutions
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Organization
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Reproduction
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Reciprocity
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Cooperation
    . . . . . . . . . . .(F-) Sex Differences (M+)
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Acquisition
    . . . . . . . . . . . Demonstrated Interests
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..|.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    Before . . . . . . . . . . . . During . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . After
    Physical Laws …. Behavioral Laws …. Evolutionary Laws
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..|.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Logical Laws
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..|.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Ternary Logic
    . . . . . . . . . . . . Ternary First Principles
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Science (Testimony)
    . . . . . . . . . . .The Grammars (Language)
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The Disciplines
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Outliers

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-30 20:02:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652765469735022592