Curt Doolittle

Theme: Civilization

  • TERNARY LOGIC AND TRIFUNCTIONALISM (Another Toy) . . . . . . . . . . . Differenc

    TERNARY LOGIC AND TRIFUNCTIONALISM
    (Another Toy)

    . . . . . . . . . . . Differences in Prosperity
    . . . . . . . .Differences in Energy Per Capita
    . . . . . . . .Rates of Civilizational Evolution
    . . . . . . . . . . . Civilizational Differences
    . . . .Trifunctional Institutional Path Dependence
    . . . . . . . . .Trifunctional Formal Institutions
    . . . . . . . . Trifunctional Elites by Influence
    . . . . . . Three Means of Influence-Coercion
    . . . . . . . .Talking, Working Fighting Classes
    . . . . . . . . . . Family, Clan, Tribe, Nation
    . . . . . . . . . . . . Informal Institutions
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Organization
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Reproduction
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Reciprocity
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Cooperation
    . . . . . . . . . . .(F-) Sex Differences (M+)
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Acquisition
    . . . . . . . . . . . Demonstrated Interests
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..|.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    Before . . . . . . . . . . . . During . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . After
    Physical Laws …. Behavioral Laws …. Evolutionary Laws
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..|.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Logical Laws
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..|.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Ternary Logic
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Science (Testimony)
    . . . . . . . . . . .The Grammars (Language)
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The Disciplines
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Outliers

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-30 20:02:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652764332701147137

  • “Miller closes by suggesting how history textbooks could correct the narrative,

    –“Miller closes by suggesting how history textbooks could correct the narrative, arguing that they should emphasize three points:
    (1) that suffrage was never desired by a majority of women before 1920; (2) that more women were organized against suffrage than in favor of it until 1916; and (3) that for many years, men were on the whole more progressive on the issue than women were.”–

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-30 14:57:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652688658955108355

  • “Miller closes by suggesting how history textbooks could correct the narrative,

    –“Miller closes by suggesting how history textbooks could correct the narrative, arguing that they should emphasize three points:
    (1) that suffrage was never desired by a majority of women before 1920; (2) that more women were organized against suffrage than in favor of it until 1916; and (3) that for many years, men were on the whole more progressive on the issue than women were.”–

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-30 14:57:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652688659022315521

  • How will you tolerate that the eugenic movement – at least the soft version of i

    How will you tolerate that the eugenic movement – at least the soft version of it prior to the nazis – was the most important movement since the industrial and scientific revolutions, and that every major problem we face in the world today is due to the postwar pseudoscientific attack on darwin and eugenics? We need 115 average to repeat the anglo miracle, and 105 to maintain it. Americans and Russians are down to 97 already. At 95 to 93 we will become a second world country whose only advantage is geographic.

    Reply addressees: @alexlammyman @vonGuda @PaoloShirasi @kareem_carr

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-30 13:46:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652670773536931840

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652647617535287296

  • How will you tolerate that the eugenic movement – at least the soft version of i

    How will you tolerate that the eugenic movement – at least the soft version of it prior to the nazis – was the most important movement since the industrial and scientific revolutions, and that every major problem we face in the world today is due to the postwar pseudoscientific attack on darwin and eugenics? We need 115 average to repeat the anglo miracle, and 105 to maintain it. Americans and Russians are down to 97 already. At 95 to 93 we will become a second world country whose only advantage is geographic.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-30 13:46:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652670773620875264

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652647617535287296

  • RT @JayMan471: It’s not “assimilation”; it’s selective migration. The whole Atla

    RT @JayMan471: It’s not “assimilation”; it’s selective migration. The whole Atlantic Ocean is simply wider than the Mediterranean Sea.

    Co…

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-29 23:00:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652447784300163073

  • But difference in population density

    But difference in population density… https://t.co/CIXsdIVei0

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-29 13:17:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652301119781994496

  • CORRECT ANSWER 1) Yes. There are a number of living sculptors capable of this ca

    CORRECT ANSWER
    1) Yes. There are a number of living sculptors capable of this calibre of work. (See: Barry Davies for example)
    2) The stylistic influences of the present favor more twisting: Classicals > Renaissance > Modern > 20th (Rodin) > Current. In other words, the style has become style for style’s sake and the contemporary works are a bit absurd or exaggerated in pose.
    3) No, no one can afford the time to produce the equivalent of that net – it’s a magnum opus for a sculptor daring others to match the feat.
    4) No one could affor to wait for a work of that calibre today, and we have no civic architecture worthy of housing it. So we have no wealthy patrons willing to pay for it. Because that’s who pays for heroic monumental sculpture: wealthy people who want a public legacy.
    5) Machines are able to achieve in fairly short time what it took months or years for humans to produce. So, we need only produce public spaces worthy of sculture again. 😉

    (FWIW: I’m classically trained)

    Reply addressees: @Culture_Crit

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-27 04:03:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1651436957816299521

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1648796326606274561

  • CORRECT ANSWER 1) Yes. There are a number of living sculptors capable of this ca

    CORRECT ANSWER
    1) Yes. There are a number of living sculptors capable of this calibre of work. (See: Barry Davies for example)
    2) The stylistic influences of the present favor more twisting: Classicals > Renaissance > Modern > 20th (Rodin) > Current. In other words, the style has become style for style’s sake and the contemporary works are a bit absurd or exaggerated in pose.
    3) No, no one can afford the time to produce the equivalent of that net – it’s a magnum opus for a sculptor daring others to match the feat.
    4) No one could affor to wait for a work of that calibre today, and we have no civic architecture worthy of housing it. So we have no wealthy patrons willing to pay for it. Because that’s who pays for heroic monumental sculpture: wealthy people who want a public legacy.
    5) Machines are able to achieve in fairly short time what it took months or years for humans to produce. So, we need only produce public spaces worthy of sculture again. 😉

    (FWIW: I’m classically trained)

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-27 04:03:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1651436957925269505

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1648796326606274561

  • THE ORIGINS OF BOAZIAN PSEUDOSCIENCE (I point out the origins of behavioral pseu

    THE ORIGINS OF BOAZIAN PSEUDOSCIENCE
    (I point out the origins of behavioral pseudoscience in the movements by Marx Boaz Freud Lysenko-Gould, Cantor-Bohr-Einstein, and Gramsci-Frankfurt neo-Marxist, and Lyotard, Baudrillard, Derrida Postmodern, and Steinem Friedan feminism, and…

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-26 19:33:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1651308441938296834