Theme: Civilization

  • Are anglo institutions superior to other country’s institutions? Well, while all

    Are anglo institutions superior to other country’s institutions? Well, while all scandinavian institutions are well organized, only the anglo are ‘scientific’, and the only competitor of size is germany, and germany has taken itself out of international affairs, where the UK maintains responsibility for international affairs – perhaps better than the USA.

    As far as I know this is just true, for the simple reason that anglo civ varies least from science.

    Reply addressees: @just_atweethere @nellie_popper @anneapplebaum


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-11 13:46:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656657121767727106

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656655827074453504

  • RT @StevePender: @AshleaSimonBF Fighting Germany is specifically why they lost t

    RT @StevePender: @AshleaSimonBF Fighting Germany is specifically why they lost their country. The war was won by an international tribe who…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-11 12:41:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656640694956572672

  • Most great thinkers were terribly wrong – and while religious prophets have caus

    Most great thinkers were terribly wrong – and while religious prophets have caused the most bloodshed than any other thinkers, philosophers have been a mixed bag, most of which was hamful, while natural philosophers (economists, engineers, scientists) have dragged mankind out of ignorance, superstition, starvation, and disease.

    Kant is no different. Rousseu began the revolution against empiricism with moral justification claiming man had a nature he did not, kant imitated him with rationalism, trying to recreate the authority of religion without mysticism. And together they caused all that followed them to follow the continental project of rejecting the Anglo invention of the modern state, rule of law, natural law and natural rights and obligations, by the PROHIBITION on authority that the french, germans, and jews tried to recreate.

    Now I can define Morality scientifically and you will be unable to falsify it. It’s just reciprocity in whatever context. Though I won’t bore you with the properties of reciprocity at present. For morality at scale we simply expand reciprocity by scale into political and international scopes of human interaction, resulting in natural law. This is a purely scientific project that began with Aristotle and was only complete today.

    Does that mean that all people will agree with reciprocity and natural law define personal to political to international morality? Of course not. Because everyone wants a moral code that benefits them, not one that is equal across all. In other words, most people are immoral and only as moral as they must be. And they justify their immorality for various reasons of psychological, economic, and political utility.

    Gods are the product of the minds of men, for various psychological reasons, we share in common, even if some more so and some less so. They were the best we could do in the ancient and medieval worlds. They were not the best the greeks could do, and they are not the best that we can do. Because religion is terribly expensive and so far we are unwilling to pay the price of a new non-false religion.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @OtonielFilho5 @bierlingm


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-11 12:30:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656637982269374466

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656537425756266497

  • THE PROBLEM AND FUTURE OF THAT THING WE CALL RELIGION. Many of us, particularly

    THE PROBLEM AND FUTURE OF THAT THING WE CALL RELIGION.
    Many of us, particularly those who are more empathic than systematizing, or those who are less able to endure the dark forces of competition, time, and ignorance, require a means of suppressing neuroticism and alienation, and obtaining the feeling of safety and calm in belonging in a group that signals inclusion and relative equality in some sort of ritual or festival. Religion evolved by repeating the primal thanks, feast, and celebration after the hunt, and the initiatic brotherhood of warriors, and the ritual of burial of the dead.

    In response to the restoration of classical reason and evidence, producing the restoration of the european rate of cognitive evolution, and the subsequent sequence of cooperative revolutions, humans have been failed by their religions. They were too archaic to reform (other than christianity->secular humanism). Largely what we are experiencing consists of the search for the equivalent of a religion that isn’t false combined with the introduction of women into political decision making, the impersonal state usurpation of charity and responsibility, the capture of education by the marxist-to-woke cult, and the postwar opening of borders for economic utility that benefited only the State and financial sectors at the expense of the polity – destroying our ancestral senses of community.

    While the Stoics discovered the optimum universal answer to religion, the National Socialists discovered the optimum particular answer, but then took it outside their borders and ended it at least for now. So we are deprived of nationalism and seduced by the alienation of globalism creating warfare as we were religious universalism that created warfare.

    So we invested heavily in intellectual education, but our religions failed to reform and we haven’t yet restored heavy investment in emotional and psychological education, and we’ve all but abandoned physical education. Meaning our reformation of education is incomplete – opening the door for other false religions (marxism-postmodernism-feminism-woke) which are even more divisive than our previous generation of abrahamic religions and their competitiors.

    So what reformed religion or equivalent can we agree to heavily invest in? We can’t make people believe in the supernatural – too many of us simply can’t do it any longer.

    All religion consists of ritualization of payment of some sort of debt, because this provokes our social instinct to submission and non aggression – simply because social debt is the only non-harmful means of obtaining loyalty without force or deception.

    Natural religion consists of national, ancestor, hero, and nature worship. Morality consists of Natural Law which is very close to human rights, but far more precise. We only *can* have one ambition that doesn’t drive us to extinction, and that is shared responsibiilty to overcome the laws of the universe by mastery of them and transcendence into the gods we imagined.

    So we know the one non-false religion so to speak, but it’s difficult to achieve it without institutional advocacy and support.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @Airmanareiks


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-11 12:16:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656634321225097222

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656565010561130498

  • Hardly. I just work in jurisprudence and, in particular, on the postwar attack o

    Hardly. I just work in jurisprudence and, in particular, on the postwar attack on the common law by the legal positivists.

    Culture matters.
    Our logic comes along with it.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-09 22:13:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656059755553513474

    Reply addressees: @clifflyon @ddoregon2020 @InsideWithPsaki @jrpsaki @RepRaskin

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656056175253676032

  • @firstpost Palki (and team) This reporting is out of hand, duplicitous, and dece

    @firstpost
    Palki (and team)

    This reporting is out of hand, duplicitous, and deceitful.

    You know, I think we’re all behind Indian nationalism. And we consider India part of the family along with Japan and Korea. But this is destructive nonsense.

    India is benefiting…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-09 20:32:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656034357084127233

  • @firstpost Palki (and team) This reporting is out of hand, duplicitous, and dece

    @firstpost
    Palki (and team)

    This reporting is out of hand, duplicitous, and deceitful.

    You know, I think we’re all behind Indian nationalism. And we consider India part of the family along with Japan and Korea. But this is destructive nonsense.

    India is benefiting profoundly from the discount on Russian oil prices… so India is profiting from instability. Why aren’t you calculating the billions that India has saved just like the american companies have made.

    American postwar policy sought to end empires and the resulting world wars, by promoting free trade, borders, human rights, and national sovereignty. And we raised the world out of poverty by doing so at the expense of our own working, laboring, and middle classes.

    Russia has violated the postwar agreement, china has, Iraq has, Iran tries to constantly. But just as China violates your borders and you don’t ask our permission or our assistance, our looser federation of european peoples, whether the many states of the european continent or our large ‘islands’ of Australia, America, and UK, choose to defend our people: the people who want freedom democracy and self determination by self determined means.

    At this point, I could start a news channel producing daily content on Indian propaganda that’s destructive of international relations by the same self congratulatory virtue signaling like the europeans did until their folly was exposed by Russian aggression. Just as India’s governmental weakness is exposed by Chinese literacy economy, and strategic aggression.

    So, stop fomenting conflict between our countries. Otherwise, we’re not the ones who lose out. The USA is autarkic both in resources, population, economics, and strategic defence.

    We didn’t make the modern world perfectly. But we did it better than anyone else, and at our expense rather than for our profit.

    The present rate of isolation, repatriation of industrialization, and our subsequent withdrawal of military policing of world assets, finance, transport, and trade, will cause the restoration of imperial age (pre war, pre-british empire) fragmentation, monopolization, and exclusion. And the consequence will mean the absolute collapse or colonization or conquest those (many) countries that cannot survive without our ‘continued investment against our interest’.

    No one is winning this war. Everyone is losing. In fact, given the dollars you’ve mentioned, It’s India and china benefitting from this war, while the rest of us are bearing incredible costs to conduct it, and we have to reverse our ‘peace dividend’ and restore previous levels of military and strategic spending we had thought we had left behind.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-09 20:32:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656034356811517953

  • Destruction of the family, Culture war (Neo-marxism to Woke), Replacement vs Pos

    Destruction of the family, Culture war (Neo-marxism to Woke), Replacement vs Possibity of ascent, and ‘bowling alone’, and rapid increase in mental illness, especially among females, but where males more readily willing to act using political violence.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-08 07:48:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1655479766944808961

    Reply addressees: @FernandoGLV1212

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1655478645681541120

  • The europeans (indo europeans) have been defeated by the semitic religions in th

    The europeans (indo europeans) have been defeated by the semitic religions in the old world through sedition, nearly by the steppe hordes in the middle ages, and now by the revised semitic religion (marxism sequence) and immigration in the modern world (largely because of our women).

    Only europeans didn’t fail by 800ad, and that’s only because we had a restoration of classical knowledge on one hand, and the church had been captured by the european martial aristocracy on the other.

    SO there is no guarranteed that good smart evolving peope win. IN fact, the evidence is to the contrary.

    Reply addressees: @ToddNQuick1


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-08 01:57:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1655391360109670401

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1655384986873368576

  • Cline from north east to south west is european hunter gatherer admixed with Ana

    Cline from north east to south west is european hunter gatherer admixed with Anatolian Farmer in the south, and admixed with steppe herder from the northeast to the west. For all intents and purposes we have the old europe on the atlantic, the scandinavian germanic spectrum as the main body of europ, the baltoslavic, slavic, and finnic followed by the uralic. With Old europe a negative introgression from the ottoman conquestes.

    The real difference is that the germanics are the ‘core europeans’, the south was under both state and religous corruption for longer, and never developed manorialism under the hajnal line, so are lower trust, while the coastal atlantics had the trade advantage of the rivers and seas, and so the ‘restoratino’ that begain in italy, spread through what was once lotharingia, and up into England where it exploded with the sequence of cognitive, to industrial revolutions, and then worked it’s way east, through germany (our height really), and was stopped by russian and jewish resistance to modernization and the subsequent end of parasitism whether state or financial.

    Reply addressees: @OtonielFilho5


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-08 01:54:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1655390581328158720

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1655385190062063616