THE EVOLUTION OF FAMILY STRUCTURES
(Engels, Todd, HBD_chick, and yours truly)
The evolution of families is economic, and refects the evolution of property and inheritance – and now, expanded to the externalization of costs and responsibility beyond the family to the state, into… https://t.co/AZwgKzAp0c
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-13 19:09:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1657463110154739713
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1657452065646342152
–“Study estimates that the earliest admixture date between West European Hunter-Gatherers and Ancient North Eurasians was 16,000 years ago. This led to the formation of the East European Hunter-Gatherer population.”–
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-05726-0.pdf
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-13 00:13:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1657177083649445889
Yes. 😉
Technical use of modern in the discipline of history refers to post medieval: after 1500.
Common usage of modern refers to either post industrial or contemporary.
Correct disambiguation of modern is contemporary or current, but may be too specific.
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-12 22:05:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1657145089892790275
Reply addressees: @Alistai13199912 @sebsklo
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1657139983117963265
WHY DOESN’T PORTUGAL HAVE A HIGH TRUST POLITY?
Portugal is Latin, not Germanic, and was infected by the Muslim conquest of Spain, after recovery, was a long time under the church, outside the Lotharingian trade route from Italy to the north sea, outside the manorialism of the Hajnal line, outside the Hanseatic league, outside the protestant reformation, like Spain predatory in colonization, and so outside the west germanic and anglo development of the modern rule of law state, late to industrialization, early to the seduction of communism and socialism.
That said, they do pretty well, have not fallen into the reproductive collapse of the absolute nuclear family, nor excess immigration to compensate. And they’ll get there within a generation or three. Why? The internet’s mass access to information was more effective than all previous revolutions at inspiring the public other than the industrial.
Christians hate this, but the longer a people were under the church, the lower the trust of the population. The church was far more corrupt than any secular government today by orders of magnitude, and Russian and Chinese propaganda has nothing on the church. The Jews may have invented it in the middle east, but Europeans using religion were really happy to use lying and propaganda to take unearned credit, evade responsibility for demonstrated crimes, and to profit like an organized crime syndicate whenever possible.
Christianity isn’t alone. Jewish and Islamic irreciprocal ethics, wither jewish organized crime against the commons, and Islamic organized warfare against all more advanced civilizations, combined with mandatory ignorance is even worse than church corruption.
Not that Chinese and russian desperate attempts to preserve pre-industrial imperialism for the benefit of single class against the interest of the people, is any better.
Cheers
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
Reply addressees: @BeedrillHive @heimbergecon
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-12 18:37:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1657092687516909570
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1657078397091078144
So contrary to the christian dogma, our founders were men of the enlightenment empiricism and reason who understood the common people needed their religion yet saw the organized church as hostile to the people.
The uniquenss of the anglosphere and america is that we are bound by rule of law of the natural law – and left behind the corruption of the aristocracy, the church, and the lazy indolent peasantry.
Reply addressees: @GEsenhourn @anneapplebaum
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-12 13:04:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1657008958857420802
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1657003679046680576
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
I am a jeffersonian christian, in that jesus was a philosopher only able to speak in the language and logic of his location and time, and the church was a politica system that sought to bring cheap semitic rule by superstition where costly european rule by reason – an aristocatic method – was ‘challenging’ to bring to the wider word of vast underclasses made worse by the prosperity the aristocacy had created giving slaves, underclasses and women the relative safety and choice that for the first time ’empowered’ them at least a little bit.
So I am loyal to the truth: the laws of nature. Christianity despite it’s church nonsense and superstition does inform us how to produce a higher trust society more prepared for economic prosperity by treating everyone as a customer – of cooperation. It’s utility-bearing but not true.
This means I am opposed to hostile religions, and tolerant of christian superstition of the peasantry. But I am and always will be aristocracy: sovereignty, liberty, and freedom, under rule of law insured by force of arms. As such my loyalty is to the people regardless of their weakness or folly.
And, the duty of the peasantry, as jesus counseled, is to be loyal to the aristocracy in matters of reality (the state).
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1657003679046680576
Why would you make the assumption that I haven’t read Guenon in particular? Or that I don’t grasp the entire movement’s attempt, like the french and german before it, to find an alternative justification for priors, after Darwin, Maxwell, Spencer and Nietzsche eliminated the supernatural, physical, biological, social, and moral foundations that religons dependend upon – while at the same time Boaz, Freud, Marx, and many other developed other pseudoscientific techniques from the jewish culture as well.
I didn’t do much more in that post than enumerate possibilities for god(s), and then the human cognitive hieararchy, then state that it’s untestifiable that there are such thing as gods; that its demonstrable that all such claims were anthropomorphic projections at best, and absolute deciets at worst.
I kind of doubt you understand the meaning of metaphysics, and how and why cultures develop different metaphysical rules both explicity and implicit.
And It’s non-logical to assume people who came before us didn’t observe the same patters in reality that we do and expressed them in the only paradigm, vocabulary and logic available to them at that time and place. So of course wisdom literature that survives tends to include more than a grain of truth when converted from archaic to present form.
Reply addressees: @JohnDuttonTrad
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-11 22:57:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656795755623972864
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656789987113807873
I mean, aside from the fact that Europeans died like flies or moths to a flame in Africa before quinine and modern medicine… Africa is HUUUUUGGGGEEE, and there are lots of people there. And travel and transport is really, really, really, hard.
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-11 18:39:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656730687959908352
Reply addressees: @Nefertiiti @TheAutistocrat @nellie_popper @FernandoGLV1212 @Bucklander1 @just_atweethere @anneapplebaum
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656728766117294084
Africa is the most genetically diverse region on the planet, with as many as thirty or more subraces depending upon the degree of precision.
The middle east (MENA) is tribal and familial, with vast genetic diversity which always and everywhere produces low trust, generating demand for authority, which explains why despite its early dominance, Christianity and its individual volition were replaced by Islamic authoritarianism.
The fact that you don’t know this is a testimony to the indoctrination of the population into pseudoscientific falsehoods, meanwhile the high trust fully integrated civilization is collapsing from within because you’re effectively intellectually infantilized.
Cheers
Reply addressees: @nellie_popper @FernandoGLV1212 @Bucklander1 @Nefertiiti @just_atweethere @anneapplebaum
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-11 18:31:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656728793082363917
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656727352246665232
RT @curtdoolittle: @Nefertiiti @FernandoGLV1212 @just_atweethere @nellie_popper @anneapplebaum Britain Moved Away From Germanic Civ
1) Brit…
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-11 18:24:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656726943931170819
Britain Moved Away From Germanic Civ
1) Britain separated from Germanic civ in about 1830.
2) Britain and Germany civ both divorced from traditional Germanic civ in the world war (european civil war ending empires). With Britain going ‘feminine’ like France – at least outside of what remained of the aristocracy.
3) USA is the only remaining (or was until 1990) fully Anglo-Germanic civilization. With Australia falling off the ledge. And canada pushed off the ledge by French Canada (the french are always wrong about everything.)
4) USA is now as Jewish-Marxist as it is Anglo-Empirical and Germanic-Rational, only because the 1950’s attempt to suppress the introgression of judeo-marxism into the states failed.
4) So the European civil war really did complete the french objective followed by the Jewish objective of destroying western civilization.
Reply addressees: @Nefertiiti @FernandoGLV1212 @just_atweethere @nellie_popper @anneapplebaum
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-11 18:24:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656726925404930057
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656719150759260163