Why would you make the assumption that I haven’t read Guenon in particular? Or t

Why would you make the assumption that I haven’t read Guenon in particular? Or that I don’t grasp the entire movement’s attempt, like the french and german before it, to find an alternative justification for priors, after Darwin, Maxwell, Spencer and Nietzsche eliminated the supernatural, physical, biological, social, and moral foundations that religons dependend upon – while at the same time Boaz, Freud, Marx, and many other developed other pseudoscientific techniques from the jewish culture as well.
I didn’t do much more in that post than enumerate possibilities for god(s), and then the human cognitive hieararchy, then state that it’s untestifiable that there are such thing as gods; that its demonstrable that all such claims were anthropomorphic projections at best, and absolute deciets at worst.
I kind of doubt you understand the meaning of metaphysics, and how and why cultures develop different metaphysical rules both explicity and implicit.
And It’s non-logical to assume people who came before us didn’t observe the same patters in reality that we do and expressed them in the only paradigm, vocabulary and logic available to them at that time and place. So of course wisdom literature that survives tends to include more than a grain of truth when converted from archaic to present form.

Reply addressees: @JohnDuttonTrad