Curt Doolittle

Theme: Civilization

  • I am still stuck with the problem that 1) THE THREE CITIES a) The anglos had the

    I am still stuck with the problem that

    1) THE THREE CITIES

    a) The anglos had the right language mode (science), the right political model (rule of law common law), the right commons model (market for commons) but the wrong theory of man (equality),.

    b) the germans had the wrong language model (literary rationalism), a typical political model (bibartate continental law), a typical commons model (decision by professional bureaucracy), and the right theory of man (hierarchy).

    c) the jews had the wrong language model (legalistic pseudoscience), political model (propaganda), commons model (none), and the wrong theory of man (separatism)

    2) THE PEDAGOGICAL VS THE DECIDABLE

    The german model is one of regulation for the prevention of conflicts at the expense of innovation. The american is one of dispute resolution for the preservation of liberty in experimentation.

    The german model of man is empirical while the anglo model is ideological – a superior german transition from aristocracy to bureaucracy.

    The german model is pedagogical an literary (literary philosophy), and the anglo model is anti-pedagogical, and limited to dispute resolution..

    The german model is to seek rational optimums while the american model is to use competition to discover optimums.

    3) What troubles me is the success of the pedagogical german model in contrast to decideable anglo model. I am an anglo analytic philosopher. I know my function. But does that mean other authors will have to create pedagogical models of my work and that it is THEY who will be successful and not I?

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-08 08:07:00 UTC

  • Islam: Somos competidores, no somos ni aliados, ni amigos, ni semejantes

    Texto original de Curt Doolittle, traducido por Alberto R. Zambrano U. Disponible en: http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2016/04/06/islam-we-are-competitors-not-allies-not-friends-not-kin/   [N]osotros somos competidores, no somos ni aliados, ni amigos ni semejantes

    1. Somos competidores, no aliados, en el sentido de que cooperamos económicamente para ganancia mutua. Pero si la cooperación requiere que nos sacrifiquemos para aumentar los números de nuestros competidores entonces eso es beneficioso sino parasitario y suicida.
    2. Usted no entiende de economía. Para mover a todo ser humano en una red, se requiere de la aplicación de diferencias mínimas en incentivos. Esto requiere de un vasto capital. Es por medio de ese vasto capital aplicado como incentivos que nosotros podemos producir la organización voluntaria de la producción.
    3. Los errores que usted comete son los siguientes:
      a. Creer que somos semejantes en vez de competidores
      b. Que es posible organizarse por otros medios
      c. Que el mundo pobre no nos genera pobreza contínua de forma perpetua.
      d. Que el objetivo que debemos perseguir es la prevención reproductiva de los pobres.
    4. El Islam es un cáncer que la civilización occidental, los rusos, africanos, hindúes y los asiáticos orientales necesitan erradicar de la faz de la tierra. Los musulmanes son el único pueblo no civilizado de la tierra – y – fuera de los buenos cristianos africanos, son los más tontos del planeta.
      Es necesario ponerle fin al Islam. Para siempre.

      ¿Así o más claro?

  • Islam: Somos competidores, no somos ni aliados, ni amigos, ni semejantes

    Texto original de Curt Doolittle, traducido por Alberto R. Zambrano U. Disponible en: http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2016/04/06/islam-we-are-competitors-not-allies-not-friends-not-kin/   [N]osotros somos competidores, no somos ni aliados, ni amigos ni semejantes

    1. Somos competidores, no aliados, en el sentido de que cooperamos económicamente para ganancia mutua. Pero si la cooperación requiere que nos sacrifiquemos para aumentar los números de nuestros competidores entonces eso es beneficioso sino parasitario y suicida.
    2. Usted no entiende de economía. Para mover a todo ser humano en una red, se requiere de la aplicación de diferencias mínimas en incentivos. Esto requiere de un vasto capital. Es por medio de ese vasto capital aplicado como incentivos que nosotros podemos producir la organización voluntaria de la producción.
    3. Los errores que usted comete son los siguientes:
      a. Creer que somos semejantes en vez de competidores
      b. Que es posible organizarse por otros medios
      c. Que el mundo pobre no nos genera pobreza contínua de forma perpetua.
      d. Que el objetivo que debemos perseguir es la prevención reproductiva de los pobres.
    4. El Islam es un cáncer que la civilización occidental, los rusos, africanos, hindúes y los asiáticos orientales necesitan erradicar de la faz de la tierra. Los musulmanes son el único pueblo no civilizado de la tierra – y – fuera de los buenos cristianos africanos, son los más tontos del planeta.
      Es necesario ponerle fin al Islam. Para siempre.

      ¿Así o más claro?

  • Either the Regimental System or the Religious Equivalent (Knights). Both were su

    Either the Regimental System or the Religious Equivalent (Knights).

    Both were supported by taxes. How is it possible today to sustain a modern equivalent? BANKING. INTEREST. EDUCATION.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-07 05:34:00 UTC

  • The Next Era of Domestication: Ending Islam and the Religion of Ignorance

    —“Curt Doolittle, Humans are not businesses; we’re interdependent for survival. Even cooperations across the world have stop competing to complement each others weaknesses in the business space… not to talk about humans.”— [W]e are -because we evolved to be – super-predators that choose to cooperate ONLY when it is MORE beneficial to cooperate than to enslave, or exterminate.

    The west advocates meritocratic trade because as a more advanced society and can compete better than others on the basis of merit. So it is to the west’s advantage to advocate trade and commercialism and consumer capitalism. But if cooperation by trade (or any other method) has become parasitic, then it is to our advantage to return to rule. If not rule enslavement. If not enslavement, extermination. Invasion of our lands by semi-human, ignorant, mystical animals is enough of a reason to return to rule, if not rule, enslavement, if not enslavement, extermination. Since all societies want to exterminate muslims EXCEPT the west, if the west stops protecting freedom of religion then all societies will justifiable exterminate islam and mulsims. The muslim is teaching the wetsern man that he must not tolerate freedom of religion, since muslims do not practice a religoin, but a law, and a law is a political system not a religion. End the west’s protection of islam, and we end much of world conflict. Islam is the source of world conflict. It is a cancer that infects the west, Africa, hindus, and east asians. ‪#‎NewRight‬

  • The Next Era of Domestication: Ending Islam and the Religion of Ignorance

    —“Curt Doolittle, Humans are not businesses; we’re interdependent for survival. Even cooperations across the world have stop competing to complement each others weaknesses in the business space… not to talk about humans.”— [W]e are -because we evolved to be – super-predators that choose to cooperate ONLY when it is MORE beneficial to cooperate than to enslave, or exterminate.

    The west advocates meritocratic trade because as a more advanced society and can compete better than others on the basis of merit. So it is to the west’s advantage to advocate trade and commercialism and consumer capitalism. But if cooperation by trade (or any other method) has become parasitic, then it is to our advantage to return to rule. If not rule enslavement. If not enslavement, extermination. Invasion of our lands by semi-human, ignorant, mystical animals is enough of a reason to return to rule, if not rule, enslavement, if not enslavement, extermination. Since all societies want to exterminate muslims EXCEPT the west, if the west stops protecting freedom of religion then all societies will justifiable exterminate islam and mulsims. The muslim is teaching the wetsern man that he must not tolerate freedom of religion, since muslims do not practice a religoin, but a law, and a law is a political system not a religion. End the west’s protection of islam, and we end much of world conflict. Islam is the source of world conflict. It is a cancer that infects the west, Africa, hindus, and east asians. ‪#‎NewRight‬

  • Why I don’t Condone Racism

    [W]HY I DON’T CONDONE RACISM 1) All groups can transcend the animal and evolve to fully human, and from fully human to our image of gods, if they merely suppress the rates of reproduction of their lower classes. 2) Classes (distributions) matter far more than race. Among elites in all races the primary differences across cultures appear to be verbal acuity – the ability to precisely articulate ideas. 3) As far as I can tell if people are fully integrated AND middle class or above (>105 IQ), and especially if they can obtain an empirical education (>110-115), they present no long term problem in small numbers because they try to obtain the benefits of membership in OUR society rather than attempt to obtain rents and political power on the behalf of their lower classes. 4) blaming others for our failings is simply an excuse not to act to change the status quo. the reason we are being invaded is the man in the mirror. States can only do what the warrior class (lower and middle class men) allow them to do.

    CAVEAT I recognize that I am an elite and that interact with the global elite and that as such my intuitionistic concern is different from that of our middle and lower classes. I know my bias is to be more ‘forgiving’. On the other hand if we build a worldwide alliance against corporatism and return to familialism, tribalism, and nationalism, it does not matter if we are different – it just provides us more opportunity to experiment. And moreover, with many small nations there is MORE ROOM AT THE TOP than there is in a ‘new world order’.

  • Why I don’t Condone Racism

    [W]HY I DON’T CONDONE RACISM 1) All groups can transcend the animal and evolve to fully human, and from fully human to our image of gods, if they merely suppress the rates of reproduction of their lower classes. 2) Classes (distributions) matter far more than race. Among elites in all races the primary differences across cultures appear to be verbal acuity – the ability to precisely articulate ideas. 3) As far as I can tell if people are fully integrated AND middle class or above (>105 IQ), and especially if they can obtain an empirical education (>110-115), they present no long term problem in small numbers because they try to obtain the benefits of membership in OUR society rather than attempt to obtain rents and political power on the behalf of their lower classes. 4) blaming others for our failings is simply an excuse not to act to change the status quo. the reason we are being invaded is the man in the mirror. States can only do what the warrior class (lower and middle class men) allow them to do.

    CAVEAT I recognize that I am an elite and that interact with the global elite and that as such my intuitionistic concern is different from that of our middle and lower classes. I know my bias is to be more ‘forgiving’. On the other hand if we build a worldwide alliance against corporatism and return to familialism, tribalism, and nationalism, it does not matter if we are different – it just provides us more opportunity to experiment. And moreover, with many small nations there is MORE ROOM AT THE TOP than there is in a ‘new world order’.

  • Dueling – The Seen and Unseen

    [L]ike many things I try to explain, the most important consequence of any action is the UNSEEN, not the seen. Duelling was pretty common, yes. But it’s not the duels that make the difference.

    Its the exceptionally rigorous public manners that make the difference. Dueling is a cost of creating civil society. So the question is not the cost of dueling. But **what is the cost of not dueling***

  • Dueling – The Seen and Unseen

    [L]ike many things I try to explain, the most important consequence of any action is the UNSEEN, not the seen. Duelling was pretty common, yes. But it’s not the duels that make the difference.

    Its the exceptionally rigorous public manners that make the difference. Dueling is a cost of creating civil society. So the question is not the cost of dueling. But **what is the cost of not dueling***