[T]he Germans are the most devout, most pious, most religious people in western civilization. They just don’t call it religion. They call it ‘being right’. They made christian morality a post-christian religion. Fascinating.
Theme: Civilization
-
The Most Religious People in the West? (Germans)
American conservatives treat the constitution with the same sacredness as religious scripture. It is this germanic american religiosity, and continental german religiosity that preserves the west. The differences are simple: the white americans preserve landed aristocracy and the white germans preserve the church. Both must do their functions for either to survive. -
The Most Religious People in the West? (Germans)
[T]he Germans are the most devout, most pious, most religious people in western civilization. They just don’t call it religion. They call it ‘being right’. They made christian morality a post-christian religion. Fascinating.
American conservatives treat the constitution with the same sacredness as religious scripture. It is this germanic american religiosity, and continental german religiosity that preserves the west. The differences are simple: the white americans preserve landed aristocracy and the white germans preserve the church. Both must do their functions for either to survive. -
OMG Please Don’t Drag Me Into Nazi Nonsense
[Y]es The Nazis tried to remove the undesirables from Europe. They transported these people to resettlement camps.
The war failed. They ran out of resources. The resettlement camps turned into death camps. Sure the Jews made a propaganda issue out of it, but so did the rest of the west – the west that germans had engaged in napoleonic conquest against. There is nothing more to know. I don’t get involved in nonsense disputes. I think this is a nonsense dispute. Is that settled? Good. Don’t involve me in this nonsense. It’s beneath me. Love always. Thanks. PS: Anyone who even discusses this issue is jerking off. You worry about fighting the last war? Are you fighting machine guns with men on horseback? You are right? Why aren’t you talking about the destruction of rule of law? Why aren’t y ou talking about the inventions of freudian psychology to oppress males? Of marxism that is meant to create parasitism upon our people? Of feminism to destroy our families? Of postmodernism to lie to our people? Of the taking of the academy by the left? Of how we CAN implement high redistribution (‘soft socialism’) if we have a homogenous polity – and we can’t if we don’t? Of the intentional invasion of our people starting with the 1964 immigration act? Why aren’t you talking about how we get rid of the invaders? How we conduct a revolution that destroys this anti-western government that seeks to devolve us into the rest of the parasitic world? -
OMG Please Don’t Drag Me Into Nazi Nonsense
[Y]es The Nazis tried to remove the undesirables from Europe. They transported these people to resettlement camps.
The war failed. They ran out of resources. The resettlement camps turned into death camps. Sure the Jews made a propaganda issue out of it, but so did the rest of the west – the west that germans had engaged in napoleonic conquest against. There is nothing more to know. I don’t get involved in nonsense disputes. I think this is a nonsense dispute. Is that settled? Good. Don’t involve me in this nonsense. It’s beneath me. Love always. Thanks. PS: Anyone who even discusses this issue is jerking off. You worry about fighting the last war? Are you fighting machine guns with men on horseback? You are right? Why aren’t you talking about the destruction of rule of law? Why aren’t y ou talking about the inventions of freudian psychology to oppress males? Of marxism that is meant to create parasitism upon our people? Of feminism to destroy our families? Of postmodernism to lie to our people? Of the taking of the academy by the left? Of how we CAN implement high redistribution (‘soft socialism’) if we have a homogenous polity – and we can’t if we don’t? Of the intentional invasion of our people starting with the 1964 immigration act? Why aren’t you talking about how we get rid of the invaders? How we conduct a revolution that destroys this anti-western government that seeks to devolve us into the rest of the parasitic world? -
Yes The nazis tried to remove the undesirables from Europe. They transported the
Yes
The nazis tried to remove the undesirables from Europe.
They transported these people to resettlement camps.
The war failed. They ran out of resources.
The resettlement camps turned into death camps.
The Jews made a propaganda issue out of it, but so did the rest of the west – the west that germans had engaged in napoleonic conquest against.
There is nothing more to know.
I don’t get involved in jerk-off disputes. I think this is a jerk off dispute.
Is that settled?
Good.
Don’t involve me in this nonsense.
It’s beneath me.
Love always.
Thanks.
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-06 02:21:00 UTC
-
THE MOST RELIGIOUS PEOPLE IN THE WEST? The Germans are the most devout, most pio
THE MOST RELIGIOUS PEOPLE IN THE WEST?
The Germans are the most devout, most pious, most religious people in western civilization. They just don’t call it religion. They call it ‘being right’. They made christian morality a post-christian religion.
Fascinating.
American conservatives treat the constitution with the same sacredness as religious scripture.
It is this germanic american religiosity, and continental german religiosity that preserves the west. The differences are simple: the white americans preserve landed aristocracy and the white germans preserve the church.
Both must do their functions for either to survive.
h/t Марта Госовська
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-06 02:04:00 UTC
-
DUELING – THE SEEN AND THE UNSEEN Like many things I try to explain, the most im
DUELING – THE SEEN AND THE UNSEEN
Like many things I try to explain, the most important consequence of any action is the UNSEEN, not the seen.
Duelling was pretty common, yes. But it’s not the duels that make the difference.
Its the exceptionally rigorous public manners that make the difference.
Dueling is a cost of creating civil society.
So the question is not the cost of dueling.
But **what is the cost of not dueling***
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-06 01:39:00 UTC
-
The ancient’s eugenetic practices are now mainstream
The ancient’s eugenetic practices are now mainstream
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-05 10:12:00 UTC
-
Q&A: “Will you explain the difference between familialism, tribalism, nationalis
—Q&A: “Will you explain the difference between familialism, tribalism, nationalism, and racism please?”—
Racism: bitching about others, talking bout how bad they are.
Nationalism: limiting your resource expenditures to kin.
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-05 07:10:00 UTC
-
WHY I DON’T CONDONE RACISM 1) All groups can transcend the animal and evolve to
WHY I DON’T CONDONE RACISM
1) All groups can transcend the animal and evolve to fully human, and from fully human to our image of gods, if they merely suppress the rates of reproduction of their lower classes.
2) Classes (distributions) matter far more than race. Among elites in all races the primary differences across cultures appear to be verbal acuity – the ability to precisely articulate ideas.
3) As far as I can tell if people are fully integrated AND middle class or above (>105 IQ), and especially if they can obtain an empirical education (>110-115), they present no long term problem in small numbers because they try to obtain the benefits of membership in OUR society rather than attempt to obtain rents and political power on the behalf of their lower classes.
4) blaming others for our failings is simply an excuse not to act to change the status quo. the reason we are being invaded is the man in the mirror. States can only do what the warrior class (lower and middle class men) allow them to do.
CAVEAT
I recognize that I am an elite and that interact with the global elite and that as such my intuitionistic concern is different from that of our middle and lower classes. I know my bias is to be more ‘forgiving’.
On the other hand if we build a worldwide alliance against corporatism and return to familialism, tribalism, and nationalism, it does not matter if we are different – it just provides us more opportunity to experiment.
And moreover, with many small nations there is MORE ROOM AT THE TOP than there is in a ‘new world order’.
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-05 04:26:00 UTC