Curt Doolittle

Theme: Civilization

  • NORTHWEST / CANADIAN / AUSTRALIAN “PRIVILEGE” We (Washingtonians) have the luxur

    NORTHWEST / CANADIAN / AUSTRALIAN “PRIVILEGE”

    We (Washingtonians) have the luxury of:

    (a) we remain on the frontier. Frontiers demonstrate borderland ethics.

    (b) never having had underclass relocation (we never had the ‘black’ problem, or the ‘catholic’ problem, or the ‘jewish’ problem and never had the ‘puerto rican’ problem, or the more recent ‘carribean problem’. And we don’t yet have the hindu/muslim problem. And we are not sure that the mexican problem is all that much of a problem.

    (c) we had an initial scandinavian-dominant (protestant) population

    (d) we had only two industries; Aviation and Technology and now Bio/Medical (although boston is still the center), and the dominance of the classes that arrived for those industries.

    (e) the ‘hippie’ flight during the 60’s that sent the yuppies to seattle and the hippies to portland.

    We are, like the nordics of europe, simply privileged by a lack of competitors on our territory.

    I leave the self congratulation to Canadians and Austrialians, both of whom, like north-westerners, are beneficiaries of circumstance, who claim intentional high mindedness rather than simply inheriting the privilege of (a) whiteness and (b) remoteness)

    As the princess said: “never confuse convenience with conviction, nor inheritance with achievement.”

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-20 12:11:00 UTC

  • THE ARYAN SPECIALIZATION IN DOMINANCE: ARISTOCRACY The church wrote the history.

    THE ARYAN SPECIALIZATION IN DOMINANCE: ARISTOCRACY

    The church wrote the history. The middle class wrote opposition: philosophy. The aristocracy did not write much of anything – other than aurelius. But they left us a record in the law.

    We evolved contractual (and therefore empirical) warfare. We evolved testimonial (empirical) truth. We evolved testimonial (empirical) law. We evolved empirical science. And we evolved them in that order.

    But we did not understand, and write down, our specialization in dominance, as we had written down our specialization in submission (christianity) or our specialization in middle class rebellion of exchange (philosophy).

    Because we did not engage in CONFLATION, but in SPECIALIZATION, we evolved excellences in each tradition: christian submission and care-taking, middle class philosophy and trade, and aristocratic dominance and violence and rule

    Our ancestors – lacking the imperial resources of the middle east and china – had to make use of every man possible in a militia: a voluntary, contractual method of warfare, funded with their own weapons and armor and training.

    To accomplish this they specialized in dominance in the aristocratic families just as the lower classes specialized in submission, and the small middle class specialized in voluntary exchange.

    So what the socialist and feminist attack on Aristocracy has consisted of, is to direct our mothers to education, and to deprive the boys of specialization in, improvement of, and mastery of dominance: to weaken us.

    The last bastion is the military, which they have finally attempted to undermine.

    They take advantage or our unwillingness to punish women and the weak.

    Yet what crime by women and the weak against our people is so worthy of punishment?

    We must re-master our dominance. We must remaster our violence. We must re-master our civilization. Or it will not only be gone. But we will deprive mankind of the one civilization, that through mastery of dominance and empiricism has raised mankind out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, and disease and made possible our transcendence into the gods we seek?

    WE MUST:

    Create a ‘Book’ of Law for our people.

    Restore the profitability of domestication of man, beast, and nature.

    Restore rule of Law, Replace Legislation and Regulation with Contract.

    Restore the stoic schools.

    Restore the military schools

    Restore the regiment

    Restore the militia.

    Restore the separation of genders in education.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-20 07:27:00 UTC

  • GOOD CRITICS HELP YOU PRODUCE GREAT WORK (more on heroism and the west) A good c

    GOOD CRITICS HELP YOU PRODUCE GREAT WORK

    (more on heroism and the west)

    A good critic is a precious thing. I love good criticism. I make most of my progress on tough issues because I’m challenged by good critics. And unfortunately, good critics are rare. Frank Lovell, Ayelam Valentine Agaliba, Josh Jeppson, Adam Voight, Bruce (I forget his name), and a few others have been particularly influential in providing criticism that was deep enough that I was able to make progress using it.

    Josh has been pushing me very hard for over a year on Aryanism and has clearly sensed it from an individual rather than social point of view (conceptual grammar so to speak).

    I have an ‘impersonal’ view of Aryanism – or all social orders for that matter. I think more in production, costs, logistics, and strategy like general, or a governor, than in the tactics, and rewards, and experiences of a warrior. So I tend to think of the resources necessary to conduct war using training and technology, rather than the inspiration of the individuals who do the fighting. I would rather give them material confidence in weapons, and strategy, than inspiration on the field. I am not a fan of poetic speech. A soldier who has material confidence does not need inspiration if he thinks he will win. And it is the abilty to win without inspiration that I seek to provide.

    But that doesn’t mean that don’t recognize truth in criticisms.

    And it wasn’t until last night that Josh voiced his criticism in a way that I could sleep on it a bit, and convert it to ‘scientific’ language.

    And while Axial-Age epistemology (the social order of power at the time), and the various concepts of truth therein are probably the first differentiators between the intellectual traditions of cultures and civilizations, I think the normative channeling of dominance that results from that social order in the axial age, is an insight that can help explain far more about various civilizations than can truth alone.

    Heroism is interesting in that it trains us from birth, not to suppress dominance but to channel it toward commons-producing ends. This individual competition for dominance by positive means is what produces over time the high trust society, in the same way it produced a high trust warrior ruling-class that we call ‘Aryanism’.

    i suspect that if I do the research (which might be expensive or time-consuming) that testimonial martial truth(bearing a cost) and heroism(bearing a cost), and dominance (demonstrating superiority empirically) produce a market for excellence in all walks of life. And that this market ‘calculates’ excellence, and is the CAUSE of our interest in economic markets that ‘calculate’ excellences as well.

    i will continue to work with this for a while. But the central insight that Truth, Heroism, and Dominance Markets calculate faster than the alternative social orders, fits well with my prior arguments that common law calculates suppression of parasitism faster, and that markets calculate innovations faster, and that frequent small wars calculate innovations faster, and that many small nations calculate innovations faster.

    And that the reason for the rapid advancement of the west in the ancient and modern worlds has been that we simply ‘calculate'(adapt and innovate) faster. And so it is not impressive if “china got there first’ so to speak, simply because they started first. The question is rather, what model will continually outpace all other models in innovation regardless of wealth and regardless of population size.

    And I think that is the answer to western civilization.

    We are not first we are fastest.

    Dominance, Sovereignty, Heroism, Truth, Voluntary Militia: The only possible institutions under that set of values are markets. And markets like cavalry that makes choices, are faster than footsoldiers that follow orders.

    it’s that simple.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-18 09:21:00 UTC

  • JOSH AND CURT ON ARYIANISM’S USE OF DOMINANCE AND HEROISM (important concept) (w

    JOSH AND CURT ON ARYIANISM’S USE OF DOMINANCE AND HEROISM

    (important concept) (western civilization)

    —“You will not find some emotional appeal for heroism therein. Heroism is not mere emotionalism, but a state of deep detachment, the sovereign psychology.”— Josh.

    Thats dominance, not heroism. That’s Excellence as an expression of dominance.

    Heroism cannot exist without a commons to benefit from the hero.

    It may be true that heroism is merely the reward for dominance on behalf of the tribe.

    It may be true that heroic status is merely compensation for breaking the ingroup moral bias against what would otherwise be interpreted as ‘dangerous’ displays of dominance. In other words, it may be true that heroism is a means of insuring the dominant that they will be free of retribution by ingroup members, by reversing the prohibition on dominance.

    It may be excuse making by the population as a means of defense against dangerous displays of dominance.

    You might be correct in that its dominance not heroism that inspires, and heroic status is merely a reward.

    You might be correct in that heroism provides training for the young in the appropriate uses of dominance. (This is my interpretation).

    In this sense your statement is correct: That we seek to be free of the evolutionary norm that inhibits our desire for alpha dominance, and that heroism is a normative institution that justifies the mature, and incentivizes the young, and limits abuses to those that benefit the commons (ingroup members).

    But you cannot conflate heroism, with dominance as you have done above.

    So since dominance exists in all cultures, but only the west has constructed a (universal) heroic society, where the incentive to apply dominance is constantly rewarded, and heroism is a pedagogical means of channeling it to good uses, and punishing it for bad uses, then I think we can come to agreement.

    I guess in this sense, the heroic tradition is our central ‘teaching’. “Your dominance is an asset to the tribe so long as it is channeled for the tribe’s benefit. And if we channel all our men’s dominance rather than suppress it, then we are concentrating a scarce and valuable resource into a constant evolutionary cycle.

    This plays into the argument that we develop faster than the rest because we do not seek to limit our people by limiting what they can do, only limiting what they cannot do. Most tribes do the opposite: they create rules of repetitive conduct (for stupid creatures) that focus effort in static directions, rather than focusing efforts of men in innovative and creative directions.

    So through heroism (training for competition) and through dominance, and reward for ‘good cunning’ and punishment for ‘bad cunning’, and through the enfranchisement of all who will fight, we create a constant stream of predators at-the-ready in constant competition with one another, producing constant innovations in war, politics, industry, family, craft, and arts.

    And this is why heroism (encouraging the mastery of dominance) is so effective a strategy: it creates a market (calculator) for excellence in dominance.

    It just took me overnight to think it through. I knew you were not so much wrong as not using the right language because conflation is natural to you, but if we agree that heroism is value/virtue that we train so that we do not need to suppress dominance, but instead, FOCUS dominance, so that we are a more competitive ‘tribe’ then I think we can agree that almost all men of ability seek to excercise their dominance just as much as a beautiful woman seeks to exercise hers so to speak.

    If you had not written this post I would not have been able to put this question into words, so yet again, I have to thank you for your insights and criticism, which over the past few years has been extremely helpful and influential.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-18 08:53:00 UTC

  • REVIEW OF THE PAST CENTURY 18-28 postwar up-and-down rapid recession and boom. 2

    REVIEW OF THE PAST CENTURY

    18-28 postwar up-and-down rapid recession and boom.

    29-39 the economy destroyed and the ongoing depression.

    40-46 the war years converted the economy.

    50’s-62 were …. celebratory. American war-dividend. And evolved into majority white collar, majority home owning, and majority car driving, and majority appliance owning.

    63-72 a catastrophe – the proles ascended postwar consuming it. spread of ‘great society’, destruction of the black family followed by white, immigration act, all the socialist programs…

    73-78 depressing decline as the 60’s played out.

    80’s once again celebratory as we ended socialism reascended

    90’s absurd as we reaped the benefits the fall of world communism and technology

    2001-2002 a shock as we overplayed our hand.

    2003-2007 comfortable but cautious.

    2008-2016 (obama) a lost decade.

    In the 80’s we might have been spoiled, but we weren’t losers like the 60’s and 70’s.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-17 15:01:00 UTC

  • CHOOSE: LARGE CASTE, SMALL NATION As South America, Islamic Civilization, Indian

    CHOOSE: LARGE CASTE, SMALL NATION

    As South America, Islamic Civilization, Indian Civilization, and the Roman Empire demonstrated, there is no ‘uniformity’ or equality possible thru inbreeding. We either divide into nation-states or we divide into castes.

    So we can only choose the to distribute hierarchies and underclasses across many small states with possible rotations, or concentrate them in an inescapable caste-trap in large states.

    This is effectively law of nature that humans would have to act against their personal and reproductive interests to change.

    For the simple reasons that (a) some races have been more successful at morphological evolution through paedomorphic mating, (b) we are unequally desirable as mates, friends, partners, allies, and leaders, because of degrees of paedomorphic evolution and eugenic culling of the underclasses, and (c) we demonstrate both kin selection(more male) and hypergamy(more female) mating preferences.

    So we can choose castes or nations. And the evidence is in: Many small nations are superior at producing relative equality.

    That this is both obvious and logical is in itself a criticism of our tendency to seek safety in numbers even when it is against our interests, and to imagine commonality of thought and interest where it does not and cannot exist.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-16 08:34:00 UTC

  • Non-Conflationary West

    The west is deconflationary. We do not confuse methods of arguments, disciplines that make use of them, institutions that provide and manage them. We maintain a competition, and circumvent any monopoly: *power*. |— LIMITS ——- > UTILITY ——–> GOALS/IDEALS–>

    • LIMITS: Law, legal jurisdiction – secular jurisdiction – a discovered science of dispute resolution.
    • UTILITY: Trade – practical jurisdiction – a learned craft of pragmatism.
    • IDEALS: Matters spiritual – are literary – and an imagined art of aspiration.

    Islam and Judaism are ‘simpler’ methods than western. simpler than Chinese. And suitable for a people less intelligent —Curt

  • Non-Conflationary West

    The west is deconflationary. We do not confuse methods of arguments, disciplines that make use of them, institutions that provide and manage them. We maintain a competition, and circumvent any monopoly: *power*. |— LIMITS ——- > UTILITY ——–> GOALS/IDEALS–>

    • LIMITS: Law, legal jurisdiction – secular jurisdiction – a discovered science of dispute resolution.
    • UTILITY: Trade – practical jurisdiction – a learned craft of pragmatism.
    • IDEALS: Matters spiritual – are literary – and an imagined art of aspiration.

    Islam and Judaism are ‘simpler’ methods than western. simpler than Chinese. And suitable for a people less intelligent —Curt

  • OUR OBJECTIVE IS FAMILY, TRIBE AND NATION. COOPERATION IS ONLY A TOOL TO ADVANCE

    OUR OBJECTIVE IS FAMILY, TRIBE AND NATION. COOPERATION IS ONLY A TOOL TO ADVANCE THEM.

    We cooperate across families only in so far as it advances each of our families. That is not the same as stating a universal human good. As soon as you breach the wall between family and corporatism, then you are removing my incentive to cooperate. My incentive once we no longer cooperate is to either prey upon you, or conquer you and restore the interests of my family.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-15 13:46:00 UTC

  • “I HAVE A DREAM” –“End the genocide. Fuck the house, the car and the TV. You ca

    “I HAVE A DREAM”

    –“End the genocide. Fuck the house, the car and the TV. You can have them. I want my people, our culture and a nation.”–

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-14 11:42:00 UTC