—“Curt Doolittle’s ‘Human Husbandry’ thesis is so fresh as a Red Pill that I consider it a Purple Pill, it’s end game knowledge that really puts human history and the rise and fall of nations in clear perspective.”–Gary Knight
Source date (UTC): 2016-10-25 17:08:00 UTC
Property, Family, Clan, Tribe, and Nation are unnatural to women.
They are the means by which we domesticated them.
And they rebel against them whenever given the opportunity.
We evolved to kill competitors to capture, herd, and domesticate women so that we could control our reproduction.
Women are universalist for the simple reason that they are always captors, and so they seek the most secure captor.
Why does this matter? Because we are exceptionally good at domesticating males – they’re much more dangerous in the short term. But we forget that while we developed many institutions to domesticate males, we created just as many to domesticate women.
It is also true that the purpose of monogamy was to domesticate undesirable males.
This asymmetry between women and men and marriage is the institutional problem we have not yet solved.
Many more men are undesirable than women are undesirable.
Source date (UTC): 2016-10-25 14:37:00 UTC
Western High Trust Society was built by forgoing early marriage and reproduction, free riding, and deciet.
Source date (UTC): 2016-10-25 11:53:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/790883927384817665
Reply addressees: @harrison_partch @SnapPopCrackle
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/790880774451032064
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/790880774451032064
THE WESTERN POLYTHEISTIC TRADITION
A well trained stupid dog is still a joy around the house.
A thoroughly Christianized prole is still a virtuous citizen.
I”m not ant-christian. It’s awesome mythology. I”m non anti-church, it’s necessary competition for the state.
I’m anti mysticism, pseudorationalsm, pseudoscience, and deceit.
THE CLASSES AND POLYTHEISM
Christianity(peasantry) ->
……. Rites and Paganism(knights) ->
…………….Science and Biography (scientists and academics)
……………………..Common Law and Literature(burghers) ->
……………………………….Natural Law and History(Judges and Kings)
Source date (UTC): 2016-10-25 10:27:00 UTC
In ever ciivlization in every era, people boycott, enact laws, revolt, or engage in civil war. Anglo civ is unique: contract
Source date (UTC): 2016-10-24 08:21:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/790468242804539392
Reply addressees: @SnapPopCrackle
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/790447536527900672
IN REPLY TO:
@SnapPopCrackle
@curtdoolittle Sounds incredibly limiting.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/790447536527900672
Every year, in every civilization, in every era, people invent new ways of stealing, and boycott, violence, and revolt build
Source date (UTC): 2016-10-24 08:20:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/790467962213990400
Reply addressees: @SnapPopCrackle
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/790447536527900672
IN REPLY TO:
@SnapPopCrackle
@curtdoolittle Sounds incredibly limiting.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/790447536527900672
You can however, (of those in particular) demonstrate that they shared uniquely western aristocratic egalitarian assumptions
Source date (UTC): 2016-10-24 08:16:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/790467106315853824
Reply addressees: @SnapPopCrackle
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/790439184552988672
IN REPLY TO:
@SnapPopCrackle
@curtdoolittle There IS no “Philosophy of Western Civilization.” You can’t pretend that Plato, Aquinas, Descartes and Nietzche shared views.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/790439184552988672
CULTURAL MARXISM=RALLYING AND SHAMING THE WEST)
– Race (Whites vs non-Whites)
– Culture (Western vs non-Western)
– Family (Nuclear family vs extended family)
– Religion (Christianity vs Pseudoscience)
– Gender (Men vs Women)
– Sexual orientation (Heterosexual vs LGBT)
– State (Nationalism vs Globalism)
– Morality (Eugenic vs Dysgenic)
Aristo Domestication’s Defense vs Prole Decivilization’s Defense.
Source date (UTC): 2016-10-24 07:59:00 UTC
SCHOOLING THE ARROGANT AND IGNORANT
It took me 15 years. But in its most reductive form, this is the philosophy of western civilization.
–What the hell am I reading?!?Dame Scary of Austin–
Something beyond your pay grade? 😉
—How is violence a freaking resource that can be “invested” in the state?—
How is my labor, my thought, my time, my wealth invested in the state? What about the opportunities I don’t seize? See?
—Your entire worldview is incoherent. How are Natural Law and Market Law in any way related?—
You display an arrogant, ignorant, egoism. You lack knowledge. You are not the judge of coherence in the absence of it.
—None of these terms are meaningfully defined. None of these premises are self-evident.—
Self-evidence requires knowledge of self-evidence. You simply don’t possess it. That said, it requires a lot of knowledge.
—“Acting allows us to obtain the difference between our expenditure and capture of energy.” I can’t even.—
Apparently, physics is included in those things that you dont know. Like life converting molecules and expending waste heat.
–And not only is your philosophy a messy word-salad, but you claim it is the philosophy of Western Civilization. Why?–
All group evolutionary strategies are contained in metaphysical assumptions rather than explicit statements. I state them.
—There IS no “Philosophy of Western Civilization.” You can’t pretend that Plato, Aquinas, Descartes and Nietzche shared views.—
You can however, (of those in particular) demonstrate that they shared uniquely western aristocratic egalitarian assumptions
—Holy shit, are you literally going to murder people when Hillary wins?—
It’s a reasonable solution, although I don’t think it will be necessary. 😉
Propertarianism: the equivalent of reducing all human activity to accounting(operations), profit and loss(incentives), and Balance(results).
—Sounds incredibly limiting.—
Every year, in every civilization, in every era, people invent new ways of stealing, and boycott, violence, and revolt.
In ever civilization in every era, people boycott, enact laws, revolt, or engage in civil war.
Anglo civ is unique: we just update the contract (constitution).
So, now that I have responded to all your statements made in ignorance, perhaps you will ask rather than assert. 😉 -cheers
Source date (UTC): 2016-10-24 04:36:00 UTC
In the 1690’s the american poulation was for all intents and purposes, literate.
The level of popular writing in that is today only thought in university seminars.
In a population of 3M, 600,000 people, more than one in six, bought a copy of Paine’s Common Sense.
Yet this complexity of thought is taught in university not grade school.
Source date (UTC): 2016-10-23 10:54:00 UTC