Curt Doolittle

Theme: Civilization

  • WILLIAM ON THE PURPOSE OF PROPERTARIANISM If you investigate less advanced count

    WILLIAM ON THE PURPOSE OF PROPERTARIANISM

    If you investigate less advanced countries, such as Papua New Guinea and see how they live and behave, by searching “Papua New Guinea witchcraft” (or “Africa witchcraft”), you will discover that liberty is not an intrinsic right. Rousseau’s Noble Savage is a lie to justify the revolution – there are just savages – they lack all nobility. In nature, the life of Man is solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short (Hobbes).

    When you are subject to pure animal whims, then you don’t live in a condition of liberty. If you can’t grow your crops without your neighbors stealing them, then you don’t have liberty. If you can’t raise a family without the government impoverishing you in old age, you don’t have a condition of liberty. A state of liberty is only produced through the wise application of violence. (prevent parasitism, prevent imposition of cost)

    In our modern society, we are so domesticated that we have been separated from this fact that we have even developed mythologies about ‘the state’ as this evil actor which only exists to oppress us. States are simply machines. Some machines produce more noise, heat and smoke (negative externalities) than others. Either way, we need those machines, because they are what separate us from the savages. Propertarianism tries to help us build the best machine, with the fewest negative externalities.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-13 08:16:00 UTC

  • STRATEGY: DISCOVER > CONQUER > RULE > DOMESTICATE > TRANSCEND White man’s burden

    STRATEGY: DISCOVER > CONQUER > RULE > DOMESTICATE > TRANSCEND

    White man’s burden was just the most recent excuse for profiting from domesticating and then evolving man.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-11 09:52:00 UTC

  • THE VIKING’S, SPARTANS, and ATHENIANS: THE ARYAN’S APPLICATION OF THE DEFAULT AG

    THE VIKING’S, SPARTANS, and ATHENIANS: THE ARYAN’S APPLICATION OF THE DEFAULT AGGRESSION PRINCIPLE

    (interesting)(important)

    VIKING

    Viking (raiding) Policy: “You can trade with us over the long term, or we can conquer and kill you and take your things and your women in the short term. You have no choice to exit. Having discovered you, we will ‘homestead’ you.”

    SPARTAN

    The Spartan (enslaving) Policy: “We can finance your conquest by taking your land, things, and women, and enslaving you, and then domesticate you for profit.”

    ATHENIAN

    The Athenian (ruling) Policy: “Having conquered, domesticated, enslaved, and domesticated you, we can slowly grant you access to the franchise because it is cheaper and more profitable to rule and regulate citizen-customers, than to rule and manage owned-slaves.”

    ROMAN

    The Roman (Commercial) Policy: “You can do as you wish, as long as you do not interfere with rule of law, production, commerce, and trade. If you do then we will punish you until you learn to.”

    ANGLO

    The Anglo-Christian (transcendent) Policy: “We can profit from industrializing rule and in doing so raise mankind out of ignorance, mysticism, poverty, and disease.”

    AMERICAN

    The American (bourgeoise) Policy: “Man is oppressed by the rulers. We can enfranchise all, and profit from enfranchising all.”

    (ROOT) ARYAN

    The Aryan Rule Policy: It is more profitable to rule you, and force you into productivity and trade, than it is to kill you and take your things. We can finance the startup cost of ruling you by taking your territory, your things, and your women, and then enslaving you, until you are sufficiently domesticated that we can profit from your productivity. Citizen customers are cheaper to rule and more productive than slaves.

    This is the group evolutionary strategy of the Aryans removed of Aryan-Christian deceits.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-11 09:12:00 UTC

  • “The Yamnaya are to Aryans what Abraham is to the Jews.”—Alexander Zavialov

    “The Yamnaya are to Aryans what Abraham is to the Jews.”—Alexander Zavialov

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-11 07:49:00 UTC

  • “Modern Brits, whether they be Scots or Englishmen or Northern Irish, are all a

    —“Modern Brits, whether they be Scots or Englishmen or Northern Irish, are all a mix between Yamnaya, Western Hunter-Gatherers and Early European Farmers. They have been on the island for 6000 years (Bell Beakers). Before that, you had the pre-Indo-European inhabitants that Ulysses speaks of. Although they never really disappeared, they just mixed with the dominant Bell Beakers to form a single cohesive people.”—Alexander Zavialov

    Alexander Zavialov is amazing.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-11 07:02:00 UTC

  • OF OTHER RELIGIONS IS EVIDENCE OF OUR REPEAT OF OTHER CIVILIZATION’S FAILURES I

    https://www.youtube.com/attribution_link?a=2i7GkX7bIYc&u=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DfKe600qHEAg%26feature%3DshareADOPTION OF OTHER RELIGIONS IS EVIDENCE OF OUR REPEAT OF OTHER CIVILIZATION’S FAILURES

    I would offer this alternative explanation to the author of the video:

    1) Westerners and easterners evolved in different ‘economies’ so to speak: westerners had small populations, with small farms, and pastorialism, a homogenous (single-ethnic) people, with harsh winters (intolerant climate), lacking any extremely productive resource (seasonal flooding that could be organized into irrigation through ‘slave’ labor). A culture with mostly heads of small businesses, requiring constant choices, seeking solutions.

    Conversely, Egypt, Mesopotamia, Hrappa, and Yang-tse, rivers were all open to irrigation and farming during cyclical, silt-replenishing floods. So (colder)westerners developed self-organizing Sovereignty, and (warmer)easterners developed authoritarian, organized (industriralized) farming. A culture with mostly slaves, lacking choices, seeking escapism.

    2) Western Philosophy evolved as a sovereign, aristocratic(propertied) discipline, for aristocratic(propertied) classes, for the purpose of RULE(profiting from organizing production). This rule includes: Rule of self(Sovereignty), Rule of household, Rule of business(farming, manufacture, and trade), and Rule of the Polity.

    When we are ruling self, household, business, and polity, we must place higher demands (value) upon our correspondence with reality, emotional tolerance for correspondence with reality, and continuous adaptation to reality, that we place upon interpreting reality in a way that lessens our emotional, intellectual, and physical burdens.

    In the west, we avoid conflation of disciplines and as such, we produced class-specializations in our ways of thinking:

    – Elites: Rule/law/war,

    – Upper: Finance/commerce/contract,

    – Middle: knowledge/reason/philosophy/morality, and

    – Working/Lower: religion/theology.

    Each depends upon the rest: an integrated polytheism of sorts. We preserved the competition between these disciplines. We preserve the sovereignty of each. And we do so because each represents the needs of the classes that they serve the interests of. The west(small manors and farms) never developed totalitarianism as did the east(industrialized flood-river farming), because we preserved sovereignty, so it was never necessary of the west to engage in conflationary argument as the east has done.

    3) Organized Religion and Eastern Philosophy evolved as a REACTION to the invention of Sovereignty and Rule. (Sovereignty ==> Zoroaster > Hinduism > Buddhism, and Polytheism > Authoritarian Monotheism > Scriptural Monotheism). There are many reasons for this reaction, but in large part, it is that sovereignty is a eugenic evolutionary strategy with upward redistribution of resources. While eastern socialism is a dysgenic evolutionary strategy.

    4) The west *DID* have it’s own version of Buddhism(mental discipline): Stoicism. And it was widely practiced until the schools were closed by the forcible conversion of the empire to Christianity in order to bring Oriental authoritarian mysticism into the declining empire. Why? Becuase it is very expensive to create truthful, empirical, high trust sovereign rule of law, and it is very cheap to create deceitful, mystical, low trust, authoritarian scripturalism. Reason requires voluntarily adopted education, and mysticism requires only ritualistic indoctrination.

    5) In modernity, we are saturated by information (most of which is false), and competition, An absence of norms in which we can find an identity, and our families have been destroyed by feminist legal activism, our intergenerational families have been destroyed through migratory labor and immigration. People live alone and lonely in boxes. Instead of the german model where they use building codes to produce cities with family sized apartments, we have spread people either in isolated suburbs, or limited reproduction in our cities by maximizing revenue per square inhabited meter – the result being that American and British Cities are IQ-sinks and Unused-Ovary graveyards.

    6) So I ask a different question: Why is it that we take the evidence of escapist eastern philosophy as a success, rather than its adoption means that we are replicating the east’s failures, and regressing to their authoritarianism and lack of choice?

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-09 07:28:00 UTC

  • Domestication by Family Unit

    —“It was precisely this domestication of men and women into family units that propelled Europeans forward. That the Germans were more monogamously disciplined than the Celts is why they went on to be the source of Northern European success, more so than the Irish. The eugenic footprint can be seen even to this day.”— Josh Jeppson

  • Domestication by Family Unit

    —“It was precisely this domestication of men and women into family units that propelled Europeans forward. That the Germans were more monogamously disciplined than the Celts is why they went on to be the source of Northern European success, more so than the Irish. The eugenic footprint can be seen even to this day.”— Josh Jeppson

  • Spanish Rule?

    Q&A: —“I’ve been interested in the case of Spain for some time, as my ancestors are primarily Spanish. And I wanted to understand the reasons for the rise of the Spanish and if they had any philosophical contributions to the western World. If you saw no reason to comment on the Spanish, I don’t wish to take your attention away from something which could be more useful. But, if there is anything to say about the Spanish, I would certainly be willing to read what you have.”— David David, The Spanish question is interesting because Spanish philosophers were central to the Scholastic movement, the Spanish empire was so powerful, and so successful but rapidly evaporated under industrialization. So that the Spanish had lost their position by the time of the enlightenment’s transfer of power from the landed to the merchant classes, and the vast inte The argument for why this happened is well understood: 1) The Spanish were a hardworking people, and meaningful commercial leaders as trade spread from the Mediterranean to the atlantic.. 2) The peak in spanish contirbution to philosophy occurred in Catalan where the Translators of Toledo first translated greek texts from arabic into latin, then to catalan. This set of translations created what we know as the modern spanish language. And is probably the basis for what we call today ‘spain’. And it was the latin translations that reintroduced europe to science and philosophy. 3) The discovery of the new world created an enormous influx of gold (currency).Spain spent its wealth on wars, notably against the low countries (Netherlands). 4) As we see with Americans, unearned wealth tends to make a people lazy, and they seek status signals not productivity. And decline after wealth is very difficult for a people to work through. 5) With the people ‘ruined’ from this process of expansion, wealth, war, and failure to convert to industrialization, they did not produce an enlightenment on the scale of england, france, germany, or ashkenazi-dom (eastern europe and russia). And spain devolved into a relatively poor country despite being second only to the UK in the territorial expansion of spanish language and genetics. 6) Spanish cultural, military, and economic excellence was was the product of Austrian not Spanish rule. Just as eastern european excellence was the product of german and Austrian rule. (see Kennedy’s bookhttps://en.wikipedia.org/…/The_Rise_and_Fall_of_the_Great_P…) And when the Hapsburgs declined, so did aristocratic influence in spain. So, Spain went into decline, and she was unable to maintain her colonies when the Americans and British chose to deny her access to first the caribbean, and then south america. Read anything basic you can find on the rise and fall of Hapsburg Spain. But I will say something uncomfortable: That Spain ascended under Roman, Muslim, and Austrian rule, but could not maintain that ascent under her own rule. SO WHY IS THAT? Something we must ponder. But most of us probably attribute this to geographic location, and mediterranean (hot weather) culture, catholicism, and the failure of Spainish culture to join the Hanjal Line and develop the absolute nuclear family, and low corruption we see in protestant countries that still practice ‘the oath’. Curt Doolittle

  • Spanish Rule?

    Q&A: —“I’ve been interested in the case of Spain for some time, as my ancestors are primarily Spanish. And I wanted to understand the reasons for the rise of the Spanish and if they had any philosophical contributions to the western World. If you saw no reason to comment on the Spanish, I don’t wish to take your attention away from something which could be more useful. But, if there is anything to say about the Spanish, I would certainly be willing to read what you have.”— David David, The Spanish question is interesting because Spanish philosophers were central to the Scholastic movement, the Spanish empire was so powerful, and so successful but rapidly evaporated under industrialization. So that the Spanish had lost their position by the time of the enlightenment’s transfer of power from the landed to the merchant classes, and the vast inte The argument for why this happened is well understood: 1) The Spanish were a hardworking people, and meaningful commercial leaders as trade spread from the Mediterranean to the atlantic.. 2) The peak in spanish contirbution to philosophy occurred in Catalan where the Translators of Toledo first translated greek texts from arabic into latin, then to catalan. This set of translations created what we know as the modern spanish language. And is probably the basis for what we call today ‘spain’. And it was the latin translations that reintroduced europe to science and philosophy. 3) The discovery of the new world created an enormous influx of gold (currency).Spain spent its wealth on wars, notably against the low countries (Netherlands). 4) As we see with Americans, unearned wealth tends to make a people lazy, and they seek status signals not productivity. And decline after wealth is very difficult for a people to work through. 5) With the people ‘ruined’ from this process of expansion, wealth, war, and failure to convert to industrialization, they did not produce an enlightenment on the scale of england, france, germany, or ashkenazi-dom (eastern europe and russia). And spain devolved into a relatively poor country despite being second only to the UK in the territorial expansion of spanish language and genetics. 6) Spanish cultural, military, and economic excellence was was the product of Austrian not Spanish rule. Just as eastern european excellence was the product of german and Austrian rule. (see Kennedy’s bookhttps://en.wikipedia.org/…/The_Rise_and_Fall_of_the_Great_P…) And when the Hapsburgs declined, so did aristocratic influence in spain. So, Spain went into decline, and she was unable to maintain her colonies when the Americans and British chose to deny her access to first the caribbean, and then south america. Read anything basic you can find on the rise and fall of Hapsburg Spain. But I will say something uncomfortable: That Spain ascended under Roman, Muslim, and Austrian rule, but could not maintain that ascent under her own rule. SO WHY IS THAT? Something we must ponder. But most of us probably attribute this to geographic location, and mediterranean (hot weather) culture, catholicism, and the failure of Spainish culture to join the Hanjal Line and develop the absolute nuclear family, and low corruption we see in protestant countries that still practice ‘the oath’. Curt Doolittle