https://www.monumentaltrees.com/en/trees/THE MONUMENTAL TREES
For Graveyards(Yews), Churchyards, and Sacred Groves (Oaks)
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-26 09:02:00 UTC
https://www.monumentaltrees.com/en/trees/THE MONUMENTAL TREES
For Graveyards(Yews), Churchyards, and Sacred Groves (Oaks)
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-26 09:02:00 UTC

The end of the West? No. An Opportunity That Comes Once in a Millennia!!!! Revel it it!!! #Trump https://t.co/zwUxjGvUo0

Source date (UTC): 2017-06-25 20:52:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/879079759669538816
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDNr8rIQXAoTHOUGHTS. AGREEMENTS, DISAGREEMENTS, DIFFERENT STRATEGIES
NOT NECESSARILY TRUE: Russia. The question is, how do we help Russia to end her weakness. We made the mistake of not bringing her into NATO, and creating the polish/ukrainian Intermarium: a power between germanic europe, and russian eurasia. A powerful barrier is very different from a weak barrier.
TRUE: Europe. There is no such thing as a European Union. They have nothing but a Trade union. And that’s all that there should be. Southern Europe is in a depression as great as the Great Depression in the USA. Germans are exporting 50% of their production to the rest of Europe – and they can’t continue.
TRUE: US MIDDLE EAST WITHDRAWAL: Agreed. We need to let the borders reform.
SOMEWHAT TRUE: MIDDLE EAST. Alternative theory Is Iran/Iraq/Syria/Pakistan with nuclear power, allied with Russia, and control of oil reserves, mandating oil in Iranian currency. TURKEY: I still don’t see Turkey. More likely Russia Restores the Orthodox Empire in cooperation with Iran/iraq/syria/kurds and turks are a minority muslim population.
CHINA: INCOHERENT: China does not use aggression, but builds a fortress, and uses soft power. China is an extended family, not a state, or an empire. She cannot project power. But she does not need to. She needs only to return to form, and make war with her impossible.
US NAVY: QUESTIONABLE: The US Navy is one war away from eradication. Everyone in the world knows this. It’s merely a factor of the number of missiles one can launch and at what velocity, and any battle group is gone. Submarines have value. Coast guard patrols have value. The navy is gone with the next war.
EXISTENTIAL THREAT? : I disagree. The problem is building up the Intermarium between Russia and Germanic europe.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-25 18:58:00 UTC
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/879079759669538816/photo/1?utm_source=fb&utm_medium=fb&utm_campaign=curtdoolittle&utm_content=879079759669538816The end of the West? No. An Opportunity That Comes Once in a Millennia!!!! Revel it it!!! #Trump https://t.co/zwUxjGvUo0
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-25 16:52:00 UTC
REVEL IN THE OPPORTUNITY!!!
What? You are worried about the end of western civilization, instead of reveling in the opportunity for morally justified predation on a scale not possible since the Roman Empire?
Revel in our time!!!
We can create legends that will outlive us for thousands of years!!!!
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-25 16:50:00 UTC
WHY I LOVE UKRAINE
The people are sweet. family and friends matter more than work and politics. The food is amazing and natural. There is little if any rude public behavior. the culture is communal and civil – you can get a punch in the face still. the men are men and manly. the women are women – and beautiful. People appreciate kindness and consideration. They go to church and dress for it. The women cook. Family is sacred. There are scammers everywhere. The women will use you if you let them. The tech sector is a wild west like the USA in the 90’s because it’s difficult to exercise corruption on information-goods. They work 10-12 hour days. There is a holiday every week or so. No one works between december 10th and January 20th – and can’t, because of food and alcohol. The entire place is falling apart. Nothing works. Banking is questionable. No one can drive at all, and everyone thinks otherwise. There is organized crime everywhere. There is corruption everywhere. There is little if any government. There is little if any police presence. But they are hopeful. And they are ‘becoming a people’ before your eyes. So basically if you make your income elsewhere and spend it in ukraine it’s akin to tripling your income, and everyone you spend it with or on benefits from it.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-25 14:18:00 UTC
Rome over extended. The peoples surrounding her seized opportunity. one of those peoples was the germanic tribes, another was the eastern orthodox empire, another was the arabs (muslims), another was the jews (christians). Eastern empire did not suppress the christians and allowed the lies of the semites to take root among the folly of women, the slaves, and the underclass. When it was protected it spread like a virus. THen it was imposed as a means of circumventing AND DEFEATING the european aristocracy.
That’s what happened. Just as aristocracy is being circumvented today.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-24 11:31:00 UTC
BECOMING OURSELVES ANEW
By Daniel Gurpide
It is impossible to ‘bring back the Greeks,’ i.e., resuscitate the pre-Christian world. A genuine Aryanism can only be neo-pagan and post-Christian, rather than merely pagan or pre-Christian, and revolutionary.
‘Neo-pagan’ because with the ‘death of God,’ the old gods that Christianity maintained indirectly alive as promise and nostalgia of a diverse world, also died. They metamorphosed into a mythical and exemplary return to the origins that make a new beginning possible.
Revolutionary in the proper sense of the word (re-volution, from the Latin revolutus, revolvere: to turn over, to return) because we want to ‘turn over’ the existing system of values, ‘change the world,’ and return to or reproduce a moment that was. Our attitude towards our present world should be similar to the one adopted by the first Christians towards the Greco-Roman world.
Before the development of diachronic linguistics, the Aryans or Indo-Europeans did not exist! The term ‘Indo-European’ may be used to classify fossils or bio-macrophysical remnants, and so doing might be considered appropriate in that history is founded on human biology. Nevertheless, we know that an historical Indo-European entity has never existed: no record has been found of a people calling themselves ‘Indo-European,’ or demonstrating awareness of possessing that identity. This is scarcely surprising: an historical fact finds its reality only at the level of human consciousness. The Indo-European fact does not enter history, does not become historical agent, until it is ‘discovered’: that is, until human consciousness, bound to a determined epochal perspective—a consciousness and a perspective which are ours—conceives it as the past of its own present.
It is no exaggeration to say that the Indo-European fact becomes such only in us and through us. It is the projection of ourselves onto the past; at the same time it is the reinvented myth through which we project ourselves into the future.
Indo-European roots are the source, the past of which we may be future heirs—but only if we dare to become what we are. For us, indeed, an effective response to the challenges of modernity must re-produce, readapt, and reinvent it: the Indo-European adventure. It is for this reason that we project the Indo-European inheritance twice: as re-presentation of the past—and as imagination and re-creation of the future.
The re-appropriation of our deepest roots entails, in itself, the rediscovery, valorisation, and defence of our identity as Europeans. By exclusion we may decide what is ‘originally’ ours—in the sense of being created by us, and in harmony with our own perception of the world, our own psyche—and what does not belong to us, but has been incorporated at a later stage, lacking authenticity and genuineness. If the two inheritances of the European world, Christian-Semitic and Indo-European, reveal themselves as irreconcilable, it is for us—the current heirs—to decide which is our own, original, and originative, and which is not.
Furthermore, in a world which has become planetary—and where Europe, at risk of losing its identity and independence, is condemned to transform its centuries-old ethno-cultural unity into an organic whole—the rediscovery of our common roots, of our affiliation with the Indo-European past, has immense political significance as foundation myth of a community of destiny of European peoples. A synthesis—political, ideological, and philosophical—capable of safeguarding European civilisation—can be articulated only by returning to the primordial source: to the cornerstone of European humankind—the core of our human specificity. There, the archetypes of our psyche can be reactivated anew.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-23 15:07:00 UTC
THE LIMITS OF THE MONOMYTH – ENDING DECEIT BY MYTHOS BY ENDING ABRAHAMISM
(more on extending – or limiting – Peterson’s thesis)
Whereas:
It is very hard to create a fiction (myth) that fails to ‘ring true’ because it makes use of the Monomyth, Limited Plots, the Archetypes, and the Virtues – and these categories reflect the methods of acquisition of methods of transcendence available to our psychology.
It is very easy to create fictions in western civilization’s group evolutionary strategy by (a) the use of hyperbole (illustration by magnification), while avoiding idealism and supernaturalism, (b) the only difference between men, heroes, demigods, and gods, is the degree of their mortality or immortality, and the degree of hyperbolic exaggeration of their abilities, (c) men, heroes, demigods, and gods, are all bound by the forces of nature (d) the gods and demigods are flawed and capricious members of extended families (e) men, heroes and demigods can defeat the flaws and capriciousness of the gods, demigods, the heroes of our enemies, and our enemies by means of courage, wit, discipline, and sacrifice – “man can defeat evil men, the god and nature” (e)
It is very easy to create fictions that are incompatible with western civilization’s group evolutionary strategy by means of inserting deceptions in the form of (a)idealism, (b)supernaturalism, (c)the power of gods over the forces of nature (d) contriving man’s inability to defeat gods (e) misrepresenting the will and intention of gods (f) demanding submission to gods, (g) directing protagonists to submit to this world of the gods rather than to transform it for the betterment of man. (h) directing we circumvent the costs of changing the world for the better because of its hopelessness.
It is very easy to create fictions that are critical of western civilization’s group evolutionary strategy, by lionizing protagonists that defeat it. (marxist, and postmodern myths and pseudo-histories)
It is very easy to create many trivial ‘essays’ rather than narratives outside of the monomyth in order to communicate experiences not lessons – as a means of criticizing the ‘meaningful’ monomyths and its Transcendence. (Postmodern literature)
It is all too easy to create pseudoscience – Boaz, Marx, Freud, Cantor – (marxists), by overloading the knowledge and reasoning of people thereby forcing appeal to intuition rather than reason.
It is all too easy to create pseudo-rationlism (pretense of philosophy) by loading, framing, overloading the rather limited abilities of people to reason thereby forcing appeal to intuition instead of reason – yet calling it philosophy (reason).
It is all too easy to outright lie and chant propaganda (political correctness), thereby overloading their ability, desire, and NEED to reason, thereby forcing appeal to intuition instead of reason – yet calling it philosophy rather than simply propaganda, falsehood, and lie.
It is all too easy for humans to fall prey to comforting lies, just as they fall prey to alcohol and drugs and gambling and a hundred other destructive vices. And that some myths *are designed precisely to do that*. After all, what is the difference between pedagogical myth for the purpose of transcendence so that one can succeed in the ‘market’ we call reality, and deceptive myth for the purpose of containment so that one can merely survive in a reality absent a market for transcendence because it is either impossible or one has been deluded that it is not desirable?
Therefore:
(1) the monomyth/archetype/plot/virtue structure is not enough to teach the virtues because it is not enough to defend against entrapment in deceit that counters the virtues. We can teach with the myths, but we can also DECEIVE with the myths. Because both teaching and deception require the use of ‘suggestion’ which provokes free association, which results in meaning. So we can either create true and good or false and bad meaning.
(2) the *limits of myths* are just as necessary as the contents of those myths. In particular there is a vast difference between history, fiction, hyperbolic myth, idealism and supernaturalism. And a vast difference between submission and transcendence through action. So the myths constructed from the monomyth architecture can use good or bad virtues, good or bad limits, and good or bad methods of discourse. The good: historical, fictional, and hyperbolic, or the bad: ideal and supernatural and fictionalism.
(3) myths can be used to harm mankind – and abrahamism in the form of judaism, christianity and islam have been used to harm mankind. In the case of judaism, the most literate people contributed nothing until converted to Aristotelianism; the christian dark ages were not exited until the reassertion of aristotelianism, and islam destroyed four ancient civilizations during their period of expansion, caused the majority of the european dark age, caused more death than the black plagues, and has caused ignorance, dysgenia, and poverty wherever it has gone. The the german abrahamists tried kantian idealism (pseudo-rationalism), the Jewish abrahamists tried pseudoscience via marx, freud and boaz; the french abrahamists tried postmodernism(anti reason, anti-logic, anti-truth, anti-science), and now the islamists have doubled-down on fundamentalism (anti-reason), raiding (terrorism), and dysgenia (overpopulation), and invasion (immigration) and propaganda (conversion).
Summation:
Reality is difficult. The universe is hostile to us. Other peoples are hostile to us. the west, the iranian branch, and the vedic branch created aristocracy
The western group evolutionary strategy is profoundly expensive. We must act heroically. We must suppress our impulses. We must speak the truth regardless of its costs to the dominance hierarchy. We must participate in a militia. We can only gain the franchise through demonstrated sacrifice for the polity.
The enemy of Aristocracy (meritocracy, truth, heroism, eugenics, excellence) is abrahamism (equality, dysgenia, falsehood, submission, subsistence).
This battle has raged at least since 500bc. Arguably it has raged since the invention of fictionalism by Zoroaster: Zoroaster > Abrahamism > Judaism > the heresy of christianity > The heresy of Islam > the french, german, jewish and russian counter-enlightenments.
REMEDY
Today we will either end the second conquest of the west by waves of abrahamism, using a demand for (scientific) truth, goodness(heroism), and beauty(excellence), or we will collapse again into a dark age from which man may never recover – abrahamism is a desirable cancer of the mind, just as much as alcohol and opiates and religions are a desirable cancer of the mind.
Acquisitionism, Propertarianism, and Testimonialism provide a method for the value neutral, loading neutral, framing neutral, analysis of the truth and falsehood, good and bad, of all human expression – including that of the Myths: Monomyth > Plots > Archetypes > and Virtues.
End abrahamism, and end idealism, and require truth in matters of politics and thereby limit all actions and speech to fully informed, productive, warrantied, voluntary transfers of goods, services, and information, free of imposition by externality of costs upon the investments of others.
It’s trivial. But we must abandon convenient habitual lies just as we have abandoned the convenience of fraud, the convenience of theft, and the convenience of violence, and the convenience of murder.
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-23 08:25:00 UTC
THE MONOMYTH, ITS LIMITS, AND THE ENDING OF ABRAHAMISM
It is very hard to create a fiction (myth) that fails to ‘ring true’ because it makes use of the Monomyth, Limited Plots, the Archetypes, and the Virtues – and these categories reflect the methods of acquisition of methods of transcendence available to our psychology.
It is very easy to create fictions in western civilization’s group evolutionary strategy by (a) the use of hyperbole (illustration by magnification), while avoiding idealism and supernaturalism, (b) the only difference between men, heroes, demigods, and gods, is the degree of their mortality or immortality, and the degree of hyperbolic exaggeration of their abilities, (c) men, heroes, demigods, and gods, are all bound by the forces of nature (d) the gods and demigods are flawed and capricious members of extended families (e) men, heroes and demigods can defeat the flaws and capriciousness of the gods, demigods, the heroes of our enemies, and our enemies by means of courage, wit, discipline, and sacrifice – “man can defeat evil men, the god and nature” (e)
It is very easy to create fictions that are incompatible with western civilization’s group evolutionary strategy by means of inserting deceptions in the form of (a)idealism, (b)supernaturalism, (c)the power of gods over the forces of nature (d) contriving man’s inability to defeat gods (e) misrepresenting the will and intention of gods (f) demanding submission to gods, (g) directing protagonists to submit to this world of the gods rather than to transform it for the betterment of man. (h) directing we circumvent the costs of changing the world for the better because of its hopelessness.
It is very easy to create fictions that are critical of western civilization’s group evolutionary strategy, by lionizing protagonists that defeat it. (marxist, and postmodern myths and pseudo-histories)
It is very easy to create many trivial ‘essays’ rather than narratives outside of the monomyth in order to communicate experiences not lessons – as a means of criticizing the ‘meaningful’ monomyths and its Transcendence. (Postmodern literature)
It is all too easy to create pseudoscience – Boaz, Marx, Freud, Cantor – (marxists), by overloading the knowledge and reasoning of people thereby forcing appeal to intuition rather than reason.
It is all too easy to create pseudo-rationlism (pretense of philosophy) by loading, framing, overloading the rather limited abilities of people to reason thereby forcing appeal to intuition instead of reason – yet calling it philosophy (reason).
It is all too easy to outright lie and chant propaganda (political correctness), thereby overloading their ability, desire, and NEED to reason, thereby forcing appeal to intuition instead of reason – yet calling it philosophy rather than simply propaganda, falsehood, and lie.
It is all too easy for humans to fall prey to comforting lies, just as they fall prey to alcohol and drugs and gambling and a hundred other destructive vices. And that some myths *are designed precisely to do that*. After all, what is the difference between pedagogical myth for the purpose of transcendence so that one can succeed in the ‘market’ we call reality, and deceptive myth for the purpose of containment so that one can merely survive in a reality absent a market for transcendence because it is either impossible or one has been deluded that it is not desirable?
THEREFORE
(1) the monomyth/archetype/plot/virtue structure is not enough to teach the virtues because it is not enough to defend against entrapment in deceit that counters the virtues. We can teach with the myths, but we can also DECEIVE with the myths. Because both teaching and deception require the use of ‘suggestion’ which provokes free association, which results in meaning. So we can either create true and good or false and bad meaning.
(2) the *limits of myths* are just as necessary as the contents of those myths. In particular there is a vast difference between history, fiction, hyperbolic myth, idealism and supernaturalism. And a vast difference between submission and transcendence through action. So the myths constructed from the monomyth architecture can use good or bad virtues, good or bad limits, and good or bad methods of discourse. The good: historical, fictional, and hyperbolic, or the bad: ideal and supernatural and fictionalism.
(3) myths can be used to harm mankind – and abrahamism in the form of judaism, christianity and islam have been used to harm mankind. In the case of judaism, the most literate people contributed nothing until converted to Aristotelianism; the christian dark ages were not exited until the reassertion of aristotelianism, and islam destroyed four ancient civilizations during their period of expansion, caused the majority of the european dark age, caused more death than the black plagues, and has caused ignorance, dysgenia, and poverty wherever it has gone. The the german abrahamists tried kantian idealism (pseudo-rationalism), the Jewish abrahamists tried pseudoscience via marx, freud and boaz; the french abrahamists tried postmodernism(anti reason, anti-logic, anti-truth, anti-science), and now the islamists have doubled-down on fundamentalism (anti-reason), raiding (terrorism), and dysgenia (overpopulation), and invasion (immigration) and propaganda (conversion).
SUMMATION
Reality is difficult. The universe is hostile to us. Other peoples are hostile to us. the west, the iranian branch, and the vedic branch created aristocracy
The western group evolutionary strategy is profoundly expensive. We must act heroically. We must suppress our impulses. We must speak the truth regardless of its costs to the dominance hierarchy. We must participate in a militia. We can only gain the franchise through demonstrated sacrifice for the polity.
The enemy of Aristocracy (meritocracy, truth, heroism, eugenics, excellence) is abrahamism (equality, dysgenia, falsehood, submission, subsistence).
This battle has raged at least since 500bc. Arguably it has raged since the invention of fictionalism by Zoroaster: Zoroaster > Abrahamism > Judaism > the heresy of christianity > The heresy of Islam > the french, german, jewish and russian counter-enlightenments.
REMEDY
Today we will either end the second conquest of the west by waves of abrahamism, using a demand for (scientific) truth, goodness(heroism), and beauty(excellence), or we will collapse again into a dark age from which man may never recover – abrahamism is a desirable cancer of the mind, just as much as alcohol and opiates and religions are a desirable cancer of the mind.
Acquisitionism, Propertarianism, and Testimonialism provide a method for the value neutral, loading neutral, framing neutral, analysis of the truth and falsehood, good and bad, of all human expression – including that of the Myths: Monomyth > Plots > Archetypes > and Virtues.
End abrahamism, and end idealism, and require truth in matters of politics and thereby limit all actions and speech to fully informed, productive, warrantied, voluntary transfers of goods, services, and information, free of imposition by externality of costs upon the investments of others.
It’s trivial. But we must abandon convenient habitual lies just as we have abandoned the convenience of fraud, the convenience of theft, and the convenience of violence, and the convenience of murder.
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-23 08:21:00 UTC