IF I COULD ASK YOU TO THINK ABOUT ONE THING DIFFERENTLY: IQ vs TRUST
We focus a lot on IQ. But that’s not necessarily our primary advantage. Our primary advantage is High Trust. No one else can do it. Its why we can unite so many people in production of such competitive common.
It’s the militia that builds that trust.
And it’s beginning to look a lot like genetics.
Maybe not 80%. But enough that with IQ we do it.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-19 15:58:00 UTC
So wait. The evidence is coming in consistently now. And it turns out that the people we call Teutons, but really are just undiluted, and manorialized aryans (Yamna), really are in fact the superior subrace?
Oh. OMG. That’s…. that’s gonna suck. Really. Seriously.
I mean. My little celtic-anglo-saxon-norman backside is just not gonna enjoy that bit of propaganda war.
Well, I have no problem being ruled by my betters.
It’s the people who aren’t my betters that bother me. 😉
Can we get a german or dutch monarch over here please????
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-18 15:26:00 UTC
What’s the equivalent of Walmart in Europe? Where do you go to see ‘the bottom fish’?
Um. Let me ask it differently. In the states we have sites where people post ‘walmart photos’, which means the underclass captured being underclass in the wild.
Are there any ‘underclass attractors’ or equivalent shops where people take equivalent photos?
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-18 05:37:00 UTC
—“When you have four sons, two can die in the crusade , two can pass on the family line, and they will have the necessary hate in their hearts to teach their sons to revenge their uncles.”—Ryan Williams
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-17 15:41:00 UTC
Akhenaten was trying to do the same thing I am, 3350 years ago. End the rent seeking parasites.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-16 17:48:00 UTC
SO WHAT DO YOU KNOW ABOUT THE OTTOMAN ECONOMY?
How was land allocated, farmed, taxed etc? How did that differ from christian lands?
Hmmmm????…..
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-16 17:08:00 UTC
WTH IS WRONG WITH THE SOUTHERN SLAVS?
(please don’t get pissed. I want to know the cause. )
I mean, look. Slovenians (clearly slavic) 96. Ukrainians pick on slovenians for being a bit ‘slow’. But favorably. (They talk about Moldovans the way americans talk about Mexicans. )
BUT….WTH:…
Albania 90
Bosnia/Herz. 90
Croatia 90
Serbia 89
I mean. These are nearly indigenous-people IQ’s.
(they speak slavonic languages, but they aren’t ethnic slavs?)
I have only spent a little time in Croatia, in Dubrovnik, and I’d live there in a heartbeat if I could get 100mb internet. But wth? Is this native genomes, or is this muslim occupation? What?
( Alexander Zavialov ??? )
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-16 16:44:00 UTC
I proposed, in one of my videos, the circumpolar civilization. And that video is worth viewing if you want to understand my point of view.
But the reality is quite simple. The west, the western slavs, the russians, the indians, the Han (chinese), Koreans, and The Japanese, have no problems with each other. We have no problem with africa. The world has a problem with islam. The world is starting to have a problem with south america – although we have hope.
But if the west would stop defending islam, and continue to ‘civilize’ india, the world would have no problems other than competing for trade.
The entire cause of this world’s suffering is islamic ‘civilization’ if you want to call it that.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-16 16:28:00 UTC
THE ROOT CAUSE OF THE CURRENT WORLD CRISIS? ISLAM.
The same root cause as it has been for 1400 years. Islam.
The ‘Root Cause’ of the current crisis, as that in antiquity, is the Jewish and Christian Heresy we call Islam that has been used to justify the raiding, exhaustion, defeat, degeneration, and extermination of the great civilizations of antiquity, and the impoverishment and ruination of four great civilizations.
We have been fighting islamic raiding, pillaging, enslavement, murder, for 1400 years, and only in the 1800’s did we turn back the tide of degeneracy.
If it were not for western virtue-signaling, that prevents the russians and the chinese and the indians from conquering and submitting islamic civilization, there would be no difficulty for the more advanced civilizations in this world.
Islam has been more deadly to mankind than the black plague. And it is informational-cancer. Those that have not been killed, have been incrementally reduced to ignorance, illiteracy, barbarism, and madness.
Islam is the worst thing that has ever happened to humanity. And that is simply an empirical fact. There is no comparison. Nothing even comes close. Not even the mongols.
THE MATTER IS SIMPLY SCIENCE.
THE WEST DEFENDS ISLAM OR IT WOULD BE GONE.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-16 15:37:00 UTC
COMPARATIVE PHILOSOPHY: ACTUALLY ITS EASY
(from elsewhere)
ALL HUMAN PHENOMENON IS COMMENSURABLE, and ALL HUMAN DIFFERENCES ARE DECIDABLE.
METHODOLOGICAL AND ONTOLOGICAL
Chinese: create ‘woo’ with humbling riddles about the world.(inaction) Westerners: create ‘woo’ with power over the world (action)
–“Daoism and Confucianism, at least after a certain stage in the development of these schools, exemplify the way that a set of interests intertwine with beliefs about the world. Both schools exemplify in different ways a conception of understanding the world that is inseparable from the interest in coming into “attunement” with it, to use a felicitous word from Charles Taylor (1982). To become attuned to the world is to see its goodness and to know one’s place in the order of the world. “—
The west: transform the world for the better for having lived in it (evolve). The east: live in harmony with it (stagnate). Or worse, islam there is no new knowledge (devolve).
Extremely poor civilizations adopt a mono-philosophy. The east and west adopted class philosophies. The west even developed methods and languages for those philosophies. We tolerate nearly infinite challenges to the dominance hierarchy and lionize creativity that increases group competition.
IMO: the present problem remains monopoly: that people are not only unequal but vastly unequal. People are not only not equal in worth to one another, but a large number force others to pay a painful cost for their existence. Not only are capitalism and socialism both failures, but so is the median: social democracy. Why? Because just as we need different philosophies we need different economies. And so far, we have tried ‘all aristocracy’ in the west and failed, ‘all middle class’ in europe and failed, ‘all family in china and failed’, all commoners under the communists, and failed. When the more obvious solution is military (slavery), ‘WPA’, (serfdom/labor), guilds(unions/craftsmen), managers(small business/inventors), professionals(calculators/investors), and jurists (deciders).
So far, the attempt to create monopolies instead of the church, state, burgher, laborer, serf/slave/prisoner system has been a temporary luxury good made possible by a rare technological leap primarily the result of the harnessing of fossil fuels.
EPISTEMIC
chinese language is quite primitive, relying on high context, and low precision. their wisdom literature is likewise, high context, low precision. they insert ‘woo’ into their wisdom literature through contradiction. the monotheists inserts ‘woo’ through supernaturalism. The west inserts ‘woo’ through extension of perception – power over nature. Explanatory power.
The difference in our virtues is limited. however the difference in truthfulness, disruption of the dominance hierarchy, and dominating the universe couldn’t be any more opposite. In other words, ‘all high trust cultures are the same, all other cultures are different. All happy families are the same, all dysfunctional families are different. All domesticable animals are the same, all un-domesticable animals are different. All intelligent people are similar, all unintelligent people are different. All desirable people are the same, all undesirable people are different. The reason being that any number of criteria must coincide to produce excellence, but if any one fails, not so. The chinese insularism was smart in retrospect. the western threat to the dominance hierarchy was smart in retrospect. had each of us chosen that one property from the other we would both have been safer. the west from conquest, the east from stagnation.
IS COMPARATIVE PHILOSOPHY HARD?
Not at all. You just have to stop denying (a) costs, (b) darwinian consequences over time (c) vast inequality of people, and (d) the fact that every person at the bottom is six times as costly as your most productive person. (e) we cannot create social economic and political orders for people we wish we had, but those for whom we do have.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-16 13:03:00 UTC